鲍威尔「打脸」特朗普,BTC跳水5%险守10万关口,后续走势会如何?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-12-19Last updated on 2026-07-10

Abstract

鲍威尔表示,美联储不被允许拥有比特币,《联邦储备法》规定了我们可以拥有什么,我们并不希望改变法律。

原文作者:BitpushNews


当地时间周三下午,美联储宣布将基准政策利率下调 25 个基点,但暗示 2025 年降息次数可能低于此前预期,美股和加密货币市场齐跳水。


美联储最新的季度经济预测显示, 2025 年可能仅降息两次——低于 9 月份预测的四次,也低于会议前市场预期的三次,这意味着他们将更加谨慎地平衡通胀和经济增长之间的关系。美联储成员对明年个人消费支出 (PCE) 和核心 PCE 通胀的预测分别从 9 月份预测的 2.1% 和 2.2% 上升至 2.5% 。


鲍威尔将这一转变描述为货币政策的「新阶段」,并强调在 2024 年降息 100 个基点之后,利率现在已明显更接近中性立场。


截至当天收盘,三大股指全线下跌,道指初步收跌 2.59% ,创 50 年来最长单日连跌纪录(连续第 10 个交易日下跌);标普 500 指数收跌 2.95% ,纳指收跌 3.56% 。美元飙升至两年高位,芝加哥期权交易所波动率指数(又称 VIX 指数和华尔街恐慌指数)飙升 58% 至 25 ,反映出投资者不确定性加剧以及对未来利率的焦虑加剧。

鲍威尔「打脸」特朗普,BTC跳水5%险守10万关口


鲍威尔言论「打脸」特朗普?


周三的新闻发布会上,在回答 Axios 记者关于特朗普上任后建立战略比特币储备的想法时, 鲍威尔说:「我们(美联储)不被允许拥有比特币,《联邦储备法》规定了我们可以拥有什么,我们并不希望改变法律。这是国会要考虑的事情,但我们并不希望美联储改变法律。」


比特币在美联储公告发布后跌至 104, 000 美元,随后在鲍威尔发言后最低回踩至 100, 256 美元附近, 24 小时内下跌近 5 %。山寨币跌幅更大,XRP、 ADA、 LTC 下跌近 10 %。

鲍威尔「打脸」特朗普,BTC跳水5%险守10万关口


特朗普多次表示要建立战略比特币储备。他上周在 CNBC 采访提到:「我们将在加密货币领域做出伟大的成就,因为我们不希望任何其他国家拥抱加密货币,我们希望成为领导者。」


比推此前报道,怀俄明州共和党参议员 Cynthia Lummis 正在起草一份法案,该法案将指示美国财政部在五年内购买 100 万枚比特币,购买资金将来自美联储银行存款和黄金储备。


美国其他州也提出了投资比特币的法案,宾夕法尼亚州共和党议员于 11 月提出了一项法案,允许宾夕法尼亚州财政部投资比特币、数字资产和基于加密货币的交易所交易产品。


建立战略性比特币储备的想法也遭到一些批评。前纽约联邦储备银行行长 Bill Dudley 在上周彭博社发表的一篇评论文章中表示,这对美国人来说是一笔「糟糕的交易」。
巴克莱银行本周发布的一份分析报告认为,为战略性比特币储备提供资金可能需要国会批准并发行新国债。巴克莱银行分析师表示,考虑到建立这种储备的可能方式,「我们怀疑该计划将面临美联储的强烈抵制」。


后续走势会如何?
加密市场目前对美国可能建立比特币战略储备的预期过高,而忽视了其他国家,Grayscale Research 的研究表明,亚洲和中东地区的主权财富基金才是更可能的下一个推动力量。


Grayscale 研究主管 Zach Pandl 表示:「美联储主席鲍威尔讲话后,比特币价格暴跌,这表明投资者可能过于看重比特币战略储备的理论可能性。Grayscale Research 预计会有更多民族国家采用比特币,但下一步更可能是亚洲或中东的主权财富基金,它们已经管理着高度多元化的资产池。」


Bitwise 欧洲研究主管 Andre Dragosch 认为:「我认为美联储目前最大的麻烦是,尽管美联储降息,但金融环境仍然收紧。自 9 月以来,长期债券收益率和抵押贷款利率一直在上升,美元升值,这也意味着金融环境收紧。美元持续升值也给比特币带来宏观风险,因为美元升值也与全球货币供应量收缩有关,这往往不利于比特币和其他加密资产,事实上,美联储净流动性持续减少。在我看来,流动性收紧和美元走强也是 BTC 面临的最大风险……另一方面,BTC 的链上因素继续非常有利,尤其是交易所余额的持续下降,这支持了 BTC 供应缺口继续加剧的假设。」

鲍威尔「打脸」特朗普,BTC跳水5%险守10万关口


比特币的下跌导致多空双方仓位发生剧烈变化。根据加密分析师 Skew 的图表,多头止损,空头获利,比特币价格跌至 10 万至 9.8 万美元区间寻求支撑。Skew 强调,若想扭转颓势,比特币价格必须通过现货买盘重新夺回 10 万至 10.14 万美元区间,并在日线图上站稳脚跟。

鲍威尔「打脸」特朗普,BTC跳水5%险守10万关口


此外, 4 小时图显示,BTC 多头需要比特币在 10 万美元附近展现出强劲的买盘力量,并成功收盘于 10.14 万美元上方,以巩固涨势。若无法守住该水平,将可能重新测试 9.8 万美元附近的支撑位和买盘聚积区。


区块链分析平台 Santiment 分析师表示乐观,并在 X 上发文称:「考虑到 BTC 暂时保持在 10 万美元以上,且与标准普尔 500 指数相比,跌幅并不像正常波动那么大,一旦未来 24-48 小时内稳定下来,这实际上可以被解读为一种强势信号。」

相关阅读:

复盘历史上的圣诞老人行情:今年会再次发生吗?

Arthur Hayes:散户警惕!特朗普执政预期或被高估,加密市场2025年恐迎剧烈抛售?

复盘“比特币耶稣”被捕全程:10 年后为何美国国税局突然发难?

高频交易之父:潜在的比特币崩盘或在明年带崩美股!

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手2h ago

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手2h ago

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit2h ago

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit2h ago

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手2h ago

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

707 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片