Solana AI 黑客松上线,来找下一个AI Agent 投资标的

链捕手Published on 2024-12-18Last updated on 2024-12-19

Abstract

本文是由 Solana 生态的 AI 项目 SEND AI 提出的十二个有关 AI 的创业方向。

作者:SEND AI
编译:Ismay,BlockBeats

编者按: 12 月 11 日,Solana 宣布首届 Solana AI 黑客松上线,旨在于 Solana 上构建 AI 代理和工具,奖金从 5000 美元到 30, 000 美元不等,旨在鼓励能够吸引风险投资或推出自有代币的严肃 Crypto x AI 项目。本文是由 Solana 生态的 AI 项目 SEND AI 提出的十二个有关 AI 的创业方向


1/ Agent 的 Shopify 平台:


问题:Agent 像应用程序一样。正如应用程序的早期阶段,Agent 目前也呈现碎片化状态,面临可发现性问题。
解决方案:为 AI Agent 打造一个应用商店:

  •  Agent 是迷你应用。
  • 用户可以像使用 Shopify 一样,探索、安装并使用这些迷你应用。

Solana AI黑客松上线:一览12个AI Agent新项目


2/ AI Agent 的 Twitch 平台:
问题:影响者 Agent 的崛起需要一个专门的平台。
解决方案:为 AI 活动打造专属流媒体平台:

  • 集成 AI 版主
  • Agent 可以直接启动或推广代币
  • 观众可以根据互动情况直接买卖代币

Solana AI黑客松上线:一览12个AI Agent新项目


Idea:Twitch for AI Agent:一个专门为 AI 活动和互动打造的流媒体平台,集成 AI 模组(即时应对审查的应急协议),代理可以直接启动并推广代币,观众则根据互动情况进行买卖。


3/ 增强版 Agent 筛选器:
问题:传统筛选器仅支持只读功能。
解决方案:想象一下一个 MEME 币筛选器(类似 @birdeye_so),你可以筛选代币并输入指标——然后一个 AI Agent 根据选择的策略自主执行交易。

Solana AI黑客松上线:一览12个AI Agent新项目


Idea:一个为链上交易机器人设计的筛选器,允许量化交易员使用量身定制的链上指标开发和优化策略,专为去中心化生态系统服务。与传统的技术指标(如移动平均线、市盈率或市值)不同,该平台利用区块链特有的数据点,例如 FDV、Raydium 池创建、代币流动性、交易量和质押奖励。用户可以根据这些链上指标快速筛选和过滤代币,从而识别高潜力资产。最终,平台简化了将这些条件应用于链上交易机器人的过程,机器人可以根据选定的策略自主执行交易。


4/ 自主交易 Agent:
问题:@aixbt_agent 的研究非常扎实,但它并不执行自主交易。
解决方案:想象一下 Aixbt,具备根据实时研究/价格执行自主交易的能力,使用一个资金账户(带有用户可投资和提取的资产管理总额)。
案例:BabyDegen 是一款自主的 AI 交易机器人,利用先进的模型和实时数据做出明智的交易决策。它从像 CoinGecko 这样的来源收集市场洞察,确保信息的时效性。通过访问来自生态系统开发者的不断增长的交易策略库,BabyDegen 能够根据市场变化选择最有效的策略。它根据分析和经验执行交易—买入、卖出或持有资产,从而优化交易结果。


5/ AI Agent 驱动的 Telegram 预测市场:
问题:和朋友们一起下注很有趣,但设立赌注、收款和跟进过程都很繁琐。
解决方案:AI Agent 将 Telegram 群组中的闲聊转化为友好的赌注,验证结果(通过 Perplexity),并支付 USDC。

Solana AI黑客松上线:一览12个AI Agent新项目


6/ 用于 Solana 操作的 Perplexity:
想象一个内嵌钱包的聊天代理:

  • 阅读:作为 Solana 区块浏览器或终端的代理,例如 Birdeye/Dexscreener。
  • 写入:使用自然语言执行 Solana 交易(例如购买 MEME 币)。

未来发展:链上购物助手。

Solana AI黑客松上线:一览12个AI Agent新项目


7/ 交易 Agent 的信任市场:
问题:交易 Agent 的崛起需要证明其可信度。
解决方案:为交易 Agent 建立一个信任评分或框架(类似穆迪评级),基于代币推荐和历史交易活动来评估信任度。
8/ DeFi Agent:

  • 个性化 Agent:根据您的钱包历史或推文为您执行 DeFi 交易。
  • 市场做市 Agent:基于大语言模型(LLM)预测动态设置买入/卖出价格。
  • 收益或流动性提供(LP)优化 Agent。
  • 启动 @sanctumso 的 LSTs(流动性证明代币)。

9/ Agent 代币工具:

  • 基于提示部署代币(可以是像 Warpcast/Clanker 这样的社交协议,也可以是 ChatGPT 风格的界面)。
  • Agent 代币的链上注册(类似 @JupiterExchange 的认证代币列表)。
  • 自主锁仓、质押等功能。

10/ AI Agent 与消费加密:

  • 健康与健身 Agent,具备 @moonwalkfitness 类型的责任追踪功能。
  • 社交金融平台上的 Agent,如 @tribedotrun。
  • 现实世界商业:自动研究、预订并为商户支付,接受加密货币或通过加密卡支付。

11/ Agent 集群或多 Agent 协作:

  • AgentDAO 或委员会:具备不同专业知识的 Agent 合作、讨论,并通过多重签名执行交易。
  • DeFiAgent 对 Agent 市场:Agent 为特定任务相互雇佣。

相关:AI Agent 的 LinkedIn。
12/ 多模态个性化 Agent:
利用 @ai16z dao 的 Eliza 框架,应用于以下场景:

  • 加密货币教育
  • DeFi 教程
  • DAO 入驻培训

可在 Discord、Telegram 和 Twitter 平台上部署。
13/ 更多激进的创意:

  • 一个 Agent 在对 Agent 友好的司法管辖区内创建自己的 LLC,并自主经营自己的业务。
  •  一个链上侦探,类似 @zachxbt,自动分析交易。
  • 一群 Agent 协同操控代币拉升。

14/ 通常,任何 AI Agent 的创意都可以应用,只要它包含以下一项或多项:

  • 访问 @solana 数据
  • 通过 Solana 钱包执行交易
  • 在 Solana 上部署代币

这些只是其中一些创意,我们期待看到最小可行产品(MVP)的实现。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手2h ago

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手2h ago

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbit2h ago

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbit2h ago

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手2h ago

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片