Meme 市场的另一种盈利策略,通过当被动 LP 提升回报

链捕手Published on 2024-11-18Last updated on 2024-11-18

原标题:《Memecoin LP II: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love IL》

作者:@jackmelnick_, Berachain DeFi负责人

编译:Felix, PANews

 

8个月前写了一篇关于LP成本的帖子,当时并没有引起太多关注,但昨天该帖的阅读量增加了三倍,所以本文用最新的例子来重新验证此方法。

前提:为了使此方法更好地发挥作用,您需要尽早布局 memecoin,并认可某个 memecoin 在中长期内具有一定优势,并且交易量要大。本文示例使用了 BUCK 代币。

正如上一篇帖子中提到的,您需要设置一个 v3 范围,范围的下限比代币的当前价格略低(通常约低于 25%),范围的上限要相对高一些(本文示例选择了约 100 BUCK/SOL 或约 2.5 美元/BUCK)。这样设置可以最大限度地减少您必须存入 LP 的 SOL 数量,并且会随着价格上涨,DCA(定期定额投资)会逐渐让您从 memecoin 转入 SOL。

下面谈谈无常损失(IL):此处转述@AbishekFi表述:

IL 是一种工具,而不是损失……衡量 LP 回报是一个热门话题,但实际上取决于您作为 LP 的偏好。您想要资产 A 还是资产 B?或者您是否愿意让您的头寸价值更高?

发生这种情况的唯一方法是您的代币对中的一个/两个资产升值,从而导致无常损失。但是,如果您对两个您不介意持有的资产进行 LP,那么您只是创建了一个同时产生费用的链上 DCA

正如 @shawmakesmagic 提到的,这对于代币开发者来说可能是一个非常有价值的工具,特别是对于具有持续成本的 AI 代理。为一代币对提供 v3 范围的流动性允许开发者使用费用来获利/支付费用,同时参与代币上涨。它会在长期内直接调整价值(取决于如何设置范围)。

为了证明这种方法是有效的,下面看一个 BUCK 简单示例,作者将其中分为初始准备金、持续无常损失、产生的费用和投资回报率。

昨天创建了一个 BUCK/SOL LP,提供 17 SOL 和 892,000 BUCK。如此做的原因是 Gamestop 运动具有广泛的吸引力,代币轮转速度快,波动性和交易量极高。

将范围设定为上限 100 BUCK/SOL(约 2.5 美元)到下限 8,500 BUCK/SOL(0.029 美元),比市场价格约 6900 BUCK/SOL 低约 20%,确保如果 BUCK 在短期内下跌,代币对不会超出范围。

这代表了总价值约为 4000 美元的 SOL 和 3 万美元的 BUCK(与稍后计算无常损失相关)。

10 小时后提取 LP,它产生了:

  • 29.3 SOL 和 156,000 BUCK(费用)
  • 25.1 SOL 和 841,456 BUCK(LP)

3.4 万美元存款在 10 小时内产生的 1.25 万美元费用大约相当于每日产生的费用的 88%。这是一个绝对令人难以置信的数字,即使没有复利,APY 也达到 32,120%。

这种情况下的无常损失,损失了约 50,000 个 BUCK 代币,这些代币被另外 8 个 SOL 所取代,从无常损失的角度来看,这些微不足道。

为了更清楚地说明:

  • 存入(总计)= 17 SOL 和 892,000 BUCK
  • 提取(总计)= 54.4 SOL 和 997,000 BUCK
  • LP 的总利润 = 37.4 SOL 和 105,000 BUCK

很明显,池产生的无常损失被交易量产生的费用大大抵消。这在保持价格与极高交易量大致一致的代币对中得到了优化。

Meme市场的另一种盈利策略,通过当被动LP提升回报

更疯狂的是,可以进一步优化:

  • 将 LP 的费用等级从 1% 调至 2%,因为流动性更深,交易量更大
  • 收紧初始范围的上限以进一步集中流动性,如果价格上涨,则随着时间的推移重新平衡范围
  • 如果想在代币上涨后避免下跌(无往返交易),可以拉动您的 LP 并重新平衡范围的下限,使其再次达到当前底价的 20%,从而将您已 DCA 的SOL 收入囊中。

在 meme 市场中,交易波动性需求极高,对价格的敏感度极低,将自己定位为被动 LP 是最大化回报的极佳策略。特别是对于持有时间较长、交易量较大的代币对,并且考虑到了对持有 SOL 还是 meme 不太确定的用户。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Illusion of a Prodigy

The Illusion of the "Genius Youth" The article discusses the recent interview incident involving Li Bojie, a former "Huawei Genius Youth," and AI company DeepSeek. It highlights the core conflict not as a simple case of suspected cheating during a coding test, but as a profound mismatch in expectations. Li, with an impressive background including entrepreneurship, a role at Huawei, and a position as a chief scientist, was deeply affected by a standard remote interview where the interviewer questioned his actions. The key point is his stated view of DeepSeek as the "pinnacle of the Chinese tech world." For him, the interview was a quest for identity validation—proof he belonged at the center of the new AI era. For DeepSeek, it was a routine skills assessment. The article argues that Li, while publicly rejecting the "genius" label, subconsciously expected to be treated as a peer for discussion, a courtesy extended by other companies like MiniMax and Xiaomi. DeepSeek, however, adhered strictly to its standardized process, prioritizing consistent, merit-based evaluation over individual prestige. This clash symbolizes a larger shift in the tech industry. The core thesis is that the AI era is dismantling the old system where past titles, companies, and accumulated experience guaranteed status. Now, with rapid knowledge obsolescence, "excellence is calculated in real-time." Li's anxiety—waiting weeks for the DeepSeek interview despite other offers—stems from the fear that rejection means being left behind by technological progress. The article concludes that this incident is a harbinger; soon, everyone will face a constant, implicit "interview" with the AI age itself, asking: "You were excellent yesterday. What about today?"

marsbit8m ago

The Illusion of a Prodigy

marsbit8m ago

Vanguard Group Enters the Arena, Opening a New Crypto Portal for 50 Million Traditional Investors

Vanguard Group, the world's second-largest asset manager with $12 trillion in assets under management and over 50 million investors, has signaled a significant strategic shift by posting a job opening for a "Head of Digital Assets, Personal Wealth." The role entails developing a comprehensive digital asset strategy, establishing long-term plans, and overseeing the full integration of digital assets into Vanguard's wealth management platform, covering areas like custody, settlement, asset tokenization, and stablecoins. This move marks a notable reversal from the firm's previous stance. In 2024, Vanguard refused to list spot Bitcoin ETFs and removed Bitcoin futures products. By late 2025, it allowed some third-party crypto ETF trading but reiterated it would not create its own crypto funds. The new hire represents a third step: building an internal team to integrate digital assets into its core infrastructure, moving beyond merely listing products. The initiative focuses on foundational financial infrastructure—how tokenized assets and digital settlement systems can connect to Vanguard's existing platform, which primarily serves long-term, conservative investors. While Vanguard maintains it will not launch proprietary crypto ETFs, it is proactively preparing its systems for a future involving tokenized assets and stablecoins, which Citigroup projects could reach a $5.5 trillion market by 2030. Vanguard's scale means its chosen standards for custody, settlement, and compliance could set de facto rules for the broader wealth management industry. The firm is acting despite regulatory uncertainty and cautious market sentiment (e.g., Citi recently lowered crypto price targets). Analysts suggest even a minimal 0.01% allocation from Vanguard's asset base would bring ~$12 billion into digital assets, forcing the development of robust risk and operational frameworks. Ultimately, Vanguard's focus is on building the plumbing for digital assets to potentially serve its vast client base, an effort whose impact may extend far beyond any single market cycle.

Foresight News22m ago

Vanguard Group Enters the Arena, Opening a New Crypto Portal for 50 Million Traditional Investors

Foresight News22m ago

Paradigm's New Playbook: Crypto in One Hand, AI and Robotics in the Other

Title: Paradigm's New Strategy: Crypto in One Hand, AI and Robotics in the Other On July 8, 2026, top-tier venture capital firm Paradigm announced the successful $12 billion close of its fourth fund, marking a strategic evolution beyond its pure-play crypto roots. While remaining committed to cryptocurrency, the firm is now formally extending its investment focus to include artificial intelligence, robotics, and other frontier technologies. This shift was foreshadowed by a subtle but significant change to its official social media description earlier in March, from "A research-driven crypto investment firm" to a broader "We build and invest in the companies and ideas shaping the frontier." The move is driven by the firm's recognition of transformative technological waves beyond crypto, particularly in AI and robotics, and a response to the shifting capital allocation landscape. Despite significant AI sector fundraising, Paradigm emphasizes its commitment remains grounded in deep technical rigor. A key intersection for Paradigm lies in AI Agents, where decentralized blockchain networks and stablecoins are seen as a natural financial infrastructure for autonomous digital operations. The firm is active in promoting open-source, decentralized AI (e.g., investing in Nous Research) and building agent-friendly blockchains (e.g., incubating Tempo). It is also developing tools like EVMbench (with OpenAI) and the Centaur AI Agent platform. Within its crypto stronghold, Paradigm will continue focusing on core infrastructure areas. These include derivatives and new liquidity layers (e.g., Hyperliquid), prediction markets (with plans for a proprietary trading terminal), and developer tools (continuing development of Reth and Foundry). In summary, Paradigm's expansion reflects a broader realignment in venture capital, where the intense capital concentration in AI and the search for exponential growth compel even crypto-native funds to broaden their narratives. However, this does not signify an abandonment of crypto; instead, the focus is sharpening on real-world financial applications like stablecoins, RWA, on-chain derivatives, prediction markets, and the convergence of Crypto and AI Agents.

Foresight News57m ago

Paradigm's New Playbook: Crypto in One Hand, AI and Robotics in the Other

Foresight News57m ago

The Preferred Stock Domino Effect: Strive Incurs a 7.08 Million Dollar Loss, Strategic Risk Spreading in a Chain Reaction

"Priority Stock Domino Effect": Strive's $7.08 Million Loss Reveals Chain-Reaction Risk in Bitcoin Reserve Sector Bitcoin reserve company-issued preferred shares are no longer just yield assets but a credit test for balance sheet health. While focus remains on Strategy, Strive, the 7th largest public Bitcoin holder, disclosed a tangible spillover effect: its holding of Strategy's (STRC) preferred shares lost $7.08 million in fair value over eight days, despite no change in share count. This exposes a clear cross-company risk transmission channel within the sector. Strive's filing shows its 505,000 STRC shares fell from ~$88.59 to ~$74.57 per share. While Strive remains solvent with 19,864 BTC and $141.7M cash, the loss signals that preferred stock risks can spread via inter-company holdings, shifting their perception from stable income to credit-like, high-risk assets dependent on issuer liquidity and dividend sustainability. In response, Strategy unveiled a "Digital Credit Capital Framework," raising STRC's annual dividend to 12%, mandating a 12-month cash reserve for dividends, and authorizing up to $1B each for STRC/common stock buybacks and a $1.25B Bitcoin sale plan to bolster reserves. This marks a shift to active credit risk management, formally incorporating potential Bitcoin sales to stabilize its capital structure. Third-party valuation tools, like Farside's calculator estimating STRC's net present value at ~$49.89, highlight that pricing now hinges critically on perpetual dividend sustainability and the issuer's ability to pay amid market volatility. Bitcoin's price (~$62k) remains below Strategy's average cost basis ($75,651), intensifying focus on reserve policies. The market faces two scenarios: 1) Contained risk, where STRC's discount narrows and stress is limited to Strategy; or 2) Systemic risk, where deep STRC discounts persist, dividend hikes fail, Bitcoin sales commence, and pressure spreads to other issuers like Strive's SATA shares. Key indicators to watch are STRC/SATA discount levels, dividend coverage credibility, equity issuance rates, and any actual Bitcoin divestment. Strive's future reports will be crucial in determining if its loss is an isolated event or the first sign of sector-wide credit risk contagion via preferred shares.

marsbit1h ago

The Preferred Stock Domino Effect: Strive Incurs a 7.08 Million Dollar Loss, Strategic Risk Spreading in a Chain Reaction

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片