WAP、🐬、🧲,Meme币PVP大战进入Next Level?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-10-12Last updated on 2024-10-12

Abstract

从动物园到emoji,Meme币代号越发“抽象”。

原创|Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者|Wenser(@wenser 2010 

WAP、🐬、🧲,Meme币PVP大战进入Next Level?

随着加密货币大盘受地区政治局势影响小幅下挫,市场的注意力和投资热情再度回到 Meme 币领域,不同的是,如今的 Meme 币同数年前的“动物园行情”有些类似,却又大大不同:一方面,有“老牌选手”——名人币的不断涌现;另一方面,继包括河马在内的各类动物主题代币之后,新一波 emoji 表情主题代币已经出现。

Odaily星球日报将于本文对 Meme 币 PVP 大战中的主要项目进行简要盘点,供读者参考。(Odaily星球日报注:Meme 币行情波动较大,投资风险较高,请谨慎选择投资标的。)

WAP:顶流 Rapper 的知名单曲,付费喊单还是个人项目?

10 月 8 日,顶流女 Rapper Cardi B 突然发布了一条“喊单推文”称自己的猫名字为 WAP,结合其曾发布的知名单曲《Wet Ass Pussy》,号召粉丝购买其同名代币 WAP。由于该推文与之前发布的推文风格迥异,且太过直白,市场上只有少数玩家对此做出反应,更多人认为其 X 平台账号被盗,Odaily星球日报也第一时间做出跟进;随后,经链上侦探 Wazz 的初步调查显示美国社媒名人 Cardi B 推广的加密货币已追踪到诈骗起源,该项目钱包地址与多个 rug pull 项目有关联。

但 9 日,Cardi B 再次发布了一条真人出镜的视频,再次喊单 WAP,市场也对此做出强烈反应;12 小时前,其再次发布推文,配图为怀抱蓝色英短猫咪的图片,正是此前提到的 WAP,该 Meme 币也经历大起大落,高点价格一度接近 0.04 美元。

代币合约:Bz7vVzQhm2KMW1XgcrDruYega1MiwrAs1DQysrx4tFkp;

代币价格: 0.019 美元;

代币市值: 1950 万美元;

WAP、🐬、🧲,Meme币PVP大战进入Next Level?

WAP 代币信息

🐬miharu:Gamestop 再出手,这次是海洋动物

10 月 9 日晚,X 平台旗下账户 @XData 发布 微笑江豚图片,并配文称“该 Meme 在 X 平台已经拥有超过 3200 万次浏览”,由于其此前一次发布动物相关图片为 9 月 21 日的红透互联网半边天的“网红河马” MOODENG,市场对其“喊单能力”异常信任,相关 Meme 代币 miharu 短时上涨 50 倍至 300 万市值。Odaily星球日报对此也做了第一时间跟进

10 月 11 日,GameStop 于 X 平台发布微笑江豚图片,由于其对市场散户极强的号召力,miharu 代币短时突破 0.01 美元,市值瞬间突破 1100 万美元,后续随着该 Meme 的进一步传播,该项目代币价格一度接近 0.02 美元;市值一度突破 2000 万美元,但在激烈的 PVP 竞争中,该项目后续还是被其他新的项目持续吸血,目前市值已大幅回落。

代币合约:6tVZVjcppH2BZ9Xj5yFU1Zt34m2rYcyDqqpSeMDZpump;

代币价格: 0.0048 美元;

代币市值: 470 万美元;

WAP、🐬、🧲,Meme币PVP大战进入Next Level?

miharu 代币信息

🧲 Magnet:新的 ID 后缀,新的身份标志

10 月 9 日,链上侦探 ZachXBT发文称,发现 11 个与加密 KOL Murad 高度相关联地址,持有约 2400 万美元 Meme 代币,将加密市场的注意力一下聚焦于 Murad 本人身上;此前 Murad 曾于 Token 2049 活动上发表了题为《Meme 币的超级周期》的演讲,吸引了不少人的关注;而其此前曾在 SPX 代币在四个月内获得 61 倍回报,获利 2360 万美元,最新数据显示,目前其已获79 倍收益;Rug Radio 创始人 Farokh 也于 9 号发布了一条此前与 Murad 线上采访的视频推文,详细了解了其进入加密世界之后的一系列经历和个人对市场现状的观点,其对 Meme 币的推崇也被市场视为又一位“ Meme 币喊单王”。

13 小时前,而另一位强势喊单 POPCAT 的加密 KOL RookieXBT 发布推文称,“🧲 意味着什么?它意味着希望;它的意思是相信某事;这是我们的世界,其他人都只是生活在其中。” 将 🧲 这一 emoji 符号赋予了别样的含义。随后,市场闻风而动,以“Magnet🧲”为代币 ID 的 Meme 币项目迅速涌现,并火速占据市场视线,市值也一路高涨。RookieXBT 随后补充道:“披露:我现在醉了。显然,人们已经推出了名为 magnet 的 Meme 币,似乎我的某个实名钱包上收到了相当大的代币供应;在更高的价格之前不会出售,并承诺当我这样做时将其中的 100% 捐赠给慈善机构。”

Murad 随后也加入了这场“符号狂欢”之中,将自己的 ID 后缀也加上了 🧲 标志;链上知名玩家 POW 等 “Meme 币风向标”也紧随其后。最新消息显示,staqi.sol 通过交易 Magnet 代币在 12 小时内实现了 421 倍的回报,净赚 1238 枚 SOL(约 18 万美元),且仍持有 374 万枚 Magnet,价值约 4.5 万美元。

代币合约:8iWsK2WH3AGviQwAnt43zvc8yLy6QMUSuv8PK2A7pump;

代币价格: 0.01 美元;

代币市值: 1070 万美元;

WAP、🐬、🧲,Meme币PVP大战进入Next Level?

小结:Meme 币的未来想象力无限,但 PVP 仍是主流玩法

在此前的《Neiro 与 NEIRO 同上币安,Meme 币赛道迎来转折点?》一文中,我们曾提到,Neiro/NEIRO 大小写之争的落幕为 Meme 币赛道开启了一个新的转折点,社区不少人调侃,后续玩 Meme 币或许需要埋伏一下 “🐶🐱🐭🐹🐰🦊🐻🐼🐨🐯🦁🐮🐷🐽🐸🐵🐒🐔🐧🐦🐤🐣🐥🦆🦅🦉🦇🐺🐗🐴🦄🐝🐛🦋🐌🐞🐜🦟🦗🕷🕸🦂🐢🐉🐍🦎🦖🦕🐙🦑🦐🦞🦀🐡🐠🐟🐬🐳🐋🦈🐊🐅🐆🦓🦍🐘🦛🦏🐪🐫🦒🦘🐂🐃🐄🐎🐖🐏🐑🦙🐐🦌🐕🐩🐈🐓🦃🦚🦜🦢🕊🐇🦝🦡🐁🐀🐿🦔🐾🐕🦺🦮🦩🦧🦥🦦🦨🪲🦭🪶🦤🐻❄🦫🦣🦬🐈⬛🐶🐱🐭🐹🐰🦊🐻🐼🐨🐯🦁🐮🐷🐽🐸🐵🐒🐔🐧🐦🐤🐣🐥🦆🦅🦉🦇🐺🐗🐴🦄🐝🐛🦋🐌🐞🐜🦟🦗🕷🕸🦂🐢🐉🐍🦎🦖🦕🐙🦑🦐🦞🦀🐡🐠🐟🐬🐳🐋🦈🐊🐅🐆🦓🦍🐘🦛🦏🐪🐫🦒🦘🐂🐃🐄🐎🐖🐏🐑🦙🐐🦌🐕🐩🐈🐓🦃🦚🦜🦢🕊🐇🦝🦡🐁🐀🐿🦔🐾🐕🦺🦮🦩🦧🦥🦦🦨🪲🦭🪶🦤🐻❄🦫🦣🦬🐈⬛,每种大概 5-6 个,一个大写一个小写;一个有社区,一个没社区;一个给 V 神转币,一个给币安转币。”

而 emoji 后缀的玩法,或许也将成为 Meme 币项目下一个的“噱头之举”,但可以肯定的是,流动性有限的加密市场中,Meme 币赛道的主流玩法仍然是 PVP——要么快人一步;要么钻到人声鼎沸。

Related Reads

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

A disgruntled early Ethereum developer and token holder presents six core criticisms of the project's trajectory, contrasting it with Solana's rise. 1. **Premature Complacency**: The Ethereum Foundation shifted from a "building" to an "infrastructure" mindset too soon, adopting a passive, "retired chairman" posture before securing market dominance, reflected in ETH's ~65% decline against BTC post-Merge. 2. **Misguided Messaging**: The Merge was marketed primarily on ESG (99.95% energy reduction) rather than user benefits like speed or yield, appealing to internal ideals instead of market demands. 3. **Delayed Execution**: Proof-of-Stake, on the roadmap since 2015, took seven years to launch, ceding critical narrative and development windows. Competitors like Solana built entire ecosystems in that time. 4. **Poor Native Staking UX**: Years after the Merge, there is still no first-party, user-friendly staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's "sound money" narrative. 5. **Managed Decline**: The rollup-centric roadmap deliberately weakens the base layer's fee capture, outsourcing value and profitability to L2s like Arbitrum and Base, which issue their own tokens and fragment capital. 6. **Ideology Over Product**: Ethereum culture prioritizes philosophical purity ("credible neutrality," "public goods") over competitive product delivery that meets user demands (e.g., financialization), while Solana's ecosystem focuses on coordinated execution. The diagnosis is accumulated execution debt, not a coordination failure. Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana efficiently executed. The current market cap reflects these specific strategic failures, not abstract theory.

marsbit23m ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

marsbit23m ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

Six Grievances from an Ethereum Developer The author, an early investor and developer still building on Ethereum, expresses deep frustration with its trajectory and declining ETH/BTC price since the merge. The core argument is that Ethereum's current market position stems from concrete failures in execution and strategy, not abstract coordination problems. The first grievance targets a shift in the Ethereum Foundation's mentality from builders to "infrastructure," adopting a premature posture of a retired victor. Second, marketing the Merge around ESG (99.95% energy reduction) is seen as talking to its own conscience rather than the market, which prioritizes user experience and yield. Third, the seven-year delay in delivering Proof-of-Stake (PoS) ceded critical narrative and development time to competitors like Solana. Fourth, three years post-merge, there is still no user-friendly first-party staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's monetary narrative. Fifth, the rollup-centric roadmap has strategically surrendered base-layer fee capture to L2s, fragmenting value within the ecosystem while Solana demonstrates an integrated L1's value accrual. Finally, the author criticizes an institutional culture that prioritizes philosophical ideals (credible neutrality, pluralism) over competitive product delivery focused on what users actually want. The diagnosis is "accumulated execution debt." Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana's ecosystem coordinated efficiently to deliver and capture the next wave of value. The conclusion is that Ethereum's market cap reflects its abandonment of the fight for asset appreciation.

链捕手33m ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

链捕手33m ago

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbit59m ago

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

marsbit59m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片