Платформа для путешествий Travala интегрировала токены на базе Solana

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2023-10-21Last updated on 2024-09-21

Платформа для бронирования путешествий с поддержкой криптовалют Travala интегрировалась с четвёртым по величине по рыночной капитализации блокчейном Solana.

Генеральный директор Travala Хуан Отеро рассказал об этом во время панельной дискуссии в Solana Breakpoint в Сингапуре в субботу. Интеграция позволит пользователям бронировать авиабилеты, отели и размещение с помощью активов на базе Solana, включая SOL, USDT и USDC, среди прочих.

Сеть Solana стала одним из наиболее используемых блокчейнов благодаря своей экономической эффективности и масштабируемости, — заявил Отеро.

Кроме того, клиенты смогут получать кешбэк до 10% от стоимости своих бронирований в виде SOL через программу лояльности, наряду с BTC и собственным токеном Travala AVA.

Несмотря на то, что Travala в настоящее время поддерживает десятки криптовалют для бронирования, в кошельках пользовательских аккаунтов платформы их поддерживается менее десяти. После интеграции пользователи теперь могут вносить и выводить SOL, USDT и USDC в сети Solana напрямую на свои счета Travala и со своих счетов с нулевой комиссией за транзакции.

Ранее глобальная торговая площадка для путешествий стала партнёром сервиса Skyscanner с аудиторией 110 миллионов пользователей в месяц, которые ежедневно совершают 80 миллиардов поисковых запросов. С помощью Travala бронирование отелей можно осуществлять более чем в 100 криптовалютах.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE
jst
JUSTJST

Related Reads

David Schwartz Says XRP Ledger Front-Running Risk Is Real But Overstated

David Schwartz, former CTO of Ripple, acknowledges that the XRP Ledger (XRPL) is exposed to sandwich attacks, but views the risk as real yet overstated. A sandwich attack occurs when an attacker exploits transaction ordering, placing trades before and after a victim's transaction to profit from the resulting price movement, leaving the victim with a worse execution price. Schwartz frames this as part of a broader debate about trade-offs in decentralized trading systems, balancing openness and user protection. He argues the issue is not an existential flaw for XRPL but highlights its importance for network credibility as on-chain trading activity grows. The key for XRPL is to ensure users have confidence in fair execution, which involves understanding, mitigating, and clearly explaining such risks rather than dismissing user concerns. Ultimately, this debate underscores that execution quality and protection against predatory trading are becoming critical components of user trust and network adoption.

bitcoinist10m ago

David Schwartz Says XRP Ledger Front-Running Risk Is Real But Overstated

bitcoinist10m ago

Ripple’s Bank Partner Count Does Not Mean 300 Banks Are Using XRP

The article clarifies a common misconception about Ripple's partnerships. While Ripple reports having over 300 institutional partners, the key point is that most of these banks and financial institutions do not use the XRP token directly for settlement. They may utilize Ripple's technology or join its networks without creating demand for XRP itself. This distinction is crucial for investors, as the value thesis for XRP relies on real token utility—such as for moving value or settling transactions—rather than just corporate relationships. The piece argues that Ripple's significant institutional footprint does not automatically equate to widespread XRP adoption. The narrative around XRP should therefore focus less on the number of partners and more on concrete evidence of how those partners are using the token. The truth lies between the extremes of supporter and critic claims: Ripple's partnerships matter, but they are not synonymous with XRP demand.

bitcoinist35m ago

Ripple’s Bank Partner Count Does Not Mean 300 Banks Are Using XRP

bitcoinist35m ago

Synapse price rallies 13% – Why SYN’s fundamentals still warrant caution

Synapse (SYN) has rallied 13%, driven by significant whale purchases, notably a $2.2 million position from Arthur Hayes. His bullish thesis centers on SYN being undervalued relative to its on-chain options product, Hypercall, which he believes could rival major exchanges. Spot market netflows show slight buying pressure. However, perpetual traders are leaning bearish, with a negative funding rate indicating substantial short positions. Fundamentally, the protocol's revenue is extremely low—generating only around $3,000 in Q2 2026—which starkly contrasts with its $91 million market cap. The rally appears driven more by narrative and positioning than by underlying financial performance.

ambcrypto59m ago

Synapse price rallies 13% – Why SYN’s fundamentals still warrant caution

ambcrypto59m ago

Analyst Flags $65-$71 Solana Support Zone After 60 Million SOL Changed Hands

Crypto analyst Ali Martinez has identified a critical support zone for Solana (SOL) between $65 and $71. This level is significant because over 60 million SOL tokens changed hands in that price range, making it a major area of demand and liquidity. If this zone holds, it could support SOL's bullish market structure, indicating a potential base. However, a decisive break below could signal a deeper price correction, turning the area into resistance and shifting focus to lower support levels. The analysis provides a specific price area to monitor for confirmation of SOL's near-term direction, emphasizing the importance of transaction-based support levels in the current fragile market environment for altcoins.

bitcoinist1h ago

Analyst Flags $65-$71 Solana Support Zone After 60 Million SOL Changed Hands

bitcoinist1h ago

Why Do Cryptocurrency Projects Frequently Change Their Names?

"Why do crypto projects frequently rebrand? Unlike traditional companies that protect brand equity as a core asset, over 16% of crypto projects have changed their names. This trend stems from key industry differences. Firstly, user loyalty in crypto is often low. Many participants are investors, airdrop hunters, or narrative traders, not traditional consumers. A name associated with price crashes, hacks, or failed narratives becomes a liability rather than an asset. Secondly, rebranding is a strategic tool. It can signal a legitimate pivot to new technologies (e.g., Matic to Polygon) or deliberately 'hitchhike' on hot narratives like AI or RWA to attract attention. It can also serve as crisis PR, attempting to distance a project from past security breaches or controversies. The most concerning aspect is when a name change coincides with a token migration or swap. This can allow projects to reset historical price charts, dilute tokenomics through added allocations, and create opportunities for price manipulation around the migration event. The core issue isn't rebranding itself, but the intent behind it. The key questions are: does the change reflect genuine strategic evolution and added value, or is it primarily an attempt to escape history, reset narratives, and manipulate perception for short-term gain?"

marsbit1h ago

Why Do Cryptocurrency Projects Frequently Change Their Names?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions