八问八答,解析索尼推出的以太坊Layer 2网络Soneium

marsbitPublished on 2024-08-22Last updated on 2024-08-23

今天下午,一则消息引发各大社区热议:

日本巨头企业索尼计划推出以太坊 Layer 2 网络 Soneium。 

Sony Block Solutions Labs 于本周五表示,其将在以太坊区块链上推出一个名为 Soneium 的全新 Layer 2 网络。Soneium 预计将在未来几天内在测试网络上线,它将利用 Optimism Rollup 技术,使用 Optimism 区块链生态系统的 OP Stack 构建。

Odaily 星球日报将结合市场资料、新项目 Soneium 社区信息等以问答形式来为大家厘清索尼即将推出的 Soneium 网络。

Web3


  • Q1:这是索尼第一次在 Web3 领域进行探索吗?

A1:不是,早在 2022 年,索尼就开始在 Web3 领域进行布局,包括元宇宙板块、NFT 板块基础、设施板块。其中讨论度最高的是 2023 年初,索尼集团旗下业务部门索尼网络通信与多链智能合约网络 Astar Network 合作,为专注于 NFT 和去中心化自治组织(DAO)实用的项目推出 Web3 孵化计划。

Sony Block Solutions Labs 主管 Sota Watanabe 此前曾表示:“到 2026 年,索尼集团(Sony Group)将为所有与索尼相关的产品和服务制作一个统一 ID。如果我们可以在区块链之上构建 DID,那将是非常有趣的,它将成为连接 Web3 和 Web2 的接口。”

  • Q2:索尼、Astar Network 与 Startale Labs 之间的关系是什么?

A2 :讲解三者关系,需要了解一个人 Sota Watanabe,他是 Astar Network 联合创始人、Startale Labs 首席执行官,同时也是 Sony Block Solutions Labs 的主管。Startale Labs 继承了 Sota Watanabe 在 Astar Network 运营里获得的技术和知识基础。Startale Labs 也与索尼有合作,从索尼那里获得了资金,与索尼建立了合资企业。

去年 9 月,Sota Watanabe 宣布,Startale Labs 将与索尼旗下全资子公司索尼网络通信将成立一家合资子公司“Sony Network Communiations Labs Pte. Ltd.”(即今日的 Sony Block Solutions Labs),新公司将聚焦区块链技术的研发。新的合资子公司将推进 Sony Chain 的开发,该链有潜力超越 Coinbase 发布的 Layer 2 网络 Base。时隔近一年,Soneium 终于即将问世。

  • Q3:索尼即将推出的 Layer 2 网络 Soneium 有哪些特点?

A3:Soneium 利用 Optimism 基金会开发的 Op Stack 和 Superchain,创建了一个可扩展、与 EVM 兼容、对开发人员友好的区块链。并且,Soneium 计划成为一个多功能、通用型区块链,可满足所有垂直领域的各种需求,并为全球用户提供支持。在 Soneium 网络,每个人都是创造者,无论用户身在何处,从事何种工作。团队希望建立一个开放的互联网,超越文化差异,将具有不同价值观的人们聚集在一起。

  • Q4:Astar Network 将直接转换成 Soneium 链吗?

A4:不是,两者有着密切的关系但不是一个项目。Soneium 是使用 Optimism 技术栈的新型以太坊 Layer 2 项目,而 Astar 是一个 Layer 1 项目,由于支持 Soneium 项目的发展,Astar zkEVM 将过渡到 Soneium L2 上,并且 ASTR 代币将在 Soneium 生态系统中发挥关键作用。

  • Q5:Soneium 近期有“大动作”吗?

A5 :有,团队计划在未来几天内推出带有 Op Stack 的 Soneim 测试网。开发人员和创作者可以开始体验 Soneium 的开发环境,并开始在测试网上创建自己的应用程序。

  • Q6 :当下有早期参与项目的机会吗?

A6:有,一方面关注官方 X 账户(点击此处跳转链接)获得项目最新资讯;另一方面,官方 Discord 社区刚刚开放,当前可以在频道中活跃发言获得 OG 身份。

  • Q7 :如何在官方 Discord 中获得 OG 身份?

A7:第一步,加入官方 Discord 社区(点击此处跳转链接);第二步,在【waiting-room】频道活跃至 2 级,自动解锁【join-main-server】频道;第三步,击服务器左上角的【join-main-server】+验证进入主频道,自动获得 OG 身份【GM】。

  • Q8:Soneium 是否有发币计划?

A8:暂不确定。根据社区截图显示,社区管理员称,Soneium 将使用 ETH 作为其 L2 网络的 Gas 费用,暂无发行原生代币、代币空投等计划,但该内容目前已删除。

Web3

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit25m ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit25m ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbit29m ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbit29m ago

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

The AI community is currently alarmed by widespread reports of significant performance degradation in two leading models. This article details a "mass self-testing frenzy" triggered by a mysterious prompt designed to detect a hidden "Juice" value, representing a model's reasoning compute budget. On OpenAI's side, users suspect a covert, limited test of a "GPT-5.6-sol" model is underway. When using a specific XML prompt on the Codex platform, a normal "gpt-5.5 xhigh" model reportedly returns a Juice value of 768. However, some users routed to the suspected GPT-5.6 test receive a drastically reduced value of 128—a six-fold decrease. This has sparked debate on whether it signifies a major efficiency leap or a "watered-down, low-cost version" achieved by slashing reasoning depth to save computational expenses. Simultaneously, Anthropic's Claude models, particularly the flagship Opus 4.8 Max, are facing intense user backlash for a perceived "physical brain cut." Users on platforms like Reddit report a dramatic decline in the model's once-impressive reasoning, with complaints of it becoming "absurdly" weakened, performing worse than older, lighter models like Haiku. Specific criticisms include: losing long-context memory, refusing to think deeply even in high-reasoning modes, providing instant incorrect answers, and engaging in unhelpful, argumentative, or "gaslighting" behavior where it contradicts users unnecessarily. The article speculates these "stealth downgrades" might be a calculated corporate strategy. Companies could initially release models with temporarily boosted compute to create an illusion of a major breakthrough, then silently scale back parameters later to manage unsustainable inference costs. A proposed underlying cause is a tightened funding environment, potentially exacerbated by SpaceX's massive IPO soaking up market liquidity, which could delay AI company IPOs and force cost-cutting measures like model "nerfing." The core issue highlighted is the asymmetry of information: subscribers pay for a service that can be silently and fundamentally altered without notification or explanation. The viral "Juice test" resonates because it represents users' desire for transparency about what they are actually paying for.

marsbit1h ago

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片