2头索拉纳鲸移动800万个代币:SOL会爆发吗?

币界网Published on 2024-08-22Last updated on 2024-08-22

币界网报道:
    SOL的交易量增长了20%,表明交易者的参与度更高。SOL的未平仓合约在过去24小时内也增长了4%,这表明投资者的兴趣日益浓厚。

在这个高度波动的加密货币市场中,两只鲸鱼从币安[BNB]购买并抵押了大量的Solana[SOL]。

8月22日,链上分析公司Lookonchain在X(前身为推特)上发帖称,两个鲸鱼地址,即“9tuA8L”和“7CsCGy”,已从币安提取了价值800万美元的56245 SOL。

前者撤回了30000索尔,后者撤回了26245索尔。

随着最近的这些撤资,鲸鱼似乎在看跌的市场情绪中找到了SOL的完美买入机会。

此外,这一重大退出正值联邦公开市场委员会(FOMC)暗示2024年9月可能降息之际。

Solana的价格表现和即将达到的水平

尽管鲸鱼感兴趣,但截至发稿时,SOL的交易价格接近143美元,在过去24小时内价格飙升了0.75%。

同期,其交易量增长了20%,表明交易者的参与度更高。

根据AMBCrypto的分析,截至发稿时,SOL仍处于上升趋势,因为它在每日时间范围内保持在200指数移动平均线(EMA)之上。

然而,在过去的几天里,SOL的价格一直在狭窄的区间内盘整。根据价格走势,突破这一整合将是决定山寨币下一步走势的关键。

如果它突破上行,SOL极有可能触及180美元的水平。另一方面,如果山寨币在整合中崩溃,它有可能跌至128美元的水平。

关键清算级别

根据链上分析公司Coinglass的数据,截至发稿时,SOL的未平仓合约在过去24小时内增长了4%,表明投资者和交易员的兴趣日益浓厚。

根据Coinglass的数据,截至目前,主要清算水平较低,接近136美元,较高,接近145美元。根据数据,这些级别的杠杆率很高。

如果市场情绪转为看跌,SOL跌至136美元的水平,价值近1.366亿美元的多头头寸将被清算。

相反,如果投资者的兴趣增长,价格上涨到145美元,近4728万美元的空头头寸将被清算。


阅读Solana的[SOL]价格预测2024-2025


这一清算数据表明,在撰写本文时,市场对索拉纳的情绪是看涨的,因为空头头寸比多头头寸少。

与此同时,整个加密货币市场上涨了2.3%。比特币[BTC]、以太坊[ETH]和狗狗币[DOGE]等顶级资产在过去24小时内分别飙升了2.5%、2%和1.5%以上。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit56m ago

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit56m ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit1h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit1h ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbit1h ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片