SOL会超越ETH吗?|疑问解答

金色财经Published on 2024-08-22Last updated on 2024-08-22

1. 玩合约爆仓8万,以后再也不玩了

以我的经历和感受,仅仅是因为在合约上有损失就能从此戒掉合约还是有相当的难度,还必须另外找到一条适合自己的投资方法并且能实实在在地从这个方法中挣到财富,甚至有条件的话还能把这个方法复制到多个投资领域并且也能取得不错的成果,那才能真正戒掉合约的诱惑。

为什么一定要找到适合自己的成功方法才能彻底戒掉合约呢?

因为人的大脑需要正反馈,只有当另外一种方式不断地让自己得到了正反馈后,我们才能逐步远离原来那些能让我们“上瘾”的方式。

否则,一直没有正反馈,一直找不到适合自己的其它方式,终有一天我们还是会忍不住再回到玩合约的老路上。

而真的要找到适合自己的方式并取得成功,以我的体会至少又需要几年时间经历一轮完整的牛熊。所以这也不是一条一帆风顺的路。

我们要做好准备。

2. SOL可以布局吗?他会超越ETH吗?

我没有布局SOL,只有一些零散的用来薅一些项目的羊毛。

如果超越指的是TVL和总市值,长期看我不认为SOL会超过ETH。

关于SOL,我在早期的文章中分享过不少对它的看法。我现在对它的看法不变,建议读者可以回看一下我以前的老文章。

3. 是否持有模块化的代币TIA?

我持有TIA,一直拿着,从没卖过。

它现在和很多生态内的项目尤其是一些以太坊的二层扩展都有深度合作。它也是我一直比较关注的项目。

c9JL0oCdhU3iTpS1Tug101KKaig4KGpTJpKR2KOg.png

4. 以太坊的增发机制是什么?总量无限是否会影响机构的投资意愿?

以太坊在发行机制方面和比特币不同,它没有固定上限,理论上可以无限增发。但自从引入了EIP-1559后,它实现了代币燃烧的功能,使得网络中的每一笔交易都会燃烧代币。这使得以太币的供需基本能达到平衡,长期看大概流通量会稳定在1.2亿枚左右,不大可能是总量无限。

我觉得以太坊现在的这种增发机制不会影响机构的投资意愿。

5. 3月份的时候,幸亏把Magic在价位1.3出了,我从23年3月拿到24年3月,整整一年,不亏不赚,所谓的VC币,就是这么难。

在这一轮行情中,VC被很多散户投资者诟病,导致VC现在在圈内几乎成了被责难的对象。

但我觉得这个敌视的氛围和态度又明显过头了,因为VC是这个生态必不可少的参与者和贡献者,现在是未来更是。

加密生态要发展下去成为能够承载大规模、高频次应用的生态必须要有与之相匹配的基础设施。

而基础设施一定需要复杂的技术并经历相对漫长的开发周期。这样的项目需要长期资金的注入和支持。而要获取这类资金的支持目前看只有通过传统科技领域那种多轮融资的方式才可行。因此越往后,我认为一定会有越来越多的VC进入这类项目。

我甚至认为随着合规在行业的渗入和普及,未来某些依靠VC支持起来的项目走传统路线上IPO都是大概率事件。

所以我还是会尽量中性地看待VC和他们所起的作用。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Valuation Inversion Emerges, Bitcoin Treasury Companies Face Trust Crisis

"Valuation Inversion Emerges, Sparking Trust Crisis for Bitcoin Treasury Firms" The investment thesis for corporate Bitcoin treasury stocks has fundamentally shifted. Investors are no longer rewarding companies simply for accumulating more Bitcoin. Instead, the focus is now on net Bitcoin per share, with intense scrutiny on whether new financings truly benefit existing shareholders or merely dilute their stake. Key indicators highlight the new reality. Metaplanet's market capitalization has fallen below the total value of its Bitcoin holdings, indicating a valuation discount. While MicroStrategy maintains a premium, its core metric—Bitcoin per diluted share for common shareholders—has been declining due to dilution from financing activities, primarily through its STRAT permanent preferred shares. This marks a transition from a pure "asset accumulation" phase to an "equity attribution" phase. Investors now deduct costs like preferred dividends and debt to calculate the actual Bitcoin claim for common equity. The widespread adoption of spot Bitcoin ETFs has removed the scarcity value these stocks once held, forcing them to justify their structure with superior leverage, dividends, or capital efficiency. European entrants like France's Capital B and Sweden's BTC AB are testing this new environment with ambitious funding plans backed by relatively small Bitcoin holdings. They are asking investors to bear complex capital structures, betting future Bitcoin purchases will cover all dilution and dividend costs. The sector's core risk is a broken financing loop. Once a company's stock trades below its Bitcoin net asset value, it loses the ability to issue equity for accretive purchases. It is then left with unpalatable choices: dilutive financing at a discount, venturing into new businesses like Bitcoin lending, or selling assets. The winners in this next phase will be those that demonstrably increase Bitcoin per share for common shareholders with every financing move.

Foresight News16m ago

Valuation Inversion Emerges, Bitcoin Treasury Companies Face Trust Crisis

Foresight News16m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片