Bitwise:2024Q2 13F文件令人鼓舞 机构在持续买入比特币

币界网Published on 2024-08-20Last updated on 2024-08-20

币界网报道:

作者:Matt Hougan,Bitwise首席投资官;编译:0xjs@

目前加密货币领域最大的问题是机构和专业投资者是否会大规模配置加密货币。

这个问题比总统选举结果、国会立法前景、区块链领域技术发展更重要。

原因很简单:数学。

大多数可投资资产主要由专业人士持有。例如,研究表明,机构控制着美国股票市场约 80% 的份额。相比之下,机构持有的加密货币相对较少。我见过的最激进的估计表明,他们可能拥有所有比特币的 10%。

为了使这一数字达到 50% 的市场份额,专业投资者需要购买约 5000 亿美元的比特币。毋庸置疑,这将对价格产生巨大影响。

那么...他们会买吗?

由于比特币 ETF 的出现,以及美国SEC要求机构使用 13F 表格按季度披露其 ETF 持股情况,我们现在可以回答这个问题了。最新一批涵盖 2024 年第二季度的 13F 文件上周上市,它们显示的内容很有趣。

以下是三个关键要点。

关键发现 1:是的,机构在继续购买比特币 ETF

第一个发现也是最重要的:机构在第二季度继续购买比特币 ETF。

这并不能保证。比特币的价格在 2024 年第二季度下跌了 12%,许多人想知道这是否会吓跑机构投资者。答案是肯定的“不”。

持有比特币 ETF 的机构投资者总数环比增长 14%,从 965 家增至 1,100 家。他们在比特币 ETF 管理的总资产 (AUM) 中所占的份额也从 18.74% 增至 21.15%。总体而言,机构投资者在本季度末持有的比特币 ETF 总额为 110 亿美元。

这些资金流动中有一些健康的流动。在第二季度,112 名在第一季度末持有比特币 ETF 的投资者卖出了该资产,而 247 家新公司进行了首次投资。总的来说,比特币 ETF 增加了 135 家新公司。

在我看来,这是一个很好的迹象。如果机构在价格波动时购买比特币,想象一下牛市会发生什么。

关键发现 2:机构采用的速度具有历史意义

批评者喜欢指出,比特币 ETF 主要由散户投资者持有,他们持有比特币 ETF 资产管理规模的约 79%。他们利用这一事实来表明机构需求疲软。

这完全是错误的。比特币 ETF 被机构采用的速度是历史上最快的。

我使用彭博社 Eric Balchunas 的一份名单,研究了有史以来增长最快的 10 只新 ETF 的机构所有权,这些 ETF 按上市一个月后的 AUM 排名。具体来说,我研究了这些 ETF 在上市两个季度后的机构持有人数量和机构 AUM 总额,以与当前的比特币 ETF 所有权状况进行比较。

增长最快的非比特币 ETF:上市两个季度后机构采用情况

资料来源:Bitwise Asset Management,数据来自 WhaleWisdom 和 Eric Balchunas。数据截至 2024 年 6 月 30 日。

(1)非比特币 ETF 排名依据的是上市一个月后的 AUM。

(2)注:QQQ 于 1999 年 3 月推出。直到 2021 年第一季度才有该基金的 13-F 数据,因此这些数字反映了上市九个季度后的所有权。

根本无法比较。唯一可比的 ETF 是 Invesco 的 QQQ,但这只是苹果和橘子之间的比较。QQQ 于 1999 年 3 月推出,但我找不到该基金直到 2001 年第一季度的任何历史 13F 数据。换句话说,QQQ 图表中的数字代表该基金在其增长九个季度后机构采用的情况。即便如此,比特币 ETF 的买家数量也是其 3 倍!

有些人可能会认为,将比特币 ETF 总体与单个 ETF 进行比较是不公平的。但即使你只看单个比特币 ETF,它们也会占据榜首。例如,Bitwise 的比特币 ETF(按 AUM 计算,在第二季度末在比特币 ETF 中排名第四)在其成立的这个阶段拥有的机构持有者(139 人)比 SPDR 的巨头 GLD(118 人)还多。

ETF 是一种独特的投资产品,机构投资者和散户投资者都可以持有。我们不应该让散户投资者对比特币 ETF 的历史性采用掩盖这样一个事实:比特币 ETF 也比历史上任何其他 ETF 更快地获得机构投资者的青睐。

关键发现 3:大多数机构还处于初试水准

还有一个事实:文件显示,第二季度报告持有比特币 ETF 的中位投资者仅有 0.47% 的投资组合投资于比特币。

我觉得这个数字非常鼓舞人心。在为专业投资者管理加密货币风险 6 年多之后,我们注意到 Bitwise 的一个趋势是,他们倾向于随着时间的推移建立自己的头寸。许多人从投资组合的 1% 或更少开始,但随着时间的推移,这个数字往往会上升到 2.5% 甚至 5%。

我预计机构投资者的平均持股量一年内将超过 1%,并从那里持续上升。

结论:ETF 是一个多年叙事

总而言之,我发现 2024 年第二季度的 13F 文件非常令人鼓舞。尽管价格下跌,但机构在第二季度继续购买比特币 ETF。数百家新的机构投资者进行了首次购买。而且,比特币 ETF 被机构采用的速度比历史上任何 ETF 都要快。

作为 ETF.com 的前首席执行官,我见证了 ETF 的推出已有二十年。我知道的一件事是,大多数 ETF 都是随着时间的推移而建立的:第一年可能是一个挑战,但势头往往会在第二年、第三年、第四年和第五年逐渐增强。我预计这里也会发生同样的事情。毕竟,主要平台现在才刚刚开始开放比特币 ETF 的访问权限(摩根士丹利本月早些时候批准了它们)。我预计 2025 年比特币 ETF 的流入量将大于 2024 年,2026 年将大于 2025 年。

机构正在不断涌现,而且规模越来越大。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

A Group of Suzhou Engineers Unexpectedly Attain Financial Freedom

In Suzhou, a group of engineers from Lianxun Instruments, a leader in optical communication testing equipment, have achieved remarkable wealth after the company's IPO. Listed just two months ago on the STAR Market, the company's stock price surged approximately 30 times, making it the only A-share stock priced above 2,000 yuan. This surge created substantial fortunes for nearly 100 technical employees who held a collective 15.91% stake through employee stock ownership platforms, valued at over 36 billion yuan at the current market cap. Among them, nearly 40 became billionaires, while even the smallest holdings exceeded 5 million yuan in value. Founded in 2017 by Hu Haiyang, Yang Jian, and Huang Jianjun, Lianxun Instruments was established to address China's reliance on foreign high-end testing instruments. The company grew rapidly with a strong focus on R&D, where technical staff make up nearly 80% of its workforce. Early implementation of employee stock plans helped retain this core talent. The company's explosive growth is fueled by booming AI computing demand, with clients including major global optical module leaders. Its revenue skyrocketed from 276 million yuan in 2023 to 1.194 billion yuan in 2025, turning a profit in 2024. The IPO has also generated massive returns for early investors, including Suzhou's state-owned capital, which saw a hundredfold return. This story reflects a broader trend in China's markets, where technology firms in AI, semiconductors, and optics are creating new wealth, rewarding engineers and technical teams who are now central to modern capital-driven success stories, marking a shift from previous eras dominated by internet and real estate tycoons.

marsbit1h ago

A Group of Suzhou Engineers Unexpectedly Attain Financial Freedom

marsbit1h ago

NVIDIA's Annual 'Most Dangerous' Paper: AI Self-Replicating Code, Unlimited Leveling and Evolution

NVIDIA's "Red Queen Gödel Machine" (RQGM) paper proposes a potentially groundbreaking AI self-evolution framework. It breaks from the long-stalled concept of the "Gödel Machine," which required mathematically proven beneficial self-modifications, by adopting an evolutionary approach. The core, and most striking, innovation is that the AI does not just evolve its own code in a static environment. Instead, it co-evolves both the "student" (the task-performing agent) and the "examiner" (the evaluation system that judges it). This creates a dynamic, recursive self-improvement loop inspired by the biological "Red Queen Hypothesis"—where continuous adaptation is needed just to maintain relative fitness. The mechanism operates in epochs. Within an epoch, a fixed examiner evaluates all candidate code variants. At epoch boundaries, a new, potentially more rigorous examiner can replace the old one, but only if it proves statistically superior on a held-out "ground truth" dataset. This "controlled utility evolution" aims to ensure progress is measurable and grounded. The paper demonstrates RQGM's effectiveness across three domains: 1. **Code Generation:** It achieved a 71.7% test-set pass rate (improving over a 69.9% SOTA) while using 1.35-1.72x fewer computational tokens. 2. **Paper Writing:** In a subjective task, the co-evolved writer and reviewer achieved a 40.5% acceptance rate by a fixed human panel, up from 21.8%. 3. **Math Proofs:** It evolved more accurate graders (at 3x lower cost) and higher-scoring provers. Notably, RQGM also mitigated a known LLM bias where AI reviewers favor AI-generated content. By specifically rewarding reviewers that correctly rejected AI-written papers from a historical pool, the evolved system achieved impartiality while maintaining 80% accuracy. The research has sparked significant discussion about the acceleration of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Some, like Anthropic's Jack Clark, have predicted a high probability of highly autonomous, self-evolving AI emerging by 2028. The paper suggests that when an AI begins to design its own evaluators and push itself toward ever-higher standards in a recursive loop, it may be taking a fundamental step toward redefining intelligence and autonomy.

marsbit2h ago

NVIDIA's Annual 'Most Dangerous' Paper: AI Self-Replicating Code, Unlimited Leveling and Evolution

marsbit2h ago

Apple and the Power Rebalancing with 'The Microns': Dissecting the Profit Ledger Behind the iPhone

The article analyzes the shifting profit dynamics and power balance between Apple and memory suppliers like Micron within the iPhone supply chain. It highlights a social media post criticizing Apple for raising iPhone prices while blaming memory chip cost increases, despite historically paying suppliers like Micron very little. An estimated iPhone 18 cost breakdown is referenced. Historically, memory was a minor cost component. In 2017's iPhone X, memory accounted for only about 1.6-2.3% of the price, with Apple capturing nearly 50% net profit. Over time, memory's share of the Bill-of-Materials (BOM) cost has grown significantly, reaching an estimated 12-15% for the iPhone 17 series. The core driver of this change is soaring demand for memory from the AI industry, particularly for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) and AI servers, which is diverting production capacity and squeezing supply for consumer electronics. Memory manufacturers, after enduring periods of low profits, now hold greater pricing power. This is reflected in their recent strong financials, like Micron's 84.6% gross margin. Apple CEO Tim Cook initially described the memory price pressure as unprecedented in his 40-year career, later calling it a "once-in-a-century flood," before Apple announced price hikes across several product lines, causing a significant stock drop. Elon Musk echoed Cook's sentiment about the dramatic cost surge. The article concludes that the era of memory suppliers being at the mercy of Apple's pricing power has temporarily reversed, thanks to AI-driven demand. It notes Apple is reportedly seeking to diversify its supply chain, including exploring chips from China's CXMT.

Odaily星球日报4h ago

Apple and the Power Rebalancing with 'The Microns': Dissecting the Profit Ledger Behind the iPhone

Odaily星球日报4h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

496 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片