以太坊ETF是否帮助贝莱德超越了Grayscale的持股?

币界网Published on 2024-08-18Last updated on 2024-08-18

币界网报道:
    贝莱德的ETF持有量首次超过Grayscale。截至发稿时,贝莱德ETF达到21217107987美元,而灰度ETF达到21202480698美元。

贝莱德ETF已经发生了历史性的转变,首次超越了灰度ETF。根据Arkham Intelligence的X(前推特)帖子,

“火箭ETF持有量首次超过Grayscale。贝莱德的ETF IBIT和ETHA在链上持有量上刚刚超过了Grayscale的ETF GBTC、BTC Mini、ETHE和ETH Mini。贝莱德ETF现在拥有所有提供商中最大的集体持股。”

这一发展使贝莱德在超越长期占据主导地位的灰度后,成为ETF市场的领导者。

截至发稿时,贝莱德的总持有量达到21217107987美元,而灰度ETF的总持有额紧随其后,为21202480698美元。

对以太坊、比特币的影响

自这一消息传出以来,加密货币市场的ETF流量发生了重大变化。

值得注意的是,现货比特币[BTC]ETF的净流入约为3590万美元,其中富达(6130万美元)和贝莱德(2040万美元)的贡献显著。

与此同时,Grayscale的比特币信托基金(GBTC)流出了7290万美元。

以太坊[ETH]ETF也出现了重大活动。现货以太坊ETF记录了1500万美元的净流出。

在以太坊ETF中,Grayscale的ETHE流出2774.3万美元,而贝莱德的ETHA和富达的FETH分别流入1033万美元和721万美元。

因此,截至发稿时,ETH现货ETF的总净流量为73.52亿美元。

贝莱德和灰度之间偏好的转变可能会对加密货币产生重大影响,尤其是在投资者信心方面。

对ETF的需求增加

ETF的需求同比呈指数级增长。例如,2022年,ETF的净发行量为6090亿美元。2023年,这一数字为5970亿美元。

然而,自1月份比特币现货ETF和7月份以太坊现货ETF获得批准以来,2024年的需求急剧激增。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbit55m ago

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbit55m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片