观点:为什么L2s不会使以太坊陷入通缩?

币界网Published on 2024-08-15Last updated on 2024-08-15

币界网报道:

作者:BREAD, 加密KOL

编译:Felix, PANews

加密社区流传着一种观点:L2s将使以太坊再次陷入通缩。这句话是不正确的,而且已经有例子可以证明。

本文是关于L2、blob以及为什么Ultrasound Money meme在没有主网用户的情况下会消亡的报告。

(注:一个与以太坊有关的meme,用于强调其在长期内变为通缩的潜力。基本概念是,如果黄金或比特币的供应量有上限,并被视为“Sound Money”,那么以太坊的供应量是在减少,应该被视为“Ultrasound Money”)

要点:

  • 只有在blob和常规费用市场都饱和的情况下,L2s才会使ETH通缩
  • L2在很大程度上不受L1特定批量发布节奏的约束
  • 上述因素结合意味着L2将不断相互协调,以避免为自己创造高费用环境

背景

首先简要回顾一下Dencun之后以太坊的现状(3月份的升级使L2s对用户来说便宜了约10倍)。

Dencun引入了blob空间的概念,这是以太坊上区块空间的扩展,旨在让L2发布其批量数据。

观点:为什么L2s不会使以太坊陷入通缩?

这个新区域有几个值得注意的特性:

  • “Blobspace” 目前限制每个区块内最多6个单独的blobs
  • 这是一个独立于常规区块空间的费用市场,但使用类似的机制

Blockspace:如果当前区块的利用率 >50%,则增加下一个区块的基本费用

Blobspace:如果当前区块中有 4 个(即 >50%)或更多 blobs,则将下一个区块的基本费用增加约 12%

注意:L2s可以自行决定使用Blockspace还是Blobspace

鉴于上述情况,可以预测这些L2的预期行为流程中将导致销毁的一些事情:

  • L2s首先会使blobspace饱和,直到其不再处于空闲状态(3 blob/block)
  • 一旦达到这个水平,他们将开始计算发布成本/声誉节省,并选择以下两种方式:
  • a.) 使用calldata
  • b.) 降低发布频率 / 分散 / 协调以冷却费用市场

这就是说,尽管顶级L2s每月已经赚取数百万的利润(利润率接近100%),但L2s将不断调整其行为,以避免为自己创造高费用环境。

ETH吸血鬼死亡循环:

  • 延长低费用环境
  • 等待以太坊扩容,重置市场
  • 延长低费用环境
  • 等待以太坊扩容,重置市场......

那么ETH计划何时扩容?

最早明年Pectra更新,这可能会将blob容量扩大约 2-3 倍。

但市场并没有提供很多这样的机会,但是有两个L2s故意修改行为以节省成本和避免费用的例子(就像任何业务或理性行为者所做的那样)。

1Blobscriptions热潮

3月下旬,blobs在blobscription阶段经历了“价格发现”,尽管如此:L2s和构建者平均将其blobs限制在3个blobs/block的非价格上涨水平:

观点:为什么L2s不会使以太坊陷入通缩?

数据来源:Dune

他们没有义务超过费用增长水平,所以他们没有这样做。

2LayerZero空投

6月20日,ZRO空投导致Arbitrum上的交易量大幅增加,并导致其涌入blob市场。

简而言之:

  • 更多来自ARB的blobs
  • 所有L2s的blob成本更高
  • 由于没有适当的基础设施来切换到常规区块空间,L2销毁了约80万美元ETH

如果你想了解更多,可查阅作者另条推文

这次事件最大的收获是各团队对高费用环境的反应:

观点:为什么L2s不会使以太坊陷入通缩?

Scroll是一个没有发布义务的zk rollup,完全停止发布。

当查看Scroll时,发现他们确实比正常情况下的速度更快,但反应比OP Mainnet晚得多。有趣的是,当基本费用飙升,blobdatacalldata更昂贵时,Scroll完全停止发布blob。这也解释了为什么与其他L2相比,Scroll的费用最少。

Taiko是一个有严格节奏的rollup,放慢批量处理速度。

由于Taiko是基于Rollup的(即一旦在L1上确认了它们的交易,交易就会在L2上得到确认),他们必须不断发布信息以保持链条的运转。这导致他们在L1上多支付了25+ ETH的费用。然而,当blob基础费用飙升时,甚至Taiko也放慢了30-50% 的批量交易速度,这表明他们在极高的价格下确实具有一定的价格敏感性。

两家市场参与者都采取了合理的措施来降低管理费用。

未来,他们肯定会采用自动化流程,以避免在转换之前浪费数十万美元。

所有的L2s都会。

能做什么?

当作者着手撰写这份报告时,只是想简单地计算一下“需要另外 4 个基础级 L2 才能再次产生 ETH Ultrasound Money™️”,但挖掘得越多,就越意识到这个目标永远无法实现。

L2将不断调整其行为以避免高昂的成本。他们是企业,当然会这样做。

那么鉴于上述情况,该怎么做呢?让主网​​再次变得”炫酷“起来,吸引用户和构建者。

必须在通过L2s进行扩展与将高级用户留在主网上之间取得平衡,而不是将他们不加区分地推到十几个不同结构的生态系统中的一个,而这些生态系统对以太坊的经济回报却微乎其微。

通过调整消息传递来取得进展:

  • 填满容量
  • 扩展到适宜水平
  • 告诉用户和应用程序“滚蛋”(跳过此步骤)
  • 通过L2s扩展

还可以实施EIP-7623之类的措施,以防止L1用户区块空间被用作L2节省成本的故障转移空间。

依靠L2s作为参与者,主网作为纯粹的结算,难道不是吗?就目前的激励措施而言,情况并非如此。

相关阅读:详解Pectra升级:继Dencun之后,以太坊历史上最大升级

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System Using First Principles

Former SpaceX engineer Lex Li applies "First Principles Thinking" to financial infrastructure with Plan Execution Lab, recently raising angel funding at a $50M post-money valuation. The team argues that the core function of finance is capital allocation, and the critical gap is not in trading but in execution, which remains highly manual and fragmented. While assets, liquidity, and settlement have migrated on-chain, execution workflows (monitoring, risk management, liquidity coordination) are still human-native. In an era of accelerating AI agents, strategy decay is rapid, shifting the competitive edge from having the best strategy to having the most robust execution network. Plan Execution Lab introduces two core components: 1. **PlanX**: A Financial Execution Protocol designed as infrastructure for the migration from CEX to DEX, providing on-chain execution capabilities, liquidity access, risk management, and capital orchestration. 2. **Xgent**: An Autonomous Financial Runtime. Users define investment intents, risk preferences, and constraints; Xgent automatically constructs an execution graph, verifies it, and handles ongoing execution and optimization—streamlining the process from Intent to Autonomous Execution. The long-term vision is to create the "Bloomberg Terminal for Autonomous Finance"—a shared operating environment and execution network built collectively by participants like execution nodes, liquidity providers, and autonomous agents. The future of finance, they contend, belongs not to isolated algorithms but to open, collaborative execution networks.

marsbit17m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System Using First Principles

marsbit17m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System from First Principles

Plan Execution Lab, a financial infrastructure project founded by former SpaceX engineer Lex Li, has raised angel funding at a $50M post-money valuation. The startup is applying "first principles thinking" from Li's SpaceX experience to rethink financial market execution. Their analysis posits that while assets, liquidity, and settlement have moved on-chain, the execution layer remains fundamentally human-dependent and fragmented. In the era of AI Agents, strategy advantages decay rapidly, shifting the competitive edge from isolated algorithms to robust **execution networks**. Plan Execution Lab's solution is a two-part system: **PlanX**, a Financial Execution Protocol designed to facilitate the migration from centralized exchanges (CEX) to on-chain markets by providing core on-chain execution capabilities; and **Xgent**, an Autonomous Financial Runtime. Xgent allows users to define investment goals and constraints, then autonomously constructs and manages the execution logic—moving from **Intent to Execution Graph to Verification to Autonomous Execution**. The long-term vision is to create the "Bloomberg Terminal for Autonomous Finance"—an operating environment not for humans, but for agents and execution nodes. The future financial system, they argue, will be a collaborative network built by diverse participants contributing execution capabilities, not secret strategies. The core competition will shift to who builds the most powerful and adaptive execution network.

链捕手17m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System from First Principles

链捕手17m ago

First Long-Horizon Doc2Repo Training Dataset: Code Agents Move Beyond Bug Fixing and Begin Creating Repositories

With the advancement of LLM Code Agents, the research focus is shifting towards long-horizon, real-world tasks, moving beyond simple bug fixes to full repository generation. To address this, researchers from Renmin University of China introduced the DeNovoSWE dataset. This dataset focuses on long-term software engineering tasks, specifically the "document-to-repository" challenge—generating an entire, executable code repository from a task description. The DeNovoSWE construction method employs a Divide & Conquer approach. It breaks down target repositories into core capabilities and uses a multi-agent Draft-Critic-Repair workflow to automatically generate high-quality, evaluation-aligned task documents. The dataset also implements difficulty-aware filtering to balance quality and diversity. The result is a high-quality, anti-leakage dataset of 4,818 instances. Experiments show that models trained on DeNovoSWE achieve significant improvements in long-horizon repository generation. For instance, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct's performance on the BeyondSWE-Doc2Repo benchmark increased from 5.8% to 47.2%, and on NL2RepoBench from 4.3% to 23.0%. Similar gains were observed with stronger backbones, demonstrating that dedicated long-horizon training data is crucial for advancing Code Agents from maintainers to architects capable of planning and building complete software projects from scratch.

marsbit32m ago

First Long-Horizon Doc2Repo Training Dataset: Code Agents Move Beyond Bug Fixing and Begin Creating Repositories

marsbit32m ago

Even CZ Praised Hyperliquid as 'Awesome', But Its Biggest Moat Might Also Be Its Biggest Risk

In an episode of Galaxy Brains, Binance founder CZ praised Hyperliquid as "awesome" but clarified that while its product is strong, Binance cannot compete in its specific niche due to Hyperliquid's no-KYC, decentralized model. CZ noted he would not personally operate such a model, highlighting the inherent legal and compliance risks tied to its access advantage. The discussion underscores a core market structure conflict: on-chain perp platforms like Hyperliquid thrive on open, low-barrier access, which regulated exchanges like Binance cannot replicate without abandoning their global compliance posture. However, this very advantage makes Hyperliquid a clear target for regulatory scrutiny. The UK FCA has already issued a warning against Hyperliquid for potentially offering unauthorized services to UK users, framing it as a financial services provider rather than neutral infrastructure. Historical cases like the CFTC's action against bZeroX and Ooki DAO further illustrate that regulators may pursue decentralized structures if they facilitate leveraged trading for retail users without proper controls. Meanwhile, regulated venues like Cboe are developing US-compliant "continuous futures" that mimic perpetual exposure, narrowing the product gap. Hyperliquid's long-term edge may increasingly hinge on its access model—the very feature most exposed to regulatory pressure. The key question is whether its "access premium" can withstand escalating legal challenges as on-chain perps gain mainstream attention.

marsbit51m ago

Even CZ Praised Hyperliquid as 'Awesome', But Its Biggest Moat Might Also Be Its Biggest Risk

marsbit51m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片