DEX活动以费用形式从Solana提取了5.18亿美元

币界网Published on 2024-08-14Last updated on 2024-08-14

币界网报道:

费用对一些网络来说是个好消息,因为它们标志着活动。高昂的费用也会重新分配代币,创造出一类新的潜在持有者或卖家。

Solana费用是激励网络参与者的必要条件。DEX和其他应用程序可能会增加自己的费用来激励流动性提供商,或者只是提高他们的底线。费用被视为区块链的看涨信号,表明活动水平很高。就Solana而言,交易费是对最终用户的一种隐性税,最终会重新分配SOL代币。

在网络的整个生命周期内,去中心化的交易、交换和模因币活动导致了超过5亿美元的总费用。

与此同时,与其他网络相比,Solana的基本交易费用仍然很低。然而,除了简单的交易之外,任何事情都包括额外的付款。

除了优先费和验证者小费外,最终用户还需要支付Raydium费用。这确保了他们的交易将被包含在一个区块中,而不会受到三明治交易机器人的攻击。总体而言,Solana连锁店也存在效率低下的问题,一些人认为这对内部人士有利。

因此,索拉纳的项目很快就变成了重要的鲸鱼。为了为其运营提供资金,他们也可能决定出售SOL并实现收益。

Pump.fun实现创纪录的活动和收入

Pump.fun是最成功的Solana应用程序之一,每天有超过4.8万活跃用户。截至2024年8月,Pump.fun在区块链上排名第三,仅次于领先的DEX Raydium和Jupiter聚合器。

Pump.fun还通过提供高风险的投资机会和简单的代币铸造过程,帮助人们增加了对Solana的关注。Meme代币活动将Pump.fun变成了一个胖费应用程序。

最近,批评者还指出,Pump.fun上加速代币创建使该应用程序变得毫无意义,不是为了优化用户体验,而是为了产生费用。如果Pump.fun的收益按年计算,该应用程序可能会产生高达3亿美元的加密收入。一些人猜测,流动性可能被用作国库,而Pump.fun正准备推出一种本地代币。

在过去的一周里,Pump.fun也实现了创纪录的每日收入,超过530万美元,在费用方面有着显著的每日基线活动。随着时间的推移,Pump.fun变成了鲸鱼,占SOL总供应量的0.1%。Pump.fun清算了USDC的部分费用,自成立以来已实现约8000万美元的费用流入。

Solana持有者呼吁模因代币回归质量

用户注意到的一个问题是,高周转率导致最终用户支付过多的优先费,以避免交易失败。但Solana的优先费不一定包括区块中的交易。相反,它们最终会进入领先应用程序的底线。

Pump.fun的另一个问题是,它避免了过滤任何发布,而是依靠用户支付费用来选择一个成功的新模因代币。提取的SOL不会丢失,但会将令牌转移回应用程序所有者或验证器。用户呼吁采用新的发布方式,Pump.fun可能会专注于质量和审查新的发布。

JitoSOL是另一个受益于Solana日益增长的活动的实体。在过去的一周里,验证器的周费用达到了1260万美元,主要来自区块包含的直接提示。JitoSOL的每周费用可能会与包括以太坊(ETH)在内的加密货币领域最大的费用生产者竞争。对于终端用户来说,这也意味着在汇率方面,使用Solana可能与使用以太坊没有什么不同。

验证器和应用程序的高昂费用也意味着Solana网络本身的收益为负。以新发行的SOL代币支付奖励,以及验证器激励,都被协议本身所吸收。

Solana链仍然记录了大约39%的失败交易,而个人用户报告了数百次与基于Solana的应用程序交互失败的尝试。尽管遭遇挫折,SOL仍在其正常区间交易。SOL略低于其月度范围,为146.58美元。


Hristina Vasileva的加密货币报道

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit1h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit1h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手3h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片