一周飙升141%,SUI能否成为「Solana杀手」?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-08-14Last updated on 2024-08-14

Abstract

一种看涨 SUI 的情绪似乎正在弥漫。

原文作者:Frank,PANews

Sui 在社交媒体最近的热度颇高,有不少人将 Sui 比作“Solana 杀手”,并通过对 Sui 的网络性能和 SUI 代币的 K 线走势作出许多分析,一种看涨 SUI 的情绪似乎正在弥漫。但这种说法真的能够站得住脚吗?Sui 的生态发展究竟如何?

百万大 V 唱多背后身份为 Sui 基金会董事

对于唱多 SUI 的言论最早来自在推特上具有百万粉丝的 Real Vision 创始人兼首席执行官 Raoul Pal, 8 月 9 日,他在推特上连发多条推文,通过对比 SUI 代币与其他多个主流公链的治理代币的走势图后,他得出的结论是:“$SUI 从价格的角度来看,它开始变得非常有趣,尽管还为时尚早,尚未得到证实,但它已经显示出与大多数代币相比的突破迹象。”

一周飙升141%,SUI能否成为「Solana杀手」?

SUI 的价格走势近期的确表现不俗,自 8 月 5 日创造近期低点 0.4625 美元后开始强势反弹,至 8 月 12 日数据显示,SUI 价格最高达到 1.1174 美元。一周内的涨幅超过 141% 。在主流公链的代币中涨幅最高。不过这一价格与今年 3 月份创造的 2.18 美元的高点相比仍具有很大差距。此前,SUI 代币自 2024 年 3 月 27 日涨至 2.18 美元后一路下滑,最低跌至 0.46 美元。半年内的跌幅超过 78.8% 。

一周飙升141%,SUI能否成为「Solana杀手」?

SUI 的突出表现或许是来自灰度的认可, 8 月 7 日,灰度宣布推出两款新的加密投资产品,SUI 代币的信托产品。灰度产品和研究主管 Rayhaneh Sharif-Askary 在一份声明中表示:“我们很高兴将 Bittensor 和 Sui 添加到我们的产品套件中,并相信 Bittensor 是去中心化 AI 发展的核心,而 Sui 正在重新定义智能合约区块链”。受此消息影响,SUI 的价格在 8 月 8 日大涨 42% ,创下近期单日最高涨幅。

灰度的加密投资产品目前共有 18 款,主要包括 Solana、莱特币等主流公链项目。

Raoul Pal 在推特上表示,“我在寻找下一个 SOL 类型机会的主要代币,而 SUI 就是其中之一。”不过,Raoul Pal 的喊单也引发了一些质疑,他本人也说明,他是 Sui 基金会的董事,与 Sui 生态存在利益关系。

Mechanism Capital 联合创始人 Andrew Kang 在推特上列举了 5 个 Sui 近期上涨的原因,其中包括 Raoul Pal 的支持、大量场外交易需求、大规模解锁后持有者保持强劲、SUI 价格走势未出现回调、Mysiceti 性能升级。不过,就关于 SUI 将超过 Solana 的论调, Andrew Kang 表示,“我并不认为 SUI 的市值会与 SOL 持平,但它的市值是 SOL 的 3.5% 。”

除了诸多 KOL 的唱多之外,Sui 生态近期也有一些动态发生, 8 月 9 日,Sui 生态域名服务 SuiNS 宣布重组为去中心化协议,将允许用户通过协议代币 NS 进行治理。并计划将 10% 的代币 空投给社区。8 月 13 日,CoinList 推出质押基金,首批支持五种加密资产,包括 ETH、SOL、NEAR、SUI、MINA。

数据对比远不及 Solana,与 TON 持平

不过,Sui 生态是否在近期突飞猛进,亦或看涨多属于“烟雾弹”而已?PANews 就 Sui、Solana、TON 的几个指标进行了对比(数据采集为 8 月 12 日)。

一周飙升141%,SUI能否成为「Solana杀手」?

从交易量和交易笔数来看,SUI 与 Solana 仍具有不小的差距,尤其 24 小时的交易额仅为 Solana 的约 5% 。鉴于 TON 在前段时间的生态表现和二级市场价格都较为出众(也一度被称为 Solana 杀手),可以看到 Sui 的整体数据表现与 TON 的表现更为接近,甚至 Sui 在多个方面的指标似乎都略有领先。但流通市值上 SUI 却和 TON 有着较大的区别,SUI 的流通市值仅为 25 亿美元,而 TON 的流通市值约为 159 亿美元,两者相差 6.4 倍,追赶上 Ton 的市值或是 SUI 的上涨空间。但考虑到 TON 背靠 Telegram 的 9 亿用户,因此比其他公链的估值有更多溢价空间。

大额解锁竟解读为利好?

SUI 代币的解锁问题也成为许多 KOL 看涨的理由, 8 月 1 日,SUI 解锁月 5389 万枚代币,占流动量的 2.56% ,价值约 5060 万美元。看涨 SUI 的人认为,这些代币解锁后市场并未迎来巨大的抛压,是市场向好的原因。而持反对观点的人则认为,SUI 代币不仅 8 月解锁,后续每个月都将迎来代币解锁,这只是主力在出货前制造声势来拉高预期的方式而已。也有用户质疑 Sui 基金会近期通过有偿的方式吸引 KOL 推销 SUI 代币。

一周飙升141%,SUI能否成为「Solana杀手」?

一周飙升141%,SUI能否成为「Solana杀手」?

此外,值得关注的是,自 8 月 5 日以来,SUI 的合约持仓量迎来大量上涨,以币安永续合约交易对为例, 8 月 5 日 SUI 合约持仓量为 2846 万张,到 8 月 12 日涨至 1 亿张。同时,资金费率保持负值。这一数据现象说明大批量的空头仓位正支付费用持仓。

一周飙升141%,SUI能否成为「Solana杀手」?

从链上的数据来看,Sui 的发展在近半年确实迎来了较大的进步,尤其是在 5 月份通过 SPAM(垃圾邮件)的模式曾一度日交易笔数超过 7000 万,超过 Solana 等所有公链。虽然此后数据有所下滑至 700 万笔左右。但仍远高于 5 月前的几十万笔。同样,活跃地址数也迎来大幅增长。但整体的量级仍和 Solana 相差较大,尤其是代表生态内活跃度的每日新发代币数量,只有 30 个左右,而 Solana 的这一数据则在 20000 个左右。

综合来看,Sui 距离成为“Solana 杀手”还言之尚早,TON 可能才是 Sui 真正可以对比的直接竞争者。

原文链接

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit2h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit2h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手3h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片