Justin Sun入局WBTC,为何触动了加密市场的“敏感神经”?

币界网Published on 2024-08-12Last updated on 2024-08-12

币界网报道:

作者:BlockBeats

昨日,BitGo 官方博客显示,BitGo 和 BiT Global 正在创建一家合资企业,以实现 WBTC 跨多个司法管辖区的托管业务和冷存储业务多元化,BitGo 将成为新合资企业的少数股东。据悉,BiT Global 是一家总部位于香港的受监管信托和公司服务提供商 (TCSP),与 Justin Sun 和 Tron 生态系统为战略合作关系。

消息一出,用户推测 Justin Sun 可能在管理 WBTC 的合资企业中拥有重大影响力或控制权。此事对 DeFi 市场影响重大,市场担忧 WBTC 的控制权转移到他的手中,会带来不可预期的风险。

Jupiter 联合创始人 meow 在社交媒体发表「致 WBTC 新旧托管人的一封信」,表示 WBTC 托管的比特币不应被用于其他用途,希望 BitGo 能够澄清社区质疑。

Justin Sun入局WBTC,为何触动了加密市场的“敏感神经”?

随后,WBTC 最大的承兑商 MakerDAO 拟发起提案以减少 WBTC 担保品规模,应对托管权变更潜在风险。

同日,Justin Sun 于 X 平台发文回应,表示「个人参与 WBTC 出于战略考虑,并不控制 WBTC 储备私钥」。但这似乎并没有打消人们的疑虑。

Justin Sun入局WBTC,为何触动了加密市场的“敏感神经”?

今日,BitGo 的首席执行官宣布 Mike Belshe 淡化了 Justin Sun 在合资企业中的参与,并强调了 BitGo 对安全性的长期承诺。Belshe 表示:「BiT Global 有一个专门的团队管理多个客户账户,他们有责任确保安全保管。他们不能将资金借出,不能随意把资金给 Justin Sun、我或其他任何人,否则就会违反法律并面临入狱的风险。」他还说:「在审计方面,我们一直有 wbtc.network,这将继续运行。」

BlockBeats 对链上数据师和一些加密 KOL 对本事件的看法和分析进行了整理,供读者参考了解:

Ai 姨(链上数据师)

今天有不少关于「WBTC 托管权变更」的讨论——MakerDAO 新提案考虑关闭新 WBTC 借贷,并把 Spark 的 WBTC 借贷比例降低为 0;孙哥出面澄清,Jupiter 联创也发文表达了质疑。

本条推文将梳理 $WBTC 相关数据,方便大家更了解这个眼熟却有些陌生的资产,对于当前的加密生态有多重要。

1/ WBTC 的起源

WBTC (Wrapped Bitcoin) 是一种在以太坊网络上发行的 ER20 代币,其价值与比特币一比一挂钩;每个 WBTC 都有相应的比特币作为储备,通过托管机构进行管理 (当前为 Bitgo),确保 WBTC 的持有者可以随时将其兑换为比特币。

WBTC 最早在 2017 年提出,并在 2019 年正式发布白皮书并投入使用,到 2020 年锁仓 BTC 规模就已突破 21 亿美元,是当之无愧的「比特币与以太坊的桥梁」。

2/ WBTC 数据情况

当前 WBTC 已支持 Ethereum / Base / Kave / Osmosis/ Tron 网络,其中以太坊主网铸造占比高达 99.8%,截止至今天已铸造 154,726 枚 WBTC(价值 94.5 亿美金),占比特币总市值的 0.78%。

Justin Sun入局WBTC,为何触动了加密市场的“敏感神经”?

Dune 面板「WBTC: Supply Dynamics」数据显示,目前超 41% 的 WBTC 用于借贷生态,其中最大的使用场景 (承兑商) 就是 MakerDAO,另外近 32% 的用于直接交易。

数据面板:https://dune.com/21co/wbtc

Justin Sun入局WBTC,为何触动了加密市场的“敏感神经”?

3/ WBTC 校对信息

目前对于 WBTC 安全性和实际使用的影响暂不明朗,如果你想进一步了解 WBTC 合作方 / 铸造与销毁具体交易 / BTC 托管地址等内容,都可以前往 https://wbtc.network/dashboard 找到相关信息,官方已经披露得很完整了。

Justin Sun入局WBTC,为何触动了加密市场的“敏感神经”?

部分海外用户反馈,可见 WBTC 对于整个 DeFi 系统具有重大意义:

Justin Sun入局WBTC,为何触动了加密市场的“敏感神经”?

Justin Sun入局WBTC,为何触动了加密市场的“敏感神经”?

刘峰(BODL 基金创始人)

WBTC 的推出,是以太坊 DeFi 生态迸射出巨大活力之前的孕育时期中最重要的标志事件之一。

那是 2018 年下半年市场最寒冷之时,BitGo 联合当时尚处襁褓、但已开始显现活力的 DeFi 协议共同推出了 WBTC,通过相对中心化、但是参与方口碑都算不错的方式,将 BTC 资产引入了以太坊生态。

现在情况大变。

简单的说,BitGo 带着 WBTC 走进了 Justin Sun 的家门:铸造 WBTC 需要锁定的那些珍贵的比特币,未来多了一个托管服务商——一家来自香港的叫 BiT Global 的公司。

重点是:这家 BiT Global 是 BitGo 和 Justin Sun 的合资公司。问题是,BiT Global 靠谱吗?

BigGo 公告说,BiT Global 是香港的「TCSP(信託或公司服务提供者)」持牌公司,看着挺唬人。。。但是,TCSP 牌照有含金量吗。。。反正我看到的数据是:这个牌照 2018 年推出,截至 2020 年 9 月,发了 7300 多个牌照。。。

你们自己品品吧。

对了,我看到的信息是,BiT Global 是 2023 年 8 月 9 号注册成立的。当月还有一个重要新闻:BitGo 之前因为未能按时拿出审计报表,被 Galaxy Ditigal 取消了收购协议,打官司又未能胜诉,只好中止自己对 Prime Trust 的收购,并且裁员、减成本、找钱自救,最后在 23 年 8 月宣布融到了 1 亿美元。

Justin Sun入局WBTC,为何触动了加密市场的“敏感神经”?

BitGo 在 2023 年 8 月宣布这比融资的时候,羞答答不公布究竟谁是这一轮的投资人。后来有消息指出来,新的投资人中,有来自亚洲。现在看,很可能孙哥那个时候,已经染指 BitGo 了。这只是猜测。BitGo 是中心化托管商,WBTC 是中心化的合成资产。我觉得,BitGo 有责任说明白这些安排,否则。。。

水滴资本 CEO 大山也在评论区发表了自己的看法:

Justin Sun入局WBTC,为何触动了加密市场的“敏感神经”?

Insight 财经

比特币下挫,WBTC 引发剧震。

事件起因:BitGOB 宣布计划将 WBTC 产品的控制权转让给与 BiT Global 的合资企业。BitGlobal 是由 Justin Sun 控制的企业,市场出于对 Justin Sun 的不信任,准备抛售 WBTC。

MakerDao 发布提案抛售:

DeFi 项目 MakerDAO 的社区发起了一个提案,提议清除 Maker 抵押仓中的 WBTC。提案一出,引发业内巨大震动。毕竟,Maker 是行业内最大的抵押借贷协议,目前还在链上管理着近 50 亿美刀的各类数字资产。而 WBTC 则是以太坊链上最大的 BTC 跨链资产,目前管理着超过 15 万枚 BTC,总价值近 100 亿美刀。

WBTC 或导致大量 Defi 项目,L2 项目处于风险中:目前很多 Defi 项目,会选择 WBTC 从以太坊流入,一旦 WBTC 托锚,大多数项目都会受到牵连。就像集束炸弹暴涨一样。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

"Rented Faith: How Much of Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money?" Bitcoin ETF inflows are often seen as a barometer of institutional conviction. However, week-to-week analysis reveals they are primarily driven by a hidden arbitrage trade rather than directional bullishness. This is the cash-and-carry trade: buying the ETF while simultaneously shorting Bitcoin futures on the CME to lock in the price difference (basis). This delta-neutral activity registers as ETF inflows but reflects a rate-seeking, not price-betting, strategy. Data shows weekly ETF flow volatility is closely tied to hedge fund ("leveraged funds") short positions on CME futures, with a correlation of 0.70. About half of weekly flow variation can be explained by this single factor. In contrast, Bitcoin's weekly price changes have no statistically significant power to predict flows. Crucially, while this arbitrage trade dominates weekly *fluctuations*, it is not the main component of the cumulative *stock*. Of the ~$55 billion total net inflow, the estimated net arbitrage position is only about $1 billion. The vast majority is steady, directional buying averaging ~$400 million per week. Thus, ETF flows overstate the *volatility* of belief, not its *level*. The "rented" arbitrage capital churns, while "owned" directional capital forms the bedrock. This arbitrage trade has been unwinding for two years, with hedge fund shorts peaking at ~$14 billion in late 2024 and falling to ~$4.5 billion. Recent outflows align with basis compression, signaling the trade's exit, not a loss of faith. For Ethereum ETFs, the same dynamic is weaker due to negative carry from forgone staking yield. The key takeaway: To interpret ETF flows, watch the basis vs. Treasury yields and CME hedge fund net shorts. They reveal how much of the weekly "demand" headline is driven by rented, rate-seeking capital versus real conviction.

链捕手16m ago

Borrowed Faith: How Much of the Bitcoin ETF Flows Are Real Money

链捕手16m ago

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

Title: Two Giants "Credit" Surge: Loan Balances of 99 Billion vs. 146 Billion USD, Brazil Emerges as Main Battlefield Summary: The article compares the rapid expansion of credit businesses by two major e-commerce and fintech players, Sea (via Monee) and Mercado Libre (via Mercado Pago), in overseas markets like Southeast Asia and Latin America, contrasting with a slowing domestic Chinese credit market. Using Q1 2026 financial data, it highlights their significant growth. Sea's Monee reached a loan balance of $99 billion, up 71% year-over-year (YoY), contributing 17.5% to Sea's total revenue. Mercado Pago's loan balance hit $146 billion, up 87% YoY, contributing 45% to its parent company's revenue. Both maintained stable risk metrics (e.g., Monee's 90+ day NPL at 1.1%) despite rapid scaling. Brazil is identified as a key and accelerating growth market for both. Sea's Brazilian operations saw loan volumes exceed $10 billion, growing 250% YoY, with SPayLater GMV penetration still low (~10%) indicating high potential. Sea also secured a key Brazilian financial credit license (SCFI). Mercado Libre's Brazil segment contributed over half (54%) of total group revenue, with its credit business there generating $11.24 billion in revenue, up 89% YoY and accounting for 12.7% of global revenue. Mercado Pago's credit portfolio, especially credit cards (46% of loans, +105% YoY), is a strategic focus, described as crucial as building logistics was a decade ago. Its net interest margin after loss (NIMAL) remains high at 17.8%. The article concludes that while Brazil presents immense opportunities, the success is largely driven by these integrated "e-commerce + fintech" giants with proprietary transaction data and ecosystems, making it challenging for standalone fintech players to compete effectively.

链捕手38m ago

Two Giants' Credit Expansion: Loan Balances of $9.9 Billion vs. $14.6 Billion, Brazil Emerges as the Main Battlefield

链捕手38m ago

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

Bernstein analyst Stacy A. Rasgon published a report on June 18 regarding Intel, assessing the potential impact of recent political support for a US-based PC chip design and manufacturing collaboration between Apple and Intel. The report views this as a significant signal for the foundry landscape shift but concludes the initial financial contribution would be minimal. Key conclusions: 1) An Apple deal is seen as a small-scale "proof of concept." Even if Intel wins 40% of Apple's premium notebook chip orders (~5 million units/year), Bernstein estimates it would generate only about $500M in annual revenue and ~$0.03 EPS, negligible against Intel's ~$55B revenue. 2) Political encouragement is not equivalent to enforceable mandates. Winning orders ultimately depends on Intel demonstrating competitive technology (like its 18A node), cost, and reliable supply. 3) The path from validation to large-scale production involves significant challenges, capital investment, and time. Due to these uncertainties, Bernstein maintains a Market-Perform (Hold) rating with a $100 price target, implying potential downside from the ~$121.10 price at the report date. The analysis highlights the tension between near-term validation value—serving as a crucial trust signal for Intel's foundry ambitions and US supply chain resilience—and the long-term opportunity to attract larger cloud and AI chip customers. The investment thesis hinges on successful 18A execution and sustained policy support, not on immediate financial gains from Apple.

marsbit1h ago

Research Report Analysis: Is Intel Making a Comeback with Apple? Bernstein's Calculations Show the Right Direction, but the Price Is Already Overvalued

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy SUN

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing SUN (SUN) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy SUN (SUN) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your SUN (SUN)After purchasing your SUN (SUN), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade SUN (SUN)Easily trade SUN (SUN) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

7.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy SUN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SUN (SUN) are presented below.

活动图片