SOL 价格反转低于 50% ,会跌破100美元吗?

金色财经Published on 2024-08-12Last updated on 2024-08-12

bd5ae148c3ada1afdd415f09676b24ac.png

随着比特币的周收盘价跌破 60,000 美元,更广泛的市场情绪难以转绿。

此外,ETF 市场显示出比特币和以太坊 ETF 的疲软。这种疲软是否会导致 Solana 再次出现看跌走势,最终将 SOL 价格跌至 100 美元以下?让我们仔细看看 Solana 价格图表,找出潜在风险。

Solana 价格表现

继最近从 193 美元的高点跌至 115 美元的低点,跌幅达 40% 之后,Solana 的反弹重新点燃了人们的希望。随着 V 型复苏,SOL 价格跃升至 163 美元的水平,3 天内上涨了 40%。

b61d3604f00730fcd77106e581e605f7.png

然而,随着供应的增加,看涨势头迅速消退,炒作也随之降温。尽管复苏势头在 4 小时图中超过了 50 和 200 EMA,但逆转使 SOL 价格回落至 150 美元以下。

近期调整期间的斐波那契回撤水平表明,流入供应量在 61.80% 水平处激增。此外,它使 Solana 跌至 38.20% 斐波那契水平以下。

由于目前维持在 140 美元以上是对突破 38.20% 斐波那契水平的重新测试,因此下行风险加大。

技术指标:

RSI:4 小时 RSI 线在达到超卖边界线之前停止,出现小幅上涨。然而,这只会增加下行潜力,在 SOL 价格达到超卖类别之前可能会出现额外损失。

EMA:V 型复苏未能推翻 50 和 200 EMA 的排列,持续的修正扩大了差距。因此,4 小时图中的动态平均线现在充当了看跌阻力位。

SOL 价格会达到 100 美元吗?

如果未能积累足够的看涨势头来吸收即将到来的供应浪潮,Solana 的下跌可能会持续下去。然而,在 23.60% 斐波纳契水平 133 美元的看涨主导地位是一个关键的十字路口。跌破 133 美元将考验 115 美元的水平。不过,逆转反弹可能会收复 150 美元,并在未来几周内跃升至 180 美元。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbit53m ago

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbit53m ago

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbit1h ago

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片