融资动态:加密货币流动资金大举押注Solana

marsbitPublished on 2024-08-11Last updated on 2024-08-12

本周早些时候,加密货币市场大幅下跌,随后反弹,比特币下跌超过 15%,以太币经历了自 FTX 崩盘以来的最大跌幅。此次抛售是由更广泛的经济担忧和地缘政治因素引发的,增加了市场的不确定性。出于好奇,这些事件是否引发了加密货币基金策略的重大转变,我联系了管理流动性和对冲基金的领先加密货币投资者,了解他们未来的计划。

有趣的是,尽管市场最近出现动荡,几家加密货币基金仍然专注于基本面,并对Solana (SOL) 和DeFi领域持强烈的看涨立场。Asymmetric Financial的创始人、首席执行官兼首席投资官乔·麦肯(Joe McCann)告诉我,他的公司管理着两个分别拥有九位数和八位数资产管理规模的流动基金,继续投资于比特币,同时超配Solana。麦肯表示:“我们今年以来完全没有持有ETH,且认为未来没有任何理由持有它。SOL相对于ETH的相对价值刚刚突破至历史新高,验证了我们的论点,即SOL将继续大幅跑赢ETH。”

在Syncracy Capital,联合创始人瑞安·沃特金斯(Ryan Watkins)也表达了类似的观点,强调了Solana相对于以太坊的低估。他告诉我:“Solana现在在大多数重要指标上与以太坊不相上下,但其估值却只有以太坊的五分之一。”沃特金斯还对Solana的生态系统表示乐观,称其同样被“误价”,相较于以太坊的生态系统,“有一些协议产生了1000万至5000万美元的收益,年增长率达到100%至1000%,其估值与标普500指数成倍数相当,远低于以太坊上的同类协议。”

沃特金斯还指出了DeFi和基础设施领域,指出Syncracy正在观察到这些领域产生了八位数到九位数的收益,且年增长率达到了三位数。他表示:“我们对这些领先类别、现金流充裕的资产非常看好。”沃特金斯补充说,Syncracy管理着一个资产管理规模为九位数的流动基金。

同样,Multicoin Capital的管理合伙人凯尔·萨马尼(Kyle Samani)重申了该公司对Solana的承诺,同时对去中心化物理和虚拟基础设施网络项目(DePINs和DeVINs)以及稳定币的信心也有所增强。

Maven 11的投资组合经理鲁本·范登埃绍夫(Ruben van den Eshof)指出,全球利率宽松周期是稳定币和DeFi增长的催化剂。他告诉我,随着更多的降息预期,稳定币市场可能会进一步增长,这将显著促进DeFi的发展。范登埃绍夫表示,Maven 11正相应地进行布局,配置了像Maker这样的稳定币以及Maple Finance等市值较低的DeFi代币。

DeFiance Capital的创始人、CEO兼CIO Arthur Cheong表示,该公司的关注点最近转向了DeFi,原因是DeFi具有强大的产品市场契合度和吸引人的估值。Cheong说:“相对于我们追踪的各种指标和市场表现,DeFi目前的估值处于自2020年以来的最低水平。”另一方面,DeFiance减少了对加密货币与人工智能(crypto-AI)领域的敞口,因为该领域需要更实质的增长和验证才能支撑更高的估值。Cheong补充说,DeFiance管理着一个资产管理规模为“高八位数”的流动基金。

Pantera Capital的投资组合经理Cosmo Jiang强调了公司对基本面的持续关注,特别是在区块空间(blockspace)、DeFi、去中心化物理基础设施网络(DePINs)和人工智能领域。Jiang表示,Pantera的投资涵盖了Solana、Toncoin、Hivemapper、Geodnet、Near和Bittensor,反映出对多个领域的广泛兴趣。Jiang还提到,Pantera管理着一系列主动与被动、开放式与封闭式的投资工具,总资产管理规模超过10亿美元。

最后,Founders Fund的Joey Krug告诉我,他个人增加了对“蓝筹”DeFi资产的配置,包括Uniswap、Fantom和Akash,这些资产都具有中长期的潜在催化剂。他表示,尽管他的ETH敞口仍然很高,但他已经减少了比特币的持仓。Krug说:“这主要是因为我认为山寨币相对于比特币已经相对触底,提供了增加敞口的良好机会。”

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片