加密市场震荡后,资金投资重心转向 Solana 与 DeFi

marsbitPublished on 2024-08-11Last updated on 2024-08-11

本周早些时候,加密货币市场大幅下跌,随后反弹,比特币下跌超过 15%,以太币经历了自 FTX 崩盘以来的最大跌幅。此次抛售是由更广泛的经济担忧和地缘政治因素引发的,增加了市场的不确定性。出于好奇,这些事件是否引发了加密货币基金策略的重大转变,我联系了管理流动性和对冲基金的领先加密货币投资者,了解他们未来的计划。

有趣的是,尽管市场最近动荡不安,但几家加密基金仍继续关注基本面,对Solana (SOL)和 DeFi 领域持强烈看涨立场。Asymmetric Financial 创始人、首席执行官兼首席信息官 Joe McCann 告诉我,他的公司管理着两只流动基金,资产管理规模 (AUM) 分别为 9 位数和 8 位数,他们仍在投资比特币,同时增持 Solana。“我们持有的以太坊为零”,麦肯说:“我认为未来完全没有理由继续持有它。Solana与 ETH 相比,SOL 刚刚突破至历史新高,验证了我们的论点,即 SOL 将继续大幅超越 ETH。”

Syncracy Capital 联合创始人 Ryan Watkins 也表达了同样的看法,他强调 Solana 相对于以太坊而言被低估了。他告诉我,“Solana 现在在大多数有意义的指标上都可以与以太坊相媲美,但交易价格仅为以太坊的 1/5。”Watkins 还对 Solana 的生态系统表示乐观,称与以太坊的生态系统相比,它的定价同样“错误”,“少数协议产生了 1000 万至 5000 万美元的收益,同比增长 100% 至 1000%,交易价格为标准普尔 500 指数的倍数——仅为以太坊同行的一小部分。”

沃特金斯还指出了 DeFi 和基础设施领域,并指出 Syncracy 观察到这些领域的收益为 8-9 位数,并且同比增长率达到三位数。“我们非常看好这些类别领先的现金流资产,”他说。沃特金斯补充说,Syncracy 管理着一只流动基金,资产管理规模为 9 位数。

同样,Multicoin Capital 的执行合伙人 Kyle Samani 重申了该公司对 Solana 的承诺,同时也表达了对去中心化物理和虚拟基础设施网络项目(DePIN 和 DeVIN)以及稳定币的信心增强

Maven 11 的投资组合经理 Ruben van den Eshof 指出,全球利率下调周期是稳定币和 DeFi 增长的催化剂。他告诉我,随着预期进一步降息,稳定币市场可能会进一步增长,这将极大地有利于 DeFi。Maven 11 正在相应地进行定位,将资金分配给 Maker 等稳定币和 Maple Finance 等市值较低的 DeFi 代币,van den Eshof 说道。

DeFiance Capital 创始人、首席执行官兼首席信息官 Arthur Cheong 分享说,该公司的重点最近转向了 DeFi,理由是其强大的产品市场契合度和诱人的估值。Cheong 说:“相对于我们跟踪的各种指标/吸引力,DeFi 的估值是 2020 年以来的最低水平。”另一方面,Cheong 补充说,由于需要更切实的增长和验证才能获得更高的估值,DeFiance 减少了对加密人工智能领域的投资。DeFiance 管理着一只流动基金,其资产管理规模为“8 位数高”。

Pantera Capital 的投资组合经理 Cosmo Jiang 强调,该公司将继续关注基本面,特别是在区块空间、DeFi、DePIN 和人工智能领域。Jiang 表示,Pantera 的投资领域包括 Solana、Toncoin、Hivemapper、Geodnet、Near 和 Bittensor,反映出其对不同行业的广泛兴趣。Jiang 表示,Pantera 管理着主动与被动、开放式与封闭式投资工具的组合,总资产管理规模超过 10 亿美元。

最后,Founders Fund 的 Joey Krug 告诉我,他个人增加了对“蓝筹” DeFi 资产的配置,包括 Uniswap、Fantom 和 Akash,每一种资产都有着良好的中长期催化剂。他说,虽然他的 ETH 敞口仍然很高,但 Krug 已经减少了比特币的持仓。“这主要是因为我认为山寨币相对于比特币已经相对触底,这为增加敞口提供了一个很好的机会,”Krug 说。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit1h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit1h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片