随着PlusToken骗局再次浮出水面,以太坊没有休息:20亿美元的ETH正在移动

币界网Published on 2024-08-08Last updated on 2024-08-08

币界网报道:
    在以太坊转账20亿美元后,ETH面临抛售担忧。PlusToken庞氏骗局链接钱包在3年后移动

在过去的一周里,加密货币市场经历了黑暗的日子。三天前,在日本市场崩盘和对美国经济衰退的担忧之后,加密货币市场受到宏观经济逆风的冲击。

在这些日益严峻的宏观经济挑战中,以太坊[ETH]受到的外部因素打击最大,如跳跃加密和现在的PlusToken庞氏骗局。

PlusToken的20亿美元ETH转账

ETH成为头条新闻,分析师报告称,与2018年至2019年在中国运营的PlusToken庞氏骗局相关的以太坊钱包已经转移。

庞氏骗局导致中国当局扣押了40亿美元的加密货币。据报道,三年多后,钱包首次被移动。

2020年,中国当局没收了833083枚ETH,按目前的市场价格计算,价值超过20亿美元。该报告首先出现在Lookonchain,并补充说,数百个与加号庞氏骗局有关的钱包正在移动。

然而,另一位分析师向X澄清了这个问题,并补充说,大部分ETH已经被扣押,目前仍有价值6300万美元的ETH在流动。

EmberCN通过X账户澄清了这些报道,并表示,

“大致追踪到过去30小时内收集了约12个与Plus Token相关的ETH地址,总计25757个ETH(6310万美元)。其中部分ETH在2021年没有转移到Bidesk;部分ETH从Bidesk撤回,但没有转移到Huobi。”

然而,Arkham Intelligence对这一分析提出异议,并补充说,在过去24小时内,超过4.5亿美元的ETH发生了转移。阿卡姆通过X指出,

“超过4.5亿美元的PLUSTOKEN资金流动。仅在过去12小时内,Plustonen钱包就与数十个移动4.647亿美元ETH的钱包连接。”

这一令人担忧的消息和相互矛盾的报道让ETH投资者、交易员和分析师担心潜在的抛售压力。

ETH在7月5日市场崩盘后经历了极端波动,达到2116美元的低点。虽然山寨币尚未完全从市场崩盘中恢复过来,但潜在价值20亿美元的ETH的消息加剧了市场的担忧和抛售压力。

这一消息导致交易量下降4.56%,至236亿美元,市值下降3.59%,至2911亿美元。

以太坊价格图表表明了什么

截至本文撰写时,ETH在3点后的交易价格为2421美元。日线图上下跌35%。同样,山寨币的市值在过去24小时内下降了3.79%,至2908亿美元,同期交易量下降了4.05%。

因此,AMBCrypto分析表明,下跌不是PlusToken运动后的孤立抛售,而是更广泛的价格调整。

RVGI低于零,为-3961,表明收盘价相对于交易区间较低。因此,市场正在经历强劲的看跌势头。

相对强弱指数也在26,这是一个超卖区,表明ETH经历了巨大的抛售压力。

在这个水平上,RSI表明抛售过度,潜在的逆转迫在眉睫,因为它为交易者提供了买入下跌的机会。

进一步看,我们对Cryptoquant的分析显示,过去七天,外汇外流有所下降。这表明交易员正在保持资产的流动性,以备潜在的抛售。

这种情绪表明,投资者对ETH的长期前景缺乏信心,因此将加密货币保持在可以轻松出售的地方。

此外,Coinglass的数据显示,ETH的未平仓合约在过去七天中有所下降。未平仓合约已从146亿美元的高点降至97亿美元。


阅读以太坊的[ETH]价格预测2024-25


未平仓合约的下降表明,投资者在没有开盘消息的情况下一直在积极平仓。

因此,尽管持有ETH的PlusToken庞氏骗局已经发生了变化,但ETH已经在经历衰退。因此,当前的价格走势并不是PlusToken庞氏骗局转移的孤立案例。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Does Every Great Financial Infrastructure Begin with a Speculative Frenzy?

The article "Does Every Great Financial Infrastructure Begin with a Speculative Frenzy?" explores the dual role of speculation in the development of financial markets, drawing parallels between historical examples and the current crypto industry. The author argues that while speculation is often dismissed as mere gambling, it frequently serves as a crucial precursor and foundation for building sustainable financial infrastructure. This is illustrated by historical cases like the 19th-century Chicago grain market, where speculators provided the necessary liquidity for the nascent futures market to function, eventually establishing a global price discovery system for wheat. Keynes's nuanced view is cited, highlighting that speculation becomes dangerous only when it detaches from underlying value; when anchored to real assets, it can play a constructive role. This pattern is now evident in crypto. Platforms like Hyperliquid, initially built for leveraged crypto speculation, have successfully expanded their model to perpetual contracts for real-world assets like equities and commodities. Similarly, Robinhood Chain, designed for tokenized stock trading, has leveraged a surge in Meme coin activity (exemplified by the FRONG token) to attract initial users and liquidity, which could later support its core securities trading vision. The piece contrasts this with purely speculative phenomena, like many short-lived Meme coins, which often fail to create lasting value. The central thesis is that speculation provides the initial capital, liquidity, and user attention. Whether this evolves into enduring infrastructure depends on the platform's ability to channel that energy towards valuable underlying assets. The trajectory of crypto platforms suggests that, much like in traditional finance, speculative frenzies can indeed lay the groundwork for significant financial innovation.

marsbit8m ago

Does Every Great Financial Infrastructure Begin with a Speculative Frenzy?

marsbit8m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片