随着Shiba枪战接近100万美元的里程碑,Popcat领先于Meme币的涨幅

币界网Published on 2024-08-07Last updated on 2024-08-07

币界网报道:

Meme币正在反弹,Popcat(Popcat)正在引领潮流。

这款以猫为主题的代币让所有人都感到惊讶,价格回升至0.579美元。

与此同时,Shiba Shootout(SHIBASHOOT)的预售也在加速,并迅速接近100万美元的融资里程碑。

Popcat以123%的涨幅荣登CoinMarketCap上涨榜榜首

Popcat正忙得不可开交。

目前,该股在CoinMarketCap的上涨股排行榜上名列前茅,从周一的低点上涨了123%,完全抹去了周末的跌幅。

随着POPCAT接近关键水平,技术分析师也在关注它。

它目前正在测试50天均线,这是中期趋势的指标。

从历史上看,当POPCAT突破这一水平时,通常标志着另一轮牛市的开始。

如果POPCAT能够突破这一动态阻力位,下一个目标可能是7月27日的0.95美元高点。

当然,这样的休息并不能保证。

拒绝50天均线也可能使POPCAT进入横盘整理期,因为它巩固了本周的涨幅。

无论接下来发生什么,投资者都对最近的价格走势感到兴奋。

这种兴奋不仅限于POPCAT。

Meme Coin行业反弹,市值回升至380亿美元以上

整个meme币行业又恢复了绿色,反映了我们在加密货币市场看到的更广泛的复苏。

该行业的总市值已回升至380亿美元以上,仅在过去24小时内,现货交易量就达到55亿美元。

现在几乎所有主要的模因币都在上涨。

WIF的表现尤为强劲,仅在最后一天就上涨了26%。

这种看涨只有少数例外,像PEPECOIN和TRUMP这样的硬币经历了小幅下跌。

这种模因币看涨似乎与市场情绪的更广泛转变有关。

人们越来越乐观地认为,美联储可能会在9月份将利率下调0.5%。

较低的利率往往有利于加密货币等“风险较高”的资产,因为投资者在传统投资之外寻求更好的回报。

因此,这种潜在的降息可能会转化为对模因币的需求浪潮。

此外,比特币自身的反弹正在拉高模因币空间。

BTC已回升至57000美元以上,较周一上涨15%。

比特币走向何方,模因币往往随之而来——这正是我们现在在市场上看到的。

狂野西部P2E游戏Shiba枪战病毒式传播并接近100万美元的预售里程碑

模因币的热情也使Shiba Shootout(SHIBASHOOT)等新项目受益。

Shiba Shootout在预售阶段迅速走红,已经筹集了88万美元。

SHIBASHOOT代币目前的价格为0.0198美元,预售有望很快达到100万美元大关。

该项目利用了以狗为主题的模因币的流行,但有一个转折:它也是一款以狂野西部为背景的P2E游戏。

玩家可以探索石坝峡谷,参加对决,并获得SHIBASHOOT代币。

Shiba Shootout生态系统有像Shiba元帅和Shiba神枪手这样的搞笑角色。

它还具有推荐“Posse Rewards”和社区建设“Campfire Stories”等功能。

甚至还有一个“仙人掌质押”协议,年收益率为1085%。

根据Shiba Shootout的白皮书,该团队计划在今年晚些时候在DEX(以及潜在的CEX)上列出SHIBASHOOT。

然后,Shiba Sharpshooter游戏的完整版将发布。

因此,随着市场的上涨,像Shiba Shootout这样的项目正在从所有的炒作中得到推动。

它是否能在推出之前保持这种速度还不得而知,但就目前而言,Shiba Shootout正在吸引一些模因币投资者的注意力。

参观芝枪战预售

免责声明:以上文章为赞助内容;它是由第三方写的。CryptoPotato不对本页面上的内容、广告、产品、质量、准确性或其他材料进行背书或承担责任。其中的任何内容都不应被解释为财务建议。强烈建议读者在参与任何提及的公司或项目之前,独立、仔细地核实信息,并进行自己的研究。投资加密货币存在资金损失的风险,建议读者在做出任何可能基于或可能不基于上述赞助内容的决定之前咨询专业人士。

建议读者阅读CryptoPotato的完整免责声明。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手7h ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手7h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit10h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit10h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手11h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手11h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit12h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit12h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片