Bitcoin 2024大会首日:特朗普元素遍布会场,牛市气氛浓厚

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-07-26Last updated on 2024-07-26

Abstract

一场别开生面的「政治盛会」。

原文来源:Cointelegraph, Decrypt

综编:Felix, PANews

比特币 2024 大会于 7 月 25 日在田纳西州纳什维尔开幕,由于多位知名政界人士加入纳什维尔活动演讲阵容,包括总统候选人唐纳德·特朗普和小罗伯特·肯尼迪,以及 Michael Saylor、Cathie Wood、参议员 Marsha Blackburn、Cynthia Lummis 等,本届大会在几周前就引起了广泛关注。

Bitcoin 2024大会首日:特朗普元素遍布会场,牛市气氛浓厚

图片来源:Cointelegraph

今年涌入纳什维尔的比特币粉丝们并不关注该资产的价格。相反,他们沉浸在牛市的氛围中,与志同道合的与会者交流。

对于许多人来说,今年的会议并不是他们第一次参加。不过,自从 14 个月前在迈阿密,比特币的价格徘徊在 2.8 万美元左右以来,局势发生了翻天覆地的变化。

在会议的正门处,有一个会议禁令的提醒标志,比如外带食物和饮料或电子烟。但“熊不得入内”的警告非常明显,似乎受到了来自世界各地的与会者的热烈欢迎。

Bitcoin 2024大会首日:特朗普元素遍布会场,牛市气氛浓厚

图片来源:Mike Germano

特朗普热潮席卷纳什维尔

会场中橙色为流行色,但今年的加密会议吸引了相当一部分穿着红色的与会者。

特朗普的名字被贴在了会议各处的广告和纪念品上。虽然距离特朗普的主题演讲还有两天,但会场上随处可见鲜艳棒球帽及周边。

Bitcoin 2024大会首日:特朗普元素遍布会场,牛市气氛浓厚

Bitcoin 2024大会首日:特朗普元素遍布会场,牛市气氛浓厚

图片来源:André Beganski/Decrypt

与此同时,一辆所谓的 MAG-wag 卡车在会场外绕圈,宣传一种以特朗普副总统候选人参议员 JD Vance (R-OH) 为主题的 Meme 币。

Bitcoin 2024大会首日:特朗普元素遍布会场,牛市气氛浓厚

图片来源:André Beganski/Decrypt

对于基于区块链的预测平台 Polymarket 而言,今年的竞选引发的政治风波刺激了该平台投注和用户数量。在会场前门附近,与会者可以免费获得 Polymarket 的周边商品,比如印有平台名称的红帽子。

Bitcoin 2024大会首日:特朗普元素遍布会场,牛市气氛浓厚

免费赠送 Polymarket 主题帽子。图片来源:André Beganski/Decrypt

大会首日发言集锦

比特币和闪电网络仍为零售银行业务产生重大影响

Lightspark 首席战略官 Christian Catalini 和 Xapo Bank 公共事务、政策和监管总监 Joey Garcia 阐述了比特币和闪电网络仍将对零售银行业产生重大影响。Bitcoin 2024大会首日:特朗普元素遍布会场,牛市气氛浓厚

图片来源:Cointelegraph

Catalini 强调,比特币自诞生之日起就能够无缝地允许用户在“超 200 个国家/地区、每天 24/7 全天候地”转移价值:

“只有一种资产,那就是比特币。它有明确的监管,几乎在全球每个国家都有出入金渠道。”

贝莱德的客户主要对 BTC、ETH 感兴趣

贝莱德数字资产主管 Michael Mitchnick 在与彭博社的 James Seyffart 的对话中,阐述了贝莱德在 2024 年通过比特币 ETF 和以太坊 ETF 进军加密领域的举措。

图片来源:Cointelegraph

“我想说,就我们今天的客户而言,他们的兴趣主要是比特币。当然,人们对以太坊也很感兴趣,但除了这两者之外,现在几乎没有客户对其他代币感兴趣。”

Mitchnick 补充说,ETF 推出时,直接投资者主导了需求。但贝莱德财富咨询和机构投资者仍在积聚动力。摩根士丹利、瑞银和美林等大型财富咨询平台还没有提供比特币 ETF,这意味着它们只会在客户的要求下提供 ETF。

Michael Saylor: 2024 年是比特币成为主流的第一年

Microstrategy 创始人 Michael Saylor 在一场活动直播中表示, 2024 年将被视为“主流机构采用比特币的第一年”。Saylor 的公司自 2020 年 8 月宣布比特币为其主要财政储备资产以来,已拥有超过 20 万枚比特币。

图片来源:Cointelegraph

Saylor 表示,他不断接到各家上市公司 CEO 和机构的电话,他们对 Saylor 优先投资比特币的方式感兴趣。

与此同时,Saylor 暗示,两位总统候选人和其他著名美国参议员的出席可能会对比特币产生积极的影响。

“我认为无论如何,比特币都会有好的发展前景。我真的不认为未来有哪个政府会不接受比特币。”

问题不在于未来政府是否“支持比特币”,而在于他们“将采取多大的积极行动”,以及“他们是迅速行动,还是更加谨慎地行动”。

Saylor 表示,该行业在 2024 年 1 月经历了一个拐点,比特币显然已经成为一种机构级数字资产。

“正如 Larry Fink(贝莱德 CEO)所说,比特币在每个投资组合中都将有一席之地。比特币在全球具有巨大的吸引力。这是独一无二的东西,世界需要更多这样的东西。”


Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

According to an analysis published by ZeroDrift on June 22, 2026, attackers have stolen approximately $16.9 million over 40 days from five deprecated but still operational smart contracts across various blockchains. The primary issue is not a specific vulnerability but the incomplete decommissioning of legacy contracts. These "zombie contracts" often retain economic value, operational permissions, and callable functions, making them prime targets long after teams cease active development. The most significant loss occurred at DxSale, where an old locker contract lost about $7.3 million due to a forgotten control path becoming accessible again. Other affected projects include TrustedVolumes (~$5.87M), Raydium's legacy AMM pool (~$1.34M), Aztec Connect (~$2.28M), and Huma Finance V1 pool (~$101k). These incidents involved diverse systems—RFQ settlement, credit pools, liquidity lockers, AMMs—demonstrating the widespread nature of the risk. The analysis highlights that automated tools are lowering the cost for attackers to systematically scan for these long-tail targets, which have public code and weaker monitoring. In contrast, defensive practices for contract retirement remain underdeveloped. While the DeFi industry has mature audit processes for new deployments, it lacks strict protocols for securely sunsetting old contracts, which only become truly "retired" after all funds, permissions, authorizations, and trust assumptions are removed.

marsbit13m ago

Hackers Steal Nearly $17 Million in 40 Days as 'Zombie Contracts' Become Their ATMs

marsbit13m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

"The Old Titans' Valuation Collapse: The Death of an Era's Valuation Framework" Between Alibaba's 2014 NYSE debut at $93.89 and its 2026 price of ~$95, twelve years have passed with zero price appreciation. This stagnation symbolizes a wholesale valuation reset for an entire generation of Chinese internet assets. Companies like Tencent, Pinduoduo, Meituan, Bilibili, and Kuaishou have seen catastrophic declines of 80-98% from their peaks. The core question arises: what framework now prices these companies, or has the framework itself expired? The valuation logic for Chinese internet stocks followed a clear "anchor-setting and anchor-removing" process. From 2014-2017, the dominant narrative was "US comparable discounting" – applying a growth premium and governance discount to US peers' multiples. This anchor loosened with the 2018 US-China trade war and the VIE structure risk, then was violently uprooted by the 2020-2021 regulatory crackdowns (Ant Group, Didi, anti-monopoly fines). The 2022 delisting panic and subsequent 2025-2026 geopolitical shocks (US military lists, AI espionage accusations) completed the demolition. The old "US对标打折" model is dead. However, this is not solely a China story. A structural mirror exists in US "old titan" stocks ("老登股"). In 2026, even Microsoft – with robust fundamentals – saw its PE compress from a 34x median to 22x, its worst performer status among the "Magnificent Seven" driven by a $190 billion annual AI capex crushing free cash flow. The core dilemma is universal: legacy platform giants, whether Alibaba or Microsoft, are spending colossal sums to chase an AI paradigm that may颠覆 their own high-margin, user/subscription-based business models. They have shifted from "companies defining the future" to "companies needing to prove they won't be淘汰ed by the future." This phenomenon of a dying valuation坐标系 has a historical precedent: post-1989 Japan. After its bubble burst, the "Japan premium" narrative ("most efficient manufacturing + perpetual growth") collapsed. A 25-year valuation vacuum ensued until Warren Buffett provided a new language in the 2010s: "low valuation + high dividend + governance reform." China's internet sector is now in a similar vacuum six years into its reset. While different from Japan's deflationary context, the parallel is clear: the old macro assumption of "deep integration with global capital" is falsified, but a new pricing framework is absent. Potential "new languages" for Chinese internet valuations are contradictory. AI transformation requires gutting profitable core businesses (e.g., Alibaba's ad-driven e-commerce) for an unproven consumption-based model, risking a Microsoft-like cash flow crunch. Alternatively, shareholder returns (buybacks/dividends) could build a floor, following Buffett's Japanese playbook, but current scales are insufficient to form a standalone anchor. The current state mirrors mid-1990s Japan: the old framework is dead, the new one unborn. The market waits in a vacuum for a重新定义ing force – a person, event, or proven business model shift – to answer "why buy." This may only be the middle phase of a prolonged re-rating.

marsbit21m ago

Valuation Rout of Old Titans: The Demise of a Generation's Asset Valuation Framework

marsbit21m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Title: STRC Deeply Discounted, mNAV Falls Below Break-even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Redefined The recent volatility in MSTR and STRC highlights the need to reassess the core business model of Bitcoin reserve companies. These entities function more like leveraged, single-asset banks rather than software/tech firms. Consequently, they should be valued using banking metrics, not based on their total Bitcoin holdings. The key valuation metric is mNAV (market net asset value), akin to a price-to-book ratio. It compares the company's market capitalization to the equity value of its Bitcoin holdings after deducting all senior debt and preferred equity (like STRC). As of June 24, Strategy's mNAV was 1.10x. The focus should be on "net Bitcoin per share" (the Bitcoin claim per share after senior claims) and its growth rate, equivalent to a bank's book value and return on assets. Given STRC's 19% discount to its $100 par value (yielding 14.2%), issuing new MSTR equity at the current price to buy more Bitcoin is inefficient. It slightly dilutes the widely watched "total Bitcoin per share" metric while providing minimal improvement to the more critical "net Bitcoin per share." The article analyzes four potential uses for $1 billion in new equity: 1. **Buy Bitcoin:** Least effective. Improves net Bitcoin per share only marginally while diluting total Bitcoin per share. 2. **Repurchase STRC:** Most effective for balance sheet repair. The discount creates immediate value, increasing net Bitcoin per share by 1.0%, reducing debt burden, and lowering future dividend obligations. 3. **Boost Cash Reserves:** Dramatically improves the "cash coverage ratio" for STRC dividends from 9.8 months to 16.8 months, a crucial liquidity metric in a tightening funding environment. 4. **50/50 Split (STRC buyback & cash):** A balanced approach improving all key metrics. Strategy's own Q1 report indicates its internal break-even mNAV for profitable equity issuance to buy Bitcoin is 1.22x. With the current mNAV at 1.10x, such a move would be value-destructive. The core assumptions of its previous expansion model—issuing STRC at par and maintaining ample dividend coverage—have broken down. The recommended path is to use new capital to optimize core financial health: repurchasing discounted STRC and/or bolstering cash reserves. This would repair the balance sheet, signal liquidity strength, support STRC's price, lower its yield, and potentially reopen the par-value issuance channel. The current STRC discount represents a low-cost capital opportunity to restart this positive cycle. Bitcoin reserve companies must be evaluated as banks, focusing on book value, leverage, and liquidity resilience.

Foresight News22m ago

STRC Trading at Significant Discount, mNAV Falls Below Break-Even, Strategy's Valuation Logic Has Been Rewritten

Foresight News22m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

463 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片