SOL 难以收回 145 美元但 Solana 网络基本面依然稳固

金色财经Published on 2024-07-14Last updated on 2024-07-14

作者:MARCEL PECHMAN;来源:cointelegraph;编译:火星财经,Daisy

Solana 的链上和衍生品指标没有显示出任何压力迹象,可能为上涨至 160 美元铺平道路。Solana 网络的原生代币自 7 月 3 日以来一直无法收于 145 美元以上。这种表现不佳的部分原因是投资者对加密货币的兴趣下降,这导致该行业的总市值在 9 天内下跌了 5%。尽管如此,SOL 在 7 月 3 日至 7 月 12 日期间的表现仍不及竞争对手,下跌了 7.8%,而 BNB和以太坊同期下降了6.5%。交易员现在担心,即使更广泛的加密货币市场已经逆转,SOL 的看跌势头仍将持续。虽然如此,Solana 的链上指标和 SOL 的衍生品表明,逆转可能正在进行中,为五周前上一次突破 160 美元的牛市铺平了道路。

Solana TVL is head to head with the vice-leader BNB Chain

一些 Solana SPL 代币表现严重不佳,这也解释了 SOL 需求减少的原因。当 Solana 生态系统参与者亏损时,其去中心化应用程序中流通的资金就会减少,从而对 SOL 的需求产生负面影响。7 月 3 日至 7 月 12 日之间的亮点包括 Dogwifhat ( WIF ) 下跌 24%,Helium (HNT) 下跌 18%,Jito (JTO) 回调 18%。

从总体来看,SOL 仍然是第四大加密货币(不包括稳定币),市值达 650 亿美元。竞争对手 Toncoin 持有 184 亿美元,Tron 持有 120 亿美元,Avalanche 持有 101 亿美元。此外,7 月 5 日,Solana 的总锁定价值 (TVL) 首次与 BNB Chain 持平,此后差距一直很小。

Solana

Solana

Solana 与 BNB Chain。锁定的总价值,美元。资料来源:DefiLlama

根据 DefiLlama 的数据,到 2023 年底,BNB Chain 的 TVL 是 Solana 的两倍多。有利于BNB Chain的20 亿美元差距现已消失,这意味着交易者正在 Solana 网络上部署更多资本。Solana 的亮点包括流动性质押Jito,持有 16 亿美元的存款,其次是 Marinade,持有 11 亿美元,以及 Kamino,TVL 也接近 11 亿美元。

Tron 以 76 亿美元的 TVL 位居第二,但其中 72% 来自单一去中心化金融(DeFi) 应用程序 JustLend。分析师们对此表示强烈担忧,因为其 94% 的存款来自比特币的包装版本,而这种版本缺乏储备的确凿证据。从本质上讲,Solana 直接与 BNB Chain 竞争存款第二的位置。

Solana network activity grew in terms of users and volumes

就去中心化应用程序 (DApps) 活动而言,Solana 远非顶级竞争者,但其指标在过去七天中有所改善,而大多数竞争对手则面临下滑。

Solana

按 7 天 DApps 交易量(美元)排名的顶级区块链。资料来源:DappRadar

数据显示,以太坊、BNB Chain 和 Polygon 的活跃用户数量均有所下降,而 Solana 在过去 7 天内增长了 19%。同样,Solana DApps 的交易量在同一时期总计 7.03 亿美元,比前 7 天增长了 12%。与此同时,市场领先的竞争对手以太坊的交易量下降了 37%。

相关:2024 年加密货币交易量将超过 108 万亿美元,欧洲领先

Solana 的去中心化交易所Raydium 在七天内聚集了令人印象深刻的 171 万个活跃地址,增长了 39%。相比之下,BNB Chain 的领先 DApp Move Stake 在同一时期拥有 198,570 个活跃地址。

最后,应该分析一下 SOL 的期货市场。永续合约(也称为反向掉期)包含每八小时重新计算一次的嵌入式利率。本质上,负利率表明空头(卖家)正在使用更高的杠杆。

Solana

SOL 永续期货 8 小时融资利率。来源:Laevitas.ch

值得注意的是,SOL 的八小时融资利率在 7 月 5 日至 7 月 6 日期间变为负值,但该指标目前接近于零,表明多头(买家)和空头之间的需求平衡。虽然无法确定是什么可能导致 SOL 投资者重拾信心并将其价格推回 160 美元,但链上和衍生品指标没有显示出任何压力迹象。

Related Reads

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

Hiring in Crypto: Balancing Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent As the crypto industry grows, founders face the dilemma of whether to prioritize hiring professionals with blockchain experience or those with traditional tech backgrounds who can learn. The key is recognizing that crypto companies are still tech companies at their core and should apply proven hiring best practices. Crypto-native talent offers immediate productivity and is essential for roles involving high-stakes, specialized work like smart contract development, where errors can be catastrophic. However, traditional professionals from large-scale software companies bring valuable experience in scaling products, operational flexibility, and expertise in areas like fintech, UX, and security, which are crucial as crypto products target mainstream adoption. Recruiting requires tailored approaches. Some candidates may be hesitant due to crypto's volatility or complexity, while others are excited by its innovative potential. Assess candidates' motivations, curiosity, and alignment with the company's vision early. Emphasize the opportunity to shape technology's future and address financial incentives, such as token-based compensation, which can offer liquidity compared to traditional equity. Onboarding is critical. Identify knowledge gaps during hiring and design education programs, mentorship, knowledge-sharing sessions, and resources like blogs or courses to accelerate learning. Pairing new hires with experienced crypto professionals helps bridge gaps and fosters collaboration. Ultimately, successful teams blend both crypto-native and traditional talent, leveraging their strengths to drive innovation and growth.

marsbit57m ago

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

marsbit57m ago

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

On April 19, a major DeFi security breach occurred, resulting in the loss of approximately $292 million. The attack targeted Kelp DAO’s rsETH bridge contract built on LayerZero, with 116,500 rsETH stolen. The attacker initiated the exploit using funds from Tornado Cash and manipulated the LayerZero EndpointV2 contract to transfer the assets. Kelp DAO confirmed the incident and temporarily paused rsETH contracts across multiple networks while collaborating with security experts for investigation. Initial analysis suggests the root cause was a compromised private key on the source chain, with the contract secured by only a 1/1 validator set, making it vulnerable to a single malicious transaction. The attacker used the stolen rsETH as collateral on lending platforms—including Aave, Compound, and Euler—to borrow more liquid assets like WETH, accumulating over $236 million in debt. Aave alone accounted for $196 million of this amount. In response, Aave froze its rsETH markets and stated it would explore covering potential bad debt through its Umbrella safety module, which holds around $50 million in WETH. This incident follows another large exploit earlier in April, where Drift Protocol on Solana lost $280 million. The repeated high-value attacks raise concerns about DeFi security, even affecting major protocols like Aave. Users are advised to exercise caution, diversify holdings, and limit exposure to on-chain protocols until more robust security measures are established.

marsbit2h ago

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片