逃顶指南:如何掌握大行情下的卖出时机?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-06-18Last updated on 2024-06-18

Abstract

投资者需综合理性评估以上指标,才能更好的把握市场机会。

原文作者: 1912212.eth,Foresight News

会买的只是徒弟,会卖的才是师傅,一语道尽市场的奥妙玄机。想象一下,当你买入的持仓标的,一开始便带来盈利,随后不断飙升,浮盈巨大,满心欢喜,你满以为会达到自己的心理价位,以为接下来的疯狂即将到来。

结果,行情戛然而止。这时你认为只是行情盘整震荡而已。随即未过多久,再次大跌,阴跌,此时利润损失大半。

卖出,太不甘心,怕卖飞。不卖,死拿,结果市场的残酷教训终于到来,开始跌破成本价,你以为到底了,结果跌去 30% ,你再次选择抄底买入,结果又接连跌去 20% 。此时,你已被严重套牢且无子弹,就在你忍痛割肉后,恰恰就是市场的底部区间,行情开始缓慢爬升。

不会止盈导致出现利润大幅回撤,甚至最后以亏本结局收场,每个初入市场的新手都必定经历过,甚至部分老手也无法逃脱市场情绪的魔咒。

本篇文章将专注于逃顶卖出指标解读,希望读者在消化理解后更好掌握大行情下的卖出时机。

Coinbase 登顶美国苹果 APP 免费榜

Coinbase 作为美国合规交易所,不仅在上币仍有不小影响力,且其 APP 下载热度可用来观测整个市场热度和情绪指标。

上轮牛市周期, 2020 年 11 月之后 Coinbase 跻身苹果应用商店免费榜 TOP 100 ,随后于 2021 年 1 月跻身 TOP 30 ,甚至一度导致其出现技术问题。

逃顶指南:如何掌握大行情下的卖出时机?

有趣的是, 9 个月后,即 2021 年 10 月 28 日,Coinbase 登上免费榜 TOP 1 ,彼时 BTC 价格在 6 万美元附近上下,距离 11 月 8 日创下的 6.9 万美元顶点仅仅相差不过 10 天而已。

当用户蜂拥而至,下载 Coinbase 买币时,顶部特征已经显露无疑。

BTC 月线图难破 7 连涨的历史记录

从过往历史图中可知,一轮完整牛市周期中只有一次 BTC 大连涨情况发生。

在上轮周期中,从 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 3 月,实现月线 6 连涨的不错态势。在本轮周期中,受益于现货 ETF 获批,BTC 罕见的实现月线 7 连涨。

逃顶指南:如何掌握大行情下的卖出时机?

此后则开始盘整,在本轮牛市中,因其价格已在 6 万美元上方,若在本轮牛市后半段想再实现 7 连涨的神迹将会非常困难。

BTC 未实现净利润 / 亏损

该指标主要用来衡量比特币链上玩家的盈利 / 亏损情况。我们可以看到其行列颜色从上到下依次为红、橙、浅黄、灰白和浅蓝。其中最底部蓝色代表大多数人亏损割肉,而顶部的红色则代表大多数玩家处于盈利。逃顶指南:如何掌握大行情下的卖出时机?


当折线图处于浅蓝色区域时,往往是 BTC 价格的底部区间,因为亏损割肉的人不断离场筑底,而当折线图处于黄色或红色区间,往往是 BTC 价格的顶部区间,大部分人盈利后,会有相当多的获利盘选择止盈离场,导致成为周期下的顶部。循环往复。

从折线图看,目前市场处于黄色区域高点,有超 52% 左右的比特币玩家仍是处于未实现净利润状态。

过往周期中,折线都有 2 次大幅下探到绿色区间,即大多数人都处于亏损状态,本轮周期还只出现过一次,未来是否重演历史仍有待观察。

HODL 供应量

该数据图主要用于观察比特币 HODL 数据表现情况。这里我们定义短期用户的持币时间在 1 年以下,而长期用户则在 1 年以上的。逃顶指南:如何掌握大行情下的卖出时机?


牛市顶部时,往往长期持有者获利止盈离场,所以其占比会将对减少,而短期持币者往往在价格高点时冲进来买入,就会看到供应占比明显相当高。

如果上图不够清晰,可参考下图,短期持币者数量增加的峰值,往往也是币价的阶段性顶部。

从该图中,还会发现一个有趣的现象,随着 BTC 的价格不断变大,资金实力不够的玩家可能已无力买够一枚 BTC,这导致虽然短期持有者供应量会有一定的持币峰值,但已经远不如过去两轮牛市的峰值持有量。

逃顶指南:如何掌握大行情下的卖出时机?

而当长期持币者比例下降的时候,往往就是市场的顶部区间(下图)。它们才是市场的聪明钱。

逃顶指南:如何掌握大行情下的卖出时机?


从图中我们看到在近期牛市中,长期持有者在今年 1 月开始抛售,在 2 月份附近速度加快,并持续至今。截至目前,其离场速度已经变平缓。

长期趋势指标 MVRV Z-Score

该指标以市场总成本作为基数,主要反映市场总体的盈利水平。浅红色区域为 MVRV,折线图为 Z-Scroe(突出市场价值和已实现价值之间数据的极端情况),当橙色折线图触及到浅红色区域时为行情最顶部。若再细分,处于 6 以上时,也是顶部区间。

逃顶指南:如何掌握大行情下的卖出时机?


当橙色折线图处于浅蓝色区域时,则代表持币者总体处于亏损状态。当前指标为 2 ,属于中间阶段。

比特币合约未平仓数量

过去数月中,一个非常有意思的现象是,每当全网比特币合约未平仓头寸创下历史新高,往往是阶段性的 BTC 价格顶部。

逃顶指南:如何掌握大行情下的卖出时机?



例如,

3 月 4 日, 290 亿美元,BTC 价格 68499 美元

3 月 13 日, 339 亿美元,BTC 价格 73650 美元

3 月 29 日, 388 亿美元,BTC 价格 70780 美元

6 月 7 日, 380 亿美元,BTC 价格 71997 美元;

合约数据代表市场资金对后市的走势看法,当市场全部一致极其看好短期走势,不断加大杠杆,往往就会迎来回调,以清洗筹码,轻装前行。

小结

除以上指标,判断市场行情的方法还包括以太坊 Gas 费、社交媒体活跃度、整数关口谢林点等因素。它既是一门科学,也是一门艺术。投资者需综合理性评估以上指标,才能更好的把握市场机会。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System Using First Principles

Former SpaceX engineer Lex Li applies "First Principles Thinking" to financial infrastructure with Plan Execution Lab, recently raising angel funding at a $50M post-money valuation. The team argues that the core function of finance is capital allocation, and the critical gap is not in trading but in execution, which remains highly manual and fragmented. While assets, liquidity, and settlement have migrated on-chain, execution workflows (monitoring, risk management, liquidity coordination) are still human-native. In an era of accelerating AI agents, strategy decay is rapid, shifting the competitive edge from having the best strategy to having the most robust execution network. Plan Execution Lab introduces two core components: 1. **PlanX**: A Financial Execution Protocol designed as infrastructure for the migration from CEX to DEX, providing on-chain execution capabilities, liquidity access, risk management, and capital orchestration. 2. **Xgent**: An Autonomous Financial Runtime. Users define investment intents, risk preferences, and constraints; Xgent automatically constructs an execution graph, verifies it, and handles ongoing execution and optimization—streamlining the process from Intent to Autonomous Execution. The long-term vision is to create the "Bloomberg Terminal for Autonomous Finance"—a shared operating environment and execution network built collectively by participants like execution nodes, liquidity providers, and autonomous agents. The future of finance, they contend, belongs not to isolated algorithms but to open, collaborative execution networks.

marsbit16m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System Using First Principles

marsbit16m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System from First Principles

Plan Execution Lab, a financial infrastructure project founded by former SpaceX engineer Lex Li, has raised angel funding at a $50M post-money valuation. The startup is applying "first principles thinking" from Li's SpaceX experience to rethink financial market execution. Their analysis posits that while assets, liquidity, and settlement have moved on-chain, the execution layer remains fundamentally human-dependent and fragmented. In the era of AI Agents, strategy advantages decay rapidly, shifting the competitive edge from isolated algorithms to robust **execution networks**. Plan Execution Lab's solution is a two-part system: **PlanX**, a Financial Execution Protocol designed to facilitate the migration from centralized exchanges (CEX) to on-chain markets by providing core on-chain execution capabilities; and **Xgent**, an Autonomous Financial Runtime. Xgent allows users to define investment goals and constraints, then autonomously constructs and manages the execution logic—moving from **Intent to Execution Graph to Verification to Autonomous Execution**. The long-term vision is to create the "Bloomberg Terminal for Autonomous Finance"—an operating environment not for humans, but for agents and execution nodes. The future financial system, they argue, will be a collaborative network built by diverse participants contributing execution capabilities, not secret strategies. The core competition will shift to who builds the most powerful and adaptive execution network.

链捕手17m ago

Former SpaceX Engineer Reconstructs Financial Execution System from First Principles

链捕手17m ago

First Long-Horizon Doc2Repo Training Dataset: Code Agents Move Beyond Bug Fixing and Begin Creating Repositories

With the advancement of LLM Code Agents, the research focus is shifting towards long-horizon, real-world tasks, moving beyond simple bug fixes to full repository generation. To address this, researchers from Renmin University of China introduced the DeNovoSWE dataset. This dataset focuses on long-term software engineering tasks, specifically the "document-to-repository" challenge—generating an entire, executable code repository from a task description. The DeNovoSWE construction method employs a Divide & Conquer approach. It breaks down target repositories into core capabilities and uses a multi-agent Draft-Critic-Repair workflow to automatically generate high-quality, evaluation-aligned task documents. The dataset also implements difficulty-aware filtering to balance quality and diversity. The result is a high-quality, anti-leakage dataset of 4,818 instances. Experiments show that models trained on DeNovoSWE achieve significant improvements in long-horizon repository generation. For instance, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct's performance on the BeyondSWE-Doc2Repo benchmark increased from 5.8% to 47.2%, and on NL2RepoBench from 4.3% to 23.0%. Similar gains were observed with stronger backbones, demonstrating that dedicated long-horizon training data is crucial for advancing Code Agents from maintainers to architects capable of planning and building complete software projects from scratch.

marsbit32m ago

First Long-Horizon Doc2Repo Training Dataset: Code Agents Move Beyond Bug Fixing and Begin Creating Repositories

marsbit32m ago

Even CZ Praised Hyperliquid as 'Awesome', But Its Biggest Moat Might Also Be Its Biggest Risk

In an episode of Galaxy Brains, Binance founder CZ praised Hyperliquid as "awesome" but clarified that while its product is strong, Binance cannot compete in its specific niche due to Hyperliquid's no-KYC, decentralized model. CZ noted he would not personally operate such a model, highlighting the inherent legal and compliance risks tied to its access advantage. The discussion underscores a core market structure conflict: on-chain perp platforms like Hyperliquid thrive on open, low-barrier access, which regulated exchanges like Binance cannot replicate without abandoning their global compliance posture. However, this very advantage makes Hyperliquid a clear target for regulatory scrutiny. The UK FCA has already issued a warning against Hyperliquid for potentially offering unauthorized services to UK users, framing it as a financial services provider rather than neutral infrastructure. Historical cases like the CFTC's action against bZeroX and Ooki DAO further illustrate that regulators may pursue decentralized structures if they facilitate leveraged trading for retail users without proper controls. Meanwhile, regulated venues like Cboe are developing US-compliant "continuous futures" that mimic perpetual exposure, narrowing the product gap. Hyperliquid's long-term edge may increasingly hinge on its access model—the very feature most exposed to regulatory pressure. The key question is whether its "access premium" can withstand escalating legal challenges as on-chain perps gain mainstream attention.

marsbit50m ago

Even CZ Praised Hyperliquid as 'Awesome', But Its Biggest Moat Might Also Be Its Biggest Risk

marsbit50m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片