Consensus 2024参会感受:以太坊和ETF闇然,AI与DePIN绽放

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-06-03Last updated on 2024-06-03

Abstract

人更少,但质量更高。

原创|Odaily星球日报

作者|jk

Consensus 2024参会感受:以太坊和ETF闇然,AI与DePIN绽放

2024 年 5 月 29 日至 31 日,美国知名 Web3 媒体 Coindesk 在德克萨斯州奥斯汀市举办了 Consensus 2024 大会,Odaily 驻北美记者前往参与。

作为全球最大、最具影响力的加密货币和区块链行业盛会之一,Consensus 大会汇聚了来自世界各地的开发者、投资者、创始人、品牌和政策制定者。本次大会不仅提供了一个展示前沿技术和探讨行业趋势的平台,还为业内人士提供了一个交流合作的绝佳机会。

牛市以来的第一场大会

这次的 Consensus 大会算是本轮牛市以来的第一次行业大会。此前,由于比特币 ETF 的批准和 ETH Denver 期间比特币从五万美元疯涨至七万,整个行业在前几个月对于牛市来临作出了充分的反应。

此次,虽然参会人数相比往年有所减少,但整体质量显著提升;从现场交流的状况来看,与会者更加专业,讨论内容非常深入,交流效果也更为高效。像对于区块链行业没有了解的新人或者是来学习的学生人数比起其他会议而言大幅减少。可以发现,今年的参会者大多是业内的深度参与者,对于想要在美国融资或是寻找客户或投资标的的公司而言,Consensus 仍然是全美前三的不可错过的区块链盛会。

会场内并不冷清,但大家都在 Side Event

尽快采用了去年经典的有一条主干道和许多小分支的主会场设计,会场内的正式活动的参加者似乎并没有去年多,甚至我在现场碰见的很多人直言并没有怎么去主会场。更多的讨论和交流发生在各种 side event 中,参会者更倾向于参加这些小型、灵活的活动,在 Consensus 活动持续的四天之内,大概有 200+场类似的活动,由各类 Web3 公司主办。这些活动更贴近实际应用和前沿技术,提供了更多探讨和合作的机会。

此外,高昂的票价(学生和开发者的票价相对要低一些)也是很多人并未出现在主会场的原因。

Consensus 2024参会感受:以太坊和ETF闇然,AI与DePIN绽放

Consensus side event 表格,来源:Consensus 官方

AI 和去中心化物联网(DePIN)是本次大会最受关注的生态系统赛道。无论是技术讨论还是项目展示,都集中在这两个领域;最直观的就是,有很多集中在这个生态上的活动,而其他 DeFi、游戏等传统赛道并没有受到以前那么多的关注。而相比之下,以太坊和 ETF 虽然仍有一定的讨论,但显然没有获得与会者的过多关注。

亚洲参会者的数量非常显著,很多与会者都是专程从国内飞过来参与这次大会,而这些人大多并非来自知名大机构,基本上都是创业公司的创始人或者是基金的投资者,来美国寻找融资机会、标的或者最新的欧美资金趋势。这也使得本次大会成为了一个国际化、高度多元的平台,促进了东西方之间的交流和合作。

总体而言,Consensus 2024 展示了行业的深度和广度,通过国际化的交流,为区块链和加密货币的未来发展提供了方向。这次大会不仅是一次行业盛会,更是一场全球顶尖思想和技术的碰撞与融合,预示着一个更加开放、创新和去中心化的未来。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Without It, There Would Be No ImageNet... Now It's Gone

Amazon is shutting down its crowdsourcing platform, Mechanical Turk (MTurk), on September 30th, ending a 21-year run. Launched in 2005, MTurk connected businesses with a global online workforce to perform small, repetitive tasks—known as Human Intelligence Tasks (HITs)—that were easy for humans but difficult for computers at the time. At its peak, it hosted over 500,000 workers worldwide. MTurk played a pivotal, though often unseen, role in the rise of modern AI. Its most famous contribution was to the creation of the ImageNet dataset. In the late 2000s, researcher Fei-Fei Li and her team faced the monumental challenge of manually sorting and labeling millions of internet images to build a large-scale visual database for training AI. They turned to MTurk, distributing the work to nearly 50,000 workers from 167 countries. This "human-in-the-loop" effort made the massive ImageNet project feasible. ImageNet, in turn, became the foundational benchmark for the 2012 ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. The victory of Geoffrey Hinton and his students' deep convolutional neural network, AlexNet, on this dataset dramatically demonstrated the power of deep learning, catalyzing the AI revolution that followed. Now, MTurk is closing. The platform has declined as the very AI it helped build has become capable of automating the simple tasks it once provided. Furthermore, the AI industry's data needs have evolved, shifting towards more specialized expertise for model tuning and evaluation, served by newer platforms. Ironically, some studies suggest MTurk workers themselves began using AI tools like ChatGPT to complete tasks, adding a layer of automation to the "artificial artificial intelligence" service. The shutdown marks the end of an era where human effort, distributed globally via the internet, laid the crucial groundwork for the intelligent machines of today.

marsbit13m ago

Without It, There Would Be No ImageNet... Now It's Gone

marsbit13m ago

Bill Gates' Latest Long-Form Article: The Real Trouble with AI is That We Aren't Ready

Bill Gates' latest essay, "The turbulent AI era is here. The choices we make now are critical," warns that society is unprepared for the profound social and economic transition AI will bring. While optimistic about AI's long-term potential in healthcare, education, and other fields, Gates focuses on the "transition period" over the next 10-20 years. He argues this transition differs from past technological shifts like the Industrial Revolution because AI automates cognitive labor itself, potentially reducing the total number of future jobs. Risks like enhanced cyber-attacks and social disruption are already emerging, not distant future threats. A key concern is "low-cost intelligence substitution," where AI performs defined tasks cheaper than humans, gradually thinning workforces. Gates introduces the concept of "Human Reserved" jobs—roles like nursing or delivering serious medical news—where human judgment and empathy should remain central, even if AI is technically capable. To manage the transition, he calls for new governance, stronger social safety nets, retraining, and international cooperation, especially between the US and China. Crucially, he proposes taxing AI usage and robots to slow displacement and fund social programs. The core dilemma Gates presents is that AI could become humanity's "greatest equalizer" or its "worst source of injustice," depending on whether its immense productivity gains are broadly shared or concentrate wealth and power. The fundamental challenge is not just advancing the technology, but adapting our social and economic systems to it.

marsbit29m ago

Bill Gates' Latest Long-Form Article: The Real Trouble with AI is That We Aren't Ready

marsbit29m ago

Just Now, Anthropic Unveils Physical MCP: Claude Begins Controlling the Real World

Anthropic has announced the Model Hardware Standard (MHS), a new standard enabling AI agents like Claude to safely control physical devices. Building on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), MHS standardizes communication between AI agents and hardware such as microscopes, robotic arms, and lasers, marking a significant step for AI from the digital into the physical world. Developed in collaboration with HHMI Janelia Research Campus, MHS uses standardized drivers to translate basic commands (e.g., read, write) into a format any programmable device can understand. This drastically reduces integration time from weeks to hours or minutes and allows agents to discover and operate new devices using natural language tags that describe machine properties and safety limits. Agents can control devices via MCP, command-line interfaces, or APIs. They can sequence operations, monitor results, adjust parameters in real-time, and generate deterministic scripts for long-running tasks. Early tests show Claude interacting with hardware exploratively, like a scientist, learning to calibrate a laser and scripting the process. Early adopters and partners include AWS, Automata, Danaher, Doosan Robotics, and Tecan, who are integrating MHS support into their platforms. While promising, challenges remain: Claude's physical reasoning is limited, requiring expert oversight, and MHS currently only works with programmable hardware. Anthropic plans further refinements and broader device support before open-sourcing the standard.

marsbit1h ago

Just Now, Anthropic Unveils Physical MCP: Claude Begins Controlling the Real World

marsbit1h ago

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

**Title: The Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate Over Any 4-Year Holding Period** This article analyzes which major, freely-tradable assets have historically never produced a nominal loss over any rolling 4-year holding window. It concludes that only two distinct categories achieve this: ultra-low-risk contractual assets and Bitcoin. Among traditional risk assets, none maintain a perfect 4-year record. The S&P 500 had negative 4-year periods (e.g., 1929-1932: -64.8%). The Nasdaq 100 fell roughly 60% from 2000-2003. Gold saw a ~47.7% loss from 1981-1984. US real estate declined about 23.3% from 2007-2010. Even long-term US Treasury bonds (e.g., 2021-2024: -19.8%) and corporate bonds can produce 4-year losses due to interest rate and market price risks. In contrast, the first category achieving 100% nominal success includes assets like rolling 3-month US Treasury Bills, 4-year certificates of deposit (CDs), and US Treasuries held to maturity within 4 years. Their "guarantee" stems from contractual obligations and credit backing (e.g., FDIC insurance, US sovereign promise), not price appreciation. The sole exception in the high-risk category is Bitcoin. Analysis of daily data from 2010-2026 across 4,419 rolling 4-year windows shows a 100% positive return rate. The worst 4-year period (April 2021 to April 2025) still yielded a +32.6% total return (~7.3% CAGR). This record is unique because Bitcoin has no issuer, promises no cash flows, and has endured severe drawdowns (70-90%), yet its market price has always recovered within a 4-year span. The key distinction is the source of the "100%": contractual assets offer known, low nominal returns, while Bitcoin's record stems purely from historical price appreciation despite extreme volatility. The article suggests that for Bitcoin, the ability to hold for 4+ years is more critical than active trading strategies.

marsbit1h ago

History's Only Asset with a 100% Win Rate After 4 Years of Holding

marsbit1h ago

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

This article details the dramatic rise and near-collapse of a hedge fund built by Leopold Aschenbrenner, a 24-year-old former OpenAI researcher. The fund, named Situational Awareness, amassed $45 billion in assets within two years. Its explosive growth stemmed from Aschenbrenner's influential 165-page manifesto predicting AGI's arrival by 2027 and his high-profile Silicon Valley connections. The fund employed an extremely aggressive strategy: high concentration and 400% leverage to bet long on AI infrastructure stocks while shorting legacy software firms. In July, this structure backfired when both sides of the trade reversed simultaneously—AI stocks plunged while shorted stocks rallied—triggering massive losses that nearly wiped out all equity. Major player Jane Street reportedly lost billions. The fund's leveraged public portfolio was ultimately sold at a discount to Citadel. The SEC is now investigating banks like Goldman Sachs for their role in facilitating the fund's high-leverage trades. The article compares this to past blow-ups like Archegos, highlighting systemic failures in risk management where the pursuit of short-term profits overrode due diligence. It questions whether such risky leverage concentrated in the AI sector, currently at record highs, poses a broader systemic threat. Ironically, Aschenbrenner, who studied AI safety at OpenAI, designed a fund structure prone to uncontrolled failure. Days after the crisis, he reportedly raised another $400 million for new investments.

marsbit1h ago

How One Article Moved 45 Billion: The Collapse of a 25-Year-Old 'AI Stock Guru'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片