读懂Arbitrum Stylus:桥接开发者涌入Web3的「摆渡船」?

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-05-27Last updated on 2024-05-27

Abstract

Arbitrum Stylus 可将百倍于 Soildity 的 Rust 和 C 开发者群体引入 Web3。

原文作者:hitesh.eth

原文编译:Frank,Foresight News

到目前为止,Stylus 或将成为 Arbitrum 推出的最值得关注的产品。市场是时候该意识到,Stylus 为何对整个区块链行业意义重大。

近年来,每名用户都为只需测试协议就能获得空投的流程感到开心,只是近段时间以来,越来越多的用户带着高期望进入,但最终什么也得不到。

这似乎在逐步演变为整个链上用户增长故事的终局,更糟糕的是,开发者们也正在离开这个由链上用户编织的虚假丛林,因为项目在代币生成事件(TGE)后很难留住这些「Farmer」。

开发者离开所造成的结果很严重,因为这意味着你将看不到任何新颖的创新,新项目们只会一味地复制 Aave、Compound 和 GMX,最终走向死胡同。

读懂Arbitrum Stylus:桥接开发者涌入Web3的「摆渡船」?

那么解决方案是什么呢?如何激励开发者留下来,以及如何吸引新的开发者进入 Web3 领域?

一个简单粗暴的办法就是向活跃于 Web3 开发者社区的开发者发放激励措施——目前也已经有项目开始向开发者空投代币,这对整个领域来说是一件非常积极的事情。

读懂Arbitrum Stylus:桥接开发者涌入Web3的「摆渡船」?

但第二种方式才是更长远的解决方案,即项目应该降低新手开发者的进入门槛——即使他们只熟悉 C 或 C++ 等基础语言,也应该可以轻松融入 Web3 开发领域。

想象一下,一个 C 语言开发者可以在 EVM 上构建 DApp 应用,这无疑会非常酷,不是么?

让我们继续讨论降低新手开发者进入门槛的方法,譬如 Arbitrum Stylus,它就正在构建一个与 C 语言兼容的虚拟机(VM),该虚拟机允许开发者使用 C、C++、Rust 以及任何可以预编译成 WASM 的语言进行编码。

目前初期他们已经开放了对 Rust 和 C 语言的支持。

据统计,全球范围内熟悉 Rust 语言的开发者有 1200 万,那么你知道有多少人懂 Solidity 语法吗?

不到 10 万。

读懂Arbitrum Stylus:桥接开发者涌入Web3的「摆渡船」?

换句话说,Arbitrum Stylus 可以接触到数量庞大的 Rust 和 C 开发者群体,他们可以从第一天就开始部署应用程序......现在,这些开发者在 Arbitrum 上部署项目将变得轻而易举。

然而,Arbitrum Stylus 不仅允许非 Solidity 开发者进行 DApp 编码和部署,其通过支持优化的 WASM 二进制代码,还能将执行效率提升 10 倍,并且将内存扩展能力提升 50-100 倍。

读懂Arbitrum Stylus:桥接开发者涌入Web3的「摆渡船」?

值得注意的是,Arbitrum 还采用了 Nitro 抗欺诈证明技术来验证编译自 C/Rust 到 WASM 的代码的准确性。

Stylus 可以被视为 Nitro 抗欺诈证明技术的自然延伸,它不仅可以对执行历史进行分割验证,还能对开发者部署的任何 WASM 程序进行验证。

读懂Arbitrum Stylus:桥接开发者涌入Web3的「摆渡船」?

在 Stylus 出现之后,开发人员可以利用 EVM 构建内存需求较高的应用程序,例如预测模型、复杂的生成艺术以及链上机器学习。借助 Stylus,人工智能也可以在 EVM 上以更优异的性能进行探索。

此外,使用 Stylus 构建的任何 DApp 都可以与 Rust DApp 互操作,这意味着 Arbitrum 生态系统中的 DApp 可以与 Solana 无缝交互。

截至发文时,Arbitrum Stylus 测试网已经上线,你可以使用 Stylus SDK 开始使用 C 和 Rust 语言构建 DApp。

预计 Stylus 将在未来 3-5 个月内上线主网,它将成为 Arbitrum 最大的升级,为其开发人员和用户大规模采用的未来发展带来裨益。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit3h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit3h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手5h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片