以太坊生态重燃,一文读懂由Uniswap牵头制定的ERC-7683

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-05-23Last updated on 2024-05-23

Abstract

天下苦跨链久矣。

原文作者:深潮 TechFlow

以太坊生态重燃,一文读懂由Uniswap牵头制定的ERC-7683

以太坊 ETF 的通过预期,又点燃了 ETH Beta 的淘金热。

主网交易的复苏,也势必辐射到以太坊的各L2生态上,例如 Farcaster 宣布巨额融资使得 DEGEN 又被关注,ETH Beta 浪潮中大家又开始追逐 OP...

以太坊生态重燃,一文读懂由Uniswap牵头制定的ERC-7683

Uniswap 协议上 L2 的总交易量即将达到 3000 亿美元

但回归到实际操作上,由于即时热点在各链随机出现,当用户想快速追热点时,可能面对各链资金量不同,需要进行资金跨链,体验和操作上都算不上好。

近日,作为 ETH 主网链上 DEX 交易的老大哥,Uniswap 紧跟时事, 在其官推上号召大家关注由其与 Across 共同制定的跨链意图新标准 --- ERC-7683 。

以太坊生态重燃,一文读懂由Uniswap牵头制定的ERC-7683

ERC-7683 标准下跨链交易的执行过程

这会不会为各 ETH DeFi 1.0 的项目们注入更多活力和催化剂?

跨链易懂,但「跨链意图」是什么?

在解释跨链意图之前,我们先介绍什么是「意图架构」:

意图架构是一种设计方法,用户只需指定他们想要达成的最终状态即(即意图),而不需要关心具体的执行过程。系统根据用户的意图自动寻找并执行实现该目标的最佳路径。

了解意图架构,「跨链意图」的概念也不再抽象:

跨链意图指在不同链之间执行用户指定的交易。例如你有一笔 USDC 在以太坊上,你希望将其兑换成 Polygon 上的 MATIC。在跨链意图系统中,你只需告诉系统“将以太坊上的 USDC 兑换成 Polygon 上的 MATIC”,系统会自动寻找最优路径完成这笔交易,包括跨链桥接和兑换。

ERC-7683 ,第一个跨链意图标准

跨链意图系统在理论上简化了传统桥接跨链的复杂性,成为用户跨链交互的主要解决方案。然而,这些系统当前的关键难题是需要足够的流动性以及活跃的填充者网络(Filler)来执行跨链交易。

随着链数量和跨链需求的增加,当流动不足以及填充者网络调度混乱时,会出现用户跨链成本更高、等待时间更长以及失败率更高的现象。

ERC-7683 将跨链意图标准化优化了跨链交易流程,通过创新方式解决当前跨链交易中的问题:

  • 标准化交易接口:ERC-7683 定义了标准的 CrossChainOrder,和 ResolvedCrossChainOrder 结构,将订单解析为可执行的标准格式,便于填充者理解和处理,使不同区块链系统之间可以互操作。ERC-7683 提出所有跨链意图都遵循相同的顺序结构,以便通用、共享的填充网络可以完成交易。

  • 共享填充者网络:用户通过标准化交易接口签署订单后,订单通过网络传播给多个填充者,填充者通过竞价机制来抢单,提供最优报价和高效执行路径。

  • 自动化处理:用户只需输入指定的交易意图,系统自动完成复杂的跨链操作,减少了成本和时间。用户享受更低的成本+更好的用户体验

  • 安全资金托管:通过标准化验证机制结算合约托管用户资金,在确定交易成功后才释放给填充者。

以太坊生态重燃,一文读懂由Uniswap牵头制定的ERC-7683

想象一下,用户通过跨链桥手动跨链的行为就像原始的物流链条,用户想要从 A 寄送包裹到 B 需要经过自己打包称重、定制路线最后联系运输渠道最后还要自己全程跟踪包裹。并且还有承运方运力、要价不一,甚至丢件的情况。这当中步骤繁杂,需要用户自主了解的知识与考量的因素众多。

ERC-7683 就像一个成熟的快递公司,具有包括称重定价、路线定制、运力分配等一系列统一且完备的标准。对用户来说,这样的“一键式跨链”自是省心又省钱。

来自项目方的期待

天下苦跨链久矣。

从理论流程来看,对于推出 ERC-7683 标准从而推动跨链技术进步这一意图,Uniswap 确实提供了便利的跨链流程。

不仅是用户,Optimism、Krystal 等一众项目方对于 ERC-7683 的推出也纷纷表示 Respect,大家都期待着一个又好又快的跨链协议来解放流动性,为链上带来更多生机。

以太坊生态重燃,一文读懂由Uniswap牵头制定的ERC-7683

目前,ERC-7683 正处于审查和讨论阶段,还未正式上线,预计将在进一步完善和批准后正式实施。

Uniswap 和 AcrossProtocol 将在美东时间本周五下午一点举行关于 ERC-7683 的交流会,届时可以通过会议了解 ERC-7683 标准上线后的实际运用以及更多信息细节。

以太坊生态重燃,一文读懂由Uniswap牵头制定的ERC-7683

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbit1h ago

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbit1h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手2h ago

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片