多个审核决议再度推迟,以太坊现货ETF获批概率降低

Odaily星球日报Published on 2024-03-20Last updated on 2024-03-20

Abstract

截至目前,美 SEC 尚未就以太坊 ETF 的具体事项与发行商进行沟通。与去年秋季的比特币现货 ETF 申请时的情景完全相反。

原文作者:念青,ChainCatcher

当地时间 3 月 19 日,美国证券交易委员会(SEC)公布的两份通知文件中再次推迟了两支以太坊现货 ETF 的决议时间,分别是把 Hashdex Nasdaq ETH ETF 的申请做出决定的时间延长至 2024 年 5 月 30 日将 ARK 21 Shares 以太坊 ETF 申请决议推迟至 2024 年 5 月 24 日

在通告中,美 SEC 表示:“委员会认为指定更长的期限来发布批准或不批准拟议规则变更的命令是适当的,以便委员会有足够的时间考虑拟议的规则变更以及其中提出的问题。”

此前报道, 3 月 4 日,SEC 推迟对贝莱德(BlackRock)申请的 iShares ETH Trust 和富达(Fidelity)申请其以太坊 ETF 的决定。

尽管此次推迟在意料之中,但仍对市场情绪和行情仍造成一定影响。据 RootData 行情数据,以太坊跌破 3200 美元,日内跌幅超 10% 。

据彭博社 ETF 分析师 James Seyffart 社交媒体,今明两天至少还会再有 3 个以太坊 ETF 推迟,VanEck、Ark/21 Shares、Hashdex 和 Grayscale 都将在未来约 12 天内延迟。他此前就曾说过,所有 ETF 审核决推迟或许会持续到 5 月 23 日。

多个审核决议再度推迟,以太坊现货ETF获批概率降低

此外,他还表示:“近几个月以来,我对 ETH ETF 谨慎乐观的态度发生了变化。我们现在相信这些申请最终将在 5 月 23 日这一轮被否决。美 SEC 尚未就以太坊的具体事项与发行商进行沟通。与去年秋季的比特币现货 ETF 申请时的情景完全相反。”

过去几周,市场对于以太坊现货 ETF 的申请通过的乐观情绪在持续下降。彭博 ETF 分析师 Eric Balchunas 最近还将以太坊现货 ETF 在 5 月份获得批准的可能性从约 70% 下调至 30% 。数据显示,以太坊一个月看涨-看跌偏度已转为负值,暗示看跌期权相对强劲。此前,以太坊 60 天指标也偏向看跌期权,而 90 天和 180 天指标仍为正值。QCP Capital 在其最新的市场洞察文章中解释称,投资者对近期以太坊看跌期权的兴趣可能源于美国 SEC 在 5 月份批准以太坊现货 ETF 的可能性在降低。

据了解,以太坊现货 ETF 有四个审核期限(45 天、 45 天、 90 天和 60 天),一但机构提交新的 ETF 申请,SEC 会将申请案登记到联邦登记册(Federal register)上,从入册的那天开始,就开始计算 240 天的周期。在每一个阶段的期限来临时,SEC 必须做出回应:通过、拒绝或推迟审核。如果第一个日期没有决议将会推迟到第二个,直至拖延至最后期限,SEC 必须做出最后的决议。也就是说,作为最早 VanEck 申请的以太坊现货 ETF 的最终期限 5 月 23 日将是关键日期,通过与否也将直接影响其他申请的决议结果。

目前,有七家主体正在申请以太坊 ETF,分别是:BlackRock、Fidelity、Invesco&Galaxy、Grayscale、VanEck、 21 Shares &Ark 和 Hashdex,各基金在 SEC 的审批期限如下表所示:

多个审核决议再度推迟,以太坊现货ETF获批概率降低

尽管此前 Bitwise 全球研究主管 Matt Hougan 等其他消息人士都预测,以太坊现货 ETF 在 5 月份获得批准的可能性接近 50% 甚至更高,但和已经上市的比特币现货 ETF 相比,以太坊现货 ETF 仍有一定的“风险”。在公开文件中,SEC 曾表示:“以太坊及其生态系统的特定特征,包括其权益证明共识机制以及少数个人或实体的控制或影响集中,是否存在导致以太坊易受欺诈和操纵的独特关注点?”

正如 BloFin 在近日发布的《我们该为以太坊现货 ETF 被拒做好准备吗?》中所提到的,与现货比特币 ETF 相比,PoS 机制的负面影响、价格操纵风险和证券化风险大幅降低了现货 ETH ETF 获批的概率。

前段时间的加密市场行情持续上涨或许拉高了我们对于这一结果的预期,这次下跌,多少能让我们回归冷静,至少做好以太坊现货 ETF 被拒的准备。

Related Reads

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit1h ago

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片