比特币杂志发布 BTC L2 严苛报道政策 有哪些正负面评价

Web3动向Published on 2024-03-05Last updated on 2024-03-05

Abstract

2 月 21 日，比特币的老牌权威媒体 BITCOIN MAGAZINE 发布其关于比特币 L2 的报道方针：比特币 L2 必须使用比特币作为其原生资产；必须使用比特币作为结算机制来执行交易；必须展示对比特币的功能依赖性，如果比特币网络故障，相关系统仍然运行，则它不是比特币的 L2；如果不具备以上三个特征，则不会进行报道。

2 月 21 日，比特币的老牌权威媒体 BITCOIN MAGAZINE 发布其关于比特币 L2 的报道方针：比特币 L2 必须使用比特币作为其原生资产；必须使用比特币作为结算机制来执行交易；必须展示对比特币的功能依赖性，如果比特币网络故障，相关系统仍然运行，则它不是比特币的 L2；如果不具备以上三个特征，则不会进行报道。

以下是 MAGAZINE 原文链接：

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/press-releases/bitcoin-magazine-editorial-policy-on-bitcoin-layer-2s-l2s

全文翻译：

《BITCOIN MAGAZINE 关于比特币 L2 的编辑政策》

比特币脚本似乎被严重低估了。

随着 2023 年 Ordinals 协议和 BitVM 白皮书的发布，关于比特币基础层可能性的观念正在改变，显然比特币现在正在吸收更广泛的加密货币生态系统中其他区块链的需求。

当然，自该协议 15 年历史之初，开发者就一直怀有为比特币添加额外功能的愿景。从早期的侧链如 Liquid 和 Rootstock 到未来的 L2，比特币杂志(Bitcoin Magazine)始终覆盖合法的扩容举措。

然而，现在有一波新的模仿者寻求利用这些发展来市场化任意加密代币。在这场比特币 L2 淘金热中，比特币杂志的编辑委员会认为有必要澄清其关于 L2 报道的立场。

要被报道，一个比特币 L2 必须：

● 使用比特币作为其原生资产：L2 必须基本上设计为使用比特币作为其主要代币或账户单位，以及支付系统费用的机制。如果它有一个代币，那么它必须由比特币支持。

● 使用比特币作为结算机制来执行交易：L2 的用户必须能够通过一种机制（可信的或无需信任的）退出系统，从而将其资金控制权返回到第 1 层。

● 展示对比特币的功能性依赖：如果比特币经历了彻底故障，而所讨论的系统仍能保持运行，那么我们的立场是，该系统不是比特币的第二层(Layer 2)。

建立在比特币上但不属于第二层(Layer 2)类别的协议，但仍可能有资格获得报道包括：

● 元协议(Meta Protocols)：像 Counterparty (XCP)或 Ordinals 这样的系统，这些协议超出了比特币协议的界限，在比特币第一层(Layer 1)上存在并运行，但没有自己的独立区块链。比特币杂志历史上已经报道了与此类协议相关的新闻和事件，并将继续这样做。

● “寄生”层(Parasite Layers)：这些系统依赖于比特币而存在，没有比特币就无法独立运作，但不满足被认为是第二层的其他标准。比特币杂志目前不报道这些协议。

此政策澄清不适用于我们的稳定币或代币报道决策。

此外，它仅适用于 BitcoinMagazine.com 及其印刷出版物，并不代表由比特币会议(The Bitcoin Conference)、Rare BTC 或 UTXO Management 执行的政策，后者是 BTC Inc 拥有和运营的机构基金，可能对基于比特币的 L2 有投资。

相关讨论

文章发布后，引发了一定的争议，BITCOIN MAGAZINE 的技术编辑 Spook 和 CEO David Bailey 等人又在推文中与社区进行了一系列讨论，经 OneKey 中文整理如下：

有人在评论区给出了一张关于所有（海外社区在关注的） BTC L2 的排列图，希望《比特币杂志》能够一一「盖章」，让大家知道什么 L2 能够被它们报道。比特币杂志 CEO 回复到：“我们正在寻找一位专职的 L2 报道作家，他会投入时间来分析这些内容。”

https://x.com/DavidFBailey/status/1760356147008057482?s=20

有人直接询问了海外社区比较关注的三个 L2—— Liquid、RSK 和 Stacks，在《比特币杂志》编辑眼里是否算 L2。Spook 的回复是：“Liquid 和 Rootstock 满足他们 BTC L2 的所有三个标准，Stacks 不使用 BTC 作为原生资产（所以不是）。”

https://x.com/brian_trollz/status/1760347879174971884?s=20

Stacks 的联合创始人 @muneeb发推表态，其认为《比特币杂志》完全不会影响 Stacks，并且认为只有最能满足用户需求和在自由市场胜出的 L2 才重要。他提倡让市场自由发展，大家应该集中精力扩大比特币市场份额。

https://x.com/muneeb/status/1760378840549924915?s=20

有人问道，如果有链直接说自己是「侧链」，而没强调自己是 L2，那会认为是 L2 吗？Spook 回复道，完全使用 BTC 作为原生资产的侧链，可以满足标准而作为 L2。对于「无法脱离比特币而运行」，他认为因为这种侧链需要 BTC 才能运行、或者联合挖矿，也是符合的。

https://x.com/brian_trollz/status/1760383704851943514?s=20

相较于 Stacks 联创的理性，Bitcoin Frontier Fund 管理合伙人、披萨忍者联创 trevor.btc @TO直接表达了「失望」的态度——甚至是挖苦讽刺。他认为这个所谓的标准，直接影响了所有有自己原生代币的 BTC L2，而且似乎还很「针对」Stacks —— 几乎每一家在这个领域内有信誉的投资公司和分析师都将 Stacks 与 Liquid 和 RSK 同等的位置。他表示这种举动会破坏创新，这也是导致过去三年没有什么人和机构想在比特币上构建、投资「酷炫的东西」。对于 Stacks ，他深入解释道，Stacks 的去中心化桥和安全机制，需要有一个自己的原生代币。这个代币为其用户服务，是出于一个合理且合法的目的。《比特币杂志》认为一个第二层必须使用BTC作为本地代币，否则它就是“坏的”，这种观点是可笑的，且没有任何合理的技术或经济基础。这不是基于事实，而是基于个人意见和政治。并且，他作为一个已经为比特币杂志撰写了三篇技术评论文章的人，他个人对于「仅仅因为有自己的代币，把很多新的和有趣的 BTC L2 排除在外」而感到失望。更讽刺的是，他反问道：这些 BTC L2 仍然被鼓励以数十万美元的价格赞助《比特币杂志》，同时被当作三等公民对待，这有点令人尝不出味道。这些 L2 能被允许赞助杂志媒体，但不足以被包括在重要的技术分析中或覆盖新闻价值和比特币创新吗？最后，他表示希望《比特币杂志》能够重新考虑立场，这个立场基于技术和经济基础而不是任意的个人意见。我们正在进入一个新的比特币创新时代，比特币杂志能做的最糟糕的事情——就是根据任意标准开始排除大量的比特币建设者。

https://twitter.com/TO/status/1760373424747110677?s=20

业内知名投资人 KOL @dotkrueger 批评道：现在出台标准太早了。看起来《比特币杂志》在真正的无需信任的 BTC L2 解决方案甚至存在之前，就开始在做“ L2 清真测试”。如果你不够“清真”，你就会被视为“寄生虫”。你们怎么不先写写技术挑战/可能的解决方案呢？

https://x.com/dotkrueger/status/1760399206819275139?s=20

Oridnal 市场 Bioniq 的 CEO @BobBodily 帮他们做了个大审查。假设按照他们的标准，那基本上要么过于理想化做不出来，要么就能先实现的方案都被排除在外。 下面的评论有人调侃道，基本所有的 ETH L2 都不能叫做 L2 了。

https://x.com/BobBodily/status/1760350951691755909?s=20

OneKey 中文对此总结道：可以看到社区多持负面态度，认为这标准太严苛且阻碍创新。其实类似的讨论，在以太坊社区已有多次。比如 V 神最开始很支持 Plasmas，后来又改口，在一些问题上甚至多次出现反转。所以不论「标准」如何，最后还得交给市场的实践。引用群友的一句话：「L2 Builder 放心飞，我们韭菜永相随」。

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
CapricornAPR
audio
AudiusAUDIO
comp
CompoundCOMP
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

Major Altcoin Market Players Did This During the Massive Rally!

As the cryptocurrency bull market intensifies, large-scale transactions by crypto 'whales' are drawing significant attention. Blockchain data reveals multi-million dollar positions opened and closed in Bitcoin ($BTC), Ethereum ($ETH), and Hyperliquid ($HYPE). A major investor, likely tied to Matrixport, closed a 40,000 $ETH long position worth ~$100.5M for a $9.9M profit. The investor still holds 80,000 $ETH (~$201M) and 500 $BTC (~$39M), with an unrealized profit of ~$22.9M. This turned their previous $92.5M total loss into an approximate $32.8M overall profit. On Hyperliquid, a trader known as loracle.hl reportedly lost over $70M trading $HYPE in the past three months. The investor currently holds ~$54.88M in $HYPE short positions, at risk of liquidation if $HYPE's price reaches $101.15. Notorious trader Machi Big Brother, who reportedly survived 500 liquidations, capitalized on the recent rally. He grew his portfolio from $152K to $12.72M in just three days, yielding over $12.5M in profit. While $HYPE hits a new all-time high, Multicoin Capital has deposited 427,422 $HYPE (~$31.74M) to Coinbase Prime over three days, raising speculation about a potential sale or portfolio rebalance. In Bitcoin markets, an anonymous whale stands out, selling ~2,700 $BTC (~$211.8M) in a recent transaction. Over three days, this whale sold a total of 7,700 $BTC, valued at approximately $576.6M.

cryptonews.ru21m ago

Major Altcoin Market Players Did This During the Massive Rally!

cryptonews.ru21m ago

Goldman Sachs' Summary After Silicon Valley Investigation: Agents Enter the Execution Era, AI Competition Shifts to Workflows, World Models Rise

Based on a recent field research in Silicon Valley, Goldman Sachs highlights a key shift in the AI industry: moving from systems that "answer questions" to autonomous AI agents that "execute tasks." Commercial models are transitioning from per-seat subscriptions to usage- and outcome-based pricing. The competition is shifting from raw model capability to mastery over specific business workflows, with value accruing to proprietary data, domain context, and operational expertise. A major hurdle for enterprise Agent deployment is not technical ability but "controllability"—issues of accountability, auditability, and error correction, especially in regulated fields. Workflows with clear rules, verifiable outcomes, and reversible actions (e.g., invoice processing) are being automated first. The model landscape is evolving toward a division of labor. Frontier models (like GPT-4) are expected to handle high-value, high-reliability core tasks, while improving open-source models will likely capture the majority (~90%) of inference tokens for standardized, high-volume tasks due to cost advantages. Finally, attention is moving from Large Language Models (LLMs) to "World Models," which understand physical environments, causality, and dynamic interactions. This shift elevates the importance of proprietary, real-world data (from industrial, scientific, and robotic systems) and could drive a second wave of compute demand. Goldman Sachs projects compute needs could grow ~24x over five years, benefiting cloud and infrastructure providers.

marsbit1h ago

Goldman Sachs' Summary After Silicon Valley Investigation: Agents Enter the Execution Era, AI Competition Shifts to Workflows, World Models Rise

marsbit1h ago

Fidelity Warns: The Boom in AI Agents May Not Be a Feast for Public Blockchains

Fidelity Digital Assets cautions that the anticipated boom in AI agents does not automatically guarantee a corresponding surge in public blockchain adoption or token value. While AI agents that can autonomously perform tasks like payments and data calls could theoretically utilize blockchain for settlement, a significant gap exists between "can use" and "must use." The analysis highlights six key risks. First, many AI agents, especially in corporate settings, may prefer closed, permissioned systems over public blockchains due to needs for speed, cost, compliance, and control. Second, increased on-chain transactions from AI-driven micropayments may not benefit native tokens if fees remain low or if value is captured by stablecoins and payment service providers instead. Third, while AI lowers development costs and increases the number of projects, more code does not equal more economic value and can lead to market oversaturation. Fourth, AI commoditizes coding, making pure technological advantage less of a sustainable moat; competition may shift to brand, liquidity, and user networks. Fifth, AI can also lower the cost of attacks by making vulnerability discovery easier, potentially outpacing security auditing and increasing ecosystem risk. Sixth, institutions may require "controlled blockchain" systems with robust identity, permissioning, and audit trails, conflicting with the permissionless nature of public chains. Ultimately, Fidelity argues against simply equating AI growth with blockchain prosperity. The narrative requires moving from speculation to a concrete analysis of which infrastructures can convert real AI agent needs into sustainable economic value, critically examining each step of the assumed value chain.

marsbit1h ago

Fidelity Warns: The Boom in AI Agents May Not Be a Feast for Public Blockchains

marsbit1h ago

Telegram Introduces WEB-Proxy Technology: Masks Traffic as Regular Website Visits

Telegram has introduced a new experimental WEB-Proxy technology designed to circumvent blocking by disguising messenger traffic as regular, secure website visits. Announced on August 21, 2026, the technology routes MTProxy data through an in-app WebView using HTTPS or WebSocket transport, making the data stream indistinguishable from legitimate web surfing. The core innovation is a multiplexed stream sent through a single WebView session. It uses special frame formats to pack multiple logical Telegram connections into one encrypted channel that externally resembles loading a web page. A server-side relay receives this stream, separates it into individual connections for the standard MTProxy, without decrypting content or knowing final destinations, thus preserving privacy. The WEB-Proxy operates on a standard HTTPS domain that also hosts a public website. The proxy bridge page is only activated by a specific URL parameter derived via HMAC-SHA256 from the proxy configuration; all other requests receive the normal site homepage. This provides reliable cover against automated detection systems. Currently a proof-of-concept, the system includes a desktop implementation, an experimental Android client, and plans for iOS support. The technology represents a shift towards more sophisticated integration with legitimate web infrastructure, complicating filtering systems that must choose between blocking HTTPS traffic entirely or allowing service access. Its long-term value will depend on resilience to adaptive traffic analysis and scalability without performance loss.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Telegram Introduces WEB-Proxy Technology: Masks Traffic as Regular Website Visits

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Justin Sun Declares War on Altcoin: 'It Freezes User Assets Through a Hidden Function'

Justin Sun has declared war on the altcoin $USD1, accusing World Liberty Financial (WLF) of embedding "backdoor functions" in its stablecoin that could allow the company to freeze or destroy user assets. In a statement via X, Sun detailed his ongoing legal battle with WLF. He claims his legal team successfully opposed WLF's attempt to move their dispute into private arbitration, keeping the case public in a California federal court. Through this process, Sun alleges he discovered $USD1 has similar hidden authorization mechanisms that grant WLF unilateral control over user funds, posing a significant counterparty risk. Sun also raised concerns about WLF's financial health. He questioned the company's ability to cover potential liabilities, including his own claims which could reach hundreds of millions of dollars. He emphasized that the roughly $4 billion in collateral backing $USD1 belongs to its users and cannot be used to satisfy company obligations. Sun urged investors to exercise "extreme caution." WLF has not yet issued an official response to these allegations. Sun's claims remain unproven at this stage.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Justin Sun Declares War on Altcoin: 'It Freezes User Assets Through a Hidden Function'

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

2.0k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions