$1T XRP trades on Upbit – Are Korean traders ignoring Bitcoin, Ethereum?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-16Last updated on 2026-02-16

Abstract

XRP has recorded nearly $1 billion in 24-hour trading volume on South Korean exchanges Upbit and Bithumb, significantly surpassing both Bitcoin and Ethereum in local markets. This dominance is driven by strong retail participation, with altcoins comprising 80% of trading volume on major platforms. Upbit alone accounts for approximately 70% of domestic market share, and XRP/KRW pairs often represent 30–35% of daily turnover. South Korea has become a major retail liquidity hub, with KRW trading volume reaching $1.1 trillion in 2024, rivaling USD as a leading fiat gateway for crypto. Retail-driven speculative activity, characterized by small average order sizes under $1,000, fuels XRP’s outperformance. Despite its spot market strength, XRP’s derivatives engagement remains limited due to local leverage restrictions, with open interest and funding rates staying neutral compared to Bitcoin and Ethereum. Premium pricing of 2–10% above global levels further highlights intense local demand. Ultimately, XRP serves as a key indicator of retail sentiment in Korea’s crypto market.

Amid heightened activity on Upbit and Bithumb, XRP recorded close to $1 billion in 24-hour trading volume.

Notably, this turnover surpassed both Bitcoin and Ethereum within local markets. In doing so, XRP reaffirmed its dominance across Korea’s retail-heavy exchanges.

South Korea has evolved into a retail liquidity hub, driven largely by fiat-denominated altcoin speculation. According to Kaiko data, KRW trading volume reached $1.1 trillion in 2024, surpassing domestic equity indices.

Thereafter, $663 billion recorded by mid-2025 sustained Korea’s global ranking. KRW now rivals USD as a leading fiat rail for crypto flows.

Altcoins dominate activity, comprising nearly 80% of volume across major exchanges. Upbit alone controls roughly 69–70% of the domestic share, reinforcing market concentration.

Meanwhile, XRP/KRW pairs frequently command approximately 30–35% of daily turnover. Cumulative Ripple [XRP] trades on Upbit have exceeded $1 trillion.

Premium pricing further shapes flows, with local valuations trading 2–10% above global levels. As retail demand intensifies, Korea’s liquidity footprint continues to influence broader altcoin price dynamics.

Altcoin rotation drives XRP volume leadership

XRP has established clear volume dominance across South Korea’s retail-driven exchanges. At the time of writing, on Upbit and Bithumb, XRP/KRW recorded approximately $789 million in combined 24-hour turnover.

Notably, Upbit contributed $528 million, capturing a 32% share. Meanwhile, Bithumb added $261 million, holding 28.27%.

By comparison, BTC/KRW totaled roughly $116 million, while ETH/KRW reached $150 million. Thus, XRP is outpacing Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH]. At peak sessions, XRP volume approached $1.2 billion amid volatility spikes.

Retail participation drives this supremacy, with altcoins comprising 80% of major exchange flows. Average Order Sizes remain under $1,000, reflecting speculative micro-trading. Thereafter, regulatory clarity and ETF narratives amplified liquidity.

Altogether, persistent KRW inflows position XRP as Korea’s retail sentiment gauge.

Spot dominance outpaces derivatives participation

Derivatives and spot markets reveal a clear structural divergence across XRP activity. In Korea, spot markets dominate, driven by retail flows through fiat on-ramps. By contrast, derivatives expansion remains constrained under local leverage restrictions.

At press time, XRP perpetual Open Interest sat near $94.7 billion. Meanwhile, Bitcoin edged slightly higher at $95 billion, while Ethereum aligned near $94.7 billion.

Despite XRP’s Spot Dominance, Derivatives Engagement does not mirror this strength. Funding Rates remained neutral—XRP at 0.0028% versus Bitcoin’s 0.0021% and Ethereum’s 0.0015%.

Similarly, Long/Short Ratio balance near 53/46 across assets. Thereafter, offshore ETF speculation adds limited futures momentum. Yet retail spot demand continues outpacing leveraged flows.

Altogether, Korea amplifies XRP sentiment more through cash markets than derivatives positioning.


Final Thoughts

  • XRP’s dominance in South Korea is retail-driven, with KRW spot inflows, altcoin rotation, and micro-sized trades propelling volumes above Bitcoin and Ethereum.
  • However, momentum remains concentrated in spot markets, as muted derivatives participation signals sentiment strength without matching leveraged conviction.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the approximate 24-hour trading volume of XRP on Upbit and Bithumb combined, and how did it compare to Bitcoin and Ethereum?

AThe combined 24-hour trading volume for XRP/KRW on Upbit and Bithumb was approximately $789 million. This significantly outpaced Bitcoin (BTC/KRW), which totaled roughly $116 million, and Ethereum (ETH/KRW), which reached $150 million.

QWhat percentage of the daily turnover on Upbit is frequently commanded by XRP/KRW trading pairs?

AXRP/KRW trading pairs frequently command approximately 30–35% of the daily turnover on Upbit.

QWhat key factor drives XRP's volume supremacy in the South Korean market, and what does the average order size indicate?

ARetail participation is the key driver of XRP's volume supremacy. The Average Order Sizes remaining under $1,000 reflect speculative micro-trading by retail investors.

QHow does XRP's derivatives activity, specifically Open Interest and Funding Rates, compare to Bitcoin and Ethereum?

AXRP's perpetual Open Interest was near $94.7 billion, slightly lower than Bitcoin's $95 billion and aligned with Ethereum's $94.7 billion. Its Funding Rate was a neutral 0.0028%, compared to Bitcoin's 0.0021% and Ethereum's 0.0015%.

QWhat is the primary reason for the structural divergence between XRP's spot market dominance and its derivatives engagement in Korea?

AThe divergence is due to retail-driven flows through fiat on-ramps dominating the spot markets, while derivatives expansion is constrained by local leverage restrictions, leading to muted leveraged futures momentum compared to strong cash market demand.

Related Reads

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

Amidst a generally stagnant crypto market in June and July, UNI, the governance token of Uniswap, saw a significant surge, nearly doubling in price from around $2.3 to $4.6. This rally represents a delayed but significant value reassessment, triggered by the practical implementation of its long-debated "fee switch" mechanism. The key turning point was the on-chain execution of the UNIfication proposal in December 2025. It activated a protocol fee on select pools, directed Unichain sequencer revenue (net of costs) to a communal treasury, executed a one-time burn of 100 million UNI, and established a system where all protocol revenue flows into a "TokenJar" contract. This treasury has a single exit: purchasing and permanently burning UNI via a "Firepit" contract. Initially, the market reacted tepidly as the generated revenue and corresponding burn rate were modest. The narrative shifted dramatically in July 2025 with two major developments. First, the launch of Robinhood Chain, tailored for tokenized stocks, rapidly became a primary source of volume and fees for Uniswap, at one point contributing nearly half of its weekly fees. Second, governance votes successfully expanded the fee mechanism to v4 pools and initiated a temperature check for fees on Robinhood Chain. The activation of v4 fees caused the protocol's daily revenue earmarked for UNI burns to nearly triple. The core of UNI's recent price action is the transition from a pure governance token to a cash-flow asset with a permanent, protocol-funded buyer. Its effectiveness is amplified by UNI's mature and widely distributed supply, with no major impending unlocks to dilute the impact of the buybacks. The sustainability of this rally now hinges on whether the transaction volume, particularly on Robinhood Chain, persists after its initial gas subsidies expire, determining if this is a genuine value realization or a subsidy-fueled spike.

marsbit1h ago

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

marsbit1h ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit2h ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit2h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit2h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.3k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片