一个新项目或协议应该关注什么?

区块创新Block ChangePublished on 2024-01-30Last updated on 2024-01-30

Abstract

让我们来看看 Curve(CRV)的结构。 实质上,Curve 为 LP 提供激励,通过他们的代币经济学鼓励参与者参与治理。而对于 Convex 来说,这里的终极目标是获得尽可能多的 veCRV 以最大化 CRV 奖励。 在明确设定目标之后,项目的创始人应该进一步研究代币的实际价值主张,持有该代币的参与者可以从中获得什么价值?比如: 质押 治理 价值存储 还有更多。如今,看到创始人提出由多种价值主张组成的代币是很常见的。当然,这可能导致对代币的更高需求。 一个完美的例子是 GMX,该代币具有多个价值主张,如治理(启发参与者的真实偏好的能力)、认领(将托管的 GMX 在一段时间内转换为 GMX 的能力)和持有(接收协议收入)。 随着这些价值主张,还有功能参数,这与决定代币的文字功能的变量有关,最简单的例子是转移或销毁。对于团队来说,确保代币的功能参数与其价值主张不冲突是绝对关键的。例如,一个用于价值转移的代币的目标和价值主张应该具有确保其可替代性的功能。以下是代币的一些功能参数: 可转让性(可转让 + 不可转让):分别是 GMX 和 esGMX。 可销毁性(可销毁 + 不可销毁):分别是 BNB 和 SBTs。 可替代性(可替代 + 不可替代):分别是 ERC20 和 ERC721(NFT)。 汇率(浮动 + 固定):分别是 MKR 和 DAI。 有时,团队故意决定一个代币被分配了冲突的价值主张或功能。在这种情况下,代币可以被分为两种或更多种类型。AXS 的著名案例就是一个最好的例子,从最初的单代币模型转变为多代币模型。 最初,AXS 有 3 个价值属性:价值转移、治理和持有。这里的冲突源于参与者如果决定在游戏内进行 AXS 的价值转移,就意味着放弃治理和持有的权益,这对游戏经济造成了问题。为了解决这个问题,他们发布了一个「新」代币 SLP,然后成为游戏内的首选价值转移工具。你可能还记得 STEPN 的 GMT 和 GST 中的同样的双系统。 然而,实施双代币系统可能使代币经济学设计过于复杂,并且有时考虑将外部代币作为辅助代币可能是重要的,以确保更顺畅的交互。一个典型的例子是 ARB,主要用于治理。 为了确保更顺畅的交互,ARB 使用 ETH 作为支付交易费用的手段,因为发生在 L2 上的交易被捆绑在一起并发送到 L1 状态。如果没有引入此外部代币(ETH)作为支付交易费用的手段,将发生以下情况:ARB 用于支付交易费用(gas 费),运营商然后必须将 ARB 兑换成 ETH 以在 L1 上进行验证并在进一步的 gas 费中损失,为 ARB 的增长创造了一种矛盾。 在上述部分,我已经介绍了代币经济学的一般动态和团队应该考虑的各种推动因素,现在让我们来看看代币供应。因为这直接影响代币价格(这是 degen 们想要的)。代币供应的结构如下: 最大供应量 分配百分比(销售、投资者、团队、市场营销、国库等) 分配的分布:分配给初始、归属和奖励发行。 最大供应量很重要,因为这决定了团队是否能够发行代币的最大上限,未限制的代币可能没有很好的价格分布。这不直接影响价格,但是影响发行速率的因素,以及代币是否通货紧缩或通货膨胀是影响价格的因素。 对于有限的最大供应量,例如 CRV(30 亿代币),价格可以上涨。因为随着网络的增长,对代币的需求增加,形成了一个供应有限的高需求区域,这种类型的最大供应的问题在于,如果代币分发不迅速,未来的新贡献者也很难提供激励。 另一方面,拥有无限最大供应可以避免关于未来激励耗尽的问题,当然...

让我们来看看 Curve(CRV)的结构。

实质上,Curve 为 LP 提供激励,通过他们的代币经济学鼓励参与者参与治理。而对于 Convex 来说,这里的终极目标是获得尽可能多的 veCRV 以最大化 CRV 奖励。

在明确设定目标之后,项目的创始人应该进一步研究代币的实际价值主张,持有该代币的参与者可以从中获得什么价值?比如:

质押

治理

价值存储

还有更多。如今,看到创始人提出由多种价值主张组成的代币是很常见的。当然,这可能导致对代币的更高需求。

一个完美的例子是 GMX,该代币具有多个价值主张,如治理(启发参与者的真实偏好的能力)、认领(将托管的 GMX 在一段时间内转换为 GMX 的能力)和持有(接收协议收入)。

随着这些价值主张,还有功能参数,这与决定代币的文字功能的变量有关,最简单的例子是转移或销毁。对于团队来说,确保代币的功能参数与其价值主张不冲突是绝对关键的。例如,一个用于价值转移的代币的目标和价值主张应该具有确保其可替代性的功能。以下是代币的一些功能参数:

可转让性(可转让 + 不可转让):分别是 GMX 和 esGMX。

可销毁性(可销毁 + 不可销毁):分别是 BNB 和 SBTs。

可替代性(可替代 + 不可替代):分别是 ERC20 和 ERC721(NFT)。

汇率(浮动 + 固定):分别是 MKR 和 DAI。

有时,团队故意决定一个代币被分配了冲突的价值主张或功能。在这种情况下,代币可以被分为两种或更多种类型。AXS 的著名案例就是一个最好的例子,从最初的单代币模型转变为多代币模型。

最初,AXS 有 3 个价值属性:价值转移、治理和持有。这里的冲突源于参与者如果决定在游戏内进行 AXS 的价值转移,就意味着放弃治理和持有的权益,这对游戏经济造成了问题。为了解决这个问题,他们发布了一个「新」代币 SLP,然后成为游戏内的首选价值转移工具。你可能还记得 STEPN 的 GMT 和 GST 中的同样的双系统。

然而,实施双代币系统可能使代币经济学设计过于复杂,并且有时考虑将外部代币作为辅助代币可能是重要的,以确保更顺畅的交互。一个典型的例子是 ARB,主要用于治理。

为了确保更顺畅的交互,ARB 使用 ETH 作为支付交易费用的手段,因为发生在 L2 上的交易被捆绑在一起并发送到 L1 状态。如果没有引入此外部代币(ETH)作为支付交易费用的手段,将发生以下情况:ARB 用于支付交易费用(gas 费),运营商然后必须将 ARB 兑换成 ETH 以在 L1 上进行验证并在进一步的 gas 费中损失,为 ARB 的增长创造了一种矛盾。

在上述部分,我已经介绍了代币经济学的一般动态和团队应该考虑的各种推动因素,现在让我们来看看代币供应。因为这直接影响代币价格(这是 degen 们想要的)。代币供应的结构如下:

最大供应量

分配百分比(销售、投资者、团队、市场营销、国库等)

分配的分布:分配给初始、归属和奖励发行。

最大供应量很重要,因为这决定了团队是否能够发行代币的最大上限,未限制的代币可能没有很好的价格分布。这不直接影响价格,但是影响发行速率的因素,以及代币是否通货紧缩或通货膨胀是影响价格的因素。

对于有限的最大供应量,例如 CRV(30 亿代币),价格可以上涨。因为随着网络的增长,对代币的需求增加,形成了一个供应有限的高需求区域,这种类型的最大供应的问题在于,如果代币分发不迅速,未来的新贡献者也很难提供激励。

另一方面,拥有无限最大供应可以避免关于未来激励耗尽的问题,当然,这里的缺点是从长远来看可能会有代币价格下降,因为实质上存在无限供应,除非使用外部模型减少流通(例如:质押、销毁等),否则长期内只能存在下降趋势,而不管其增长如何。

在分配方面,通常是基于最大供应的百分比,实际上确定了每个类别应该分配的最大供应的百分比。主要的类别有:团队(包括创始人、开发者、市场营销等,实际上是负责建设项目的个人),投资者(参与早期/种子/私募轮的人员),国库(运营成本,如研发、储备等),社区(空投、LP 奖励、挖矿奖励等),公开销售(ICO、IDO、IEO、LBP 等)和营销(包括顾问、意见领袖、代理等)。

这些是项目考虑的一些关键要素,然而这些要素对每个项目来说基本上是独特的,可以根据它们的「战略」简化或进一步细分类别。

值得注意的是,在 2020-21 年 DeFi 崛起时,团队意识到通过允许更高奖励给他们的社区,或通过空投增加初始持有者的浮动量,可能会导致网络增长和可持续代币经济的繁荣。

最后,分发。初始供应是在「启动」时立即释放到开放市场的初始浮动量,或者有些人称之为 TGE。分配到这个类别的分配通常是国库、公开销售和我们到处都能看到的臭名昭著的空投的一部分百分比。

对于待解锁的代币,这些通常会被锁定 x 个月/年,通常适用于投资者、国库、团队代币,他们可以自行决定持续时间和何时开始解锁,通常解锁防止大规模的代币抛售,特别是因为这个部分的参与者通常是以低于上市价的估值购买的投资者。

那么,这一切为什么重要呢?

简单来说,代币需求和价值捕获意味着理论上市场参与者应该通过持有代币来获得价值。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit1h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit1h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手2h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手2h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit3h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit3h ago

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Down, Users & Transactions Hit New Highs Token Terminal's Q1 2026 report on Ethereum presents a pivotal development: the network achieved record highs in monthly active users (13.2M, +85.9% YoY), total transactions (200.4M, +81.5% YoY), and throughput (25.78 TPS), while transaction fees on the mainnet plummeted by 47.9% quarter-over-quarter. This shift is attributed to the network's strategic move into a "low fees for scale" phase, exemplified by the Fusaka upgrade which increased data capacity and lowered block space costs, releasing pent-up demand (a manifestation of Jevons's Paradox). The report highlights a core narrative shift for Ethereum: from a DeFi-centric blockchain to a global financial settlement layer. It maintains a dominant position in tokenized assets, holding majority market shares among top chains in stablecoins (61.8%), tokenized funds (73.0%), and tokenized commodities (84.0%). Growth in tokenized funds (+73.1% YoY) and commodities (+325.9% YoY) was particularly strong, driven by institutions like BlackRock and JPMorgan entering the space. Contrasting these usage gains, several USD-denominated value metrics declined in Q1: fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% QoQ, total value locked (TVL) dropped 11.0%, and ecosystem transaction volume decreased 24.0%. The report interprets this as Ethereum prioritizing long-term network expansion and cementing its role as the default settlement layer for finance over short-term fee capture. The commentary from Etherealize argues that, much like the early internet, Ethereum's open, permissionless model is poised to win over closed alternatives as institutional tokenization accelerates.

marsbit5h ago

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: Fees Decline, Users and Transaction Volume Hit New Highs

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy CRV

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Curve DAO Token (CRV) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Curve DAO Token (CRV) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Curve DAO Token (CRV)After purchasing your Curve DAO Token (CRV), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Curve DAO Token (CRV)Easily trade Curve DAO Token (CRV) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.1k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy CRV

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of CRV (CRV) are presented below.

活动图片