最终修复方案出炉，Aave坏账风波终于要结局了

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-28Last updated on 2026-04-28

作者|Azuma(@azuma_eth)

折腾了一个多星期的 Aave 坏账风波已基本迎来尾声。

随着 DeFi United 已募集到了足够解决问题的资金(截至发文已募集 132704 ETH,价值约 3.02 亿美元),Aave 官方也在 4 月 28 日中午发布了关于修复 rsETH 抵押状况并恢复市场正常运行的技术实施方案。

  • Odaily注:前情提要可参阅《DeFi再次被盗2.92亿美元,这下连Aave都不安全了?》;《2.9亿窟窿下的三方博弈:Aave、L0、Kelp谁能买单?》;《Aave正因自己的愚蠢,拱手让出DeFi借贷的王座》。

背景回溯

关于 Kelp DAO 如何失窃 116500 rsETH 的细节已不用多提,重点在于被盗之后的赃款流向。

黑客得手之后,先是将这 116500 枚 rsETH 分散至多个地址。其中一部分被作为抵押存入以太坊主网上的 Aave V3 并借出 WETH,另一部分被桥接至 Arbitrum 并在该网络上的 Aave 抵押借出 WETH,其余少部分赃款则通过不同渠道转移。

目前,与黑客相关的 7 个地址在 Aave 和 Compound 上仍持有活跃的 rsETH 抵押头寸,约占最初被盗 116500 枚中的 107000 枚。

解决方案

为了实现修复目标,Aave 在拟设的实施方案中设置了两个目标。其一为恢复 rsETH 的抵押支撑;其二为清理 Aave、Compound 等借贷市场中的受影响头寸,以回收约 107000 枚 rsETH 的超额抵押资产,进而修复市场受损情况。

先来说说第一个目标 —— 恢复 rsETH 的抵押支撑。

目前的 rsETH 实质上是属于“资不抵债”状态,虽然底层质押中 ETH 仍然完好,但黑客已通过抵押借贷完成出逃,这部分缺口的存在就导致 rsETH 与 ETH 的兑换报价出现了“脱锚”。

因此 Aave 提到,为了恢复 rsETH 的抵押支撑,就需要将 rsETH 和 ETH 之间的兑换比例拉回到 1 :1.07。这将通过 DeFi United 推动实现,该组织现已获得足够的 ETH 承诺出资,以恢复系统的完整运作,但最终执行仍取决于治理批准、执行时间安排以及相关协议的签署。

若方案能够顺利推进,DeFi United 将通过向 rsETH 的桥接锁仓合约(RSETH_OFTAdapter 0x85d456b2...98ef3)存入 ETH 来完全恢复 rsETH 的抵押支持。具体流程如下:

  • 分批将 DeFi United 的 ETH 转换为 rsETH;
  • 将这些 rsETH 转入相关锁仓合约;
  • 使桥接系统能够安全恢复并全面运行。
  • LayerZero 和 Kelp DAO 方面会实施额外安全措施,以确保桥恢复后的安全性。

再来看第二个目标 —— 清理借贷市场中的受影响头寸。

rsETH 的抵押支撑恢复之后,理论上 Aave 的借贷市场便已不存在坏账(此时抵押价值已大于借出价值),但仍需将与黑客相关的几个异常抵押头寸清理(预计可回收 13000 ETH),以恢复市场的正常运行。

对此,Aave 表示将在以太坊与 Arbitrum 依次上发起治理提案,通过“受控的清算流程”来清理异常头寸。具体的解决流程为:

  • 暂时调整 rsETH 预言机价格,以触发高效清算;
  • 清算过程中会产生暂时性亏空(后续步骤将弥补该亏空);
  • 回收的 rsETH 抵押品将转移至 DeFi United 管理的多签地址。

Aave 强调,上述参数调整仅为临时措施,仅用于恢复执行,所有调整将在完成后恢复,不会对 Aave 协议造成长期影响。 在解决问题期间,以太坊主网、Arbitrum、Base、Mantle 和 Linea 上的 WETH 与 rsETH 存款均将保持冻结状态。

完成清算后的理想状况为:rsETH 价格预言机将恢复; 回收的 rsETH 将通过 Kelp DAO 标准赎回流程兑换为 ETH;这些 ETH 将用于填补 Aave 在以太坊和 Arbitrum 市场中的亏空。

至于 Compound,也将采取类似的清理方式,在 DeFi United 提供流动性支持的情况下,预计可额外回收约 16776 ETH。

待两大目标都有效完成后,Aave 解除所有相关市场中的 rsETH 与 ETH 暂停和冻结状态,随后会恢复 ETH 及其他资产的贷款价值比(LTV)等参数配置。

待解问题

Aave 补充提到,尽管上述方案有望在不出现社会化损失的情况下实现修复目标,但仍存在以下几点不确定性。

一是尽管已获得足够 ETH 承诺,但资金部署仍依赖最终协议与治理批准; 二是受影响头寸的清理依赖治理提案顺利通过与执行; 三是攻击者若刻意干扰,可能导致亏空未完全形成,需要额外清算步骤; 四是LayerZero 与 Kelp 已部署额外安全措施,但在生产环境验证前仍存在残余风险;

但无论如何,已搅扰 DeFi 市场许久的“Kelp DAO 被盗,Aave 坏账”事件看起来终于是要有个尾声了,后续需要看的就是方案能否在实际环境下如预期般推进。

正如 The Rollup 创始人 Andy 的评论:“接下来几天对 DeFi 来说至关重要,任务艰巨,且必须既快速又稳妥地完成。这既是一次技术挑战,更是一场社会协同的考验。能实时见证这一切的发展,确实有种不真实的感觉。”

希望好运站在 DeFi 这一侧。

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

SpaceX, AI, and XRP: Why the Next Wealth Transfer Might Be Different?

The article posits that the global economy is transitioning into a new phase of infrastructure investment. Capital, facing slowing traditional growth engines, is flowing towards emerging foundational systems. This includes space infrastructure (exemplified by SpaceX), AI computing power, satellite networks, data centers, and global payment systems. A key driver is a potential new commodity supercycle fueled by industrial demand from these sectors. Concurrently, the role of blockchain is evolving from speculative assets to a critical settlement layer for the future economy. Digital assets like XRP and XLM, focused on payments and interoperability, are highlighted as potential rails for cross-border settlement, tokenized assets, and machine-to-machine (AI Agent) transactions. The narrative connects figures like Ripple's Jed McCaleb to space ventures, suggesting convergence. The argument emphasizes a shift from speculative narratives to utility-driven value. As AI and space commerce generate new economic activity, and regulatory clarity improves, blockchain networks may underpin real-time value transfer. The conclusion urges investors to consider which networks will form the backbone of this integrated next-generation economic infrastructure.

marsbit1h ago

SpaceX, AI, and XRP: Why the Next Wealth Transfer Might Be Different?

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit2h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit2h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit3h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit3h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinist4h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinist4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy AAVE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Aave Protocol (AAVE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Aave Protocol (AAVE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Aave Protocol (AAVE)After purchasing your Aave Protocol (AAVE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Aave Protocol (AAVE)Easily trade Aave Protocol (AAVE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.5k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy AAVE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AAVE (AAVE) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions