Ripple CTO Sounds Alarm: New Form Of Scam Targets Crypto Users

bitcoinistPublished on 2024-10-04Last updated on 2024-10-05

Abstract

Scams within the crypto landscape are evolving with dizzying complexity. Just recently, Ripple Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, showed how...

Scams within the crypto landscape are evolving with dizzying complexity. Just recently, Ripple Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, showed how phishing attacks have also been carried out against unsuspecting Coinbase users–the largest cryptocurrency exchange. It is a biting reminder of the dangers lurking within the digital space, and even the most seasoned professionals can be fooled by audacious fraudsters.

Ripple CTO Reveals Latest Scam

Schwartz took to social media to disclose all the details of the scam message he received from where their sender claimed to be a Coinbase representative. The scammers misrepresented themselves as being from the asset shielding department and told him that an investigation was ongoing into his account.

It started with a phone call and an email with the case ID and representative name. In order to deceive, they give a false image of legality.

However, it was from an unofficial domain. Now, that’s a definite signal for something fishy. Many victims tend to ignore this piece of information when things are at their most intense moment during the attack, despite the warning sign. The story of Schwartz typifies just how fraudsters use social engineering tactics for gaining trust and siphoning sensitive information from unsuspecting individuals.

A Growing Concern In Crypto

This incident is not an isolated occurrence. Additionally, Jacob Canfield, a distinguished crypto trader, recently disclosed his unfortunate encounter with a comparable fraud. He received a text message alerting him to modifications to his account’s two-factor authentication settings.

Total crypto market cap currently at $2 trillion. Chart: TradingView

Subsequently, he received telephone calls from individuals who claimed to be Coinbase support personnel. They even went so far as to send him an email that appeared to be from Coinbase’s official address, which further complicated the situation. Canfield’s experience shows how these schemes can ensnare even the most vigilant users.

By declining to furnish verification codes when requested, he successfully circumvented the scam. Nevertheless, a significant number of individuals have not been as fortunate; reports suggest that up to 30 individuals have already lost substantial sums of money as a result of this particular fraud.

Top Targets

With 38% of all brand phishing assaults in Q1 2024, Microsoft was the brand most frequently targeted. With 11% more of the same kind of attacks, Google came next. Cybercriminals have been tricking users into divulging private information, such as login credentials, by sending emails that seem authentic.

These emails have posed problems for the consumers since they tend to sound like formal letters, and these are confusing for a consumer to determine between real and fake ones. According to a recent survey, malicious emails have surged by 341% in just this year alone.

One of the largest European retailers, Pepco Group, was attacked by phishing scammers worth approximately €15.5 million in February 2024. Fraudsters herein spoofed valid employee emails to mislead finance staff into remitting funds.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Christian Encila

Christian Encila

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Related Reads

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片