Bittensor Price Prediction – TAO Price Estimated to Reach $709.64 By Apr 18, 2024 | CoinCodex

cryptodailyPublished on 2024-04-16Last updated on 2024-04-16

Abstract

Bittensor price$ 550.02Bittensor prediction $ 709.64 (30.33%)Sentiment BearishFear & Greed index 72 (Greed)Key support levels$ 487.74, $ 432.78, $ 354.09Key resistance levels$ 621.39, $ 700.08, $ 755.04TAO price is expected to rise by 30.33% in the next 5 days according to our Bittensor price prediction


Table of Contents


  • Bittensor is down -13.43% today against the US Dollar
  • TAO/BTC decreased by -8.89% today
  • TAO/ETH decreased by -5.56% today
  • Bittensor is currently trading 22.49% below our prediction on Apr 18, 2024
  • Bittensor dropped -13.76% in the last month and is up 798.47% since 1 year ago

Bittensor price$ 550.02Bittensor prediction $ 709.64 (30.33%)Sentiment BearishFear & Greed index 72 (Greed)Key support levels$ 487.74, $ 432.78, $ 354.09Key resistance levels$ 621.39, $ 700.08, $ 755.04TAO price is expected to rise by 30.33% in the next 5 days according to our Bittensor price prediction
Bittensor price today is trading at $ 550.02 after losing -13.43% in the last 24 hours. The coin underperformed the cryptocurrency market, as the total crypto market cap decreased by -7.55% in the same time period. TAO performed poorly against BTC today and recorded a -8.89% loss against the world’s largest cryptocurrency.
According to our Bittensor price prediction, TAO is expected to reach a price of $ 709.64 by Apr 18, 2024. This would represent a 30.33% price increase for TAO in the next 5 days.
TAO Price Prediction Chart

Buy/Sell Bittensor
What has been going on with Bittensor in the last 30 days
Bittensor has been displaying a negative trend recently, as the coin lost -13.76% in the last 30-days. The medium-term trend for Bittensor has been bullish, with TAO increasing by 136.99% in the last 3 months. The long-term picture for Bittensor has been positive, as TAO is currently displaying a 798.47% 1-year price change. On this day last year, TAO was trading at $ 61.22.
Bittensor reached its all-time high price on Apr 11, 2024, when the price of TAO peaked at $ 783.81. The current TAO cycle high is $ 571.64, while the cycle low is at $ 508.85. TAO has been displaying low volatility recently – the 1-month volatility of the coin is at 7.83. Bittensor recorded 13 green days in the last 30 days.

Bittensor technical analysis for today - Apr 13, 2024
The sentiment in the Bittensor markets is currently Bearish, and the Fear & Greed index is reading Greed. The most important support levels to watch are $ 487.74, $ 432.78 and $ 354.09, while $ 621.39, $ 700.08 and $ 755.04 are the key resistance levels.
Bearish sentiment for Bittensor
10 indicators are currently signaling a bullish prediction for Bittensor, while 15 indicators are showing a bearish forecast. With 60% of indicators favoring a negative prediction. This results in an overall Bearish sentiment for Bittensor.
Crypto market is currently experiencing Greed
Currently, the Fear & Greed index is at 72 (Greed), which signals that investors have a positive outlook on the market. The Fear & Greed index is a measure of sentiment among cryptocurrency investors. A “Greed” reading suggests that investors are currently optimistic about the cryptocurrency market, but can also be an indication that the market is overvalued. A “Fear” reading, on the other hand, signals that investors are currently hesitant about the cryptocurrency market, which potentially represents a buying opportunity.
Bittensor moving averages & oscillators
Let’s take a look at what some of the most important technical indicators are signaling. We’ll be going through key moving averages and oscillators that will allow us to get a better idea of how Bittensor is positioned in the market right now.

PeriodDaily SimpleDaily ExponentialWeekly SimpleWeekly ExponentialMA3$ 588.14 (SELL)$ 576.25 (SELL)--MA5$ 569.73 (SELL)$ 565.63 (SELL)--MA10$ 585.39 (SELL)$ 563.03 (SELL)--MA21$ 570.88 (SELL)$ 580.40 (SELL)$ 517.87 (BUY)$ 452.66 (BUY)MA50$ 617.03 (SELL)$ 574.48 (SELL)$ 152.88 (BUY)$ 180.46 (BUY)MA100$ 498.53 (BUY)$ 501.15 (BUY)--MA200$ 333.38 (BUY)$ 380.87 (BUY)--
PeriodValueActionRSI (14)55.93NEUTRALStoch RSI (14)100.00SELLStochastic Fast (14)52.28NEUTRALCommodity Channel Index (20)66.67NEUTRALAverage Directional Index (14)18.13NEUTRALAwesome Oscillator (5, 34)-8.29NEUTRALMomentum (10)51.12NEUTRALMACD (12, 26)8.24NEUTRALWilliams Percent Range (14)-47.72NEUTRALUltimate Oscillator (7, 14, 28)37.27NEUTRALVWMA (10)591.64BUYHull Moving Average (9)610.89BUYIchimoku Cloud B/L (9, 26, 52, 26)623.58NEUTRALThe Relative Strength Index (RSI 14) is a widely used indicator that helps inform investors whether an asset is currently overbought or oversold. The RSI 14 for Bittensor is at 55.93, suggesting that TAO is currently neutral.
The 50-day Simple Moving Average (SMA 50) takes into account the closing price of Bittensor over the last 50 days. Currently, Bittensor is trading above the SMA 50 trendline, which is a bullish signal.
Meanwhile, the 200-day Simple Moving Average (SMA 200) is a long-term trendline that’s calculated by taking an average of the TAO closing price for the last 200 days. TAO is now trading below the SMA 200, signaling that the market is currently bearish.
The bottom line about this Bittensor prediction
After considering the above factors, we can conclude that the current forecast for Bittensor price prediction is Bearish. TAO would have to increase by 30.33% to hit our $ 709.64 target within the next five days. Moving forward, it will be important to monitor the TAO market sentiment, the key support and resistance levels, and other metrics. However, we have to keep in mind that the cryptocurrency markets are unpredictable, and even the largest crypto assets display a lot of price volatility. For long-term Bittensor price predictions click here.
Disclaimer: This is not investment advice. The information provided is for general purposes only. No information, materials, services and other content provided on this page constitute a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or any financial, investment, or other advice. Seek independent professional consultation in the form of legal, financial, and fiscal advice before making any investment decision.

Trending Cryptos

ctr
CitreaCTR
wstusdt
wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT
apr
aPrioriAPR
ctx
Cryptex FinanceCTX
audio
AudiusAUDIO
mantra
MantraMANTRA
xvs
VenusXVS
waxl
AxelarWAXL
bill
Billions NetworkBILL
pyth
PYTH (Pyth)PYTH
rune
THORChainRUNE
velodrome
Velodrome FinanceVELODROME
brev
BrevisBREV
zrx
ZRX（0X）ZRX
cake
PancakeSwapCAKE

Related Reads

XRP Reversal Setup Forms Around Harmonic Pattern And Key Support Zone

XRP is trading at a critical technical support zone, according to a June 20 TradingView analysis. This area combines multiple layers of confluence, including the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement level and the point of control for the current range. Such convergence can intensify the battle between buyers and sellers at this level. The analysis suggests this support could form the basis for a broader harmonic reversal pattern. While not a guarantee, such setups provide a structured framework for identifying potential trend changes, invalidation points, and price targets. For the reversal thesis to gain credibility, XRP needs a decisive bullish reaction from this zone—specifically, a sustained bounce with volume that reclaims nearby resistance, not just a brief wick. Failure to hold support or repeated tests of the area would weaken the bullish argument. The setup is notable but requires confirmation from market price action.

bitcoinist56m ago

XRP Reversal Setup Forms Around Harmonic Pattern And Key Support Zone

bitcoinist56m ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

Vitalik Buterin's recent algorithmic stablecoin proposal envisions using an option-like mechanism to create a stablecoin without the liquidation risks inherent in traditional collateralized debt position (CDP) models. The design splits one unit of ETH into two components: a 'stable' leg (P) that maintains value up to a certain strike price, and an 'upside' leg (N) that captures any appreciation above that price. Together, they always sum to one ETH, eliminating the need for debt or liquidation mechanisms. From an options perspective, the stable leg essentially functions as a synthetic, covered call position. However, significant challenges exist. For the stable asset to maintain its peg, it must continuously roll deep in-the-money call options, leading to potential rollover slippage, predictable trading paths vulnerable to front-running, and liquidity issues. Crucially, the system's scalability depends on a constant demand for the upside leg—a form of leveraged ETH long position without funding rates or liquidation risk. It's unclear if such persistent, specific demand will materialize from speculators or market makers who have simpler alternatives like perpetual swaps. The author, drawing from experience with Rysk, argues that DeFi options have struggled as standalone trading products due to complexity and fragmented liquidity. Their potential lies instead as foundational infrastructure underpinning more complex financial primitives like stablecoins, structured yields, or index products—transforming from a direct product into a core pricing and risk distribution engine for the next generation of on-chain finance.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Algorithmic Stablecoin Vision: Interpreting the Mechanism and Challenges from an Options Perspective

marsbit1h ago

SpaceX, AI, and XRP: Why the Next Wealth Transfer Might Be Different?

The article posits that the global economy is transitioning into a new phase of infrastructure investment. Capital, facing slowing traditional growth engines, is flowing towards emerging foundational systems. This includes space infrastructure (exemplified by SpaceX), AI computing power, satellite networks, data centers, and global payment systems. A key driver is a potential new commodity supercycle fueled by industrial demand from these sectors. Concurrently, the role of blockchain is evolving from speculative assets to a critical settlement layer for the future economy. Digital assets like XRP and XLM, focused on payments and interoperability, are highlighted as potential rails for cross-border settlement, tokenized assets, and machine-to-machine (AI Agent) transactions. The narrative connects figures like Ripple's Jed McCaleb to space ventures, suggesting convergence. The argument emphasizes a shift from speculative narratives to utility-driven value. As AI and space commerce generate new economic activity, and regulatory clarity improves, blockchain networks may underpin real-time value transfer. The conclusion urges investors to consider which networks will form the backbone of this integrated next-generation economic infrastructure.

marsbit2h ago

SpaceX, AI, and XRP: Why the Next Wealth Transfer Might Be Different?

marsbit2h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit3h ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit3h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit4h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow