Uniswap Wins Legal Battle as U.S. Federal Judge Dismisses Crypto Rug-Pull Lawsuit

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-03-03更新於 2026-03-03

文章摘要

A U.S. federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Uniswap Labs and its founder, Hayden Adams, which sought to hold the decentralized exchange accountable for alleged rug pulls and pump-and-dump schemes on its platform. Judge Katherine Polk Failla ruled that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the fraudulent actions of anonymous token issuers, emphasizing that operating a decentralized, open-source trading platform does not constitute assisting fraud. The plaintiffs had refiled the case with state-level consumer protection claims after an earlier dismissal, but the court reaffirmed legal protections for DeFi infrastructure. Following the decision, Uniswap's native token UNI saw a price increase and higher trading volume. The ruling is seen as a significant legal victory for the DeFi sector.

Uniswap Labs and its founder, Hayden Adams, saw a significant legal victory when a US federal judge dismissed a four-year-old class-action complaint seeking to hold the decentralized exchange accountable for rug pull and pump-and-dump fraud on its platform.

The decision was delivered by Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan on March 2, ruling that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the actions of anonymous token issuers and that operating as a decentralized platform providing an open‐source trading environment does not constitute assisting fraud.

Federal Court Backs DeFi Infrastructure

Nessa Risley led the plaintiffs and filed the first lawsuit against Hayden Adams and Uniswap in April 2022. The lawsuit was dismissed in August 2023 and upheld on appeal. Again, the plaintiffs refiled in May; this time, they switched to state consumer protection concerns and claimed that the platform permitted pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls.

The court upheld the legal safeguards for open-source DeFi platforms by rejecting the arguments once more.

Then, Brian, policy and legal lead at Uniswap Labs, said the ruling marks “another precedent-setting win for DeFi,” He stressed that even though the plaintiffs switched to state-level claims, the court once more determined that Uniswap cannot be held accountable for stated scams carried out by anonymous third-party token issuers, adding that it “defies logic” to hold a smart contract developer accountable for how others abuse the protocol.

As this decision marks Uniswap’s another major courtroom victory, as in February, Bancor-affiliated entities filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the exchange, which was dismissed by a New York federal judge, ruling that the patents at issue were based on abstract ideas and therefore not eligible for protection under U.S. patent law.

Following the ruling and continued legal wins, UNI is trading up about 1.5%, at $3.86, with a total market cap of $2.45 billion. Also, the 24-hour trading volume climbed over 23%, which signals increased market activity.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Hong Kong and Shanghai Authorities Integrate Cargo Data on Blockchain

TagsUNIUniswap

相關問答

QWhat was the outcome of the US federal judge's ruling regarding Uniswap Labs and the class-action lawsuit?

AThe US federal judge dismissed the class-action complaint against Uniswap Labs, ruling that the decentralized exchange cannot be held accountable for rug pull and pump-and-dump fraud conducted by anonymous token issuers on its platform.

QWho is the judge that delivered the decision in the Uniswap lawsuit and on what date?

AJudge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan delivered the decision on March 2.

QWhat did the plaintiffs claim in their refiled lawsuit against Uniswap in May?

AThe plaintiffs refiled the lawsuit switching to state consumer protection concerns, claiming that the platform permitted pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls.

QHow did the legal representative of Uniswap Labs characterize this court ruling?

ABrian, the policy and legal lead at Uniswap Labs, said the ruling marks 'another precedent-setting win for DeFi' and stated that it 'defies logic' to hold a smart contract developer accountable for how others abuse the protocol.

QWhat was the market reaction of UNI token following the court ruling?

AFollowing the ruling, UNI was trading up about 1.5% at $3.86, with a 24-hour trading volume that climbed over 23%, signaling increased market activity.

你可能也喜歡

大摩2026半导体报告:买封装、买测试、买中国芯,避开传统赛道

**大摩2026年半导体报告核心摘要** 报告指出,全球AI资本开支超预期扩张,算力供给正从“NVIDIA主导”转向“GPU + ASIC + 中国芯”三轨并行。核心投资逻辑是抓住AI供应链红利,回避被边缘化的传统赛道。 **核心结论(按重要性排序):** 1. **买封装**:先进封装(CoWoS/SoIC)是确定性最强主线。AI服务器需求直接拉动产能,台积电(TSMC)因其不可替代性成为核心受益者。 2. **买测试设备**:测试设备(Handler/Socket/探针卡)是估值最低、成长最确定的细分方向。AI芯片复杂度导致测试时长结构性翻倍增长,市场重估严重滞后。重点公司:鸿精密、颖崴科技(WinWay)、MPI。 3. **买中国AI芯片**:出口管制倒逼国产替代,中国云厂商加速切换。国产芯片在推理场景已具备总拥有成本(TCO)优势。市场呈分化格局,华为占据主导(62%),寒武纪(14%)因客户锁定和盈利确定性成为首选标的。 4. **避开传统赛道**:非AI半导体(消费/汽车/工控)被AI系统性虹吸供应链资源,复苏弱于预期,建议回避纯传统敞口。存储内部分化,坚定看多HBM(海力士最受益),对传统DRAM/NAND持谨慎态度。 5. **宏观与结构变量**:地缘政治(出口管制)强化中国芯替代逻辑;AI需求对非AI供应链的“蚕食效应”是传统半导体疲软的核心原因;科技通胀(晶圆/封测/存储成本上涨)挤压非AI芯片设计公司利润。 **一句话总结**:聚焦AI基础设施核心环节(封装、测试)及中国替代龙头(寒武纪),规避传统半导体复苏幻想,时间窗口在2026-2027年。

marsbit4 分鐘前

大摩2026半导体报告:买封装、买测试、买中国芯,避开传统赛道

marsbit4 分鐘前

Michael Saylor:我确实说要卖比特币,但我是为了买更多

微策略公司执行主席迈克尔·塞勒在近期播客访谈中,澄清了公司关于可能出售比特币以支付STRC优先股股息的决定。他强调,此举并非“净卖出”,公司始终是比特币的净累积者。微策略通过发行STRC等数字信用工具筹集资金,转而购买更多比特币,利用比特币作为“数字资本”的高增值属性(预期年升值约30-40%)来覆盖股息支付(约11%),从而实现持仓规模的持续净增长。例如,公司在一个月内融资30亿美元购买比特币,仅需支付约8000万至9000万美元股息,本质是“买入30个,卖出1个”。 塞勒解释,该商业模式类似于房地产开发公司:发行信用工具投资资产,资产增值后变现部分收益。他强调,只要公司持续增长且比特币年度增值超过2.3%,就能永久支付股息并保持净买入。他重申,个人投资者也应成为比特币的“净累积者”,每年持仓应增加。 访谈还提及,比特币作为表现最佳的资本资产,其杀手级应用之一是作为数字信用的抵押品。STRC因此成为市场上夏普比率最高、流动性最强的优先股之一,推动了数字信用生态发展。塞勒认为,比特币市场流动性极强,单一实体无法显著影响其价格,主要驱动力在于全球宏观因素。尽管存在地缘政治等逆风,比特币仍会因持续的资金流入和有限供应而缓慢上涨。

marsbit58 分鐘前

Michael Saylor:我确实说要卖比特币,但我是为了买更多

marsbit58 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片