Uniswap Wins Legal Battle as U.S. Federal Judge Dismisses Crypto Rug-Pull Lawsuit

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-03-03更新於 2026-03-03

文章摘要

A U.S. federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Uniswap Labs and its founder, Hayden Adams, which sought to hold the decentralized exchange accountable for alleged rug pulls and pump-and-dump schemes on its platform. Judge Katherine Polk Failla ruled that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the fraudulent actions of anonymous token issuers, emphasizing that operating a decentralized, open-source trading platform does not constitute assisting fraud. The plaintiffs had refiled the case with state-level consumer protection claims after an earlier dismissal, but the court reaffirmed legal protections for DeFi infrastructure. Following the decision, Uniswap's native token UNI saw a price increase and higher trading volume. The ruling is seen as a significant legal victory for the DeFi sector.

Uniswap Labs and its founder, Hayden Adams, saw a significant legal victory when a US federal judge dismissed a four-year-old class-action complaint seeking to hold the decentralized exchange accountable for rug pull and pump-and-dump fraud on its platform.

The decision was delivered by Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan on March 2, ruling that Uniswap cannot be held responsible for the actions of anonymous token issuers and that operating as a decentralized platform providing an open‐source trading environment does not constitute assisting fraud.

Federal Court Backs DeFi Infrastructure

Nessa Risley led the plaintiffs and filed the first lawsuit against Hayden Adams and Uniswap in April 2022. The lawsuit was dismissed in August 2023 and upheld on appeal. Again, the plaintiffs refiled in May; this time, they switched to state consumer protection concerns and claimed that the platform permitted pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls.

The court upheld the legal safeguards for open-source DeFi platforms by rejecting the arguments once more.

Then, Brian, policy and legal lead at Uniswap Labs, said the ruling marks “another precedent-setting win for DeFi,” He stressed that even though the plaintiffs switched to state-level claims, the court once more determined that Uniswap cannot be held accountable for stated scams carried out by anonymous third-party token issuers, adding that it “defies logic” to hold a smart contract developer accountable for how others abuse the protocol.

As this decision marks Uniswap’s another major courtroom victory, as in February, Bancor-affiliated entities filed a patent infringement lawsuit against the exchange, which was dismissed by a New York federal judge, ruling that the patents at issue were based on abstract ideas and therefore not eligible for protection under U.S. patent law.

Following the ruling and continued legal wins, UNI is trading up about 1.5%, at $3.86, with a total market cap of $2.45 billion. Also, the 24-hour trading volume climbed over 23%, which signals increased market activity.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Hong Kong and Shanghai Authorities Integrate Cargo Data on Blockchain

TagsUNIUniswap

相關問答

QWhat was the outcome of the US federal judge's ruling regarding Uniswap Labs and the class-action lawsuit?

AThe US federal judge dismissed the class-action complaint against Uniswap Labs, ruling that the decentralized exchange cannot be held accountable for rug pull and pump-and-dump fraud conducted by anonymous token issuers on its platform.

QWho is the judge that delivered the decision in the Uniswap lawsuit and on what date?

AJudge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan delivered the decision on March 2.

QWhat did the plaintiffs claim in their refiled lawsuit against Uniswap in May?

AThe plaintiffs refiled the lawsuit switching to state consumer protection concerns, claiming that the platform permitted pump-and-dump schemes and rug pulls.

QHow did the legal representative of Uniswap Labs characterize this court ruling?

ABrian, the policy and legal lead at Uniswap Labs, said the ruling marks 'another precedent-setting win for DeFi' and stated that it 'defies logic' to hold a smart contract developer accountable for how others abuse the protocol.

QWhat was the market reaction of UNI token following the court ruling?

AFollowing the ruling, UNI was trading up about 1.5% at $3.86, with a 24-hour trading volume that climbed over 23%, signaling increased market activity.

你可能也喜歡

图解Cloudflare钱包:使用X402的稳定币支付新玩家

8月4日,Cloudflare宣布推出Wallets,但当前仅开放用户认领“handle”(名称),而充值、付款等核心功能尚未上线。此次发布更接近于确立付款方身份,而非完整的支付解决方案。 Cloudflare近期支付相关产品包括:处于开放测试的Stripe Projects(代理为用户刷卡开通服务)、仍在等候名单的Monetization Gateway(商户收款入口),以及此次的Wallet。三者侧重不同,Wallet旨在补充付款方的身份、余额与授权规则。 x402协议数据显示其网络过去30天处理超7500万笔交易,总金额约2424万美元,平均每笔0.32美元,符合API调用等微支付特征。但这反映的是开放协议的整体活动,并不能直接等同于Cloudflare钱包的采用率或代理自主消费规模。 Cloudflare文档示例将单次API调用定价为0.01美元,并展示了基于HTTP 402状态的微支付流程。但目前开发者路径仍需自行保管私钥并使用测试网络货币。Wallet计划区分账户持有者的主钱包与代理使用的虚拟钱包,并引入额度、白名单等风控规则,但这些功能尚未开放配置。 当前存在三条不同的代理支付路径:Stripe Projects使用支付令牌且设有消费上限;x402开发者路径需自持私钥;而Wallet仅开放名称注册。三者仅在“代理支付”概念上共享交集,Cloudflare钱包的稳定币支持、链选择、地区合规及费率等关键细节仍有待公布。

marsbit10 分鐘前

图解Cloudflare钱包:使用X402的稳定币支付新玩家

marsbit10 分鐘前

TradeXYZ与Hyperliquid:揭秘50%分成下的共生关系

市场情绪趋向谨慎,AI投资需兼顾增长与现金流才会受认可;加密市场则面临ETF资金流出和利率上升的压力。加密货币内部,市场热点轮动至Solana和去中心化交易所(DEX)板块。 宏观层面,美股主要指数表现分化,黄金微涨,而比特币表现较弱。AI巨头财报显示,市场更青睐能证明投资回报且不严重损耗现金流的公司。加密市场持续承压,ETF资金转为净流出,国债收益率高企压制风险偏好。 在加密领域,Solana生态本周表现最佳,主要受个别代币上线主流交易所推动;DEX板块紧随其后,Uniswap因费用机制扩展至新链而上涨。文章指出,围绕Uniswap v4 hooks的链上创新值得关注。 文章重点探讨了交易平台TradeXYZ与底层链Hyperliquid之间的关系。TradeXYZ在Hyperliquid上构建,并将其协议收入的一半分给Hyperliquid。针对外界关于TradeXYZ可能因分成过高而离开、或Hyperliquid如何实现价值的担忧,文章分析认为,双方是高度共生的关系:Hyperliquid提供了关键的基础设施和用户基础,而TradeXYZ的执行力是RWA市场增长的关键。离开对双方都是“声誉自杀”,且不切实际。Hyperliquid除分成外,还通过其他费用和二阶效应(如增加稳定币供应带来收入)获利。 核心问题在于双方如何从追求增长的“低费率”模式,转向更稳定、更高的费用基础以实现长期盈利。

marsbit25 分鐘前

TradeXYZ与Hyperliquid:揭秘50%分成下的共生关系

marsbit25 分鐘前

报道:DeepSeek 重启融资,投前估值 5000 亿元

多名交易人士透露,DeepSeek已重启第二轮融资,计划募资500亿元,投前估值约5000亿元,目标8月下旬完成签约。此前,该公司于今年4月启动、6月完成首轮融资,募资500亿元,估值超3500亿元,创下中国AI大模型领域首轮融资规模纪录。 第二轮融资在7月中旬开启后一度暂停,据称与创始人梁文锋对网上流传的“投资者会议实录”不满有关。目前重启后,公司与投资方希望低调推进。部分投资机构表示尚未收到重启通知。 本轮融资名单包括首轮落选机构及既有投资方的增资意向。DeepSeek首轮投资方包括国家人工智能产业投资基金、腾讯、宁德时代、溥泉资本、网易、京东等。首轮融资意向资金超1000亿元,显示市场热度高涨。 若本轮顺利完成,DeepSeek两轮融资总额将超1000亿元,估值较首轮提升约43%。其融资规模远超同行,例如月之暗面近期以约2100亿元估值完成融资,并已启动Pre-IPO轮。 模型能力与效率直接影响公司估值。DeepSeek原定7月中旬发布的V4正式版略有延迟,V4-Flash已于7月31日公测,其Agent能力显著提升,在多项基准测试中表现优异。第三方评测显示,其智能水平国内领先,且延续高性价比路线,API调用成本低于多数竞争对手。 在推理成本上升的背景下,高性价比成为行业趋势。近期OpenAI亦下调模型价格,但DeepSeek-V4-Flash发布后性价比优势再度凸显。据OpenRouter榜单,该模型本周Token消耗量已居全球首位。

marsbit49 分鐘前

报道:DeepSeek 重启融资,投前估值 5000 亿元

marsbit49 分鐘前

OpenAI连破10道数学难题,Fable 24小时「复现」5道

上周末,OpenAI与Anthropic在数学前沿领域展开了一场引人注目的竞争。 8月1日,OpenAI研究员Sébastien Bubeck宣布,其未发布的新主力模型Astra一口气证明了10项停滞多年的前沿数学难题,并提供了详细的Lean证明证书和思路复盘。其中,关于“非索菲克群”的成果被认为足以刊登顶级期刊《数学年刊》。这一突破引发了AI界关于“数学奇点”的热议。 不到24小时,Anthropic迅速接招。其研究员Levent Alpöge表示,利用已公开的模型Fable,在无网络、防泄漏的条件下,独立复现了Astra成果中的5项。这意味着,OpenAI凭借未发布模型获得的“首发”优势,保质期大幅缩短至一天以内。 OpenAI方面称,找到这10项解法的边际推理成本不足2000美元,但此数字未包含模型训练、人力整理与形式化证明等前期巨大投入。尽管如此,这仍将AI解决前沿难题的单次成本降至新低。 此次竞争不同于传统“刷榜”。两大模型在独立条件下抵达相同结论,更接近于科学界的“同行评审”和“独立验证”,旨在检验结果的可靠性与可复现性。 然而,这些高度专业的数学成果超出了绝大多数人的理解范围,公众只能依赖专家构建的信任链。有数学家指出,AI的成就建立在人类数百年的数学积累之上,将其简单描述为“AI取代数学家”并不准确。关键在于证明是否带来了关于问题本身的新认知。 随着AI可能进入低成本、批量产出数学证明的阶段,最稀缺的能力或许正从“生成证明”转向“验收证明”。当证明的产出速度越来越快,人类验证与理解的能力能否跟上,已成为新的核心考验。

marsbit52 分鐘前

OpenAI连破10道数学难题,Fable 24小时「复现」5道

marsbit52 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片