The DeepSeek Financing Story

链捕手發佈於 2026-06-18更新於 2026-06-18

文章摘要

DeepSeek's financing round, totaling approximately 3 billion USD, concluded recently, revealing details about the process and key investors. The round was initiated around April with strict initial terms: a minimum commitment of 5 billion RMB, no syndication, and a pure RMB structure. These were later relaxed, with the minimum ticket size reduced to 1.5 billion RMB. A pivotal four-hour online investor meeting in mid-May served as the primary interaction for many backers with DeepSeek's founder, Liang Wenfeng. Despite not being a naturally eloquent speaker, Liang's philosophy deeply resonated. He consistently emphasized the company's singular focus on AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), the principle of "less is more," extreme caution in spending, and the paramount importance of team stability. His notable quotes included describing the team as "ordinary people doing extraordinary things" and stating that "AGI is a big enough thing; everything else is just process." The final investor list featured 10 entities, but underlying fund structures indicate participation from nearly 100 institutions and individuals. Notable lead investors include Monolith Capital (increasing its commitment from 1.5 to 3 billion RMB), Zhenxingu Capital, IDG Capital, and state-affiliated investors like Guozhitou. Conspicuously absent were major firms like Sequoia China and Hillhouse Capital, despite earlier speculation about their involvement. A core condition set by Liang Wenfeng for all investo...

Author:@Liu Jing, elsewhere

Information about DeepSeek's financing is already everywhere.

Known information will not be repeated by "elsewhere." Below are some untold stories or details we have learned about.

The Legendary Four-Hour Meeting

First, let's talk about that investor meeting, the one whispered about as the "four-hour meeting."

In mid-May, DeepSeek organized this online meeting using the Tencent Meeting system. At that time, the investors were largely finalized, with each institution having two spots to attend.

Liang Wenfeng spoke first, followed by a Q&A session where he addressed investors' questions.

Legend has it that one CVC investor spent ten minutes just asking questions: first a lengthy self-introduction, then three lengthy questions. The atmosphere became awkward for a moment—a scene easy to imagine. Some people whispered among themselves, asking who this person was.

But Liang was unfazed and answered each question seriously. Although after answering the second question, he momentarily forgot the third one and had the investor repeat it.

Prior to this, most of these investors who eventually got in had never met Liang Wenfeng offline, so this was essentially their first real interaction with him. After the meeting, many were left with a lingering impression, a feeling that the essence of the discussion remained with them.

Liang Wenfeng's memorable quotes and spirit began circulating in the market.

Restraint and AGI

Liang Wenfeng is not an exceptionally articulate speaker, and his pace of speech isn't fast, but several quotes from that meeting are often mentioned (paraphrased, the exact wording may vary slightly)—

"We have no fame or influence; we are a group of very ordinary people."

"The narrative I like is that a group of ordinary people accomplished something extraordinary. For DeepSeek, our core is to ensure team stability—this is more important than money or resources. This is the biggest risk and also the greatest challenge."

"Assuming AGI will account for 20% of GDP, those who want 5% of it will lose to those who want 1%; those who want 1% will lose to those who want 0.1%."

"We will focus on things related to enhancing intelligence; we won't do anything else."

"AGI is a significant enough goal; everything else is just a process."

Throughout the four hours, the themes Liang Wenfeng repeatedly emphasized were consistent: focusing solely on AGI; 'less is more'; restraint, and so on.

From 5 Billion to 1.5 Billion

Formal fundraising began around April this year. There was reportedly a so-called "fund white list" consisting of institutions with strong investment capabilities and good reputations.

Initially, DeepSeek required a minimum ticket size of 5 billion RMB, no syndication of shares, and a pure RMB structure.

Against this backdrop, a prominent investor who was initially rumored to definitely participate but ultimately didn't, is widely believed in the industry to have been excluded because they had reportedly marketed shares to Middle Eastern LPs.

However, in China, there are very few market-oriented funds capable of a single investment of 3 billion RMB. Therefore, some VCs repeatedly negotiated whether it could be split among multiple fund entities.

So, looking at the result, the minimum ticket size for a fund was lowered to 1.5 billion RMB, and the fund-raising method became more flexible.

There was also a rumor that participating institutions should preferably not have invested in other large language models. This was probably unrealistic for a simple reason—finding a top-tier fund that hasn't invested in large models is contradictory.

During the investor meeting, Liang Wenfeng also expressed that DeepSeek is willing to help other companies—even including other LLM companies. Of course, the premise remains that they don't poach his people.

Monolith

Monolith Capital appeared early on the investor list. The change was that initially it was 1.5 billion, but it ended up being 3 billion.

The change in numbers is said to be related to the adjustment in Guozhitou's allocation, freeing up some shares—the latter's figure of 980 million RMB suggests it was kept below the 1 billion integer.

Regardless, being willing to place big bets is indeed Cao Xi's distinctive style. He has proven it once with Kimi.

Monolith is probably the youngest VC among the participating institutions in this round.

Zhengxingu

Zhengxingu might be the most surprising presence in the final list.

Many interpret it as Zhengxingu having not invested in any Chinese LLM company during this wave, thus being more eager to get on board. However, according to our knowledge, they did invest in Kimi, likely between $6 billion and $10 billion valuation. But compared to their fund size, the investment amount is relatively limited.

One market interpretation is that the founder of Zhengxingu comes from a secondary market background and seems to have more connections with quantitative funds like Huafang. But in reality, in the secondary market, quantitative investing and fundamental investing are two distinct circles, even with different values.

According to our understanding, this investment happened not only because of Lin Lijun and his partnerYe Chunyan, but also due to the efforts of a newly joined investor.

Zhengxingu was also one of the earliest VCs to start communicating with DeepSeek.

Will DeepSeek Be Sequoia and Hillhouse's Biggest Miss?

Now to the most surprising part of this deal.

In the initial rumors, Hillhouse would participate and invest 5 billion. Zhang Lei also reportedly mentioned to friends multiple times that since 2025, he and Liang Wenfeng had occasional exchanges, and when in Beijing, he would visit Liang's home.

But this story later evolved into: Hillhouse wouldn't participate, but Zhang Lei personally would invest. Reasons cited include Hillhouse's fundraising cycle and regulatory considerations.

Ultimately, neither Zhang Lei nor Hillhouse appeared on the list.

Sequoia China, on the other hand, was almost considered a non-participant from the beginning. The most widespread version cited concerns about overseas LPs. We asked several people close to Sequoia, and they expressed similar sentiments. Of course, other explanations are also circulating.

The bottom line is that Sequoia and Hillhouse, the two institutions that seemed almost certain to be involved, ultimately were not. A senior lawyer told us that for companies with an RMB structure, theoretically, investors cannot be hidden.

Among the established VCs, only IDG invested.

So someone asked us a question in return: Could DeepSeek potentially become Sequoia and Hillhouse's biggest miss?

It's hard to say. However, based on our understanding, DeepSeek might not just raise this one round.

100 Institutions and Individuals

Looking at the investor list, only 10 parties are listed as participating. But "elsewhere" did a simple look-through of the fund entities and found that the actual number of participants is quite high.

For example, the external CVC related to the CATL system—Puyuan Capital's backers include: state-owned assets from Xiamen, Ordos, and other regions; entities related to CATL; and the National Green Development Fund.

Several IDG Capital funds related to this transaction have strong insurance capital characteristics and account for a very high proportion of the 30 billion. Additionally, there are entities related to Nongfu Spring, Septwolves, etc.

Monolith's current LPs are mainly state-owned assets from Zhejiang and Shanghai, as well as listed companies like By-health and Yanghe Distillery.

Furthermore, iHealth Labs is also a participant. In fact, iHealth is also an LP behind many GPs.

A rough estimate, after a shallow look-through and simple deduplication, suggests that nearly 100 institutions or individuals participated in this round of DeepSeek's financing.

The Key Requirement: Don't Poach Talent

We won't reiterate DeepSeek's investment terms here. Just one addition: whether dealing with large corporations or VC funds, Liang Wenfeng's most important requirement is: do not poach DeepSeek's people or encourage them to start their own ventures.

"China's Largest Listed Company"

Returning to viewing this as an investment, what kind of odds does DeepSeek really have?

One participating investor once worriedly said, could this be an investment with too much consensus? According to the experience of the investment industry, consensus outcomes are often mediocre.

But it's hard to say that about DeepSeek. Or rather, we cannot simply understand it through a conventional investment lens, whether in terms of its significance for China's AGI industry or its spiritual meaning.

As one investor put it: "They are doing all this with immense goodwill. He seems to be telling us: this is how the world should be."

So while some hesitated, others believed, "there's no reason not to invest"—if it does IPO as some expect, could DeepSeek potentially become China's largest listed company by market cap on the A-share market?

Low Profile and Ambition

While following DeepSeek's financing progress, one prominent feeling stood out: for most people, DeepSeek was probably a completely unexpected answer. Even for the most competitive investors, they never imagined it would open up for fundraising one day.

So as mentioned, most of the well-known investment veterans only recently connected with the company. Objectively, Liang Wenfeng has indeed long avoided meeting with investors.

When news of the fundraising spread, many institutions didn't even attempt to compete for an investment opportunity. But looking at the result, some got their ticket based on synergy, some on insight, some on brand spirit, and some simply on persistence.

"elsewhere" tried to ask some investors, but most didn't want to discuss this investment much. The sensitivity of the deal is one reason, but more so, it seems to be a conscious desire to maintain this low profile, stemming from a sense of shared honor.

One participating investor said that throughout the process, he cherished every document, hoping to have them framed someday. Another investor repeated twice the 16-character phrase released with the DeepSeek V4 preview:"Not lured by praise, not frightened by slander; act according to the Way, upright and correct oneself."

熱門幣種推薦

相關問答

QWhat is the main topic of the article 'DeepSeek Financing Story'?

AThe main topic of the article is the details and background stories behind the latest financing round of the AI company DeepSeek, highlighting key events, investor meetings, and the company's philosophy.

QWho is Liang Wenfeng and what is his core message during the four-hour investor meeting?

ALiang Wenfeng is the founder of DeepSeek. During the four-hour meeting, his core message was to focus solely on AGI, emphasize team stability, and advocate for a 'less is more' and 'restrained' approach, stating that 'our core is to ensure team stability—this is more important than money and resources.'

QWhy were venture capital giants like Sequoia China and Hillhouse Capital absent from DeepSeek's investor list according to the article?

ASequoia China was reportedly absent due to concerns related to its overseas LPs. Regarding Hillhouse Capital and its founder Zhang Lei, various reasons are mentioned, including the firm's fundraising rhythm and regulatory factors, but ultimately neither participated in this round.

QWhat was the primary non-financial requirement DeepSeek had for its investors?

ADeepSeek's primary non-financial requirement was that investors, including large corporations and VC funds, must not poach DeepSeek's employees or encourage them to leave to start their own ventures.

QWhat is the article's perspective on the broader significance of DeepSeek beyond just an investment opportunity?

AThe article suggests DeepSeek's significance extends beyond a simple investment. It highlights its importance for China's AGI industry and its inspirational value, describing the team as acting with 'great goodwill' and potentially becoming 'the largest listed company in China's A-share market' if it IPOs.

你可能也喜歡

Michael Saylor:反对 BIP—110 的 110 个理由

Michael Saylor发表长文,系统性地阐述了反对比特币改进提案BIP 110的110个理由。他认为,BIP 110旨在通过修改共识规则来限制区块链上的非支付类数据存储(如铭文等),但其根本动机源于对特定应用的价值判断和“垃圾信息”的担忧,而非修复协议的安全或技术漏洞。Saylor强调,比特币的核心优势在于其中立性、硬共识和开放的无许可创新环境。 他反对BIP 110的主要论点包括:该提案将社会性价值判断提升为协议法律,破坏了规则的中立性;其举证不足,未能量化所谓“紧急威胁”的具体影响;提案捆绑了七项过于宽泛的技术限制,可能误伤未来的合法金融应用与升级路径;临时性的共识规则增加了系统复杂性和协调风险;可能对矿工收入、网络安全和长期创新产生不确定的负面经济影响。 Saylor指出,比特币已具备区块大小和手续费市场等中立的调节机制,节点和矿工也可以自行制定中继和打包策略,这些是比动用共识分叉更优的解决方案。他警告,BIP 110会开创一个危险的先例,即通过协议规则排除不受欢迎的用途,这可能导致未来更多的治理冲突,并扼杀尚未被发现的创新。他呼吁社区应完善测量、采用更精准的资源定价机制,并等待压倒性的共识,而非仓促实施一个可能弊大于利的方案。他最终主张,比特币需要的是“中立性的守护者”,而非“救赎性的守护者”。

marsbit4 分鐘前

Michael Saylor:反对 BIP—110 的 110 个理由

marsbit4 分鐘前

United Stables 市值突破 10 亿美元,Chainlink 数据喂价保障 U 代币抵押资产

United Stables发行的稳定币U市值已突破10亿美元,其关键在于采用了Chainlink数据预言机网络来提供抵押品定价和数据基础设施。 这一里程碑事件突显了在稳定币领域,可靠的数据基础设施已非可选,而是必需品。稳定币的价值依赖于用户对其抵押品、定价和赎回机制的信任,若相关数据薄弱或不透明,将阻碍其在DeFi中的整合与应用。Chainlink通过提供外部数据源,为U稳定币生态系统支持自动化的抵押品审计和定价。 需要明确的是,Chainlink在此扮演的是基础设施角色,它本身并不直接赋予稳定币价值,而是通过提供可靠的数据层,使其他系统能更安全地与稳定币交互。U市值的增长也表明,尽管稳定币市场仍由巨头主导,但新的发行方正在凭借强大的基础设施支持找到发展空间。 对于LINK持有者而言,这一集成案例巩固了Chainlink在稳定币关键基础设施(如抵押品验证)领域的战略地位,增强了其网络效应和机构相关性。然而,单一稳定币的增长并不能直接等同于LINK代币的费用增长或价格驱动,其影响更多是间接和战略层面的。核心在于,稳定币正变得越来越重要、受监管且依赖基础设施,而Chainlink正将自己定位为该环境中的关键服务提供商。

bitcoinist1 小時前

United Stables 市值突破 10 亿美元,Chainlink 数据喂价保障 U 代币抵押资产

bitcoinist1 小時前

交易

現貨

熱門文章

什麼是 $S$

理解 SPERO:全面概述 SPERO 簡介 隨著創新領域的不斷演變,web3 技術和加密貨幣項目的出現在塑造數字未來中扮演著關鍵角色。在這個動態領域中,SPERO(標記為 SPERO,$$s$)是一個引起關注的項目。本文旨在收集並呈現有關 SPERO 的詳細信息,以幫助愛好者和投資者理解其基礎、目標和在 web3 和加密領域內的創新。 SPERO,$$s$ 是什麼? SPERO,$$s$ 是加密空間中的一個獨特項目,旨在利用去中心化和區塊鏈技術的原則,創建一個促進參與、實用性和金融包容性的生態系統。該項目旨在以新的方式促進點對點互動,為用戶提供創新的金融解決方案和服務。 SPERO,$$s$ 的核心目標是通過提供增強用戶體驗的工具和平台來賦能個人。這包括使交易方式更加靈活、促進社區驅動的倡議,以及通過去中心化應用程序(dApps)創造金融機會的途徑。SPERO,$$s$ 的基本願景圍繞包容性展開,旨在彌合傳統金融中的差距,同時利用區塊鏈技術的優勢。 誰是 SPERO,$$s$ 的創建者? SPERO,$$s$ 的創建者身份仍然有些模糊,因為公開可用的資源對其創始人提供的詳細背景信息有限。這種缺乏透明度可能源於該項目對去中心化的承諾——這是一種許多 web3 項目所共享的精神,優先考慮集體貢獻而非個人認可。 通過將討論重心放在社區及其共同目標上,SPERO,$$s$ 體現了賦能的本質,而不特別突出某些個體。因此,理解 SPERO 的精神和使命比識別單一創建者更為重要。 誰是 SPERO,$$s$ 的投資者? SPERO,$$s$ 得到了來自風險投資家到天使投資者的多樣化投資者的支持,他們致力於促進加密領域的創新。這些投資者的關注點通常與 SPERO 的使命一致——優先考慮那些承諾社會技術進步、金融包容性和去中心化治理的項目。 這些投資者通常對不僅提供創新產品,還對區塊鏈社區及其生態系統做出積極貢獻的項目感興趣。這些投資者的支持強化了 SPERO,$$s$ 作為快速發展的加密項目領域中的一個重要競爭者。 SPERO,$$s$ 如何運作? SPERO,$$s$ 採用多面向的框架,使其與傳統的加密貨幣項目區別開來。以下是一些突顯其獨特性和創新的關鍵特徵: 去中心化治理:SPERO,$$s$ 整合了去中心化治理模型,賦予用戶積極參與決策過程的權力,關於項目的未來。這種方法促進了社區成員之間的擁有感和責任感。 代幣實用性:SPERO,$$s$ 使用其自己的加密貨幣代幣,旨在在生態系統內部提供多種功能。這些代幣使交易、獎勵和平台上提供的服務得以促進,增強了整體參與度和實用性。 分層架構:SPERO,$$s$ 的技術架構支持模塊化和可擴展性,允許在項目發展過程中無縫整合額外的功能和應用。這種適應性對於在不斷變化的加密環境中保持相關性至關重要。 社區參與:該項目強調社區驅動的倡議,採用激勵合作和反饋的機制。通過培養強大的社區,SPERO,$$s$ 能夠更好地滿足用戶需求並適應市場趨勢。 專注於包容性:通過提供低交易費用和用戶友好的界面,SPERO,$$s$ 旨在吸引多樣化的用戶群體,包括那些以前可能未曾參與加密領域的個體。這種對包容性的承諾與其通過可及性賦能的總體使命相一致。 SPERO,$$s$ 的時間線 理解一個項目的歷史提供了對其發展軌跡和里程碑的關鍵見解。以下是建議的時間線,映射 SPERO,$$s$ 演變中的重要事件: 概念化和構思階段:形成 SPERO,$$s$ 基礎的初步想法被提出,與區塊鏈行業內的去中心化和社區聚焦原則密切相關。 項目白皮書的發布:在概念階段之後,發布了一份全面的白皮書,詳細說明了 SPERO,$$s$ 的願景、目標和技術基礎設施,以吸引社區的興趣和反饋。 社區建設和早期參與:積極進行外展工作,建立早期採用者和潛在投資者的社區,促進圍繞項目目標的討論並獲得支持。 代幣生成事件:SPERO,$$s$ 進行了一次代幣生成事件(TGE),向早期支持者分發其原生代幣,並在生態系統內建立初步流動性。 首次 dApp 上線:與 SPERO,$$s$ 相關的第一個去中心化應用程序(dApp)上線,允許用戶參與平台的核心功能。 持續發展和夥伴關係:對項目產品的持續更新和增強,包括與區塊鏈領域其他參與者的戰略夥伴關係,使 SPERO,$$s$ 成為加密市場中一個具有競爭力和不斷演變的參與者。 結論 SPERO,$$s$ 是 web3 和加密貨幣潛力的見證,能夠徹底改變金融系統並賦能個人。憑藉對去中心化治理、社區參與和創新設計功能的承諾,它為更具包容性的金融環境鋪平了道路。 與任何在快速發展的加密領域中的投資一樣,潛在的投資者和用戶都被鼓勵進行徹底研究,並對 SPERO,$$s$ 的持續發展進行深思熟慮的參與。該項目展示了加密行業的創新精神,邀請人們進一步探索其無數可能性。儘管 SPERO,$$s$ 的旅程仍在展開,但其基礎原則確實可能影響我們在互聯網數字生態系統中如何與技術、金融和彼此互動的未來。

274 人學過發佈於 2024.12.17更新於 2024.12.17

什麼是 $S$

什麼是 AGENT S

Agent S:Web3中自主互動的未來 介紹 在不斷演變的Web3和加密貨幣領域,創新不斷重新定義個人如何與數字平台互動。Agent S是一個開創性的項目,承諾通過其開放的代理框架徹底改變人機互動。Agent S旨在簡化複雜任務,為人工智能(AI)提供變革性的應用,鋪平自主互動的道路。本詳細探索將深入研究該項目的複雜性、其獨特特徵以及對加密貨幣領域的影響。 什麼是Agent S? Agent S是一個突破性的開放代理框架,專門設計用來解決計算機任務自動化中的三個基本挑戰: 獲取特定領域知識:該框架智能地從各種外部知識來源和內部經驗中學習。這種雙重方法使其能夠建立豐富的特定領域知識庫,提升其在任務執行中的表現。 長期任務規劃:Agent S採用經驗增強的分層規劃,這是一種戰略方法,可以有效地分解和執行複雜任務。此特徵顯著提升了其高效和有效地管理多個子任務的能力。 處理動態、不均勻的界面:該項目引入了代理-計算機界面(ACI),這是一種創新的解決方案,增強了代理和用戶之間的互動。利用多模態大型語言模型(MLLMs),Agent S能夠無縫導航和操作各種圖形用戶界面。 通過這些開創性特徵,Agent S提供了一個強大的框架,解決了自動化人機互動中涉及的複雜性,為AI及其他領域的無數應用奠定了基礎。 誰是Agent S的創建者? 儘管Agent S的概念根本上是創新的,但有關其創建者的具體信息仍然難以捉摸。創建者目前尚不清楚,這突顯了該項目的初期階段或戰略選擇將創始成員保密。無論是否匿名,重點仍然在於框架的能力和潛力。 誰是Agent S的投資者? 由於Agent S在加密生態系統中相對較新,關於其投資者和財務支持者的詳細信息並未明確記錄。缺乏對支持該項目的投資基礎或組織的公開見解,引發了對其資金結構和發展路線圖的質疑。了解其支持背景對於評估該項目的可持續性和潛在市場影響至關重要。 Agent S如何運作? Agent S的核心是尖端技術,使其能夠在多種環境中有效運作。其運營模型圍繞幾個關鍵特徵構建: 類人計算機互動:該框架提供先進的AI規劃,力求使與計算機的互動更加直觀。通過模仿人類在任務執行中的行為,承諾提升用戶體驗。 敘事記憶:用於利用高級經驗,Agent S利用敘事記憶來跟蹤任務歷史,從而增強其決策過程。 情節記憶:此特徵為用戶提供逐步指導,使框架能夠在任務展開時提供上下文支持。 支持OpenACI:Agent S能夠在本地運行,使用戶能夠控制其互動和工作流程,與Web3的去中心化理念相一致。 與外部API的輕鬆集成:其多功能性和與各種AI平台的兼容性確保了Agent S能夠無縫融入現有技術生態系統,成為開發者和組織的理想選擇。 這些功能共同促成了Agent S在加密領域的獨特地位,因為它以最小的人類干預自動化複雜的多步任務。隨著項目的發展,其在Web3中的潛在應用可能重新定義數字互動的展開方式。 Agent S的時間線 Agent S的發展和里程碑可以用一個時間線來概括,突顯其重要事件: 2024年9月27日:Agent S的概念在一篇名為《一個像人類一樣使用計算機的開放代理框架》的綜合研究論文中推出,展示了該項目的基礎工作。 2024年10月10日:該研究論文在arXiv上公開,提供了對框架及其基於OSWorld基準的性能評估的深入探索。 2024年10月12日:發布了一個視頻演示,提供了對Agent S能力和特徵的視覺洞察,進一步吸引潛在用戶和投資者。 這些時間線上的標記不僅展示了Agent S的進展,還表明了其對透明度和社區參與的承諾。 有關Agent S的要點 隨著Agent S框架的持續演變,幾個關鍵特徵脫穎而出,強調其創新性和潛力: 創新框架:旨在提供類似人類互動的直觀計算機使用,Agent S為任務自動化帶來了新穎的方法。 自主互動:通過GUI自主與計算機互動的能力標誌著向更智能和高效的計算解決方案邁進了一步。 複雜任務自動化:憑藉其強大的方法論,能夠自動化複雜的多步任務,使過程更快且更少出錯。 持續改進:學習機制使Agent S能夠從過去的經驗中改進,不斷提升其性能和效率。 多功能性:其在OSWorld和WindowsAgentArena等不同操作環境中的適應性確保了它能夠服務於廣泛的應用。 隨著Agent S在Web3和加密領域中的定位,其增強互動能力和自動化過程的潛力標誌著AI技術的一次重大進步。通過其創新框架,Agent S展現了數字互動的未來,為各行各業的用戶承諾提供更無縫和高效的體驗。 結論 Agent S代表了AI與Web3結合的一次大膽飛躍,具有重新定義我們與技術互動方式的能力。儘管仍處於早期階段,但其應用的可能性廣泛且引人入勝。通過其全面的框架解決關鍵挑戰,Agent S旨在將自主互動帶到數字體驗的最前沿。隨著我們深入加密貨幣和去中心化的領域,像Agent S這樣的項目無疑將在塑造技術和人機協作的未來中發揮關鍵作用。

1.0k 人學過發佈於 2025.01.14更新於 2025.01.14

什麼是 AGENT S

如何購買S

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買Sonic (S)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買Sonic (S)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的Sonic (S)購買Sonic (S)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易Sonic (S)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易Sonic (S)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

2.2k 人學過發佈於 2025.01.15更新於 2026.06.02

如何購買S

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 S (S)幣價的意見。

活动图片