South Korea Urges Crypto Circuit Breakers After $42B Bithumb Mishap

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-04-13更新於 2026-04-13

文章摘要

South Korea's central bank has recommended implementing cryptocurrency exchange "circuit breakers" following a major incident on Bithumb. In February, the exchange erroneously distributed 620,000 Bitcoin (worth approximately $42 billion) to customers instead of the intended 620,000 Korean won (about $400). This triggered panic selling, causing Bitcoin's price on the platform to plummet. Although Bithumb quickly halted trading and reversed the transactions, nearly $125 million in Bitcoin had already been sold. The Bank of Korea's report emphasizes that the crypto sector lacks the stringent internal controls of traditional finance and calls for mandatory systems to detect and prevent such human errors and discrepancies in asset records. This proposal is part of broader legislative moves in South Korea to enhance the security and transparency of virtual asset exchanges.

To avoid a recurrence of the market chaos that ensued in February when Bithumb accidentally delivered over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to its clients, the South Korean central bank has suggested that cryptocurrency exchanges have “circuit breakers” that temporarily suspend trade.

In a payments report released on Monday, the Bank of Korea suggested that legislators think about implementing measures to halt trading in cryptocurrency in the event of unexpected price fluctuations, much as the trading limitations implemented by the Korea Exchange.

Stringent Protocols

According to the bank, the virtual asset sector is currently not well-regulated and does not have the same internal control procedures as more traditional financial institutions. Therefore, the research concluded, stronger applicable policies are required to proactively avoid such instances, as they may happen at other virtual asset exchanges.

This comes at a time when politicians in South Korea are trying to enact legislation that would further regulate cryptocurrency. The Bank of Korea has said that these regulations should include its recommendations to make virtual asset exchange activities more secure and transparent.

Rather than 620,000 Korean won, which was about $400, Bithumb mistakenly transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, which was valued around $42 billion at the time, to clients in early February. According to the bank’s assessment, the price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as consumers hurried to sell, which in turn caused others to panic-sell, further lowering its price.

Within minutes, Bithumb stopped trading and reversed their Bitcoin transfers. However, the exchange clarified that 1,788 BTC, or almost $125 million, had already been sold before it could take any action, and it made up the difference using corporate reserves.

Crypto exchanges should be obligated to have systems that can identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, according to the Bank of Korea. It went on to say that exchanges should also be able to detect and report differences between a platform’s internal assets and those on the blockchain.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitwise Accelerates Hyperliquid ETF Debut with Revised Filing

TagsAltcoinBitcoinBlockchain

相關問答

QWhat did the Bank of Korea propose to prevent a recurrence of the Bithumb mishap?

AThe Bank of Korea proposed that cryptocurrency exchanges implement 'circuit breakers' to temporarily suspend trade in the event of unexpected price fluctuations.

QWhat was the nature of the error that Bithumb made in February?

ABithumb accidentally transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, valued at approximately $42 billion, to its clients instead of 620,000 Korean won (about $400).

QWhat was the market impact of Bithumb's erroneous transfer?

AThe price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as customers hurried to sell the mistakenly received funds, which triggered panic-selling and further drove down the price.

QAccording to the Bank of Korea, why is the virtual asset sector particularly vulnerable to such incidents?

AThe Bank of Korea stated that the virtual asset sector is not well-regulated and lacks the same internal control procedures as traditional financial institutions.

QWhat specific systems did the Bank of Korea suggest exchanges be obligated to have?

AThe Bank of Korea suggested exchanges should have systems to identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, and to detect and report differences between a platform's internal assets and those on the blockchain.

你可能也喜歡

对话达利欧：当下正处AI泡沫中，投资组合的1%是比特币

桥水基金创始人瑞·达利欧在访谈中指出，当前AI热潮已显现经典泡沫特征，高估值与过度借贷可能在未来经济变故下引发资产抛售与衰退。他强调，这背后是更宏大的“大周期”在起作用，即贫富差距、政府债务高企及地缘政治变动共同驱动的约80年循环，目前全球秩序正处力量交替的衰退阶段。 为应对不确定性，达利欧建议个人投资者进行多元化资产配置，包括股票、黄金、债券等，而非仅持有现金。他透露自己投资组合中约有1%为比特币，认为其具备硬通货特性，但个人更偏好实物黄金。对于AI的影响，他认为这将在更高层面替代人类思维，加剧贫富差距，而善于运用人类情感、直觉并与AI协作的人将更具优势。 谈及英美热议的“财富税”，达利欧认为操作困难，可能引发资本外流或刺破泡沫。关于世界秩序，他预判未来可能走向区域化发展，而非单一主导。最后，他指出美国卷入伊朗冲突暴露了其军事与经济影响力的脆弱性，类似历史上大英帝国的衰落征兆。

marsbit2 小時前

对话达利欧：当下正处AI泡沫中，投资组合的1%是比特币

marsbit2 小時前

单日 7.2 万亿韩元，外资周五净买入创纪录！华尔街：韩股资金面逆风已经消退

韩国股市资金面出现实质性转机。7月31日，外资单日净买入KOSPI股票约7.2万亿韩元，创历史最高纪录，标志着持续数月的外资净流出趋势发生根本逆转。7月外资净卖出规模已大幅收窄至9.8万亿韩元，远低于5、6月的水平。同时，国内养老金及基金在7月转为净买入1.0万亿韩元。 监管层面，韩国金融服务委员会自7月31日起收紧散户投资单股杠杆ETF的门槛，新规实施后相关产品成交量已降至月均水平的约50%，有助于平抑市场短期波动。 花旗研究维持KOSPI年内目标点位10000点不变，认为资金面逆风正在消退。支撑因素包括存储芯片行业基本面稳健、KOSPI估值处于历史低位、韩国经济基本面强劲以及政策环境友好。花旗还指出，若有必要，韩国金融当局存在提供流动性支持的可能性，为市场提供了政策底部支撑。

marsbit2 小時前

单日 7.2 万亿韩元，外资周五净买入创纪录！华尔街：韩股资金面逆风已经消退

marsbit2 小時前

突发！OpenAI下一代AI攻克10项菲尔兹奖级难题

OpenAI发布其下一代AI模型Astra，在数学领域取得轰动性突破，一举攻克了10个长期未解的难题，其中多项成果被专家评价为“菲尔茨奖级别”。这些突破涵盖了高维几何、群论、算子代数等多个核心数学分支，相关论文长达249页。 最引人注目的成果包括：构造出首个无限有限呈现的“非sofic群”，否定了自1999年提出相关猜想；在高维球体堆积问题上，打破了自1978年以来人类未能突破的理论极限；推翻了菲尔兹奖得主Alain Connes提出的“刚性猜想”，构造出无限多不同构但生成相同冯·诺依曼代数的群。 据称，生成这10项证明的总计算成本仅约2000美元。所有证明均通过了Lean 4形式化验证，确保了其严密性。这一系列成果被视作AI在深度推理和数学直觉上的重大飞跃，标志着AI已成为数学研究领域的强大工具。

marsbit4 小時前

突发！OpenAI下一代AI攻克10项菲尔兹奖级难题

marsbit4 小時前

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

面对人工智能的冲击，许多人担心工作被取代。然而，真正的威胁在于个人对他人和系统的依赖，以及由此产生的“薪资奴役”——即为生存而从事无意义、枯燥的工作。摆脱这种困境的关键，不是抵制技术，而是成为拥有高自主性的“不可受雇”个体。 文章提出了成功抵御AI替代的五个核心要素：自主性（主动行动的能力）、品味（判断事物价值的经验）、说服力（让他人关注你工作的能力）、毅力（坚持并从错误中学习）和迭代（根据反馈持续改进）。这些能力无法仅通过理论学习获得，必须通过实践来培养。 要启动转变，首先要彻底改变环境，重塑身份认同。其次，应选择一个能获得真实、快速反馈的实践领域，例如创业。在众多技能中，内容创作（媒体）比编写代码更具优势，因为其价值是主观的，需要独特的审美和判断力，这正是AI目前难以完全复制的。 具体行动上，可以从三个步骤开始： 1. **挖掘原始素材**：反思自己长期痴迷的知识领域、轻松解决的难题或童年被压抑的兴趣，找到独特的个人经验。 2. **确立反向思考主轴**：找出你坚信但主流观点错误的地方，或行业内普遍忽视的“皇帝新衣”，形成独特的批判性视角。 3. **立即发布**：将前两步的思考融合，撰写并发布第一个核心内容（如帖子、视频），勇敢接受真实世界的反馈，并在此基础上持续学习和迭代。 最终，抵御AI的关键在于构建一份与自身身份深度契合的毕生事业，通过持续的内容创作和真实互动，建立无法被自动化取代的独特价值和影响力。行动，从今天发布第一个想法开始。

marsbit4 小時前

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

marsbit4 小時前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥：并非人人愿意为之

文章探讨了通过投掷骰子生成比特币钱包种子短语的安全方法及其现实挑战。核心观点如下： **1. 骰子提供物理熵源** 骰子结果由众多微小变量决定，理论上虽可预测，但实践中无法被攻击者复制或计算，从而提供高质量的随机性。每个六面骰子投掷约产生2.585比特熵，50次投掷即可满足典型12词助记词（128比特熵）的安全需求。 **2. Coldcard漏洞事件凸显手工熵源的价值** 近期Coldcard硬件钱包因固件漏洞导致其内部随机数生成器存在缺陷，致使约1128枚比特币被盗。但那些**完全**通过足量骰子投掷生成种子短语的用户未受此漏洞影响，因为他们的主密钥未使用有缺陷的生成器。 **3. 重要警示：手工种子并非万能保护** 安全研究员指出，即使用户使用骰子生成了安全的种子，若他们使用了Coldcard的其他功能（如生成纸钱包、克隆密钥、共享签名密钥、密码等），这些**衍生密钥**仍可能调用有漏洞的随机数生成器，从而存在风险。安全种子不保证设备生成的所有秘密都安全。 **4. 手工生成熵源的现实局限性** 尽管数学上可靠，但该方法对大多数用户并不友好： * **过程繁琐易错**：需投掷50-99次，精确记录，任何输入错误都会导致钱包完全不同。 * **引入新风险**：用户可能在记录、转换过程中泄露信息，或使用有偏的骰子/投掷方式。 * **用户体验差**：难以想象大规模推广需要用户手动投掷近百次骰子。安全措施需适应现实生活场景和普通用户的知识水平。 **5. 给用户的建议** 受影响的Coldcard用户应： * 更新固件至最新版。 * 检查是否使用过有漏洞的功能生成了次级密钥或密码，如有则需立即更换。 * 考虑采用多签方案，使用不同厂商的设备分散风险。 **结论**：手工投掷骰子生成熵源是技术娴熟用户的一个有效安全选项，但其过程复杂、容易出错，不适合作为主流用户的默认方法。长远目标是依赖安全、透明且无需专业知识的硬件/软件随机数生成方案。

cryptonews.ru7 小時前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥：并非人人愿意为之

cryptonews.ru7 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片

熱門分類right-arrow

熱門標籤right-arrow