South Korea Urges Crypto Circuit Breakers After $42B Bithumb Mishap

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-04-13更新於 2026-04-13

文章摘要

South Korea's central bank has recommended implementing cryptocurrency exchange "circuit breakers" following a major incident on Bithumb. In February, the exchange erroneously distributed 620,000 Bitcoin (worth approximately $42 billion) to customers instead of the intended 620,000 Korean won (about $400). This triggered panic selling, causing Bitcoin's price on the platform to plummet. Although Bithumb quickly halted trading and reversed the transactions, nearly $125 million in Bitcoin had already been sold. The Bank of Korea's report emphasizes that the crypto sector lacks the stringent internal controls of traditional finance and calls for mandatory systems to detect and prevent such human errors and discrepancies in asset records. This proposal is part of broader legislative moves in South Korea to enhance the security and transparency of virtual asset exchanges.

To avoid a recurrence of the market chaos that ensued in February when Bithumb accidentally delivered over $40 billion worth of Bitcoin to its clients, the South Korean central bank has suggested that cryptocurrency exchanges have “circuit breakers” that temporarily suspend trade.

In a payments report released on Monday, the Bank of Korea suggested that legislators think about implementing measures to halt trading in cryptocurrency in the event of unexpected price fluctuations, much as the trading limitations implemented by the Korea Exchange.

Stringent Protocols

According to the bank, the virtual asset sector is currently not well-regulated and does not have the same internal control procedures as more traditional financial institutions. Therefore, the research concluded, stronger applicable policies are required to proactively avoid such instances, as they may happen at other virtual asset exchanges.

This comes at a time when politicians in South Korea are trying to enact legislation that would further regulate cryptocurrency. The Bank of Korea has said that these regulations should include its recommendations to make virtual asset exchange activities more secure and transparent.

Rather than 620,000 Korean won, which was about $400, Bithumb mistakenly transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, which was valued around $42 billion at the time, to clients in early February. According to the bank’s assessment, the price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as consumers hurried to sell, which in turn caused others to panic-sell, further lowering its price.

Within minutes, Bithumb stopped trading and reversed their Bitcoin transfers. However, the exchange clarified that 1,788 BTC, or almost $125 million, had already been sold before it could take any action, and it made up the difference using corporate reserves.

Crypto exchanges should be obligated to have systems that can identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, according to the Bank of Korea. It went on to say that exchanges should also be able to detect and report differences between a platform’s internal assets and those on the blockchain.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bitwise Accelerates Hyperliquid ETF Debut with Revised Filing

TagsAltcoinBitcoinBlockchain

相關問答

QWhat did the Bank of Korea propose to prevent a recurrence of the Bithumb mishap?

AThe Bank of Korea proposed that cryptocurrency exchanges implement 'circuit breakers' to temporarily suspend trade in the event of unexpected price fluctuations.

QWhat was the nature of the error that Bithumb made in February?

ABithumb accidentally transferred 620,000 Bitcoin, valued at approximately $42 billion, to its clients instead of 620,000 Korean won (about $400).

QWhat was the market impact of Bithumb's erroneous transfer?

AThe price of Bitcoin on Bithumb dropped as customers hurried to sell the mistakenly received funds, which triggered panic-selling and further drove down the price.

QAccording to the Bank of Korea, why is the virtual asset sector particularly vulnerable to such incidents?

AThe Bank of Korea stated that the virtual asset sector is not well-regulated and lacks the same internal control procedures as traditional financial institutions.

QWhat specific systems did the Bank of Korea suggest exchanges be obligated to have?

AThe Bank of Korea suggested exchanges should have systems to identify and prevent human error-induced incorrect payments, and to detect and report differences between a platform's internal assets and those on the blockchain.

你可能也喜歡

中国Web3创业,有哪些好路子?(五)

本文探讨了中国Web3团队向AI领域迁移的可行路径,重点聚焦于安全风控团队和应用层及社区型团队。 对于安全风控团队,其机遇在于从传统的链上合约、资产安全,转向AI Agent时代的行为安全。随着AI Agent在企业的渗透,其工具调用、数据访问和自动支付等行为将催生新的安全需求,如权限管控、操作审计和风险监控。Web3安全团队可将原有的审计与风控能力迁移至此,为企业提供Agent行为日志、权限边界设定和合规审计等服务,这一B2B方向有明确的付费需求且合规风险相对较低。 对于应用层和社区型团队(如内容、投研、教育、社区产品),迁移的关键在于将AI作为能力增强器,而非彻底转型。应专注于利用AI解决现有产品或运营中的具体痛点,例如:用AI帮助投研工具高效处理海量信息、辅助社区产品进行用户分层与运营、为教育平台提供个性化学习路径。核心是让AI深度嵌入现有工作流,提升效率、决策质量或用户体验,避免脱离真实场景空谈AI概念。 文章同时提醒了应谨慎进入的方向:1)需巨大投入的通用大模型;2)缺乏明确任务与付费方的泛Agent平台;3)易触碰资金与合规红线的AI交易员、自动收益类产品;4)仅为原有项目简单套上AI外壳、而无实质价值提升的“伪创新”。 总之,迁移成功的关键在于团队能否将Web3领域已沉淀的核心能力(如数据、支付、安全、运营经验)与AI新场景有效结合,并找到真实的业务需求与付费方,而非追逐热点概念。

marsbit1 小時前

中国Web3创业,有哪些好路子?(五)

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片