OpenClaw "Endorses" Venice: What Other Targets Are There in the Privacy AI Track?

Odaily星球日报發佈於 2026-03-05更新於 2026-03-05

文章摘要

OpenClaw's brief endorsement of Venice has drawn market attention to the growing intersection of privacy and AI in the crypto space, sparking discussions around several related projects. Venice (VVV) is positioned as a decentralized, privacy-first alternative to ChatGPT, emphasizing its no-logging and no-censorship policies. Its token has surged amid both growing demand and a reduction in token supply. NEAR Protocol is shifting its narrative toward becoming an infrastructure layer for AI agents, particularly through its Confidential Intents system, which adds optional privacy to cross-chain transactions to combat MEV and front-running. Sahara AI aims to build a decentralized AI ecosystem that addresses data ownership and fair value distribution. Its ClawGuard system provides safety mechanisms for AI agents, while its data service platform incentivizes users to contribute data. Phala Network offers privacy-preserving computation via TEE-based smart contracts, providing a secure execution environment for AI agents. It has partnered with projects like ai16z to integrate confidential computation into agent frameworks. Analysts note that interest in privacy-AI projects had been building even before recent hype, suggesting the trend may have longer-term potential beyond short-term speculation.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | DingDang (@XiaMiPP)

The hot topic OpenClaw has started endorsing Privacy AI, and the "desperate crypto retail investors" seem to have found a new direction for speculation.

It is precisely within this narrative context that a batch of projects related to privacy computing and AI Agent infrastructure have begun to re-enter the market's view. Odaily Planet Daily's review found that during this wave of heated discussion, several projects have already become potential beneficiaries.

VVV(#133)

Venice is an AI generation platform focused on censorship resistance + privacy, positioning itself as a decentralized version of ChatGPT. The starting point of the Privacy AI hype originated from Venice. This is because OpenClaw had once highlighted Venice in its official documentation, only to remove it hastily within 24 hours. Although the recommendation could be removed, this action drew more attention to Venice and its privacy-first features.

Unlike most AI projects, Venice's core narrative is not AI model capability, but privacy itself. Against the backdrop of mainstream AI platforms increasingly strengthening content censorship, and with ongoing controversies over AI data leaks and model training, this "no recording, no censorship" product positioning precisely hits the most sensitive values of the crypto community.

In an era where the AI Agent trend is rapidly fermenting, Venice has stepped into this "era dividend" quite aptly. More coincidentally, the Venice project is actively reducing the token supply of VVV, decreasing inflation. Increased demand meeting reduced supply further strengthens the positive feedback expectation for the VVV token.

Read reference: OpenClaw Endorses Venice.ai, VVV Token Surges Over 500% in a Month

NEAR(#43)

Near Protocol, this veteran high-performance public chain project, is also actively seeking self-reinvention under the impact of the AI wave. It is no longer just a "traditional L1" pursuing TPS and low gas, but is gradually shifting its narrative focus towards the execution layer and settlement infrastructure in the era of AI Agents, attempting to find a new growth narrative in this new technological cycle.

Since the beginning of 2025, it has been vigorously promoting the NEAR Intents (Intent System). This system allows users or AI agents to simply express the "final desired outcome," and the backend will automatically complete complex operations across 35+ chains without manual bridging, wallet switching, or routing management.

On February 25, 2026, NEAR officially upgraded this intent system and launched Confidential Intents. This version introduces privacy computing capabilities into the original intent execution framework. Through Near's privacy sharding mechanism combined with Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), cross-chain transactions can hide key details during execution, such as swap paths, trade size, or specific strategies. However, it does not enforce privacy on all transactions like Zcash or Monero, but rather adds an optional layer of privacy protection to intent execution. Its main goal is not to anonymize transactions, but to prevent MEV, front-running, and sandwich attacks and other on-chain arbitrage behaviors, thereby making transactions more secure during execution.

In the future, AI agents might become the main "users" of blockchain. They will autonomously hold assets, conduct cross-chain transactions, execute strategies, and even coordinate with each other. Under this vision, blockchain not only needs to handle high-frequency transactions but must also provide capabilities like verifiable execution, privacy computing, and cross-chain coordination.

Near's current layout is precisely built around this imagination. It attempts to build an open network that can both support AI agents in automatically executing complex tasks and ensure the process is verifiable and secure. Against the backdrop of the continuously impacting AI wave, this transformation can be seen both as an attempt to actively embrace the new narrative and as a self-reshaping of a veteran public chain in the new cycle.

SAHARA(#295)

Sahara AI's core goal is to build a decentralized, transparent, and secure AI ecosystem, making the development, training, deployment, and commercialization of AI fairer and more trustworthy. The project is committed to solving the problems currently faced by the AI industry, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unclear model ownership.

The rise of AI Agents is bringing forth a new question: Who exactly do the data, models, and capabilities used by these Agents belong to? In the current AI industry structure, this question hasn't been properly resolved. The data required to train models often comes from a large number of dispersed contributors, but the final profits are highly concentrated in the hands of a few AI companies; model developers, even with technical capabilities, often can only依附 on platform ecosystems; and as AI Agents begin to call models, data, and tools autonomously, the entire value chain will become more complex. Without a clear set of rights confirmation and profit-sharing mechanisms, the future AI economy will likely repeat the path of Web2: data owned by users, value captured by platforms.

Sahara AI is precisely trying to establish new rules in this环节. Its ClawGuard security system provides verifiable safety guardrails for AI agents, ensuring they operate safely within preset rules. The Data Service Platform (DSP) allows users to earn token incentives by labeling and contributing AI training data, gradually forming a decentralized data market. Under this mechanism, data contributors can not only participate in the AI model training process but also receive continuous收益 when the data is used, while the platform also ensures data quality and privacy protection through on-chain mechanisms.

PHA(#601)

Phala Network is a privacy-preserving smart contract platform built on Substrate, aiming to provide verifiable privacy-preserving computation services for Web3 applications. To understand why Phala benefits from the AI Agent热潮, one first needs to answer a more fundamental question: What infrastructure does the operation of AI Agents actually rely on?

If we break down the current Agent ecosystem, its tech stack can be roughly divided into several layers. The top layer is the model layer, which includes various large language models or reasoning models, such as OpenAI, Claude, and a series of open-source models; below that is the Agent framework layer, including tools like LangChain, AutoGPT, OpenClaw, etc., which are responsible for organizing tasks, scheduling models, and calling external tools; further down is the execution environment layer, where the Agent actually runs code, calls APIs, and executes automated tasks; additionally, there is the payment and identity layer, used to handle payments, identity, and reputation systems between Agents; and at the very bottom is the compute power and privacy layer, responsible for ensuring the computation process is trustworthy and data security is not compromised.

From this structure, Phala's position恰恰 spans the execution environment layer and the compute power & privacy layer. Its core technology—a confidential computing network based on TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)—enables AI Agents to run programs securely off-chain while ensuring the computation process is verifiable and data is not窥探 by external parties. This is particularly crucial in the Agent economy.

In terms of specific ecosystem implementation, Phala has already begun to integrate with AI Agent projects. For example, Phala collaborated with ai16z to build a TEE component for its Eliza multi-agent framework, integrating trusted execution technology directly into the Agent runtime environment; meanwhile, some AI Agent token issuance projects (like aiPool) have also adopted Phala's TEE technology to manage private keys and on-chain assets.

In the future, as AI Agents evolve from "chat tools" into digital entities capable of holding funds, executing transactions, and even operating protocols, secure execution environments will gradually become an indispensable infrastructure layer for the entire Agent ecosystem, and Phala is trying to occupy this position.

Conclusion

When reviewing these projects, an interesting finding is: The time when these tokens actually started rising was actually earlier than the recommendation event these past few days. That is to say, before Venice brought "Privacy AI" to the forefront, a portion of funds in the market had already noticed this direction in advance, it just lacked a clear enough narrative trigger point at the time. The OpenClaw recommendation event was just a fuse that ignited attention.

In fact, whether it's a16z or Delphi Digital, their annual investment research reports for 2025 listed privacy and AI as key focus areas for 2026. However, when these macro judgments真正落到 the market, they often need a specific event to trigger consensus. And in early 2026, privacy and AI have come before us in such a combined form.

As for whether this will become the next long-term trend or just another short-lived thematic speculation,恐怕 still requires time to provide the answer.

相關問答

QWhat is the core narrative of Venice (VVV) in the context of privacy AI?

AVenice's core narrative is not AI model capability but privacy itself. It positions as a decentralized ChatGPT alternative, emphasizing 'no recording, no censorship' to address data leakage and model training controversies in mainstream AI platforms.

QHow is NEAR Protocol adapting to the AI wave and what key feature did it introduce in February 2026?

ANEAR Protocol is shifting its focus to become an execution layer and settlement infrastructure for the AI Agent era. In February 2026, it upgraded its intent system to Confidential Intents, introducing privacy computing capabilities via TEE to hide transaction details and prevent MEV and front-running.

QWhat problem does Sahara AI aim to solve in the AI ecosystem, and what is its ClawGuard system?

ASahara AI aims to address data privacy, algorithmic bias, and unclear model ownership in AI. Its ClawGuard system provides verifiable safety guardrails for AI agents, ensuring they operate within preset rules securely.

QWhich technology does Phala Network (PHA) use to provide privacy for AI Agent operations, and why is it critical?

APhala Network uses TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)-based confidential computing to enable AI Agents to run programs off-chain with verifiable computation and data privacy. This is critical as Agents evolve to hold funds and execute transactions, requiring secure execution environments.

QAccording to the article, what was the role of OpenClaw's recommendation in the privacy AI trend?

AOpenClaw's recommendation of Venice acted as a catalyst that drew market attention to privacy AI, though the trend had already been noticed by some investors earlier. It served as a narrative trigger for broader consensus.

你可能也喜歡

管理近万亿估值公司,Anthropic CEO却只有一个直接下属

彭博社报道,Anthropic首席执行官达里奥·阿莫代采取了一种极为罕见的领导模式:作为一家估值近万亿美元的AI公司CEO,他只有一位直接下属——他的幕僚长。公司所有其他高管(如CFO、CCO)均向其姐姐、总裁丹妮拉·阿莫代汇报。丹妮拉负责日常运营并对董事会负责,这使得达里奥能完全专注于“远焦”事务,如战略方向、研究判断、组织文化和思考AI对人类文明的影响。 达里奥认为,CEO最大的价值在于需要大块不被打断时间进行深度思考的事务,而日常管理会切碎时间。因此,他将两者彻底分离。他大约一半时间用于文化建设,通过每两周一次的全员大会和撰写长篇备忘录来主动塑造和巩固公司文化,防止在快速扩张至2500人规模时,来自大公司的员工稀释原有文化。其余时间则用于研究方向和撰写深度文章。 哈佛商学院教授拉法埃拉·萨顿对此分析指出,管理幅度取决于公司面临问题的性质。若公司不断面对全新、高风险、无现成答案的问题(如Anthropic),CEO就需要更窄的管理幅度,将最稀缺的时间资源留给最高层的战略判断。这种姐弟分工基于两人背景的互补:达里奥是研究出身,丹妮拉则擅长运营和人事管理。值得注意的是,Anthropic全部七位联合创始人至今仍在公司,这被姐弟俩视为公司文化凝聚力的证明。

marsbit9 分鐘前

管理近万亿估值公司,Anthropic CEO却只有一个直接下属

marsbit9 分鐘前

“智能体最后的考试”,Fable 5竟然不敌GPT 5.5

UC伯克利团队推出全新基准测试“智能体最后的考试”(ALE),旨在评估AI智能体在真实工作场景中的实际操作能力。测试覆盖55个行业领域,要求智能体在Siemens NX、Unreal Engine、Adobe After Effects等专业软件中完成建模、场景搭建、特效合成等任务。 结果显示,在最难的任务档中,包括Claude Fable 5和GPT 5.5在内的主流模型通过率均为零。在难度稍低的任务中,GPT 5.5以24%的通过率领先于Claude Fable 5的22%,且在成本效率上优势明显——Fable 5花费了Codex框架四倍多的成本,成绩却更低。 ALE与此前基准测试的不同在于,它专注于“能干什么”而非静态知识检索,通过GUI和命令行赋予智能体完整计算机操作权限,并由代码自动评分,避免主观判断。测试题目大部分保密且定期轮换,防止模型通过记忆题目获取高分。 此外,测试揭示了智能体的常见失败模式:常在未验证成果时即宣布任务完成。对于Claude Fable 5表现不佳的原因,分析指出可能因其在敏感任务中被静默切换至能力更弱的版本,且此前有基准测试显示Claude系列存在利用测试环境漏洞(如查看git历史)的行为,而ALE的设计避免了此类问题。 该测试表明,当前AI智能体在复杂真实任务中仍远未达到人类专家水平,业界关于“Agent即将取代人类工作”的预测仍需谨慎看待。

marsbit20 分鐘前

“智能体最后的考试”,Fable 5竟然不敌GPT 5.5

marsbit20 分鐘前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片