Online vs. Offline CBDCs — The Privacy Battle Dividing the EU

ccn.com發佈於 2025-12-25更新於 2025-12-25

文章摘要

The EU is divided over the design of its proposed digital euro, with a key conflict emerging between online and offline functionality. The Council of the EU supports a hybrid model that includes both online and offline capabilities. In contrast, privacy-focused members of the European Parliament advocate for an offline-only version, arguing it offers stronger, cash-like privacy by enabling peer-to-peer transactions without centralized tracking. They warn that an online system could allow excessive surveillance of consumer spending. The European Central Bank and European Commission favor the hybrid approach but face opposition from data protection authorities concerned about data minimization. With negotiations set for 2026, the outcome will determine the balance between privacy and functionality in the EU's digital currency.

Key Takeaways
  • The Council of the EU has adopted a digital euro negotiating position that favors online and offline functionality.
  • However, privacy hawks in the European Parliament are pushing for an offline-only digital currency.
  • As the two sides prepare for negotiations in 2026, privacy has emerged as the key battle line.

As the EU’s digital euro inches closer to realization, policymakers are split between two camps with competing visions for the central bank digital currency.

In one model, offline CBDCs behave like digital cash, with strong privacy built in by design.

However, another, more ambitious approach envisions the digital euro as a comprehensive online payment instrument that offers the same functionality as cards and digital wallets.

New Trending Crypto Wallet Offers
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Tangem

promotions
Trusted & Secure
Coins
111
  • Aave
  • Uniswap
  • GMX
  • Pendle
  • Ondo
  • Ankr
  • Fantom
  • Synthetix
  • Curve DAO Token
  • Compound
  • Maker
  • THORChain
  • Stacks
  • Arweave
  • Sui
  • Immutable
  • Optimism
  • Arbitrum
  • VeChain
  • The Sandbox
  • Decentraland
  • Axie Infinity
  • Render
  • The Graph
  • Chiliz
  • Helium
  • PAX Gold
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Tether
  • USD Coin
  • Solana
  • Ripple
  • Dogecoin
  • Cardano
  • Toncoin
  • Shiba Inu
  • Avalanche
  • TRON
  • Chainlink
  • Polygon Matic
  • Polkadot
  • Wrapped Bitcoin
  • Litecoin
  • Dai
  • NEAR Protocol
  • Bitcoin Cash
  • Monero
  • Stellar
  • Cosmos
  • Filecoin
  • Ethereum Classic
  • Aptos
  • Cronos
  • Binance USD
  • Neo
  • APEcoin
  • Gala
  • Theta Network
  • Wrapped Ethereum
  • OKB
  • Pepe
  • Mantle
  • First Digital USD
  • Kaspa
  • Bittensor
  • Celestia
  • XDC Network
  • Artificial Superintelligence Alliance
  • Jupiter
  • Quant
  • Worldcoin
  • PayPal USD
  • Bonk
  • Rocket Pool ETH
  • Flare
  • Tether Gold
  • Sei
  • JITO
  • JasmyCoin
  • PancakeSwap
  • Core
  • Ethereum Name Service
  • SushiSwap
  • 1inch Network
  • Tezos
  • Algorand
  • Flow
  • Trust Wallet Token
  • KuCoin Token
  • MultiversX
  • GateToken
  • Zcash
  • IOTA
  • Basic Attention Token
  • Enjin Coin
  • Frax
  • Ethena
  • Ethena USDe
  • Ethena Staked USDe
  • Kusama
  • Celo
  • STEPN
  • Gemini Dollar
  • UNUS SED LEO
  • Internet Computer
  • EOS
  • BitTorrent
  • Mina
  • Dash
  • Zilliqa
  • Casper
  • TrueUSD
  • Floki Inu
  • IoTex
  • Build'N'Build
No result
Claim Offer

BitBox

promotions
Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly
Coins
Claim Offer

Blockstream

promotions
Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly
Coins
Claim Offer

The Two Digital Euros: Online Accounts vs. Offline Tokens

The distinction between online and offline versions of the CBDC emerged early on in discussions over the digital euro, with a string of EU policy documents exploring the pros and cons of each model since 2020.

An online digital euro would function like today’s electronic payments, with accounts tied to individual consumers and businesses, and transactions validated through infrastructure operated by banks and other regulated Eurosystem participants.

Meanwhile, offline CBDCs more closely resemble traditional cryptocurrencies, with tokens that move between wallets on a peer-to-peer basis, eliminating the need to update balances on a centralized ledger.

Privacy Hawks Favor Offline-Only CBDC

In the debate over online versus offline digital euros, privacy is a central political constraint.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has repeatedly framed privacy as “by design,” arguing that it wants the digital euro to meet very high privacy standards compared with existing electronic payment rails.

But that prospect holds much more weight with an offline CBDC, which promises a cash-like degree of anonymity, at least for small payments.

Alongside the European Commission, the ECB favors a hybrid system, with larger payments requiring online validation, but some offline functionality for low-value payments.

However, after the Commission outlined a proposal for online and offline functionality in 2023, privacy hawks in the European Parliament pushed back, arguing that online CBDCs could grant centralized authorities unprecedented visibility into consumers’ daily spending.

They argued that the proposal’s privacy guarantees for online CBDCs lacked legal grounding and would require users to simply trust that their payment data wouldn’t be accessed by centralized authorities.

That view is backed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), which have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles.

Council vs. Parliament

Since 2023, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have increasingly rallied around an offline-first, or even offline-only, digital euro.

But on Dec. 19,  the EU Council representing Member States backed a negotiating position that more closely aligns with the European Commission’s 2023 proposal.

Now, the EU’s two decision-making branches are on a collision course.

With negotiations set to take place throughout 2026, the future of the digital euro project rests on whether or not the Council can convince enough MEPs to back online CBDCs.

Critics of online digital euro payments can be found across the political spectrum.

With diverse parliamentary alliances expected to push for strong privacy protections for any online functionality, the Council will likely need to offer legal guarantees that have been absent from the discussion so far.

Top Trending Crypto Articles
  • Best Exchanges Check Out Our Recommended Exchanges Here
  • Buy Crypto Fast How To Buy Crypto with a Credit Card Now
  • Safe Crypto Gambling See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

相關問答

QWhat are the two competing models for the digital euro being debated in the EU?

AThe two competing models are an online digital euro, which functions like electronic payments with accounts tied to individuals and validated through bank infrastructure, and an offline digital euro, which operates like digital cash with peer-to-peer transactions and no need for a centralized ledger.

QWhy do privacy advocates in the European Parliament favor an offline-only digital euro?

APrivacy advocates favor an offline-only digital euro because it offers cash-like anonymity for transactions, especially for small payments, and prevents centralized authorities from having unprecedented visibility into consumers' daily spending, which they argue is a risk with online CBDCs.

QWhat is the position of the EU Council regarding the digital euro's functionality?

AThe EU Council adopted a negotiating position on December 19 that favors a hybrid system with both online and offline functionality, aligning closely with the European Commission's 2023 proposal.

QWhat concerns have data protection authorities raised about the online digital euro model?

AThe European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles and lacks strong legal grounding for privacy guarantees.

QWhen are negotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament on the digital euro expected to take place?

ANegotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament are set to take place throughout 2026 to resolve the differences in their positions on the digital euro's design and functionality.

你可能也喜歡

福建晋江,一家存储超级独角兽静悄悄

近日,随着长鑫科技A股上市成为股王,同为国内三大存储芯片项目之一的福建晋华集成电路有限公司(晋华)重新进入公众视野。这家位于福建晋江的DRAM企业,自2016年成立起便肩负打破海外垄断的使命,却因2018年被美国列入实体清单并遭遇司法指控而陷入长达数年的沉寂。2024年2月,美国法院裁定其无罪,晋华才得以摆脱法律阴影。 晋华的曲折发展与灵魂人物陈正坤密不可分。这位拥有美光与联电背景的工程师,怀揣自主开发DRAM的梦想加入晋华。公司初期通过与联电合作快速推进,但随后美光发起诉讼,指控技术窃密,导致晋华产线因设备禁运而停摆。在极端困难下,陈正坤带领团队改造国产设备、重构工艺,艰难维持运营。尽管最终赢得清白,但发展进度已被严重拖慢。目前,晋华专注于利基型DRAM市场,月产能约4万片,拥有千余项专利,但仍在美国实体清单限制之下。 晋江这座以鞋服闻名的民营经济强市,为引入晋华这一“硬科技”项目投入巨资,并以政府基金、全链条配套和持续的政策支持,助力企业在制裁中生存下来。如今,以晋华为龙头,晋江已形成超千亿规模的集成电路产业集群。在全球AI驱动存储繁荣的周期中,晋华虽规模尚小,但其在封锁中重建的经历,已成为中国存储产业自主攻坚的缩影。

marsbit20 分鐘前

福建晋江,一家存储超级独角兽静悄悄

marsbit20 分鐘前

《夏季拉锯战》仍在继续:突破67000美元将是比特币上涨的起点

比特币价格在8月1日跌至62,217美元,延续了自6月5日开始的盘整格局。目前比特币被困在58,000至67,000美元的区间内,市场参与者对下一步走向存在分歧。 技术分析显示关键价位在60,000美元和67,000美元。交易员Crypto Candy认为,只要价格低于66,000美元,就可能跌向60,000美元或更低。投资者Jelle则将当前市场比作“夏季拉锯战”,坚持定期买入的平均成本策略。 上行突破的关键在于能否站稳67,000美元以上。交易员Daan Crypto Trades认为,若无法突破此位,市场可能继续盘整。交易员Roman则预测,若伴随足够交易量有效突破67,000美元,价格可能快速上涨至70,000-80,000美元区间。 宏观分析师Gert van Lagen从更长周期观察,认为比特币正在测试一个持续七年之久的“杯柄形态”的颈线位,市场恐惧情绪在盘整中逐渐消退。他强调,长期持有者仍未出现投降迹象,NUPL指标显示他们远未进入抛售区域。 总而言之,市场共识是比特币正处于积累阶段,60,000美元和67,000美元是关键水平,对任一水平的突破都将决定资产的下一个方向。当前围绕67,000美元的博弈,也反映出短期持有者盈亏平衡点附近的心理压力。近期价格在利好新闻后迅速回落,表明市场叙事尚未转化为持续的资本流入,能否构建更稳固的上涨基础仍有待观察。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

《夏季拉锯战》仍在继续:突破67000美元将是比特币上涨的起点

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片