Online vs. Offline CBDCs — The Privacy Battle Dividing the EU

ccn.com發佈於 2025-12-25更新於 2025-12-25

文章摘要

The EU is divided over the design of its proposed digital euro, with a key conflict emerging between online and offline functionality. The Council of the EU supports a hybrid model that includes both online and offline capabilities. In contrast, privacy-focused members of the European Parliament advocate for an offline-only version, arguing it offers stronger, cash-like privacy by enabling peer-to-peer transactions without centralized tracking. They warn that an online system could allow excessive surveillance of consumer spending. The European Central Bank and European Commission favor the hybrid approach but face opposition from data protection authorities concerned about data minimization. With negotiations set for 2026, the outcome will determine the balance between privacy and functionality in the EU's digital currency.

Key Takeaways
  • The Council of the EU has adopted a digital euro negotiating position that favors online and offline functionality.
  • However, privacy hawks in the European Parliament are pushing for an offline-only digital currency.
  • As the two sides prepare for negotiations in 2026, privacy has emerged as the key battle line.

As the EU’s digital euro inches closer to realization, policymakers are split between two camps with competing visions for the central bank digital currency.

In one model, offline CBDCs behave like digital cash, with strong privacy built in by design.

However, another, more ambitious approach envisions the digital euro as a comprehensive online payment instrument that offers the same functionality as cards and digital wallets.

New Trending Crypto Wallet Offers
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Tangem

promotions
Trusted & Secure
Coins
111
  • Aave
  • Uniswap
  • GMX
  • Pendle
  • Ondo
  • Ankr
  • Fantom
  • Synthetix
  • Curve DAO Token
  • Compound
  • Maker
  • THORChain
  • Stacks
  • Arweave
  • Sui
  • Immutable
  • Optimism
  • Arbitrum
  • VeChain
  • The Sandbox
  • Decentraland
  • Axie Infinity
  • Render
  • The Graph
  • Chiliz
  • Helium
  • PAX Gold
  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Tether
  • USD Coin
  • Solana
  • Ripple
  • Dogecoin
  • Cardano
  • Toncoin
  • Shiba Inu
  • Avalanche
  • TRON
  • Chainlink
  • Polygon Matic
  • Polkadot
  • Wrapped Bitcoin
  • Litecoin
  • Dai
  • NEAR Protocol
  • Bitcoin Cash
  • Monero
  • Stellar
  • Cosmos
  • Filecoin
  • Ethereum Classic
  • Aptos
  • Cronos
  • Binance USD
  • Neo
  • APEcoin
  • Gala
  • Theta Network
  • Wrapped Ethereum
  • OKB
  • Pepe
  • Mantle
  • First Digital USD
  • Kaspa
  • Bittensor
  • Celestia
  • XDC Network
  • Artificial Superintelligence Alliance
  • Jupiter
  • Quant
  • Worldcoin
  • PayPal USD
  • Bonk
  • Rocket Pool ETH
  • Flare
  • Tether Gold
  • Sei
  • JITO
  • JasmyCoin
  • PancakeSwap
  • Core
  • Ethereum Name Service
  • SushiSwap
  • 1inch Network
  • Tezos
  • Algorand
  • Flow
  • Trust Wallet Token
  • KuCoin Token
  • MultiversX
  • GateToken
  • Zcash
  • IOTA
  • Basic Attention Token
  • Enjin Coin
  • Frax
  • Ethena
  • Ethena USDe
  • Ethena Staked USDe
  • Kusama
  • Celo
  • STEPN
  • Gemini Dollar
  • UNUS SED LEO
  • Internet Computer
  • EOS
  • BitTorrent
  • Mina
  • Dash
  • Zilliqa
  • Casper
  • TrueUSD
  • Floki Inu
  • IoTex
  • Build'N'Build
No result
Claim Offer

BitBox

promotions
Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly
Coins
Claim Offer

Blockstream

promotions
Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly
Coins
Claim Offer

The Two Digital Euros: Online Accounts vs. Offline Tokens

The distinction between online and offline versions of the CBDC emerged early on in discussions over the digital euro, with a string of EU policy documents exploring the pros and cons of each model since 2020.

An online digital euro would function like today’s electronic payments, with accounts tied to individual consumers and businesses, and transactions validated through infrastructure operated by banks and other regulated Eurosystem participants.

Meanwhile, offline CBDCs more closely resemble traditional cryptocurrencies, with tokens that move between wallets on a peer-to-peer basis, eliminating the need to update balances on a centralized ledger.

Privacy Hawks Favor Offline-Only CBDC

In the debate over online versus offline digital euros, privacy is a central political constraint.

The European Central Bank (ECB) has repeatedly framed privacy as “by design,” arguing that it wants the digital euro to meet very high privacy standards compared with existing electronic payment rails.

But that prospect holds much more weight with an offline CBDC, which promises a cash-like degree of anonymity, at least for small payments.

Alongside the European Commission, the ECB favors a hybrid system, with larger payments requiring online validation, but some offline functionality for low-value payments.

However, after the Commission outlined a proposal for online and offline functionality in 2023, privacy hawks in the European Parliament pushed back, arguing that online CBDCs could grant centralized authorities unprecedented visibility into consumers’ daily spending.

They argued that the proposal’s privacy guarantees for online CBDCs lacked legal grounding and would require users to simply trust that their payment data wouldn’t be accessed by centralized authorities.

That view is backed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), which have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles.

Council vs. Parliament

Since 2023, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) have increasingly rallied around an offline-first, or even offline-only, digital euro.

But on Dec. 19,  the EU Council representing Member States backed a negotiating position that more closely aligns with the European Commission’s 2023 proposal.

Now, the EU’s two decision-making branches are on a collision course.

With negotiations set to take place throughout 2026, the future of the digital euro project rests on whether or not the Council can convince enough MEPs to back online CBDCs.

Critics of online digital euro payments can be found across the political spectrum.

With diverse parliamentary alliances expected to push for strong privacy protections for any online functionality, the Council will likely need to offer legal guarantees that have been absent from the discussion so far.

Top Trending Crypto Articles
  • Best Exchanges Check Out Our Recommended Exchanges Here
  • Buy Crypto Fast How To Buy Crypto with a Credit Card Now
  • Safe Crypto Gambling See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

相關問答

QWhat are the two competing models for the digital euro being debated in the EU?

AThe two competing models are an online digital euro, which functions like electronic payments with accounts tied to individuals and validated through bank infrastructure, and an offline digital euro, which operates like digital cash with peer-to-peer transactions and no need for a centralized ledger.

QWhy do privacy advocates in the European Parliament favor an offline-only digital euro?

APrivacy advocates favor an offline-only digital euro because it offers cash-like anonymity for transactions, especially for small payments, and prevents centralized authorities from having unprecedented visibility into consumers' daily spending, which they argue is a risk with online CBDCs.

QWhat is the position of the EU Council regarding the digital euro's functionality?

AThe EU Council adopted a negotiating position on December 19 that favors a hybrid system with both online and offline functionality, aligning closely with the European Commission's 2023 proposal.

QWhat concerns have data protection authorities raised about the online digital euro model?

AThe European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) have warned that the systematic logging of online payments risks violating EU data-minimization principles and lacks strong legal grounding for privacy guarantees.

QWhen are negotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament on the digital euro expected to take place?

ANegotiations between the EU Council and the European Parliament are set to take place throughout 2026 to resolve the differences in their positions on the digital euro's design and functionality.

你可能也喜歡

《夏季拉锯战》仍在继续:突破67000美元将是比特币上涨的起点

比特币价格在8月1日跌至62,217美元,延续了自6月5日开始的盘整格局。目前比特币被困在58,000至67,000美元的区间内,市场参与者对下一步走向存在分歧。 技术分析显示关键价位在60,000美元和67,000美元。交易员Crypto Candy认为,只要价格低于66,000美元,就可能跌向60,000美元或更低。投资者Jelle则将当前市场比作“夏季拉锯战”,坚持定期买入的平均成本策略。 上行突破的关键在于能否站稳67,000美元以上。交易员Daan Crypto Trades认为,若无法突破此位,市场可能继续盘整。交易员Roman则预测,若伴随足够交易量有效突破67,000美元,价格可能快速上涨至70,000-80,000美元区间。 宏观分析师Gert van Lagen从更长周期观察,认为比特币正在测试一个持续七年之久的“杯柄形态”的颈线位,市场恐惧情绪在盘整中逐渐消退。他强调,长期持有者仍未出现投降迹象,NUPL指标显示他们远未进入抛售区域。 总而言之,市场共识是比特币正处于积累阶段,60,000美元和67,000美元是关键水平,对任一水平的突破都将决定资产的下一个方向。当前围绕67,000美元的博弈,也反映出短期持有者盈亏平衡点附近的心理压力。近期价格在利好新闻后迅速回落,表明市场叙事尚未转化为持续的资本流入,能否构建更稳固的上涨基础仍有待观察。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

《夏季拉锯战》仍在继续:突破67000美元将是比特币上涨的起点

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

股票跌得比加密货币还狠,钱去了哪?

7月底,韩国Kospi指数罕见连续两天触发熔断,全球半导体股集体暴跌。SK海力士业绩虽创纪录但不及预期,股价重挫,其两倍做多杠杆ETF市值更蒸发超万亿港元。与此同时,比特币却从低点反弹约15%,呈现“股票跌出币圈样,比特币装死躺赢”的反常局面。 此次暴跌并非全市场恐慌,而是对前期最拥挤交易(如AI半导体)的精准去杠杆。催化剂包括不及预期的财报、中国存储芯片扩产带来的竞争压力,以及日元套息交易平仓带来的流动性压力。分析认为,产业逻辑未死,死的是过高的杠杆。 那么,从股市流出的资金是否流入了比特币?答案是否定的。比特币的相对抗跌,是因为它在5月至6月已提前经历大幅调整,美国现货比特币ETF曾出现历史性资金外流。真正的避险资金流向了黄金。数据显示,比特币与黄金的相关性已降至极低水平,“数字黄金”叙事在此次危机中暂时失效。机构将两者视为不同资产:黄金用于避险,比特币用于博弈高波动回报。 资金未来的流向取决于三个条件:全球流动性压力缓解、美联储在不引发衰退的前提下降息,以及美国CLARITY加密法案的最终落地。当前,比特币与纳斯达克指数的走势正在脱钩,其价格更依赖全球流动性而非单一科技股盈利。这种低相关性可能使其在未来成为机构资产配置中分散风险的选择。尽管当前并非避风港,但比特币已提前出清,为未来资本重新配置占据了有利位置。

marsbit1 小時前

股票跌得比加密货币还狠,钱去了哪?

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片