Multicoin Co-founder: Is Decentralization Always Slower Than Centralization? PropAMM Is Breaking This Bias

marsbit發佈於 2026-03-13更新於 2026-03-13

文章摘要

In a recent article, Multicoin Capital co-founder Kyle Samani argues that PropAMM (Proactive Automated Market Maker) on Solana represents one of the most significant innovations in market microstructure in decades. It challenges the long-held belief that decentralized systems are inherently slower than centralized ones due to global node communication. In traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs), market makers co-locate servers and engage in constant bidirectional communication with the exchange to update orders, resulting in latency. In contrast, PropAMM runs market-making algorithms directly on the Solana blockchain, eliminating the need for inter-server messaging. Price updates occur within the same physical silicon, drastically reducing latency. PropAMM already offers narrower spreads for SOL-USDC spot trading than major CEXs. Samani predicts it will dominate on-chain trading across spots, perpetuals, and prediction markets in 2024. Current challenges include non-deterministic routing and lack of guaranteed best execution for takers, but solutions from aggregators like Jupiter and dFlow are expected. Upcoming Solana upgrades—such as higher compute limits, reduced slot times, and lower network latency—will further enhance PropAMM performance, solidifying its advantage over traditional systems.

Author: Kyle Samani, Multicoin Co-founder

Compiled by: Azuma, Odaily Planet Daily

Editor's Note: The man who knows how to hype Solana best, Multicoin Capital's former co-founder Kyle Samani, who recently made a high-profile exit, is back!

Last night, Kyle Samani posted a long Thread on his personal X account. In the post, Samani once again demonstrated his highly persuasive "hype" (not derogatory here) rhetoric, using "efficiency"—a weak point in the decentralization narrative—as a breakthrough. He detailed how Solana's PropAMM will catch up with or even surpass traditional centralized models in efficiency, arguing that PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, or even decades.

Below is the original content:

PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, and perhaps even one of the most significant in decades.

To help everyone grasp this conclusion, let's first look at how market makers (MMs) quote prices on traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs).

Market makers typically engage in physical co-location with the trading platform. Each market maker runs an algorithm on a server and connects to another server running the exchange's system via a network cable of uniform length (e.g., 50 meters).

A massive stream of data is constantly exchanged between market makers and the trading platform. Whenever a market maker sends an order to the exchange—whether it's a limit order, cancellation, or market order—the exchange must broadcast this information to all other market makers; then, other market makers resend their orders based on the new information; this cycle repeats indefinitely.

Here is a simple diagram.

Now let's look at how PropAMM works on the Solana mainnet.

The beauty of PropAMM on Solana is that the blockchain itself directly "hosts" the market maker algorithms. This means the system no longer needs to send billions of messages back and forth between market makers and the exchange; the market-making algorithms will run directly on the same physical machine as the exchange.

Here is the new diagram. (That's right, only the Solana blockchain is needed!)

There has long been a common view in the cryptocurrency industry that decentralized systems must be slower (with higher latency) than centralized systems because they require communication between global nodes.

But if you reframe the issue, on-chain hosted algorithms could actually have lower latency than traditional centralized financial exchanges.

Why is that? The reason is that the latency required for PropAMM to update prices only involves electrons moving within the same physical silicon chip. For example, if the last market order causes a change in the SOL-USD price, this information is immediately visible to all PropAMMs and used to price the next market order. Everything happens within the same silicon chip; there is no longer a need for two-way communication between servers.

It's worth noting that PropAMM does require frequent oracle updates, but this is not a problem and does not change the overall fact described above.

The most critical point remains that when the trading platform—in this case, the Solana blockchain—directly hosts the PropAMM algorithms, the market makers' pricing changes in real-time within the same physical silicon chip.

PropAMM has already become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, with narrower spreads than all major CEXs. I expect this market structure to become the dominant model for on-chain trading this year, including spot, perpetual contracts (perps), and even prediction markets.

The biggest challenge for PropAMM is that there is currently no way to ensure that takers always get the best execution, because:

· The algorithms of all PropAMMs are not public (which is reasonable, as traditional market-making algorithms are also proprietary);

· When routing trades between multiple PropAMMs, the results are non-deterministic.

However, this problem can be solved. I expect all relevant aggregator teams to launch solutions this year, such as Jupiter and dFlow for spot, and Phoenix for contracts.

Current PropAMMs are still under-optimized and constrained by various limitations of the Solana blockchain itself. This year, Solana will roll out a series of major upgrades that will significantly enhance PropAMM performance, including:

1. Higher CU (Compute Unit) limits per transaction and larger transaction sizes;

2. Higher CU limits per block;

3. Alpenglow: Reducing slot time from 400ms to 100–150ms;

4. DoubleZero: Reducing global network latency;

5. Application-controlled execution;

6. Multiple concurrent leaders.

If PropAMMs on the Solana mainnet can already offer narrower quotes than all CEXs without these upgrades, imagine how powerful they will become as these upgrades are gradually implemented.

Related reading: The Turnaround of Kyle Samani, the "Best Crypto Investor in History," and a Mirror of a Decade Ago

相關問答

QWhat is PropAMM and why is it considered a major innovation in market microstructure?

APropAMM is a mechanism on Solana where market maker algorithms are hosted directly on the blockchain, eliminating the need for constant communication between market makers and exchanges. It is considered a major innovation because it reduces latency by running algorithms on the same physical hardware as the exchange, potentially outperforming traditional centralized systems in efficiency.

QHow does PropAMM achieve lower latency compared to traditional centralized exchanges?

APropAMM achieves lower latency by hosting market maker algorithms directly on the Solana blockchain, allowing price updates to occur within the same physical silicon. This eliminates the bidirectional communication delays between market makers and exchanges in traditional systems, as all operations happen internally on the same hardware.

QWhat are the current challenges faced by PropAMM in ensuring best execution for takers?

AThe main challenges are that PropAMM algorithms are not publicly disclosed (similar to traditional market makers), and trading routing across multiple PropAMMs is non-deterministic, making it difficult to guarantee the best execution for takers automatically.

QWhich Solana upgrades are expected to enhance PropAMM performance in the future?

AKey Solana upgrades include higher CU limits per transaction, larger transaction sizes, increased CU per block, Alpenglow (reducing slot time to 100-150ms), DoubleZero (reducing global network latency), application-controlled execution, and multiple concurrent leaders.

QHow has PropAMM already demonstrated its effectiveness on Solana's mainnet?

APropAMM has become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, offering narrower spreads than all major centralized exchanges (CEXs), showcasing its efficiency and potential to lead on-chain trading in spots, perpetuals, and prediction markets.

你可能也喜歡

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

面对人工智能的冲击,许多人担心工作被取代。然而,真正的威胁在于个人对他人和系统的依赖,以及由此产生的“薪资奴役”——即为生存而从事无意义、枯燥的工作。摆脱这种困境的关键,不是抵制技术,而是成为拥有高自主性的“不可受雇”个体。 文章提出了成功抵御AI替代的五个核心要素:自主性(主动行动的能力)、品味(判断事物价值的经验)、说服力(让他人关注你工作的能力)、毅力(坚持并从错误中学习)和迭代(根据反馈持续改进)。这些能力无法仅通过理论学习获得,必须通过实践来培养。 要启动转变,首先要彻底改变环境,重塑身份认同。其次,应选择一个能获得真实、快速反馈的实践领域,例如创业。在众多技能中,内容创作(媒体)比编写代码更具优势,因为其价值是主观的,需要独特的审美和判断力,这正是AI目前难以完全复制的。 具体行动上,可以从三个步骤开始: 1. **挖掘原始素材**:反思自己长期痴迷的知识领域、轻松解决的难题或童年被压抑的兴趣,找到独特的个人经验。 2. **确立反向思考主轴**:找出你坚信但主流观点错误的地方,或行业内普遍忽视的“皇帝新衣”,形成独特的批判性视角。 3. **立即发布**:将前两步的思考融合,撰写并发布第一个核心内容(如帖子、视频),勇敢接受真实世界的反馈,并在此基础上持续学习和迭代。 最终,抵御AI的关键在于构建一份与自身身份深度契合的毕生事业,通过持续的内容创作和真实互动,建立无法被自动化取代的独特价值和影响力。行动,从今天发布第一个想法开始。

marsbit3 小時前

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

marsbit3 小時前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

文章探讨了通过投掷骰子生成比特币钱包种子短语的安全方法及其现实挑战。核心观点如下: **1. 骰子提供物理熵源** 骰子结果由众多微小变量决定,理论上虽可预测,但实践中无法被攻击者复制或计算,从而提供高质量的随机性。每个六面骰子投掷约产生2.585比特熵,50次投掷即可满足典型12词助记词(128比特熵)的安全需求。 **2. Coldcard漏洞事件凸显手工熵源的价值** 近期Coldcard硬件钱包因固件漏洞导致其内部随机数生成器存在缺陷,致使约1128枚比特币被盗。但那些**完全**通过足量骰子投掷生成种子短语的用户未受此漏洞影响,因为他们的主密钥未使用有缺陷的生成器。 **3. 重要警示:手工种子并非万能保护** 安全研究员指出,即使用户使用骰子生成了安全的种子,若他们使用了Coldcard的其他功能(如生成纸钱包、克隆密钥、共享签名密钥、密码等),这些**衍生密钥**仍可能调用有漏洞的随机数生成器,从而存在风险。安全种子不保证设备生成的所有秘密都安全。 **4. 手工生成熵源的现实局限性** 尽管数学上可靠,但该方法对大多数用户并不友好: * **过程繁琐易错**:需投掷50-99次,精确记录,任何输入错误都会导致钱包完全不同。 * **引入新风险**:用户可能在记录、转换过程中泄露信息,或使用有偏的骰子/投掷方式。 * **用户体验差**:难以想象大规模推广需要用户手动投掷近百次骰子。安全措施需适应现实生活场景和普通用户的知识水平。 **5. 给用户的建议** 受影响的Coldcard用户应: * 更新固件至最新版。 * 检查是否使用过有漏洞的功能生成了次级密钥或密码,如有则需立即更换。 * 考虑采用多签方案,使用不同厂商的设备分散风险。 **结论**:手工投掷骰子生成熵源是技术娴熟用户的一个有效安全选项,但其过程复杂、容易出错,不适合作为主流用户的默认方法。长远目标是依赖安全、透明且无需专业知识的硬件/软件随机数生成方案。

cryptonews.ru6 小時前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

cryptonews.ru6 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片