Multicoin Co-founder: Is Decentralization Always Slower Than Centralization? PropAMM Is Breaking This Bias

marsbit發佈於 2026-03-13更新於 2026-03-13

文章摘要

In a recent article, Multicoin Capital co-founder Kyle Samani argues that PropAMM (Proactive Automated Market Maker) on Solana represents one of the most significant innovations in market microstructure in decades. It challenges the long-held belief that decentralized systems are inherently slower than centralized ones due to global node communication. In traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs), market makers co-locate servers and engage in constant bidirectional communication with the exchange to update orders, resulting in latency. In contrast, PropAMM runs market-making algorithms directly on the Solana blockchain, eliminating the need for inter-server messaging. Price updates occur within the same physical silicon, drastically reducing latency. PropAMM already offers narrower spreads for SOL-USDC spot trading than major CEXs. Samani predicts it will dominate on-chain trading across spots, perpetuals, and prediction markets in 2024. Current challenges include non-deterministic routing and lack of guaranteed best execution for takers, but solutions from aggregators like Jupiter and dFlow are expected. Upcoming Solana upgrades—such as higher compute limits, reduced slot times, and lower network latency—will further enhance PropAMM performance, solidifying its advantage over traditional systems.

Author: Kyle Samani, Multicoin Co-founder

Compiled by: Azuma, Odaily Planet Daily

Editor's Note: The man who knows how to hype Solana best, Multicoin Capital's former co-founder Kyle Samani, who recently made a high-profile exit, is back!

Last night, Kyle Samani posted a long Thread on his personal X account. In the post, Samani once again demonstrated his highly persuasive "hype" (not derogatory here) rhetoric, using "efficiency"—a weak point in the decentralization narrative—as a breakthrough. He detailed how Solana's PropAMM will catch up with or even surpass traditional centralized models in efficiency, arguing that PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, or even decades.

Below is the original content:

PropAMM is one of the most important innovations in market microstructure in recent years, and perhaps even one of the most significant in decades.

To help everyone grasp this conclusion, let's first look at how market makers (MMs) quote prices on traditional centralized exchanges (CEXs).

Market makers typically engage in physical co-location with the trading platform. Each market maker runs an algorithm on a server and connects to another server running the exchange's system via a network cable of uniform length (e.g., 50 meters).

A massive stream of data is constantly exchanged between market makers and the trading platform. Whenever a market maker sends an order to the exchange—whether it's a limit order, cancellation, or market order—the exchange must broadcast this information to all other market makers; then, other market makers resend their orders based on the new information; this cycle repeats indefinitely.

Here is a simple diagram.

Now let's look at how PropAMM works on the Solana mainnet.

The beauty of PropAMM on Solana is that the blockchain itself directly "hosts" the market maker algorithms. This means the system no longer needs to send billions of messages back and forth between market makers and the exchange; the market-making algorithms will run directly on the same physical machine as the exchange.

Here is the new diagram. (That's right, only the Solana blockchain is needed!)

There has long been a common view in the cryptocurrency industry that decentralized systems must be slower (with higher latency) than centralized systems because they require communication between global nodes.

But if you reframe the issue, on-chain hosted algorithms could actually have lower latency than traditional centralized financial exchanges.

Why is that? The reason is that the latency required for PropAMM to update prices only involves electrons moving within the same physical silicon chip. For example, if the last market order causes a change in the SOL-USD price, this information is immediately visible to all PropAMMs and used to price the next market order. Everything happens within the same silicon chip; there is no longer a need for two-way communication between servers.

It's worth noting that PropAMM does require frequent oracle updates, but this is not a problem and does not change the overall fact described above.

The most critical point remains that when the trading platform—in this case, the Solana blockchain—directly hosts the PropAMM algorithms, the market makers' pricing changes in real-time within the same physical silicon chip.

PropAMM has already become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, with narrower spreads than all major CEXs. I expect this market structure to become the dominant model for on-chain trading this year, including spot, perpetual contracts (perps), and even prediction markets.

The biggest challenge for PropAMM is that there is currently no way to ensure that takers always get the best execution, because:

· The algorithms of all PropAMMs are not public (which is reasonable, as traditional market-making algorithms are also proprietary);

· When routing trades between multiple PropAMMs, the results are non-deterministic.

However, this problem can be solved. I expect all relevant aggregator teams to launch solutions this year, such as Jupiter and dFlow for spot, and Phoenix for contracts.

Current PropAMMs are still under-optimized and constrained by various limitations of the Solana blockchain itself. This year, Solana will roll out a series of major upgrades that will significantly enhance PropAMM performance, including:

1. Higher CU (Compute Unit) limits per transaction and larger transaction sizes;

2. Higher CU limits per block;

3. Alpenglow: Reducing slot time from 400ms to 100–150ms;

4. DoubleZero: Reducing global network latency;

5. Application-controlled execution;

6. Multiple concurrent leaders.

If PropAMMs on the Solana mainnet can already offer narrower quotes than all CEXs without these upgrades, imagine how powerful they will become as these upgrades are gradually implemented.

Related reading: The Turnaround of Kyle Samani, the "Best Crypto Investor in History," and a Mirror of a Decade Ago

相關問答

QWhat is PropAMM and why is it considered a major innovation in market microstructure?

APropAMM is a mechanism on Solana where market maker algorithms are hosted directly on the blockchain, eliminating the need for constant communication between market makers and exchanges. It is considered a major innovation because it reduces latency by running algorithms on the same physical hardware as the exchange, potentially outperforming traditional centralized systems in efficiency.

QHow does PropAMM achieve lower latency compared to traditional centralized exchanges?

APropAMM achieves lower latency by hosting market maker algorithms directly on the Solana blockchain, allowing price updates to occur within the same physical silicon. This eliminates the bidirectional communication delays between market makers and exchanges in traditional systems, as all operations happen internally on the same hardware.

QWhat are the current challenges faced by PropAMM in ensuring best execution for takers?

AThe main challenges are that PropAMM algorithms are not publicly disclosed (similar to traditional market makers), and trading routing across multiple PropAMMs is non-deterministic, making it difficult to guarantee the best execution for takers automatically.

QWhich Solana upgrades are expected to enhance PropAMM performance in the future?

AKey Solana upgrades include higher CU limits per transaction, larger transaction sizes, increased CU per block, Alpenglow (reducing slot time to 100-150ms), DoubleZero (reducing global network latency), application-controlled execution, and multiple concurrent leaders.

QHow has PropAMM already demonstrated its effectiveness on Solana's mainnet?

APropAMM has become the dominant mechanism for SOL-USDC spot quotes on Solana, offering narrower spreads than all major centralized exchanges (CEXs), showcasing its efficiency and potential to lead on-chain trading in spots, perpetuals, and prediction markets.

你可能也喜歡

以太坊上形成了长达43天的质押队列:但专家认为,这并非真正的看涨信号

以太坊网络上因希望进行质押的验证者数量激增,形成了约250万枚ETH的激活队列,新参与者需等待约43天才能激活其代币。然而,Sygnum Bank的托管与质押部门负责人托马斯·布伦纳指出,这种漫长的等待不应被直接解读为强烈的看涨信号。 布伦纳表示,验证者队列的拥堵虽然反映了机构需求,但也受到以太坊协议技术特性的显著影响。他提到,自Dencun升级后,每日验证者吞吐量被限制在约57,600枚ETH,且这一限制在Pectra升级中并未提高。Pectra升级允许单个验证者最多持有2048枚ETH并支持自动复利功能,大型质押运营商可以向现有验证者追加ETH而非创建新验证者。但即便仅向现有验证者添加1枚ETH,该交易也会与新的质押者一同进入相同的激活队列。 因此,布伦纳认为,并非队列中的所有ETH都源自新投资者的需求,其中部分积累来自于已质押ETH的再分配、对现有验证者的补充以及复利过程。他指出,一个更重要的市场信号是提款队列几乎为空,这表明现有参与者正在维持其网络头寸,显示出真实的信心。 目前,以太坊网络上已质押约4120万枚ETH,约占流通总量的33.8%。布伦纳还强调,尽管ETH价格有所疲软,机构投资者并未放弃质押。许多机构将质押收益视为以太坊内在的基本特性,但机构参与的最大障碍之一仍是隐私问题。由于验证者地址、存款地址和提款交易在区块链上可被追踪,机构投资者对扩大其质押规模持谨慎态度,隐私问题仍是制约以太坊机构质押市场更快增长的主要障碍。

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

以太坊上形成了长达43天的质押队列:但专家认为,这并非真正的看涨信号

cryptonews.ru1 小時前

韩国银行公布代币化存款测试结果

韩国央行公布了其代币化存款测试结果。该试点项目涉及28家央行及国际金融机构,韩方参与者包括KB国民银行、NH农协银行、新韩银行、友利银行和韩亚银行。 测试显示,从支付指令到最终结算的整个过程平均耗时约1分20秒,其中最终结算平均需80秒。在测试中,参与者执行了30笔交易,覆盖17种不同场景,包括企业和银行间转账,并涉及韩元、美元和欧元等六种货币。交易总额约合99.5万美元。 央行表示,平台在整个测试期间运行稳定,尽管仅在部分连接现有银行基础设施的环境下运作。即使在支付网络和银行系统兼容性有限的情况下,代币化存款结算仍能无缝、快速、透明地完成。 此外,韩国央行还通过Project Agora平台,在NH农协银行和新韩银行之间完成了一笔2000万韩元(约1.389万美元)的内部转账测试。该交易涉及手动连接其批发型央行数字货币(CBDC)平台Project Hangang至央行现有网络,以验证兼容性。 同时,韩国KB国民银行与日本三菱日联金融集团(MUFG Bank)也完成了使用存款代币的支付测试。这些代币是银行在试点中发行的数字凭证,并非由央行直接发行。韩国央行计划继续测试存款代币支付。 去年,韩国当局曾承诺加强对韩元稳定币的监管,要求其发行必须获得韩国央行和金融服务委员会(FSC)的批准。

cryptonews.ru2 小時前

韩国银行公布代币化存款测试结果

cryptonews.ru2 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片