Is Washington About To Kill Crypto Prediction Markets For Good? — Why Congress Suddenly Cares

bitcoinist發佈於 2026-03-26更新於 2026-03-26

文章摘要

On March 25, two separate acts were introduced to ban U.S. congressional staff, members of Congress, and federal officials from trading on prediction markets. Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts issued an immediate office-wide ban, calling these markets “playgrounds for corrupt insiders” that create perverse incentives. Separately, Representatives Adrian Smith and Nikki Budzinski introduced the bipartisan PREDICT Act, which would prohibit elected officials, senior appointees, and their families from trading on political and policy outcome markets. Violators would face a 10% fine on the value of the trade and forfeiture of profits. The moves reflect growing concern in Washington over insider trading risks in prediction markets, especially following instances of traders making large profits on geopolitical events. These actions may lead to stricter regulations and increased scrutiny on crypto-based prediction platforms.

Two different acts banning congressional staff, members of congress and federal officials from trading on prediction markets were introduced on Wednesday, March 25, one of them being effective immediately.

Massachusetts Bans Crypto Prediction Market

Washington’s battle against prediction markets rages on. Following a bipartisan Senate bill introduced on Monday that targets sports‐style bets on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, democratic representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts (MA-06) formally banned all of his staff from “participating in prediction markets”, such as the aforementioned, “to trade or hold positions on political, legislative, regulatory, geopolitical outcomes, or any information that is learned in an official capacity”. The press release frames it as the first such explicit office-wide ban in Congress.

Moulton’s rationale is clear: staff are meant to serve constituents, not profit from policy choices and global events. As he views it, prediction markets have become ethically questionable “playgrounds for corrupt insiders”:

Prediction markets have become a playground for corrupt insiders who are able to place bets on things like election outcomes, wars, and even the deaths of public figures. This is creating a perverse incentive structure that poses a genuine threat to American society today.

Congressional staff and the Members they work for exist to serve the constituents of the districts they represent, not to profit off of the very policy decisions and world events that we are here to respond to.

Nebraska Bans Crypto Prediction Market Too

On Nebraska’s side, Congressman Adrian Smith (R-NE-03) and Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski (D-IL-13) introduced the Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act), another bipartisan effort that aims to ban members of Congress, their spouses and children, the president and vice president, and senior appointees from trading on political and policy outcome markets.

Their core argument and statement are very similar to Moulton’s. Recent episodes of little‐known traders making massive profits on contracts tied to war with Iran or the length of government shutdowns have sharpened fears about insider information leaking into these markets. Smith said:

Serving the American people is a privilege, not a pathway to profit. Our commonsense, bipartisan bill will give Americans confidence that the decisions of their elected officials are guided by merit, not personal profit.

Budzinski added:

The American people are tired of politicians using their influence for personal gain, and the rise of prediction markets has made those concerns even more relevant. In recent months, we’ve seen instances of little-known traders making massive profits on events ranging from war with Iran to how long a government shutdown will last, raising necessary questions about the use of inside information.

Breaking the PREDICT Act would trigger a civil fine equal to 10% of the value of the banned trade, plus a requirement to hand over all profits from it to the U.S. Treasury, the announcement states.

A Growing Concern For Washington?

These new episodes come on top of earlier efforts like Rep. Ritchie Torres’s Financial Prediction Markets Public Integrity Act, following the capture of Venezuela’s former dictator Nicolás Maduro, which also targeted insider trading on platforms such as Polymarket.

For on‐chain and offshore prediction markets, a hard ban on US officials could actually de‐risk the space by reducing headline “insider” scandals, but it also raises the odds of stricter KYC and monitoring requirements in the US.

As it becomes increasingly clear that Washington has its attention set on ethically questionable crypto ventures, it is not too far-fetched to think that similar logic could be extended to other high‐beta crypto venues where policy and profit visibly collide (e.g., tokens tightly linked to election or war outcomes). Traders would do well pricing in regulatory overhang alongside usual market risk.

BTC’s price drops slightly after reaching $71k yesterday, trading for around $69k today. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

相關問答

QWhat is the main reason cited by Representative Seth Moulton for banning his staff from participating in prediction markets?

AMoulton believes staff should serve constituents, not profit from policy choices and global events, and views prediction markets as ethically questionable 'playgrounds for corrupt insiders'.

QWhat is the name of the bipartisan act introduced by Congressman Adrian Smith and Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski to ban trading on political prediction markets?

AThe Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act).

QWhat are the penalties for violating the PREDICT Act according to the announcement?

AA civil fine equal to 10% of the value of the banned trade, plus a requirement to hand over all profits from it to the U.S. Treasury.

QWhich earlier legislative effort targeted insider trading on platforms like Polymarket, as mentioned in the article?

ARep. Ritchie Torres's Financial Prediction Markets Public Integrity Act.

QHow might a hard ban on US officials using prediction markets affect the crypto prediction market space?

AIt could de-risk the space by reducing headline 'insider' scandals but also increase the likelihood of stricter KYC and monitoring requirements in the US.

你可能也喜歡

年薪百万抢电工,Meta急到自己办技校

AI竞赛正面临新的瓶颈:工地。美国正面临严重的电工、建筑工等技术工人短缺,这已成为微软、Meta、OpenAI等公司快速建设超大规模AI数据中心(如OpenAI耗资160亿美元的“星际之门”项目)的“头号障碍”。 尽管AI公司愿支付高薪(如电工年薪可达24-28万美元),远超传统行业,但熟练技工仍供不应求。麦肯锡预测,美国在2023-2030年间需额外培养13万名电工和24万名建筑工,而劳工统计局预计每年仍有8万个电工岗位空缺。这种短缺导致项目延迟,每月可能造成数百万美元的收入损失。 AI数据中心建设复杂,需应对巨大功耗(一座设施耗电堪比数十万户家庭)、复杂的配电系统以及高密度散热(需液冷技术)等挑战,因此亟需大量技术娴熟的工人。 为此,科技巨头开始亲自下场培养人才。例如,Meta投入1.15亿美元建立建筑工人培训学校,提供免费培训及生活补贴,以快速输送工人上岗。OpenAI则与建筑工会合作,提前锁定熟练劳动力。同时,企业也将招聘目光投向高中生,鼓励年轻人投身技工行业。这些举措已见成效,Z世代对技工职业的兴趣显著上升。 然而,更深层的挑战在于电力。AI数据中心用电量正以惊人速度增长,已推高部分地区的电价。此外,数据中心建设是项目制的,建设期需要成千上万的工人,但建成后仅需少量常驻人员。这意味着未来可能面临熟练工人短期过剩、并流向其他行业压低薪资的风险。如何实现劳动力与电力资源的长期平衡,仍是悬而未决的问题。

marsbit1 小時前

年薪百万抢电工,Meta急到自己办技校

marsbit1 小時前

OpenAI 不靠最贵的模型卖钱了

OpenAI近期调整了API定价策略,旗舰模型GPT-5.6 Luna降价80%,Terra降价20%,而顶级模型Sol未降价但新增了更快的“Fast”模式。此次调整的核心并非单纯的价格战,而是标志着OpenAI首次引导用户根据任务需求选择不同模型,而非一味追求最强模型。官方建议复杂任务可由Sol进行规划,再由Luna等成本更优的模型执行。 此举与Anthropic近期推出半价替代旗舰的Claude Opus 5策略相似,显示硅谷领先公司正形成默契:旗舰模型(如Sol、Fable)的角色正从直接盈利转向树立技术品牌和探索上限,而商业化走量和利润则主要由中端及性价比模型(如Luna、Opus)承担。这类似于汽车等行业“旗舰立形象,走量车型赚利润”的模式。 更深层的变化在于成本下降的驱动力。OpenAI透露,此次降价部分得益于由Sol模型自身参与优化底层生产内核,实现了效率提升与成本降低,开启了“模型优化模型”的自我加速循环。 行业竞争焦点正从“谁最聪明”的单项性能比拼,转向为企业提供基于任务重要性、出错成本、规模等因素的“模型组合”最优解,追求整体ROI。这类似于云计算按数据冷热使用不同存储的策略。 OpenAI的长期战略日益清晰:其真正目标并非依靠单一模型的高毛利,而是通过极低的调用成本构建庞大的开发者生态与调用量,形成类似操作系统或云平台的渗透率与用户粘性。当API调用成本低至可被忽略,AI将如水电般无缝嵌入所有业务流程,其发展也将从追求智能巅峰的“产品时代”,进入驱动全面自动化与效率的“基础设施时代”。

marsbit1 小時前

OpenAI 不靠最贵的模型卖钱了

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片