Hawk Tuah Influencer Says Memecoin Collapse Left Her Traumatized, But Critics Push Back

bitcoinist發佈於 2026-03-23更新於 2026-03-23

文章摘要

Hawk Tuah influencer Hailey Welsh says the collapse of the HAWK memecoin in December 2024 left her traumatized. The token surged to a $490 million market cap before crashing over 90% the next day. Welsh claims she was only a promoter, received no profits, and faced death threats after the incident. She was cleared by an FBI investigation and excluded from an investor lawsuit targeting the token’s creators. Despite warnings from the crypto community, she launched the token without fully understanding the risks. Welsh now advises others to avoid crypto entirely. Estimated losses from the failed launch are around $200,000.

Her lawyer puts the total losses from the botched HAWK token launch at roughly $200,000 — a figure that, in the world of crypto, barely registers. But for Hailey Welsh, better known online as the “Hawk Tuah Girl,” the fallout from that December 2024 disaster was anything but small.

Hawk Tuah: Death Threats And Silence Followed The Crash

Welsh told YouTube channel Channel 5 that she went into hiding for months after the token’s collapse, driven there by a wave of death threats and public anger.

“I’m sitting here, and I’m the one getting hit for this,” she said. “It’s rough.” She described pulling her head down whenever she stepped outside, bracing for hostility wherever she went. The experience, she said, left her traumatized.

The HAWK memecoin launched in December 2024 and exploded almost immediately. Within hours, its market cap surged past $490 million. Then it collapsed just as fast — down more than 90% the next day, bottoming out around $40 million.

It has since fallen to just over $1 million. The crash was widely labeled a rug pull, though Welsh insists she had no hand in engineering it.

She told Channel 5’s Andrew Callaghan that she was approached and agreed to promote the coin without fully grasping what she was getting into.

She said she received none of the proceeds and lacked the technical knowledge to launch a token in the first place. A Federal Bureau of Investigation probe examined her role in 2025. Investigators cleared her of any wrongdoing.

Lawsuit Targets Creators, Not Welsh

An investor lawsuit filed in December 2024 named the team and entities behind the coin — not Welsh. The suit alleged those parties sold unregistered securities.

Welsh was kept out of the legal action entirely, which tracks with her account of being a public face rather than a decision-maker.

BTCUSD now trading at $68,777. Chart: TradingView

Still, not everyone is moved by her version of events. Onchain analyst ZachXBT said the broader crypto community had warned Welsh repeatedly not to move forward with a token launch.

She launched one anyway. When it collapsed, he said, she went quiet while investors absorbed the losses.

Hawk Tuah Girl Now Tells Others To Avoid Crypto Entirely

More than a year after the incident, Welsh says she still does not understand the crypto industry. Her advice to anyone considering getting involved: stay out.

She told Callaghan that people need to be careful about what they attach their name to — a lesson she learned the hard way.

Whether Welsh was a victim, a willing participant, or something in between remains a matter of debate. What is not in dispute is that the coin was launched, it failed, and real people lost money.

Her lawyer’s $200,000 estimate of retail losses may sound modest against the token’s once-massive valuation, but it was real money that belonged to real people who bought in on her name.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView

相關問答

QWhat was the total estimated loss from the HAWK token launch as stated by Hailey Welsh's lawyer?

AHer lawyer put the total losses at roughly $200,000.

QWhat was the peak market capitalization of the HAWK memecoin and what did it fall to the next day?

AIts market cap surged past $490 million and then collapsed by more than 90% the next day, bottoming out around $40 million.

QWhat was the outcome of the Federal Bureau of Investigation probe into Hailey Welsh's role in the token launch?

AInvestigators cleared her of any wrongdoing.

QAccording to onchain analyst ZachXBT, what did the crypto community do before the token launch?

AZachXBT said the broader crypto community had warned Welsh repeatedly not to move forward with a token launch.

QWhat is Hailey Welsh's current stance on the crypto industry after the incident?

AHer advice is for anyone considering getting involved to stay out of crypto entirely.

你可能也喜歡

资本围剿之下,去中心化是公链的唯一防线

在这篇题为《资本围剿之下,去中心化是公链的唯一防线》的文章中,哥伦比亚商学院副教授Omid Malekan阐述了他对区块链核心价值的看法。他认为,去中心化并非公链众多特性之一,而是其唯一不可替代的核心特质,是抵御资本和传统巨头收编腐化的根本防线。 作者从现实主义的“马基雅维利”视角出发,分析了企业和资本的固有本性。他指出,盈利企业必然将自身利润置于技术创新之上,指望现有巨头自愿颠覆自身利益格局是不切实际的幻想。因此,任何在去中心化程度上妥协的方案,无论是许可链、节点高度集中的公链,还是中心化的二层网络,最终都会被资本劫持和控制,丧失其最初的中立与开放精神。 文章着重警告了“内部控制权掠夺”的风险,认为这比外部攻击(如51%攻击)更为致命。他列举了Visa、Mastercard和谷歌等平台从开放走向垄断的“劣化”历程,并指出承载价值更为广泛的底层公链,面临的被蚕食风险更高。企业推广“伪去中心化”的联盟链,实质是一种拖延战术,意在延缓真正去中心化技术的普及,并为自身设置准入壁垒。 最后,作者得出结论:尽管以太坊等去中心化公链存在缺陷且运行成本高昂,但在多方博弈下,市场中的资产终将流向安全性最高、最抗审查的基础设施。因此,以太坊仍是当下对抗资本围剿、避免被传统利益集团吞并的最优现实选择。

Foresight News12 分鐘前

资本围剿之下,去中心化是公链的唯一防线

Foresight News12 分鐘前

比特币的规则由谁决定?BIP-110 引爆治理分歧

BIP-110提案旨在通过临时软分叉,在共识层限制比特币链上非货币数据(如铭文、Runes),将部分当前有效的交易变为无效,以应对区块空间占用和节点负担问题。此举引发了比特币社区关于治理权的深刻分歧。 支持者(如部分节点运营者)认为,默认的节点转发策略已因绕行工具(如直接提交API)而失效,必须将边界推至共识层。反对者则有多重理由:MicroStrategy创始人Michael Saylor列出110条理由,认为该提案门槛(55%矿工信号)过低,且可能开创危险的治理先例;Blockstream联合创始人Adam Back主张,比特币无需许可的本质意味着无人有权强加价值判断,技术共识过程本身就是防止轻率变更的“免疫系统”;此外,该提案即使激活,也可能无法完全阻止数据嵌入,且被曝存在晚升级节点的共识漏洞风险。 争论还涉及各方的权力依据:矿工内部意见分裂(如Ocean支持,F2Pool反对,Foundry交客户投票);节点运营者强调每个节点的平等验证权;Core开发者能改变默认软件行为但缺乏问责;大型持币机构(如MicroStrategy)则以市场和叙事权介入。BIP-110已演变为一场关于“谁有权决定比特币规则”的治理压力测试,暴露了社区在协议升级合法性来源(PoW算力、节点执行、技术共识等)上的根本性分歧。

链捕手41 分鐘前

比特币的规则由谁决定?BIP-110 引爆治理分歧

链捕手41 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片