Gujarat National Law University Report Urges Clear Crypto Regulation in India

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-03-11更新於 2026-03-11

文章摘要

A recent report from Gujarat National Law University, produced with the Society of Indian Law Firms, urges India to establish a clear regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It highlights that approximately 120 million Indians are already using cryptocurrencies despite the absence of comprehensive regulation. The report argues that the current regulatory gap has negatively impacted capital flows, industry growth, and innovation. It proposes a multi-agency regulatory model rather than oversight by a single body, given the cross-disciplinary nature of crypto involving markets and payments. The recommended approach emphasizes institutional coordination to enhance consumer protection, address illicit finance, and support blockchain innovation.

A recent project research from Gujarat National Law University advises India to create a clear crypto-asset regulatory framework, proposes a systematic framework for regulation, and provides a thorough analysis of India’s actual stance on crypto-assets.

The project report, titled “Crypto-Assets in India: Assessing the Case for Regulation.” Which was prepared in association with the Society of Indian Law Firms. Meanwhile, the Senior judges, prominent lawyers, policy experts, and leaders of the digital asset sector convened at the launch event to discuss the future direction of crypto regulation in India.

Rising Crypto Adoption in India

The report highlights the extent of cryptocurrency acceptance in India, according to Prof. S. Shanthakumar, Director of Gujarat National Law University, nearly 12 crore Indians are already using crypto assets despite the absence of a comprehensive regulatory framework. He added, “The report ultimately presents five possible regulatory models, leaving policymakers with practical options to consider while shaping India’s approach to crypto regulation.”

Many major economies have implemented explicit crypto-asset laws informed by comparative regulatory models and global policy trends. India established measures and extended anti-money laundering obligations to crypto, but its lack of a clear, comprehensive crypto framework has affected capital flows, industry development, and innovation, as per the report.

Report Calls for Balanced Crypto Regulation

Meanwhile, Kalyanjit Hatibaruah, Web3 Technology Management Consultant, shared an AI video on LinkedIn that summarized the report. Which pointed out that the report concludes that since the crypto industry combines a variety of domains, including markets and payments, it cannot be regulated by a single body. Following consultations with senior officials and authorities, the report suggests a multi-agency regulatory model.

The report finally calls for a calibrated regulatory approach that includes institutional control and cooperation between different authorities, because it says that could improve consumer protection, address issues with illicit finance stability, and promote the overall growth of blockchain-based innovation.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Filecoin (FIL) Slides 8%: Can Support Hold or Will Bears Push the Price Below $5?

TagsBlockchainCrypto RegulationsIndia

相關問答

QWhat is the main recommendation of the Gujarat National Law University report regarding crypto-assets in India?

AThe report recommends that India create a clear and comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto-assets.

QHow many Indians are estimated to be using crypto assets according to Prof. S. Shanthakumar?

ANearly 12 crore (120 million) Indians are estimated to be using crypto assets.

QWhat type of regulatory model does the report suggest for the crypto industry and why?

AThe report suggests a multi-agency regulatory model because the crypto industry combines various domains like markets and payments, making it impossible for a single body to regulate effectively.

QWhat are some of the negative impacts of India's lack of a clear crypto framework mentioned in the report?

AThe lack of a clear framework has negatively affected capital flows, industry development, and innovation in India.

QWhat key benefits does the report say a calibrated regulatory approach could provide?

AA calibrated regulatory approach could improve consumer protection, address issues with illicit finance stability, and promote the overall growth of blockchain-based innovation.

你可能也喜歡

比特币矿工纷纷认输，但他们的股票却飙升

比特币全网算力持续下滑，矿工难度大幅下降，显示矿工因经济压力正大规模关闭矿机。然而，上市矿企的股票却逆势飙升，与比特币价格下跌形成罕见背离。这主要得益于AI叙事推动，使得矿企股票表现强劲。 矿工以BTC计价的区块奖励收入创历史新低，手续费收入占比极低，远不足以弥补补贴减少的缺口。历史上矿工投降通常与价格下跌同步，但此次两者出现分化。长期看，矿工激励机制需重新设计或依赖币价上涨来维持网络安全预算。熊市可能促使市场更认真地面对这些根本问题。

marsbit3 分鐘前

比特币矿工纷纷认输，但他们的股票却飙升

marsbit3 分鐘前

被「忽略」的市场大事：美日韩联合干预，美国财政部「罕见」下场，贝森特悄悄「救市」？

近期，美国、日本和韩国罕见地实施了近三十年来最大规模的外汇市场协调干预。此次行动不仅针对日元和韩元的贬值压力，更被市场视为一场稳定日韩金融市场的“救市”行动，旨在防止风险向全球科技产业链和美国市场外溢。 具体操作中，日本和韩国外汇当局直接抛售美元以支撑本币。美国则通过非美元渠道介入，首次直接参与日元干预，委托华尔街机构卖出欧元、买入日元，在缓解日元贬值的同时避免美元承压。纽约联储在行动前还进行了“汇率检查”，向市场释放政策信号。 分析指出，美国此举超越了传统汇率稳定目标。其核心意图在于维护日本、韩国这两个半导体及AI供应链关键盟友的资产价格稳定，防止其金融市场（如韩国KOSDAQ指数跌至阶段低点）压力引发连锁反应，进而波及美国国债市场与科技产业链。 此次三方联手干预后，日元和韩元汇率应声大幅反弹。市场观点认为，这标志着高杠杆交易可能进入尾声，但当前政策更多是控制波动，而非扭转市场趋势。

marsbit6 分鐘前

被「忽略」的市场大事：美日韩联合干预，美国财政部「罕见」下场，贝森特悄悄「救市」？

marsbit6 分鐘前

美联储九月必加息？加密与美股将如何承压？

市场对美联储九月加息的预期在短短一周内从不足五成大幅跳升至八成以上，主要因近期油价上涨推高通胀担忧。美联储7月议息会议虽维持利率不变，但内部9:3的投票分歧显示出鹰派力量增强，强化了加息可能性。 加息预期升温对加密资产构成压力。比特币作为高风险资产，对流动性敏感，加息将提升其持有成本，可能促使资金流向货币市场。但历史表明，若市场将加息解读为紧缩周期尾声，其负面影响可能有限且短暂。 美股方面，加息将推高贴现率，对高估值的科技股及加密概念股（如Coinbase、MicroStrategy）造成更大压力。当前正值科技巨头财报季，市场关注点已从资本开支规模转向其能否转化为实际营收与现金流。若九月加息，融资成本上升可能加剧那些依赖“烧钱换增长”叙事公司的股价波动。 未来需密切关注油价走势、7月CPI数据及美联储官员在杰克逊霍尔年会上的表态，这些将是判断九月是否加息的关键。

Odaily星球日报6 分鐘前

美联储九月必加息？加密与美股将如何承压？

Odaily星球日报6 分鐘前

美日联合干预：新“广场协议”，布雷顿森林体系 2.0 的开端与日元套利时代的终结

美日两国罕见地联合干预外汇市场以支撑日元，标志着数十年来依赖低利率日元融资的全球套利交易模式可能面临拐点。美国财长贝森特与总统特朗普高调证实参与干预，并预期美国将从中获得财务收益。此举导致日元汇率急剧反弹，同时引发市场对日本可能抛售美债以捍卫日元的担忧，进而可能推高美债长端收益率。 分析指出，当前市场波动并非单纯由通胀驱动，而是源于全球资本流动的结构性调整。日本外汇储备的潜在清算、大型科技公司从资本提供者转变为大规模借款者以投资AI等领域，共同收紧全球信贷条件。此次协同干预被视为具有“新广场协议”的意味，可能是“布雷顿森林体系2.0”的开端，象征着美国通过供给侧政策推动增长、日本重组其经济角色的新格局。无论短期效果如何，这一行动已迫使市场重新评估延续数十年的全球资本流动秩序。

marsbit46 分鐘前

美日联合干预：新“广场协议”，布雷顿森林体系 2.0 的开端与日元套利时代的终结

marsbit46 分鐘前

TradeXYZ脱离Hyperliquid单飞的可能性有多高

**TradeXYZ脱离Hyperliquid单飞的可能性分析** 随着TradeXYZ业务规模持续扩大，并长期占据Hyperliquid HIP-3市场超过90%的份额，近期社区对其是否可能脱离Hyperliquid并独立搭建交易平台的讨论升温。 **自立门户的驱动力** TradeXYZ已借助Hyperliquid成长为RWA永续合约市场的巨擘，其贡献的交易量占Hyperliquid总交易量70%以上。若选择自立门户，核心商业驱动力可能是为了**捕获全部底层交易手续费**。目前，TradeXYZ与Hyperliquid的交易费用分成固定为50/50，这意味着近一半收入归属于Hyperliquid。对于一个创造超4000亿美元交易量的项目而言，调整分成比例或独立运营以获取全部收益，具有显著吸引力。行业历史上也存在类似案例，如Uniswap、dYdX等项目在壮大后选择构建自有基础设施。 **制约与风险** 然而，TradeXYZ独立面临多重制约： 1. **性能挑战**：Hyperliquid提供了强大的底层技术（HyperCore），管理着撮合、清算等核心功能。自建同等性能的基础设施短期内难以实现，可能影响产品体验和市场叙事。 2. **渠道依赖**：尽管TradeXYZ拥有自己的交易前端，但大部分用户仍习惯通过Hyperliquid前端访问其流动性市场。Hyperliquid是其主要的分发渠道，失去渠道支持的价值难以估量。 3. **合作关系与信任**：TradeXYZ创始人Shoku是Hyperliquid的早期支持者，双方团队关系密切，存在深厚的信任基础。“背刺”合作方可能引发舆论争议，损害信誉。 **双输的潜在结局** 分析指出，若TradeXYZ真的选择分裂，很可能导致**双输局面**： * 对Hyperliquid而言，将失去最大的增长点和叙事基础（RWA合约龙头地位），总交易量可能骤降超50%，其代币HYPE估值或受重创。 * 对TradeXYZ而言，将面临从零开始构建基础设施和培养用户习惯的挑战，同时可能因竞争关系失去原有渠道优势，并在激烈的市场中被其他竞争者趁虚而入。 **结论** 综合来看，虽然TradeXYZ市场影响力日益增强，拥有议价能力，但考虑到技术依赖、渠道价值、双方信任关系以及可能引发的双输竞争，**其脱离Hyperliquid自立门户的可能性较低，也并非理智选择**。更可能的发展路径是在维持现有合作集成优势的基础上，协商更有利的条款，并逐步将发展重点向自身品牌和用户生态建设倾斜。

marsbit57 分鐘前

TradeXYZ脱离Hyperliquid单飞的可能性有多高

marsbit57 分鐘前

交易

現貨
活动图片

熱門分類right-arrow

熱門標籤right-arrow