Gujarat National Law University Report Urges Clear Crypto Regulation in India

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-03-11更新於 2026-03-11

文章摘要

A recent report from Gujarat National Law University, produced with the Society of Indian Law Firms, urges India to establish a clear regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It highlights that approximately 120 million Indians are already using cryptocurrencies despite the absence of comprehensive regulation. The report argues that the current regulatory gap has negatively impacted capital flows, industry growth, and innovation. It proposes a multi-agency regulatory model rather than oversight by a single body, given the cross-disciplinary nature of crypto involving markets and payments. The recommended approach emphasizes institutional coordination to enhance consumer protection, address illicit finance, and support blockchain innovation.

A recent project research from Gujarat National Law University advises India to create a clear crypto-asset regulatory framework, proposes a systematic framework for regulation, and provides a thorough analysis of India’s actual stance on crypto-assets.

The project report, titled “Crypto-Assets in India: Assessing the Case for Regulation.” Which was prepared in association with the Society of Indian Law Firms. Meanwhile, the Senior judges, prominent lawyers, policy experts, and leaders of the digital asset sector convened at the launch event to discuss the future direction of crypto regulation in India.

Rising Crypto Adoption in India

The report highlights the extent of cryptocurrency acceptance in India, according to Prof. S. Shanthakumar, Director of Gujarat National Law University, nearly 12 crore Indians are already using crypto assets despite the absence of a comprehensive regulatory framework. He added, “The report ultimately presents five possible regulatory models, leaving policymakers with practical options to consider while shaping India’s approach to crypto regulation.”

Many major economies have implemented explicit crypto-asset laws informed by comparative regulatory models and global policy trends. India established measures and extended anti-money laundering obligations to crypto, but its lack of a clear, comprehensive crypto framework has affected capital flows, industry development, and innovation, as per the report.

Report Calls for Balanced Crypto Regulation

Meanwhile, Kalyanjit Hatibaruah, Web3 Technology Management Consultant, shared an AI video on LinkedIn that summarized the report. Which pointed out that the report concludes that since the crypto industry combines a variety of domains, including markets and payments, it cannot be regulated by a single body. Following consultations with senior officials and authorities, the report suggests a multi-agency regulatory model.

The report finally calls for a calibrated regulatory approach that includes institutional control and cooperation between different authorities, because it says that could improve consumer protection, address issues with illicit finance stability, and promote the overall growth of blockchain-based innovation.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Filecoin (FIL) Slides 8%: Can Support Hold or Will Bears Push the Price Below $5?

TagsBlockchainCrypto RegulationsIndia

相關問答

QWhat is the main recommendation of the Gujarat National Law University report regarding crypto-assets in India?

AThe report recommends that India create a clear and comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto-assets.

QHow many Indians are estimated to be using crypto assets according to Prof. S. Shanthakumar?

ANearly 12 crore (120 million) Indians are estimated to be using crypto assets.

QWhat type of regulatory model does the report suggest for the crypto industry and why?

AThe report suggests a multi-agency regulatory model because the crypto industry combines various domains like markets and payments, making it impossible for a single body to regulate effectively.

QWhat are some of the negative impacts of India's lack of a clear crypto framework mentioned in the report?

AThe lack of a clear framework has negatively affected capital flows, industry development, and innovation in India.

QWhat key benefits does the report say a calibrated regulatory approach could provide?

AA calibrated regulatory approach could improve consumer protection, address issues with illicit finance stability, and promote the overall growth of blockchain-based innovation.

你可能也喜歡

中国AI为什么发展得这么快?答案藏在实验室内部

本文通过作者走访中国头部AI实验室的经历,探讨了中国AI快速发展的原因及其与美国的路径差异。文章指出,中国AI的优势不仅在于人才、工程和迭代速度,更在于其务实的组织方式:少谈概念,多做模型;强调团队执行而非个人明星;倾向于自研核心技术栈而非依赖外部服务。 中国AI生态呈现出与美国不同的发展模式:美国注重原创范式、资本投入和顶尖科学家的个人影响力;中国则更擅长在已有方向上快速追赶,通过开源协作、工程优化和大量年轻研究者的投入,将模型能力迅速推向前沿。中国的许多核心贡献者是学生,他们带着谦逊和专注投入工作,较少受个人主义或哲学讨论的干扰,更专注于模型构建本身。 在产业层面,中国公司普遍持有“技术所有权”心态,倾向于自建而非购买技术栈,大型科技公司纷纷研发自己的大语言模型以掌控核心技术。尽管对英伟达算力有强烈需求,且国内数据产业不如西方发达,但中国AI需求正在增长,更接近云市场的支出模式而非传统的SaaS市场。 文章认为,未来的AI竞争不仅是模型能力的比拼,更是组织能力、开发者生态和产业执行力的竞争。中国AI正以自身独特的方式参与全球前沿,两种不同的发展路径正在形成。作者最后强调,尽管存在地缘政治紧张,但全球开放AI生态的繁荣对世界更为有益,并表达了对中美在AI领域协同发展的期望。

marsbit9 小時前

中国AI为什么发展得这么快?答案藏在实验室内部

marsbit9 小時前

3年5倍,百年玻璃厂重生

本文探讨了拥有175年历史的玻璃制造商康宁公司如何在AI数据中心建设浪潮中,借助光纤需求爆发实现业绩与股价的飞跃。文章核心内容如下: AI数据中心对光纤的需求出现结构性爆发,根据CRU数据,年增长率高达75.9%,导致供需缺口扩大。英伟达为此投资康宁等三家公司,总金额达45亿美元,旨在打通从激光器、光芯片到光纤的全链条。康宁作为被选中的光纤供应商,承诺大幅扩张产能。 需求爆发的背后有两重逻辑:一是光纤核心材料“预制棒”的扩产周期长、工艺要求高,供给存在刚性约束;二是AI芯片算力提升迫使数据通信从电转向光,以降低能耗并提高传输效率,这直接推动了高端特种光纤(如用于CPO共封装光学)的需求。AI数据中心的光纤用量可达传统机柜的5-10倍,并随GPU集群规模超比例增长。 在此背景下,康宁光通信业务收入从2023年的13亿美元快速增长,2026年Q1同比增长93%,并获得了Meta、英伟达等科技巨头的长期大额订单。虽然从全球市场份额看康宁并非最大,但其在超低损耗、高密度、高抗弯等AI所需的高端特种光纤技术上具备优势,且企业级(数据中心)客户收入占比已超40%,这使其区别于以电信运营商客户为主的其他厂商。 文章指出,光纤涨价红利正惠及全行业。康宁当前股价和估值已大幅攀升,未来表现将取决于CPO技术落地节奏、大客户订单执行情况以及“空芯光纤”等潜在技术变革的影响。尽管前景看好,但短期过快的涨幅也可能带来波动风险。

marsbit10 小時前

3年5倍,百年玻璃厂重生

marsbit10 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片