Crypto May No Longer Be Treated Like Penny Stocks Under SEC Plan

bitcoinist發佈於 2026-03-17更新於 2026-03-17

文章摘要

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed amending Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11 to apply only to equity securities, a move that could significantly impact crypto market structure. The rule, historically used to prevent fraud in over-the-counter equity markets, would no longer broadly apply to other asset classes like cryptocurrencies. This change is seen as a meaningful shift away from forcing crypto into existing securities frameworks. By excluding crypto from these rules—originally designed for penny stocks—the SEC signals a more tailored regulatory approach. The proposal is open for public comment, reflecting the agency's growing willingness to treat crypto differently from traditional equities.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed narrowing Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11 so that it applies only to equity securities, a technical change that could carry outsized significance for crypto market structure. For digital assets, the proposal signals a more tailored regulatory approach after years of trying to force crypto into frameworks built for traditional securities.

In a press release issued March 16, the SEC said Rule 15c2-11 has historically focused on preventing manipulative and fraudulent schemes in over-the-counter equity markets. The proposed amendment would revise the rule so it refers only to equity securities, rather than leaving room for broader application to other asset classes.

Quiet But Meaningful Win For Crypto

That matters because Rule 15c2-11 governs certain information gathering and review requirements for broker-dealers that publish quotations for, or maintain a continuous quoted market in, securities in the OTC market. By explicitly tying the rule to equities, the SEC appears to be drawing a cleaner line around where those obligations begin and end.

SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins framed the move as a matter of regulatory fit rather than ideology. “Regulations should be appropriately tailored to fit the asset class to which they apply,” Atkins said. “This proposal would clarify regulatory obligations when publishing quotations and affirm what was always understood: Rule 15c2-11 applies to equity securities.”

For crypto market participants, the proposal reads as more than a drafting cleanup. Marty Bent, writing on X (@TFTC), argued that the shift quietly reverses the posture that defined much of the prior SEC era. “The SEC just proposed excluding crypto assets from OTC market rules that govern broker-dealer quotations. These are regulations originally designed for penny stocks and thinly traded equities.”

He went further, casting the amendment as a subtle but meaningful break from the agency’s past playbook. “This is a quiet but meaningful shift. Instead of forcing Bitcoin and crypto into existing securities frameworks, the SEC is explicitly carving it out. The rules being amended (Rule 15c2-11) dictate how broker-dealers can publish quotes for securities. By clarifying that crypto doesn’t fall under these requirements, the SEC is signaling it doesn’t view these assets through the same lens as traditional equities.”

That interpretation is likely to resonate because Rule 15c2-11 was never designed with digital assets in mind. Its original function was tied to OTC equities, particularly the kind of thinly traded names that have historically been vulnerable to quote manipulation and fraud. In that context, the SEC’s proposal does not create a bespoke crypto regime, but it does something nearly as important: it narrows the set of legacy securities rules that might otherwise be stretched to cover crypto by default.

Bent also contrasted the proposal with the enforcement-heavy approach associated with former Chair Gary Gensler. “Under Gensler, the approach was the opposite, force everything into existing rules, then sue when companies couldn’t comply. This is the regulatory posture flipping from ‘prove you’re not a security’ to ‘these rules weren’t built for you.’”

The proposal is now headed to the standard public process. The SEC said the release will be published on SEC.gov and later in the Federal Register, with a 60-day comment period beginning after Federal Register publication. That leaves room for revisions, but the message is already clear enough: the agency is increasingly willing to distinguish crypto from the infrastructure and assumptions of legacy equity markets.

At press time, the total crypto market cap stood at $2.51 trillion.

Total crypto market cap must reclaim the 0.786 Fib, 1-week chart | Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

相關問答

QWhat is the main change proposed by the SEC regarding Rule 15c2-11?

AThe SEC has proposed narrowing Exchange Act Rule 15c2-11 so that it applies only to equity securities, rather than having broader application to other asset classes like crypto.

QWhy is this proposal considered a significant shift for the crypto market?

AIt signals a more tailored regulatory approach, distinguishing crypto from traditional securities frameworks and reversing the previous posture of forcing crypto into existing rules designed for equities like penny stocks.

QHow did SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins justify the proposed amendment?

AHe framed it as a matter of regulatory fit, stating that regulations should be appropriately tailored to the asset class they apply to, and that the proposal clarifies Rule 15c2-11 was always understood to apply to equity securities.

QWhat does Marty Bent suggest about the SEC's change in approach compared to the Gary Gensler era?

ABent argues this shifts from an enforcement-heavy approach that forced crypto into existing rules and then sued for non-compliance, to a posture that acknowledges these rules weren't built for crypto assets.

QWhat is the next step for this SEC proposal after its announcement?

AThe proposal will go through a standard public process with a 60-day comment period after being published in the Federal Register, leaving room for potential revisions.

你可能也喜歡

福建晋江,一家存储超级独角兽静悄悄

近日,随着长鑫科技A股上市成为股王,同为国内三大存储芯片项目之一的福建晋华集成电路有限公司(晋华)重新进入公众视野。这家位于福建晋江的DRAM企业,自2016年成立起便肩负打破海外垄断的使命,却因2018年被美国列入实体清单并遭遇司法指控而陷入长达数年的沉寂。2024年2月,美国法院裁定其无罪,晋华才得以摆脱法律阴影。 晋华的曲折发展与灵魂人物陈正坤密不可分。这位拥有美光与联电背景的工程师,怀揣自主开发DRAM的梦想加入晋华。公司初期通过与联电合作快速推进,但随后美光发起诉讼,指控技术窃密,导致晋华产线因设备禁运而停摆。在极端困难下,陈正坤带领团队改造国产设备、重构工艺,艰难维持运营。尽管最终赢得清白,但发展进度已被严重拖慢。目前,晋华专注于利基型DRAM市场,月产能约4万片,拥有千余项专利,但仍在美国实体清单限制之下。 晋江这座以鞋服闻名的民营经济强市,为引入晋华这一“硬科技”项目投入巨资,并以政府基金、全链条配套和持续的政策支持,助力企业在制裁中生存下来。如今,以晋华为龙头,晋江已形成超千亿规模的集成电路产业集群。在全球AI驱动存储繁荣的周期中,晋华虽规模尚小,但其在封锁中重建的经历,已成为中国存储产业自主攻坚的缩影。

marsbit1 小時前

福建晋江,一家存储超级独角兽静悄悄

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
活动图片