Blockchain Association Urges Congress To Keep BRCA Intact In Crypto Market Structure Bill

bitcoinist發佈於 2026-02-27更新於 2026-02-27

文章摘要

With a March 1 deadline approaching for the CLARITY Act, the Blockchain Association is intensifying its advocacy efforts on Capitol Hill. The trade group is urging lawmakers to preserve the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) within the upcoming crypto market structure bill. Its primary focus is on Title III of the draft legislation, emphasizing the need to protect open-source software developers from being regulated as financial intermediaries. The association argues that developers who write and publish non-custodial code, without controlling user assets, should not be subject to the same rules as financial institutions. This distinction is presented as crucial for fostering American leadership in DeFi innovation. Concurrently, a new bipartisan bill, the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026, has been introduced in the House to explicitly protect developers from prosecution under laws targeting unlicensed money transmitters.

With a White House deadline on the anticipated CLARITY Act set for March 1, crypto policy discussions are intensifying in Washington. On Thursday afternoon, Senate Democrats are scheduled to meet to continue deliberations on the crypto market structure bill.

Ahead of those talks, the Blockchain Association returned to Capitol Hill to press lawmakers on how decentralized finance (DeFi) will be treated in the latest draft from the Senate Banking Committee.

Blockchain Association Lobbies For Developer Protections

The industry trade group, which represents a range of crypto companies, said its advocacy efforts are focused particularly on Title III of the draft legislation and on preserving the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) as negotiations move forward.

In a post on social media platform X, the organization stated that leaders from 18 member companies were meeting with 24 Senate offices across both the Banking and Agriculture Committees.

According to the association, the stakes extend beyond technical regulatory language. “Today’s meetings are about whether America will keep its commitment to open innovation — and to the developers who build permissionless software,” the group wrote.

It emphasized that it has consistently pushed for legislation that clearly distinguishes between developers of non-custodial software and financial intermediaries that actually take control of customer funds.

As Congress works toward a comprehensive framework for digital asset markets, the association argued, policymakers must ensure that DeFi protocols are not effectively pushed out of existence through overly broad rules.

Clear Line Between Custodians And Code Writers

Central to the debate is the treatment of open-source developers. The group maintains that developers who publish code but do not custody or manage user assets should not be regulated as financial institutions.

“Open-source developers should not be treated as financial intermediaries when they do not custody or control customer assets,” the association said, adding that the United States has a significant opportunity to lead globally in DeFi innovation if it gets the policy approach right.

Summer Mersinger, the Blockchain Association’s chief executive officer, reinforced that message in a post earlier Thursday. She described developer protections as foundational to what she called the next wave of American innovation.

As lawmakers advance market structure legislation, she said, it is essential to draw a clear boundary between entities that hold and control consumer funds and those that merely create and publish open-source software.

New Bipartisan Crypto Bill

The debate over developer liability is also unfolding in the House of Representatives. On Thursday, crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett reported that Representatives Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren introduced the bipartisan Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026.

The proposed legislation is designed to protect software developers from prosecution under Section 1960 of the federal criminal code. The bill seeks to clarify that Section 1960 — originally crafted to address unlicensed money transmitters that custody customer funds — applies only to actors who actually control user assets.

It would exclude developers who simply write or publish code, a distinction that the crypto industry, and especially the DeFi sector, has been advocating to incorporate into the CLARITY Act.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation at $2.3 trillion as of Thursday afternoon. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com

相關問答

QWhat is the Blockchain Association urging Congress to do regarding the BRCA in the crypto market structure bill?

AThe Blockchain Association is urging Congress to keep the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) intact as negotiations on the crypto market structure bill move forward.

QWhich specific part of the draft legislation is the Blockchain Association's advocacy focused on?

AThe association's advocacy efforts are focused particularly on Title III of the draft legislation.

QAccording to the Blockchain Association, what is the fundamental distinction that must be made in regulation?

AThe association argues for a clear distinction between developers of non-custodial software and financial intermediaries that actually take control of customer funds.

QWhat is the name and purpose of the new bipartisan bill introduced in the House of Representatives?

AThe new bipartisan bill is called the Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act of 2026. Its purpose is to protect software developers from prosecution under Section 1960 of the federal criminal code by clarifying that it only applies to actors who control user assets, not those who merely write or publish code.

QWhat does the Blockchain Association say is at stake in these policy discussions?

AThe association states that the stakes are about whether America will keep its commitment to open innovation and to the developers who build permissionless software, ensuring that DeFi protocols are not pushed out of existence by overly broad rules.

你可能也喜歡

美 SEC 想拆掉一条 2005 年旧规,代币化股票看到了什么

美国证券交易委员会(SEC)近日提出一项拟议规则,计划撤销《国家市场体系条例》(Regulation NMS)中的第611条规则和第610(e)条规则。第611条规则(即“穿价成交规则”)旨在防止交易绕过市场上最优的报价成交;第610(e)条规则则限制“锁定报价”(买价等于另一场所卖价)和“交叉报价”(买价高于卖价)。 SEC认为,这些制定于2005年的规则已不适应如今高度自动化、互联且快速的市场环境。它们增加了市场参与者的合规成本和系统复杂性,并可能加剧交易碎片化。撤销这些规则可为交易场所、经纪商和另类交易系统(ATS)在订单路由、报价展示和交易机制上提供更大的灵活性与创新空间。 这项改革提案引起了Web3领域的关注,因为SEC在背景说明中特别提到了分布式账本技术、证券代币化以及智能合约和自动做市商(AMM)带来的新型交易方式。市场分析人士指出,此举可能为“代币化股票”的发展扫除部分结构性障碍。传统美股市场基于中心化协调和报价保护体系,而链上交易则倾向于全天候运行、智能合约撮合和跨场所流动性。现有规则可能限制了新型交易机制的设计空间。 SEC估计,撤销这两条规则后,市场参与者每年可节省约5420万至7700万美元的成本。提案目前处于公众意见征求阶段,最终能否实施尚不确定。即便规则撤销,代币化证券仍面临发行注册、托管、清算、股东权利等多重监管挑战。然而,这标志着SEC开始审视传统市场规则是否契合当前技术条件,为金融创新提供了可能的试验窗口。

Foresight News1 小時前

美 SEC 想拆掉一条 2005 年旧规,代币化股票看到了什么

Foresight News1 小時前

Ethena 的转型与华尔街的焦虑

2026年6月9日,稳定币协议Ethena宣布与全球资管巨头Janus Henderson达成深度战略合作,标志着其从DeFi原生协议正式迈入传统金融核心。Ethena将使用Janus Henderson的AAA级CLO基金作为其稳定币USDe的储备资产,而Janus Henderson则通过旗下平台收购ENA代币、将USDe纳入自身财库管理,并计划开发相关的交易所交易产品(ETP)向机构客户分销。 Ethena最初以Delta中性策略稳定币USDe闻名,其收益率高度依赖衍生品市场资金费率,在牛市中迅速扩张,但在市场转熊时暴露出脆弱性。经历2025年危机后,Ethena积极转型,大幅降低衍生品头寸占比,将储备资产扩展至包括国债、企业信贷和CLO在内的多种传统资产,使USDe转变为一种混合RWA抵押的稳定币。 此次合作展现了传统金融机构的深层焦虑。随着美国《GENIUS法案》等监管框架的明确,稳定币竞争转向合规与分发网络建设。传统资管机构面临“代币化或被代币化”的战略压力、收益率压力以及对未来资金入口控制权的担忧。Janus Henderson通过合作嵌入稳定币生态,旨在确保其在下一代金融基础设施中的地位。 这一案例揭示了传统金融与去中心化金融边界正在消融的趋势,稳定币成为双方融合的核心战场。双方通过资产互通、战略投资、财库管理和产品分销的四重合作,共同探索新的金融范式。

Foresight News1 小時前

Ethena 的转型与华尔街的焦虑

Foresight News1 小時前

不是所有链都能接住机构,Canton 为什么可以

不是所有链都能承接机构的核心金融业务。Canton 网络的目标是成为机构金融工作流的底层协调层,让金融机构在保留各自系统和权限的同时,能在同一个网络中安全、同步地进行交易、抵押和结算。 其成功的关键在于深谙机构需求。Canton 采用分段架构和选择性披露机制,确保交易数据仅在授权范围内可见。其 Daml 智能合约将复杂的业务规则和权限控制内置于逻辑中。更重要的是,它提供了资产锁定、原子化结算和全局同步器等功能,有效解决了机构间交易中的信用风险、交收不同步等核心痛点,还原了金融业务的运行逻辑。 这一务实定位获得了罕见的多方认可。其开发主体 Digital Asset 近期完成了由众多传统金融巨头和加密资本共同参与的融资,累计融资额约 8.05 亿美元。这反映出金融核心玩家们对 Canton 作为未来金融协作底层的战略共识。 网络生态已初具规模,连接了近 300 家合作伙伴,包括顶尖银行、市场基础设施和资管公司,并已处理了数万亿美元的代币化资产和巨额回购交易。其原生代币 CC 是支撑网络同步与结算服务可持续运行的经济机制。 总体而言,Canton 并非直接与开放公链竞争流量,而是致力于为最严肃的机构金融活动构建一个安全、有序且可互操作的协调底座。这为机构资产大规模上链、进而间接影响更广阔的链上金融市场,奠定了关键的基础设施条件。

Foresight News2 小時前

不是所有链都能接住机构,Canton 为什么可以

Foresight News2 小時前

速汇金:我们为何推出自有稳定币?

全球跨境汇款巨头速汇金推出自有稳定币MGUSD,旨在服务其庞大的现有用户网络,解决无银行账户或银行服务不足人群的真实痛点。MGUSD并非意在争夺主流稳定币的市场份额,而是作为速汇金战略升级的一部分,为用户提供一个稳定持有美元余额的渠道,并与其全球汇款、现金支取、消费支付等成熟服务网络无缝对接。 文章指出,速汇金拥有超过八十年的历史和海量跨境汇款用户,无需从零教育市场。MGUSD基于Stellar区块链和自托管钱包架构,让用户能自主掌控资产,进行安全的价值储存和便捷流转,同时享受速汇金线上线下结合的网络优势,实现数字余额与现金、本地货币的灵活转换。该产品在设计之初即深度融合了KYC、反洗钱等全球合规要求。 此外,MGUSD的推出也推动了速汇金内部基础设施的现代化与运营模式革新。公司通过组织架构扁平化、组建跨职能团队,以初创企业的速度在约一年内完成了产品落地。稳定币技术已整合进公司财资管理体系,用于提升全球资金结算与流动性管理效率,年化外汇交易规模已达20亿美元。 速汇金强调,其商业模式坚持开放合作,在优化直接用户体验的同时,致力于成为合作伙伴更优质的结算与服务通道。MGUSD的核心目标是通过可信赖的成熟网络,为用户提供更完善、可控的金融资产存储与使用方案。

Foresight News2 小時前

速汇金:我们为何推出自有稳定币?

Foresight News2 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片