ETH staking service providers’ dominance is concerning, here’s why

Ambcrypto發佈於 2023-01-24更新於 2023-01-24

文章摘要

70% of Ethereum staked is controlled by staking services, which has raised concerns about decentralization. Revenue generated by Ethereum has increased despite a decline in trading activity.

According to data provided by glassnode, it was observed that 70.86% of all Ethereum staked on the beacon chain was being staked by staking services such as Lido, Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance.

""

This concentration of staking services on the beacon chain has the potential to impact the overall decentralization of the Ethereum network. At press time, Lido made up 29.3% of the overall staked ETH, followed by Coinbase (12.8%), Kraken (7.6%), and Binance (6.3%).

""

This suggests that a relatively small number of entities hold a significant portion of the staked ETH and that the network is less decentralized than it could be.

""

Despite this, the number of validators on the Ethereum network continued to grow.

""

Ethereum gets validation

""

Based on data provided by Staking Rewards, the number of validators on the Ethereum network grew by 2.53% over the last month. Along with that, the revenue generated by the stakers grew as well.

""

This implied that an increasing number of people are becoming interested in staking their ETH and earning rewards for validating transactions on the network.

Source: Staking Rewards

""

Large ETH addresses flee

""

Although validators showed interest in ETH, it was observed that large addresses shied away from holding Ethereum, despite growing prices. According to glassnode’s data, the number of addresses holding 10k+ coins reached a 1-month low of 1,199 at press time. This suggested that large holders of ETH were not as confident in the long-term prospects of the token as they once were.

""

One of the reasons for the same could be the growing number of Ethereum addresses in profit. At the time of writing, more than 60% of addresses holding Ethereum were in profit.

""

If this number continues to grow, it could incentivize addresses to sell their holdings for a profit which could impact ETH’s price negatively.

Source: glassnode

""

Another cause of concern for Ethereum would be the decline in the number of Ethereum trades. Based on Santiment’s data, the number of trades on the Ethereum network declined materially.

""

This also impacted the overall gas spent on the network, which decreased sharply over the past few days.

Source: Santiment

""

Furthermore, according to token terminals data, the revenue generated by Ethereum increased by 39.6% over the last month. During press time the cumulative revenue accumulated by Ethereum was $79.3 million.

However, it is yet to be determined how all these factors could come together and impact Ethereum’s price.

你可能也喜歡

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创立的Blockstream频繁引发争议。本月初,调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream发行的比特币矿业票据(BMN)可能存在严重问题。 指控核心包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN的兑付义务,Blockstream需运营远超其公开显示的算力(约15 EH/s),但未在公开渠道找到相匹配的矿场、电力或算力证据。票据条款允许其以任意来源的BTC进行兑付,透明度不足。2. **高收益与高风险**:相关票据提供高达20%的固定年化收益,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,资金来源成疑。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:Blockstream矿业业务的重要关联方、Exacore CEO Christopher Cook曾被判邮件欺诈罪,但此前未在发行文件中披露,其背景陈述也存在夸大。4. **牵连BSTR上市计划**:质疑者担心BMN的潜在风险可能波及Adam Back关联的、正筹备SPAC上市的Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company(BSTR),尽管其法律独立性尚不明确。 BitMEX Research随后发表评论,承认Cook的前科属实且高收益令人担忧,但认为其他部分指控证据不足或存在误导,例如BMN与BSTR在法律上可能独立。社区争论焦点集中于Blockstream矿场算力的**可验证性**——投资者能否独立核查支撑收益的真实挖矿活动。 目前,围绕BMN仍存在几个关键疑问:实际发行规模与责任边界、矿场算力是否足以支撑兑付、近20%固定收益的具体来源、兑付资金的链上可验证性,以及Cook的实际角色。Blockstream尚未对此作出系统性回应。尽管指控有待最终证实,但BMN产品在透明度、风险披露和收益合理性方面,确实存在需要厘清的空间。

marsbit1 小時前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

marsbit1 小時前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创办的Blockstream频陷争议。年初,美国司法部文件披露Jeffrey Epstein曾通过关联基金投资Blockstream;四月,《纽约时报》将其列为中本聪有力候选人;同时,其关联的比特币财库公司BSTR正筹划通过SPAC上市。 然而,本月初调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream旗下挖矿票据(BMN)存在严重问题。文章核心质疑包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN兑付义务,Blockstream需运营20 EH/s以上算力,但其仪表盘显示实际仅15 EH/s,且公开渠道(如电网记录、矿池数据)未见匹配的大规模矿场证据。BMN条款允许其以任意来源的BTC兑付,缺乏透明度。2. **高收益与高风险**:BMN票据承诺的年化收益高达近20%,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,且部分到期本金滚入更高收益新票据,引发庞氏担忧。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:负责矿业的Exacore公司CEO Christopher Cook曾因邮件欺诈被判刑,此记录未在BMN文件中披露,其“NASA任职”经历亦被指夸大。4. **关联BSTR/SPAC的潜在风险**:文章质疑Cook的前科及BMN巨额负债未在BSTR上市文件中披露,可能存在治理与责任边界不清问题。 对此,BitMEX Research认为部分指控证据不足,例如BMN与BSTR法律结构独立,Cook非BSTR董事故无强制披露义务。但社区争论焦点集中于**算力与收益的可验证性**:投资者能否独立核实支撑BMN兑付的真实矿场算力与BTC来源? 目前Blockstream尚未系统回应。事件凸显BMN产品在规模、收益来源、资产验证及关键人员披露方面仍需澄清,其高固定收益在周期性强的挖矿行业中风险显著。

链捕手3 小時前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

链捕手3 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片