Bitcoin: Why betting against a BTC price rally might not be the way ahead

Ambcrypto發佈於 2023-01-12更新於 2023-01-12

文章摘要

BTC logged its largest profit-take ratio day for the first time since 28 March 2022. Its price has grown by 5% since the beginning of the year

An assessment of the aggregate amount of coins across all Bitcoin [BTC] transactions on the network that moved in profit or loss revealed that the king coin had clinched its largest profit-take ratio day for the first time since 28 March 2022, data from Santiment revealed.

”“

What do the metrics of BTC reveal?

”“

According to the on-chain analytics platform, the recent spike in the profit-take ratio was attributable to the 5% growth in the leading coin’s price since 2023 began. As of this writing, BTC traded at $17,446.89. On 1 January, one BTC exchanged hands at $16,548, data from CoinMarketCap revealed.

”“

In addition, per data from CoinGlass, there was a surge in BTC’s Open Interest since the beginning of the year. This suggested that there have been numerous contracts open in a bid to profit from BTC’s price growth.

”“

An increase in open interest indicated that more traders were entering the market and opening new positions at press time. This could be an indication of growing investor confidence in the market.

”“

It is also evidence of increased liquidity and volatility in the market. This was because more traders and more open positions typically lead to more buying and selling activity.

”“

With $9.79 billion at press time, BTC’s Open Interest has grown by 7% since the year started.

Source: CoinGlass

”“

Many are rooting for the king coin

”“

An analysis of BTC’s on-chain activity showed that the number of sell-offs for the coin decreased since the start of the year. Thus, signaling a potentially positive trend for the digital asset’s value.

”“

According to Santiment, after a momentary rally in BTC’s supply on exchanges between 1 – 4 January, it has since declined by 1%. The uptick in BTC’s supply on exchanges in the first few days of the new trading year was because of the negative sentiment that many investors harbored at the close of 2022. This caused them to sell off their holdings.

”“

It is trite that when the supply of a crypto asset on exchanges decreases, it typically indicates that more coins are being held by traders and investors rather than being sold in the open market.

Source: Santiment

”“

BTC’s funding rates have been positive since the year began, data from CryptoQuant showed. A positive funding rate indicates that traders who have taken long positions, believing the price of the crypto asset will rise, are in the majority.

”“

This is because, in this case, short-position traders are required to pay these long-position traders, marking their dominance in the market.

Source: CryptoQuant

你可能也喜歡

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

今年以来,比特币先驱Adam Back及其创办的Blockstream频陷争议。年初,美国司法部文件披露Jeffrey Epstein曾通过关联基金投资Blockstream;四月,《纽约时报》将其列为中本聪有力候选人;同时,其关联的比特币财库公司BSTR正筹划通过SPAC上市。 然而,本月初调查账号NatInfoSec发布长文,指控Blockstream旗下挖矿票据(BMN)存在严重问题。文章核心质疑包括:1. **算力与兑付能力存疑**:根据BMN兑付义务,Blockstream需运营20 EH/s以上算力,但其仪表盘显示实际仅15 EH/s,且公开渠道(如电网记录、矿池数据)未见匹配的大规模矿场证据。BMN条款允许其以任意来源的BTC兑付,缺乏透明度。2. **高收益与高风险**:BMN票据承诺的年化收益高达近20%,在波动剧烈的挖矿行业中难以持续,且部分到期本金滚入更高收益新票据,引发庞氏担忧。3. **关键人物前科与披露问题**:负责矿业的Exacore公司CEO Christopher Cook曾因邮件欺诈被判刑,此记录未在BMN文件中披露,其“NASA任职”经历亦被指夸大。4. **关联BSTR/SPAC的潜在风险**:文章质疑Cook的前科及BMN巨额负债未在BSTR上市文件中披露,可能存在治理与责任边界不清问题。 对此,BitMEX Research认为部分指控证据不足,例如BMN与BSTR法律结构独立,Cook非BSTR董事故无强制披露义务。但社区争论焦点集中于**算力与收益的可验证性**:投资者能否独立核实支撑BMN兑付的真实矿场算力与BTC来源? 目前Blockstream尚未系统回应。事件凸显BMN产品在规模、收益来源、资产验证及关键人员披露方面仍需澄清,其高固定收益在周期性强的挖矿行业中风险显著。

链捕手26 分鐘前

加密独角兽 Blockstream 深陷严重欺诈始末

链捕手26 分鐘前

a16z:AI 时代,公司争夺人才先从职位命名开始

本文探讨了在AI时代,公司如何通过重新命名职位来争夺人才和定义新兴能力。文章以Palantir创造的“前沿部署工程师”(FDE)为例,说明这一角色将客户现场的技术落地工作从边缘的售后或实施范畴,提升为一种关键的组织能力。这种策略被称为“职位名称套利”,即当某种能力价值上升而旧有职位名称未能体现时,抢先定义新职位可以吸引人才并占据市场心智。 职位名称是一种组织语言,反映了工作的价值变迁。从“程序员”到“软件工程师”,从“数据录入”到“机器学习工程师”,名称的变化标志着该工作在商业中战略地位的提升。有效的命名不是虚假镀金,而应基于真实涌现的新工作模式,例如“法律工程师”或“增长工程师”,它们对应了AI时代所需的、兼具业务理解和自动化能力的新角色。 对于AI to B创业者而言,思考产品将在客户组织内催生何种新岗位至关重要。为一个新角色命名(如Legal Engineer),能帮助客户内部识别和授权这些高杠杆个体,从而反过来巩固产品的心智定位。文章指出,AI转型的深层挑战往往在于组织缺乏语言来认可那些创造新价值的人。 当前,AI原生公司的产品与服务边界日益模糊,客户现场经验直接塑造产品演进。因此,像FDE这样能准确描述“在客户现场将复杂需求转化为可复制能力”的职位名称,比传统的“售后”或“实施”更贴合实际价值。最终,成功的公司不仅能命名新能力,更能从汇报线、激励机制等方面真正将这些角色置于组织的核心,从而构建竞争壁垒。

marsbit1 小時前

a16z:AI 时代,公司争夺人才先从职位命名开始

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片