[Featured Research]A16z: Trend of crypto for 2023

a16z發佈於 2022-12-26更新於 2022-12-26

文章摘要

Despite the uncertainty surrounding the potential impact, institutional adoption of crypto remains steadfast, with many investors taking the long view and recognizing the cyclical nature of these markets. Rather than abandoning their bets on Crypto, they are using this environment to hone their knowledge and build infrastructure to be ready for the future.

Below is a shortlist of just some of the things that excite partners across the engineering, research, and investing teams about what’s ahead.

Blockchain’s Mobile Moment

How far or close are we to the “mobile moment” for crypto? There is a large group of blockchain users and others whose main access to the internet is through their smartphones, but which relies on centralized infrastructure — which is convenient, but also risky. Users have traditionally solved this problem by running their own nodes — a time- and resource-intensive endeavor that, at the very least, requires a constantly-online machine, hundreds of gigabytes of storage, and around a day to sync from scratch… not to mention special skills.

But more people are now starting to care about decentralizing access to blockchains for all users — even those who cannot run a node themselves. With the introduction of “light” clients that provide similar functionality to running a full node — such as Helios (released by a16z crypto), Kevlar, and Nimbus — users can now verify blockchain data directly from their devices. I’m hoping to see similar trust and decentralization improvements in other parts of the stack, such as event indexing and user data storage. Taken together, all of these can help achieve true decentralization for mobile frontends.

—Noah Citron, engineering partner, crypto team (@noahcitron, @ncitron on Farcaster)

Zero Knowledge, Multi-Party Computation, and Post-Quantum Crypto

Zero knowledge systems are powerful, foundational technologies that hold the keys to blockchain scalability, privacy-preserving applications, and much more. But there are a lot of tradeoffs between prover efficiency, proof succinctness, and the need for a trusted setup. It would be fantastic to see more constructions for zk-proofs that fill the gaps in the multidimensional space of these tradeoffs. For me, it would be most interesting to see whether trusted setups are required for constant-size proofs (and constant-time verification), which would further justify the need for more transparent trusted setup ceremonies.

We also need better constructions for threshold ECDSA (elliptic curve digital signature algorithm) signatures. Attaining thresholds removes the need to trust a single signer, which is why threshold signatures are important for multi-party, distributed computation on private data and have several applications in web3. The most interesting threshold ECDSA signatures would be those that minimize the overall number of rounds — including the pre-signing rounds where the message is not known yet. Finally: As new post-quantum signatures near the end of standardization, per NIST, it would be great to explore which of these could be made friendly to aggregation or thresholdization.

—Valeria Nikolaenko, research partner, crypto team (@lera_banda)

Developer Onboarding for Zero Knowledge

Zero knowledge systems have been a long time coming. In recent years, they moved from theory to practice, but in 2022 it felt like we turned the corner on developer onboarding for ZK. Specifically, we saw the proliferation of educational materials and the maturation of high-level programming languages (such as Noir and Leo) that made it easier than ever for engineers to start writing ZK applications. I expect these developments, along with continued theoretical advances, will lead to an influx of application developers, given how significant zero knowledge is to so many use cases. Putting things into the hands of developers often leads to unexpected new use cases; I’m excited to see what comes next.

—Michael Zhu, engineering partner, crypto team (@moodlezoup)

VDF Hardware

Verifiable Delay Functions (VDFs) are an exciting cryptographic tool with many applications, from verifiable lotteries to leader election to preventing front-running. But the biggest catch has long been hardware implementations, which are needed to have confidence that attackers can’t compute the VDF faster. I’m excited for the first generation of VDF hardware to be available, paving the way for practical deployment.

—Joseph Bonneau, research partner, crypto team (@josephbonneau)

Fully On-Chain Games and Autonomous Worlds

What if you could create a game world that could not be taken down or censored, had no need for servers, and could live far beyond any of our individual (or even organizational) lifetimes? For the first time ever, we can. We are at the very beginning of crypto-native, fully “on-chain games,” or — as others prefer to call its superset — “autonomous worlds,” built on top of blockchain technology.

Whatever you call it (and the lexicon is still forming!), the nascent movement toward maximally decentralized games offers new affordances that make it possible to actually build these games online. Specifically, the ability to put a game’s entire state and logic on a publicly verifiable, censorship-resistant, and decentralized blockchain… as well as advances in on-chain procedural generation, which not only overcome constraints like storage, but are essentially “a trick to compress a complex world into an executable.” What new games, and gameplay, become possible that were never possible before? Are such games still… games?

—Carra Wu, investing partner, crypto team (@carrawu, @carra on Farcaster)

Non-Transferable Tokens

I much prefer the term “non-transferable tokens” over “soulbound” tokens (a term borrowed from gaming by Vitalik Buterin for NFTs); these tokens are for cases where it doesn’t make sense to transfer NFTs. I’m excited to see the various web3 applications that will be built on top of not just this primitive, but also with decentralized identifiers and verifiable credentials. While the discussion of these primitives usually revolves around decentralized identity, there are many other applications to be explored as well: For instance, tickets, digital <> physical, reputation… and much more ahead.

—Michael Blau, investing partner, crypto team (@blauyourmind, @michaelblau on Farcaster)

Decentralized Energy

How can we apply the decentralization ethos to energy? For instance, power grids are dated, centralized, and face several other issues like high upfront capital expenditures and misaligned incentives. There are great opportunities to build microgrids and storage and transmissions networks, by solving issues such as high capital expenditures and disparate incentives solved through tokens. There are also burgeoning markets for renewable energy certificates (REC), and carbon credits on-chain. I’m excited to see builders continue to expand what’s possible in this category of decentralized energy coordinated by blockchains.

—Guy Wuollet, investing partner, crypto team (@guywuolletjr, @guy on Farcaster)

你可能也喜歡

DRAM ETF 发行方:三星、SK 海力士、美光全部破万亿,存储芯片的 AI 时代才刚开始

全球三大存储芯片制造商三星、SK海力士和美光市值均突破1万亿美元,引发市场关注。晨星发文提醒投资者警惕该行业历史上反复出现的繁荣-萧条周期,认为存储芯片缺乏护城河,当前涨势可能由市场动量而非基本面驱动。 但DRAM ETF发行方Roundhill Investments反驳称,此次情况已发生结构性变化。核心论点包括: 1. **需求驱动不同**:当前需求由AI基础设施扩张驱动,规模远超过去的消费电子周期,且客户开始签订具有强约束力的长期供应协议。 2. **技术护城河高**:关键的AI存储组件HBM制造复杂、壁垒极高,核心技术由三大厂商垄断,新玩家难以进入。关键设备EUV光刻机交付周期长,也限制了产能快速扩张。 3. **盈利前景强劲**:根据预测,到2027年,三家公司的合计净利润预计将达到7040亿美元,营收超1万亿美元,并有望跻身全球最赚钱公司行列,利润率已达历史新高。 4. **估值仍具吸引力**:尽管股价大涨,但存储股估值相对于其惊人的盈利增长预期(例如当前财年EPS增速中位数达632%)而言并不算高,行业正经历基于新基本面的价值重估。 总结而言,Roundhill认为,在AI时代,存储行业因制造壁垒、长期需求协议和持续的供给短缺,已经摆脱了传统的强周期模式,正在进入一个盈利能力和估值水平都将维持在历史高位的新阶段。

marsbit10 分鐘前

DRAM ETF 发行方:三星、SK 海力士、美光全部破万亿,存储芯片的 AI 时代才刚开始

marsbit10 分鐘前

EF史诗级重组:裁员20%、预算砍半,以太坊要轻装上阵?

以太坊基金会(EF)近日宣布进行大规模组织架构重组,将内部划分为协议层、接入层、用户层、社区层和机构层等多个职能集群。同时,基金会裁员约20%(54名员工),并计划在未来几年削减约40%的预算,年度支出率将从约15%逐步降至2030年后的约5%,向捐赠基金驱动的运营模式转型。 此次改革被视为EF对长期以来角色定位模糊、面临社区诸多质疑(如执行力不足、战略不清晰、持续出售ETH影响市场信心等)的系统性回应。EF明确将工作重心回归到协议研发、公共物品支持和生态协调等核心职能,主动收缩边界,将更多具体的生态建设工作交由市场与独立团队承担。 改革伴随着一些具体调整,例如PSE(隐私与扩容探索)团队将逐步退出,Devcon将转向更小规模模式,对以太坊外大型项目的投入也会减少。与此同时,以太坊生态内正在涌现新的独立组织(如由前EF研究员创立的Ethlabs),以及上市财库公司等力量,共同填补EF收缩后留下的空间,推动生态向更去中心化、协作式的结构演进。 Solana联合创始人toly对此评论表示看好,认为更精简的EF将能更专注、更快速地行动。此次重组标志着EF承认其能力有限,不再试图包办一切,而是推动以太坊生态进入一个由多方力量共同驱动发展的新阶段。

Odaily星球日报51 分鐘前

EF史诗级重组:裁员20%、预算砍半,以太坊要轻装上阵?

Odaily星球日报51 分鐘前

Dragonfly 合伙人 Haseeb: 未来增长最快的公司或都将卡在 149 人

Dragonfly合伙人Haseeb在文章中提出,未来增长最快的公司可能都会刻意将员工规模控制在149人以下,其根本原因在于当前大型AI模型公司(如Anthropic)的企业定价策略。 文章指出,AI公司为小规模团队(通常指少于150人)提供类似“团队订阅”的打包定价模式,用户每月支付固定费用即可获得大量代币额度。在这种模式下,额外使用代币的边际成本为零,极大地鼓励了初创公司和小团队进行大胆的AI实验和应用,最大化利用资源,几乎是在享受一种“创新补贴”。 然而,一旦公司规模超过150人,就必须切换到“企业版”定价。该模式按实际代币使用量收费,且据分析其毛利率高达75%左右。这意味着大型企业每多使用一个代币,都需要支付高昂的附加费用,形成了一种实质上的“AI劳动力税”。 这种定价差异造成了两种截然不同的激励机制: 1. **对小公司(<150人)**:零边际成本激励它们疯狂探索AI自动化,用尽订阅额度,力求以最少的人力创造最大产出。 2. **对大公司(>150人)**:高昂的边际成本抑制了其进行探索性、实验性的AI应用,只愿意将AI用于最成熟、批量化的任务,从而在边际上倾向于保留更多人类员工。 Haseeb将此比作一种由企业制定的“税收政策”,其核心断点就在150人。这可能导致一个奇特的经济现象:最具颠覆性的AI原生公司会想尽办法(如广泛使用AI智能体、频繁外包、严格控编)将正式员工数维持在149人以下,以保持成本优势。而大公司的劳动力替代可能不会以内部“AI裁员”的形式直接出现,而是因其在效率上输给这些灵活的小型竞争对手,导致市场收缩和间接裁员。 最终,文章认为,这种非官方的“定价税”可能在未来十年成为塑造企业形态和市场竞争格局的关键无形之手,促使一批高增长公司集体卡在149人的规模上。

marsbit1 小時前

Dragonfly 合伙人 Haseeb: 未来增长最快的公司或都将卡在 149 人

marsbit1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約
活动图片